Internet Tax Ban Must Be Made Permanent

By Congressman Paul Broun Posted in | Comments (12) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

The Christmas catalogues are arriving in the mail. Forget the post-Thanksgiving rush. Holiday shopping has already begun – and begins earlier each year -- thanks to the World Wide Web.

But if the Democratic Congress has its way, consumers could pay up to 17 percent more to shop online if the federal ban on the state and local taxes on Internet sales is allowed to expire on Nov. 1.

For years, Republican leaders have pushed for a permanent ban on taxing sales on the Internet – something I firmly support. Instead, Congress continues to argue about proposals that would continue a short-term ban on state and local governments from levying taxes on web sales.

The Senate has passed a seven year extension of the ban; the House, a four-year extension. The clock is ticking without a bill passed, and the only true consumer protection be a permanent Internet tax ban so no new taxes could be enacted in the future.

Democrats have cowed to the lobbying of state and local governments – including Georgia cities -- which can never get enough of Americans’ hard-earned money and want the opportunity to someday tax web sales.
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees have argued against a permanent ban on the Internet tax. Even the National Governors Association recently sent a letter to Congress asking for a weak version of the bill.

But for Christmas shoppers and year-round web shoppers who like the convenience of purchasing a sweater, a book or even selling their car on the Internet, for example, the consequences could be enormous if the ban is allowed to expire.

Policy analysts predict American Internet users would see new taxes on Internet sales and taxes on access to the web, fees on downloads and perhaps even e-mail taxes. Anyone with Internet access on their handheld device such as a blackberry could also be taxed whether they shopped with it or not.

The web has become such a part of our everyday lives that many of us never leave our desk to shop. According to Forrester Research, 45.6 percent of all households purchased a product or service on the Internet in 2005. That number is expected to hit 61 percent in 2011.

Unfortunately, state and local governments are never satisfied that they have enough money to spend, thus their opposition to the permanent ban on the Internet tax. Think about it. In recent years, Georgia moved to tax rentals of movies – something unheard of 10 years ago. There is even discussion in our state of taxing haircuts, doctor visits and even if the plumber makes a trip to your house to unclog a toilet. Washington, D.C. once had a popcorn tax that applied to all popped pop corn but not unpopped kernels. Give state and local governments the opportunity and they will find dozens of creative ways to tax consumers --- the web included.

The development of the Internet has been perhaps one of the greatest economic tools known to man. It allows free sales and commerce between unknown parties across the street or across the planet. The fact it has escaped the heavy hand of the tax man thus far has been nothing short of a miracle. It’s been 10 years since Congress enacted the first temporary ban on Internet taxes, but that can only hold for so long. Special interests will eventually get their way unless the ban is made permanent.

Taxes are an unlawful taking of what rightfully belongs to hard-working Americans. If the Internet is one way consumers can escape this taking, then let’s applaud the ingenuity of the web for what is --- creative and a truly free marketplace, untouchable by government.

Broun, a Republican, represents Georgia’s 10th Congressional District.

I love it when an elected government official tells it straight. We need more people elected to Congress who will work for low taxes and limited government (aka Constitutional government). I wish my Congressman would think and talk like Paul Broun does.

it goes without saying that taxing the internet is dumb with all capital letters, however I really don't see even the Democrats ever trying to pull that move. I think this is a non issue. Everyone can see the power of the internet and everyone can see that limiting it with any tax would be foolish. Am I wrong?

Always tell the truth, George; it's the easiest thing to remember.

Proprietor Nation

Congressman, what about the fairtax which you support - wouldn't that include taxing internet services?

the Edsel seem like a good idea, thus if the fair tax includes taxing the internet I am immediately against it. There is no more obvious thing than the internet working. Politicians need to stay as far away from it as they can, at least when it comes to commerce. There is plenty they can do as far as child predators and the like, but when it comes to commerce if any politicians dares to think about taxing it, there will be critical mass.

Always tell the truth, George; it's the easiest thing to remember.

Proprietor Nation

Not against broad based taxes that also happen to include internet access or stuff you bought on the internet. I pay sales tax on my internet access. I don't pay the 33% in extra special taxes and fees that I pay for my phone services, though. That's what the moratorium is about.
---
Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman

"Taxes are an unlawful taking of what rightfully belongs to hard-working Americans."

Making such a broad statement about taxes kind of undermines the legitimate arguments here. If taxes are unlawful can I skip paying this year? What law makes taxes unlawful?

There are a lot of taxes prohibited by law (export tariffs, poll taxes, etc.)

...a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right...

---Thomas Paine---

but your information is wrong. The internet tax ban is a ban on taxes for internet ACCESS, not a ban on state sales taxes.

Trust me, I wish what you think is true, were true. I am only chiming in so people are not mislead. I hate taxes and would like any and all of them ended. However, the reality is states that have sales taxes DO require individuals to pay tax on internet purchases. There may be an exception or two, but most states want the cash. I am well aware few people pay this tax, but the law says to do it. I do pay the tax, and sometimes I feel like an idiot for doing it; but I do it.

http://www.bplans.com/eb/article.cfm/114

I would love to Molon Labe!

it looks like that text came from something else I was typing, no no hidden meaning :)

Molon Labe!

If a state were to try to add a special internet sales tax surcharge, it would be prohibited under the current moratorium, as I understand it. This is not so inconceivable... just like we have county and city surcharges now, an internet purchase surcharge could be implemented by a money hungry state.

But yea, there's a lot of misunderstanding about the moratorium and what it does and does not do.
---
Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman

maybe that is what he meant? So many taxes and prospective taxes ourt there, it is hard to keep up with them :( Maybe if enough Dems get in, they will be taxing our income tax.

Molon Labe!

Is it Congress's place to tell state and local governments what taxes to levy?

I don't know about you, but I kind of like the idea that the Feds' powers have some limits.

Gar

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service