Giuliani Called Philanderer by Charlie Rangel---Who Has Five Kids by Five Different Mom!! None He was Married To!
By daveinboca Posted in 2008 — Comments (5) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Cross-posted at THE MINORITY REPORT
The New York Observer trots out an anvil chorus of moronic lefties dwelling in the Rotten Apple who say nasty things about Giuliani, the man who reduced them to the complete meltdown they are in at present. ABC News has picked up Rangel's comments and uncritically run with them.
Of course they are hypocrites, but none more than the sanctimonious specimen of shape-changer named Charles Rangel. Here's Rangel on Giuliani's son Andrew:
“sons respect and admire their fathers, but they love their mothers against cheating goddamn husbands.”
Rangel has sired at least five kids out of wedlock, I was told by one of his senior staffers about a dozen years ago. I wonder how these kids feel about their philandering daddy? Or if they even know who he is? Here's more hypocrisy:
Mr. Rangel said he still looked forward to Mr. Giuliani’s Republican opponents making an issue of his infidelity—“Romney could say, ‘I’m entitled to three wives,’
Rangel's Aide says that the august Congressman does pay for the support of his fatherless brood. Of course, who needs five wives if you just walk away and send monthly checks to the offspring of Charlie's sperm recipients?
I submit that the rest of the country likes Giuliani so much because of how he has shunted the maniacs and hypocrites to the political sidelines in NYC, and kicked out crime along with the crime-coddlers.
I'll bet the Republicans outside NYC hope Rudy could do it to the rest of the country.
You don't understand liberal thinking. You see, it's OK that Rangel has babies with random women because he never married any of them. You see, Giuliani is a 'hypocrite' because he at least married the women he was carrying on with. Since Rangel didn't even pretend to really care, and didn't even try to make a marriage work, he's OK, because under liberal logic, because he's not a hypocrite, which is the only sin to liberals.
Jindal/Palin '16
Well, if Giuliani ends up as the Republican nominee (as is looking more and more likely), I'll bet that marital fidelity and sexual morality will not be the first item on the list of either candidate to bring up against the other.
There'll be glass houses all over the place.
BTW, one of the things that endears me to Mr. Giuliani is just how much he ires the Charlie Rangels of the world. Anybody who angers Charlie Rangel can't be that bad.
...with regards to Charlie R's ethics , it's the "too strict mandatory crack cocaine sentencing guidelines" that sets the tone for the behavioral mores in some segments of this society.
Nobody in that group mentioned actually obeying any of America's laws. I guess that part of America is still segregated, ie.. the obedience of the laws thing is for whites only.
It might be due to the genetically higher testosterone levels as well, but there we're getting into areas where Professors Watson and Gray had the temerity to recently tread and found themselves severely rebuked. Ahhh... shades of Larry Summers revisited.