A Climate of Tyranny

By Repair Man Jack Posted in Comments (12) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

So why are people so concerned about the state of the climate? I mean really, why are these people so concerned? Do they care about polar bears, baby seals and cute, little Arctic lemurs? Please!

These people have found the ticket to power, the fulcrum of Archimedes’ dreams. They can control what we do at work, what we eat, what we drive and now, how many children we have and which people are allowed to even have them. And they do it all, for the future.

Global Warming is the ultimate mind job. The issue provides the ultimate shillelagh of guilt to beat us into acquiescence to their appalling and arrogant tyranny. Never mind that Al Gore has four kids of his own, according to John Seagar, of the North Jersey Herald:

“Yet, apart from insightful comments by former Vice President Al Gore, there has never been much public discussion about the role of human population growth in global warming.”

Read on . . .

Yes, once Tipper was safely done popping them out, Al Gore became adamantly opposed to the creation of new human life not surnamed Gore. But fear not, Planet-Lovers, Al Gore does not stand alone atop the lofty summit of detestable hypocrisy. It seems some over-credentialed moron of a Professor at The London School of Economics, probably also done with sowing his seed and reaping his rich, clean, eugenically superior uberkind, has taken up the fight against the reproductive rights of others.

“Professor Tim Dyson of the London School of Economics indicates that a 40 percent cut by 2050 in per capita carbon emissions in the developed world could be completely cancelled by global population growth.”

But according to Seagar, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Predictably, it’s the headlights of an oncoming freight train of government social programs. Presumably, these programs will tell all us hicks out in Jesus-land, not smart enough to have planned ahead and had ourselves born related to Gore and Dyson, how many children our benevolent state will permit us to progenate.

“What can we do? We know that family planning works everywhere. When women and couples are free to make their own informed choices, they choose to have smaller families.”

It works like Hades in India and China. Those two countries are not accidentally producing too few female children. Oops, I’m sorry. I’m certain that’s not what Captain Planet, John Seagar, really wanted to advocate.

”Globally, at least 350 million couples lack family planning services. Here in the United States, one-third of all births are unplanned. And the Bush Administration's family planning failures, from its Global Gag Rule to ideologically driven abstinence-only programs, contribute directly to millions of unwanted and unplanned births.”

At least he got his liberal catechism straight. This really and truly is “ALL BUSH’S FAULT!™ More abortions, less global warming. Just don’t ask John Seager who would pay for his old age if we were to rigorously apply Kant’s Categorical Imperative to this one.

This is utter claptrap, even in the face of a preliminary data study. No society on Earth has succeeded in population controlling its way to useless dotage better than either Europe or Japan. Not a single one of these countries can hit a Kyoto emission target. By including Japan in this sample, we control for the factor that economic central planners from the EU couldn’t hit the English Channel if they fell off a boat.

The demographics do not drive CO2 emissions. The United Arab Emirates has a birthrate that you won’t find anywhere off a mink farm. They also do not lead the world in GHG production.

Global Warming and overpopulation may or may not be problems. We may or may not have to deal with either or both at some date down the line. However, the amateurish attempt of this author to conflate two obviously unrelated phenomena smacks special pleading overreach. It also signals a darker danger that lurks beneath the climate scare iceberg.

Untalented, troglodytic, unauthentic, miasmatic, soul-sucking jerks latch onto Global Warming to offer themselves a gravaman to dominate others. It stops being a problem, in and of itself, and starts being a ticket onto the gravy train of unearned adulation and power.

In this sense, Global Warming reminds me of Marxism. It can’t be coincidence that one got cranked up in earnest scant years after the other was consigned to histories putrid dung heap.

now I have heard it all, time for a little lesson in the birds and the bees I think.
__________________________________________________________
Thou art the Great Cat, the avenger of the Gods, and the judge of words...-Inscription on the Royal Tombs at Thebes

isn't he the one who, well you know, America? :>)

It's kinda like watching power-hungry firemen in their big red trucks racing to a house fire, as if without them the house would just burn down.

Cut the substanceless snark and contribute something or be gone. I'm cool with either choice.

-----------
Even those who learn from history are surrounded by those doomed to repeat it.

They haven't quite succeeded in actually spraying anything on the fire.

Harry Reid is to ethics reform what HIV was to free love!

Global Warming and overpopulation may or may not be problems. We may or may not have to deal with either or both at some date down the line.

amazing

Our side is willing to accept proof if it's produced. So far what's been presented as "proof" leaves much to be desired.

I'm not convinced that the .6 degree (+/- .2 degree) change in the earths temps over the last 120 years is anything but natural variations in temperatures. I am further not convinced that mankind is the primary cause of this .6 degree (+/- .2 degree) change.

But I'm willing to look at data and be convinced otherwise.

As for overpopulation, we've been hearing that tune for the better part of 50 years and it appears to be a non-issue. Again, I'm willing to change my mind if presented with proof to the contrary, but I don't expect to have to deal with this as an issue. (An asside: Did you know that the entire population of the earth could be provided housing on a 100x50 lot for a family of 4 and fit in an area the size of the state of Texas?)

Socialism doesn't work. It looks nice on paper, but it's been tried and it's failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.

the entire population of the earth could be provided housing on a 100x50 lot for a family of 4 and fit in an area the size of the state of Texas

amazing

Let's see if I can flush out what you're actually thinking. Two questions: please answer each one independently of the other.

1) How many children do you have or are planning to have?

2) How many children do you think I should have?

He didn't consider the possibility of going vertical. If you did that you could easily have everybody live on Rhode Island. Do yourself a favor go to your library and check out Silverberg's "The World Inside". Its an old concept.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

You don't see to have learned any words that start with the letter 'b'.

Harry Reid is to ethics reform what HIV was to free love!

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service