The Obamas and Osama were taught to hate America
By gamecock Posted in Archived — Comments (70) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
I see no evidence that either Obama hates America, but I was only mildly surprised to hear the Democratic Party’s nominee for First Lady say that she had never been proud of her country before her husband’s recent electoral success in his campaign for the presidency.
Since the McGovernite takeover of the world’s oldest party in 1972, and especially since 9/11, most leaders of the party say and do for free what America’s enemies would gladly pay them to say and do.
The madrassa educated Osama bin Laden regularly quotes prominent Democrats in biennial missives from his cave echoing his grievances against the America the infidel as justification for the terrorist war being waged against the United States. Iran’s mullahs and their front man president as well as Saddam Hussein’s former lawyers have regularly quoted elected Democrats in recent years to justify their hatred of The Great Satan as well as, Israel, the Little Satan.
Michelle Obama, like her husband, were “educated” at madrassa-like (sans any belief in God) Ivy League blame America first institutions to be ashamed of America. Millions of Blacks and Whites are victims of the 1960’s born academic, mainstream media and Hollywood Fifth column in this country that has robbed them of their individuality and the joy of the love of one’s country by projecting their own racism onto the GOP and most whites.
Like I said early last year, Barack Obama is an Out of the Mainstream Liberal McGovernite, but the Obamas have suffered a double whammy via the left’s use of “Black Power” to thwart the power of Martin Luther King’s dream and the objective fact that most American whites now and have for decades embraced that color-blind society dream. The Obamas’ formal education has been reinforced by the black nationalist, Hate America church they have attended for years in Chicago. The pride they exhibit is their grievance ideology fueled “community organizing”, i.e. the democratic party’s vile recruitment method of ginning up hate against America among the less educated denizens of inner cities that heretofore hadn’t thought to blame “The Man” for their lot in life.
Given all that, it would be a miracle if Michelle had been proud of the USA before 2007.
Of course, her gaffe (how the media defines the speaking of vile truths about the Left that they would prefer be kept secret) is now being “explained” as only referring to pride in American “politics”, not America.
Fooey!
How are our “politics” any different in 2008 than in any previous election year, other than that her husband is a candidate? They aren’t. Moreover, her statement is consistent with what she and her husband have said in other contexts, not to mention what they and most liberal dems have not said for most of the past 40 years.
The quotes of American presidents Barack is proud of, that were “borrowed” from Massachusetts governor DuVal Patrick, end in 1968. Michelle says her husband is the only man that can save America’s soul.
The Obamas, like most liberal dems since 1972, very rarely volunteer their pride in America, and especially not the achievements of its military forces abroad. Rather, they speak of the need for us (non-military) to “protect” or “kids” from our own Commander in Chief.
Obama wants to be President so he can hide the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines in Yucca Flats so that they are the last killed? Or as they protect them with words?
I left the dem party after 18 years an activist and official in no small part due to the evolution of racism as a cancer on the party, as well as the party’s aggression inviting appeasement and hostility to faith on God. The party treats blacks like disabled children, and their race-based laws since the assassination of MLK, Jr. 40 years ago this coming April 4th, have had the effect of disabling millions, not just Michelle.
I was very disheartened by several black callers into Dennis Prager’s radio show last week, even from conservatives, that said until Obama’s recent successes, they hadn’t felt “all in” as fully patriotic Americans.
Who is responsible for this? The dems would say the much overblown Nixon “southern strategy” in 1968/1972 to woo former dem party racists into the GOP.
For democrats, it’s always 1860, 1929 or 1964 in America if a Republican occupies the White House.
Earth to libs. It is the Year of our Lord 2008.
The blame for blacks not feeling “all in”, lies at the feet of Obama’s party and their leftist masters in the culture whose main message is that no one is all in. We are all members of victimized by whites, groups. Only exceptional personalities could resist 40 years of brainwashing. The ones that do, like Clarence Thomas and Condi Rice, are vilified as Uncle Tom betrayers of their “race.”
The left is “all in” for the idea that skin pigmentation limits one’s ability to think for oneself, an idea that is anathema to all America stands for.
The GOP needs to get “all in” to denounce the left in no uncertain moral terms. President Bush has done well with his “soft bigotry of low expectations” and appointments of blacks to positions of great power.
But that is not enough, and the real issue is about much more than race. It is about morally and intellectually bankrupt modern day liberalism and its vessel, the Democratic Party.
Achieve King's dream with equal treatment
Now, what about Caucasians?
I became active in the Democratic Party mainly due to my disdain for the racism I saw in the 1970s. Happily, I watched most of the Republican racism melt under the weight of King's mainstream American and Judeo-Christian moral arguments. Unhappily, I watched disturbing pathologies develop within my party and its members.
Then, during my five years in Atlanta before moving to the Queen City, I experienced what I call a "conservative epiphany," in large part due to the covertly racist behavior of fellow liberal Democrats in their treatment of blacks as inferior victim dependents and their overt disdain for the Christian faith that inspired King.
Radio talk show host Dennis Prager recently described being shown a video of people reacting to a talk show organized by a firm that specializes in analyzing such shows for their producers. Prager noticed that the carefully chosen panel included no blacks. The firm explained that in their previous experience they discovered that after a black person gave their opinion about a show, white people would rarely offer differing opinions for fear of being deemed racist.
This condescending and misplaced white guilt and fear of the Political Correctness Police must end.
Face down the PC crowd
I don't remember Daddy's answer to his eldest son's innocent inquiry some 39 years ago, but there is nothing I better remember than the way he lived his life. Dad employed the non-race-based Golden Rule found in Matthew's Gospel as he coached some of the first racially integrated little league baseball teams in my hometown and insisted that blacks employed with him at Southern Railway be held to the same standards as whites.
King based his civil rights message largely on that New Testament passage, which admonishes us to do unto others as we would have them do unto us, as well as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, which acknowledge equality before our Creator and require equal treatment under the law.
Quite simply, whites must stop treating blacks as inferiors, and muster the courage to face down the PC crowd to make King's dream more of a reality.
When we can re-expose the sins of such liberalism that great majorities were educated on in the 70’s and who saw Reagan’s conservative policies correct, then we will have a chance at having fewer un-proud Obamas in the future so that we can better defeat Osamas.
But even more importantly, my heart aches for the joy too many liberals are missing. America deserves to be loved and it is part of the greatest joy of my life that I was properly educated to realize it, and to live it. I previously described this love libs are missing below:
The maturing of patriotism post-911
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
The HinzSight Report
The Minority Report
Huck is history in the Race 4 2008
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
follow the link for additional interesting reading
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JB26Aa01.html
"You never need a firearm,until you need it BADLY!"
From your linked article:
"...It is hard for the descendants of slaves not to resent America."
"Obama's choice of wife is a failsafe indicator of his own sentiments. Spouses do not necessarily share their likes, but they must have their hatreds in common. Obama imbibed this hatred with his mother's milk."
etc.,etc.
"Interesting reading", indeed. I think I'll leave it at that.
Up to your usual standards for clarity and purpose.
of academia to madrassas. The religion might be missing, but the political indoctrination is certainly the same -- as well as the hatred for all that makes America great.
that Republicans love America for all that it is, all that it was, and all that it can be.
Democrats love America only for what they hope to remake it into.
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
"her project" has been offered before.
___________________________________________________________
Molon Labe!
Unless you're lucky enough to get into Stanford or J. Reuban Clark or Chapman Law School.
Con law professors have the worst "hate-America" attitudes that I've ever seen. They tend to like the 14th Amendment but dread a literal reading of either the First or the Second Amendment.
I'm with Robert Bork: the constitution should be READ, not "interpreted".
Proudly supporting John S. McCain for President (McCain/Romney?)
My property, conlaw and contracts professors were conservatives that quoted Bork often in the early to mid 80s!
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Has Bork written on the issue of originalist or strict construction of the 1st and 2nd amendments?
I'm curious because I've always thought that the originalist and strict constructionist theory fail on those amendments.
For example, if we read the 1st amendment as originalists or strict constructionists, doesn't it prohibit restricting child pornography on the internet because there would have been no originalist interpretation that such speech would not fall under the 1st amendment and the strict construction wouldn't allow for any differentiation between protected and unprotected speech.
I'm curious how Bork has found otherwise.
that the feds can't interfere with and that the first amendment was meant to protect political speech.
more later
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
I think that is problematic because what is preventing a state from defining their militia as their national guard?
Isn't the "originalist" meaning much broader? At the time of the writing, my understanding is that it meant any white male between the age of 14 and 45 was required to own a gun and volunteer for the state militia.
I don't see how the originalist or strict construction can lead to an individual right. I'd much rather have that "reading" or interpretation.
I have to go check on the status of that DC case. I know there was some talk about getting it pulled -- but I don't think it was the primary litigants who were thinking about doing that. The ABA journal article indicates the litigants and the NRA are not exactly seeing eye to eye on this case.
For example, if we read the 1st amendment as originalists or strict constructionists, doesn't it prohibit restricting child pornography on the internet because there would have been no originalist interpretation that such speech would not fall under the 1st amendment and the strict construction wouldn't allow for any differentiation between protected and unprotected speech.
There were robust decency laws under the founding fathers that restricted and penalized obscene speech and drawings, so the framers clearly didn't think the 1st Amendment protected this kind of expression. Thus, it's not hard to discern the framers' original intent on this issue.
Some good articles on the 1st Amendment and kiddy porn:
http://www.aclj.org/news/Read.aspx?ID=556
http://www.aclj.org/news/Read.aspx?ID=554
http://www.aclj.org/news/Read.aspx?ID=555
http://www.nlf.net/Activities/briefs/Ashcroft%20v.%20ACLU-NLF%20amicus.P...
Mike Griffith
Let Freedom Ring website
http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/id47.htm
but not that bad. America's colleges aren't churning out mass murderers, though I see where the OP is coming from.
The word "black" appears 12 times, yet the potentially more inflammatory "madrassa" only appears twice.
But I will grant you bonus points for conflating a US Senator with a wily and elusive terrorist mastermind.
How many times do the words "liberal troll" show up in this post?
Count that.
Proudly supporting John S. McCain for President (McCain/Romney?)
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Mike
Well said as usual.
In a rational world the first direct confrontation between Obama and McCain would result in the sudden realization that there is nothing inside Obama's suit; the sudden awakening that Obama is not in fact the Messiah. However, I do not for a moment think this is a rational world.
Regretably, at the first appearance of reality in the Obama-McCain matchup the left will play the race card and McCain will not have any possible counter.
Despite him not being my preference, I will dutifully go forth and campaign for McCain; I will donate to McCain; I will vote for McCain. But I fear that we will have to find the will to survive four years of Obama.
John
----------
Why would God invent something like whiskey? To keep the Irish from ruling the world of course
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
for some time ... I just haven't felt that I had anything worth saying --- some might say that is still true :-)
John
----------
Why would God invent something like whiskey? To keep the Irish from ruling the world of course
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
I think we've all had the same thoughts, but felt it difficult to express without coming off as capricious, or even imbecilic.
You've accomplished it here. Well done.
Recommended.
Freedom of Religion not Freedom from Religion
I ran across this article at the politico.
The subject is Michelle Obama's Princeton Thesis, and it appears to dove-tail nicely with your post. Her influence on Sen. Obama is apparent.
Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community
(pdf links to the thesis)
***
“Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so.” – Ronald Reagan
“One element in the strength of any government is the patriotism of the people, their love for its institutions, their pride for its name and achievements.” ~ William McKinley
I have been thinking along the same lines. Your eloquence cannot be matched. My fear is that Barack Hussein Obama will become our next President. It's pretty scary when he says, "We will change America and then we will change the world." What does that mean?
___________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
The entire diary dances around the Obama-muslim smear. It's distressing to me that you choose to lump Obama into the same camp as Osamabin Laden. Dsagree with him on policy, even believe that liberals are deluded fools, but accusing them of being in-kind?
For shame, sir.
--
Dean Nation is now Nation-Building: Purple politics, muscular liberalism, principled pragmatism
"I see no evidence that either Obama hates America"
And besides the "madrassa-like Ivy League" I don't see any real equivalence. It seems like a pretty standard History of the Left by a Conservative Author diary.
______________________________________
Donate to the Rs in Close Senate Races through Slatecard
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Yes, he's making a point: It's not his muslim background that's the America-hating part of him. It's his left-leaning background that does so.
HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater
If there weren't a tendency among some commentators to slyly use the Senator's middle name every chance they get... if there weren't a significant portion of the electorate that refuses to vote for Obama because they think he's Muslim... if there weren't the insinuations from day one that "Obama" sounds like "Osama" and there must therefore be other similarities... if none of those things were true, I'd think Mike's point clever.
Because I'm familiar with Mike's other writing, I understand that he was making a legitimate point. But this election is going to turn on the votes of independents and moderates, the ones who might otherwise vote for Obama. Most of those in the middle (how can anyone be in the middle in this election, I wonder...) will not respond well to rhetoric that seems a smear. The headline of this article is exactly the type of thing we need to avoid in this election cycle (and generally, too, unless we totally plan on marginalizing ourselves)
I think as a rule we should stop using the Senator's middle name for purposes of insinuation. I think as a rule we should stop linking Obama and Osama unless we're talking about the Senator's plan - or lack thereof - to capture the villain.
If this coming election is to mean anything, we have to earn it based on the clear rejection of the liberal policies espoused by the Senator from Illinois, or his lack of real substance. If we win election this because people think Obama is a Muslim or a terrorist, we've committed a fraud on the electorate and have not won any meaningful advance for the party or the conservative movement.
By all means, let's take the debate to our opponent, but lets do it on our strengths - the conservative policies that have been successful every time they've been tried; the call to freedom sounded by Ronald Reagan at the Brandenburg Gate; the courage of our own honest convictions. We don't need to smear Obama to beat him, and to beat him, we don't need to appeal to those who respond to smears. So let's steer wide and clear of anything that looks like one.
I voted early in the Florida primary. Find out who and why.
"If this election is to mean anything?" Since when do elections mean anything other than the voters sided with one over the other?
In any case, all this talk of smears is really drifting, because GC did no such thing.
HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater
Mark my words, the Dems will rue the Obama nomination. They're already starting to wring their hands a little.
Why the heck did they dump Richardson so early? He was their most qualified and electable candidate.
The Dems are divided between the rich/intellectual posers on one side and the poor/uneducated mob at the other. That is why the Democrats have this superdelegate business. They know that if they let their base choose, they'll get an Obama, who would be a disaster for the country.
It's patriotism, in other words.
--
Gone 2500 years, still not PC.
The left wing movement has always been a conspiracy between the elite (and academic wannabees) on the one hand, and the great unwashed on the other.
The object of their hatred? The middle class of course.
"Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty"
Kyle
than the rich intellectual posers. It is the latter which tend to vote for the hard-line liberals, including Obama.
Quentin Langley
Editor of http://www.quentinlangley.net
International Editor of
Personally, I see a great deal of evidence that Obama loathes the fundamental principles upon which this nation was founded. Yet, he is not unlike a great cross section of his party, who as properly stated herein, bases their longevity on dependency. Who does that servitude benefit and is it aligned with the fundamental principles of freedom? Hardly, these are the very bonds we sought to break in our Declaration of Independence and reinforced in the Constitution. There is also enough evidence in the fight to end slavery and the Civil Rights movement to realize this is not the end we collectively are in search of. In fact, we sought not to be slaves or subjects of man nor government and yet this is the “hope and change” Democrats try to conflate into what are immiscible philosophies.
I truly weep for this country as many seems to irresponsibly and without forethought follow populist overtures which run contrary to our purpose and founding principles; all for government handouts, capricious taxation and further intrusion into our lives. At what cost do we achieve such a reckless and ominous decline in our liberty and freedom? The answer is potentially without boundaries as we dip towards socialist and moral decline because government “by the people” becomes a remnant of our past. In following, will not be a government that steals our liberty in the night; it is will be one that does so because we have given them the keys to our house. I for one will never submit to a Democrat Party and their specious oratory, ill founded principals and whimsical pleas not matter how good they sound.
"Nec Aspera Terrent"
bene ambula et redambula
Contributor to The Minority Report
With a handful of friends.
I am the rightmost guy in the room for this discussion (I think Thomas calls this the ObWi problem or something like that). Anyway, my main argument is something to the effect of "the problems that exist in other countries are alleviated by the heavy lifting of the US when it comes to big pharma and bleeding edge medical advancements. If the US switches to the systems similar to those you are proposing, not only will we have the same problems that exist there *BUT* we will also have the problem of nothing analagous to the US to help alleviate those problems."
And back and forth and back and forth arguing this point.
I point out how England is denying coverage for this ailment, or that one, or how Canada is not denying coverage but there's a waiting list that takes many months, if not more than a year, and a line for life-saving treatments is a form of denial of coverage and so on and so forth. I pointed out, several times, that I did not like the system we had... but that I suspected that it was many, many times better than what we'd end up with if we tried to emulate England's NHS.
I'm sure you're all familiar with the arguments at stake.
Anyway, yesterday, one of my co-arguers brought out the old, trusty "You are arguing that people ought to be denied coverage and care because they are poor. This is evil. You are arguing an evil position and any problems you feel defending our system is because, deep down, you know that you are defending *EVIL*."
Anyway, this diary reminded me of that argument.
Man is free at the moment he wishes to be. --Voltaire
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Denying coverage by not providing it universally is evil.
Denying coverage because it's not available due to inherent limits in providing it universally (clearly known beforehand) is not evil.
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, and Liberals are from Pluto.
Is that they psychoanalyze me (or assess the state of my, for lack of a better word, "soul") as often as they make arguments that actually disagree.
Man is free at the moment he wishes to be. --Voltaire
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
The madrassa educated Osama bin Laden
Are you sure this is true? I have never heard this, and the (rather short) Wikipedia article on his supposed school gives the impression that it was not. I have no idea, but I would not be shocked if he was in a more normal school, only to become a crazy person later.
Michelle Obama, like her husband, were “educated” at madrassa-like (sans any belief in God) Ivy League blame America first institutions to be ashamed of America.
Half of the people in our government, including the current President, went to Ivy League schools. How can that be a strike against the Obamas and nobody else? As for hating America, I am at an Ivy League University right now and the people I know here don't hate America. That includes both the other students (including most international students*) and my professors, including my con law prof. Now there may be a bunch of bad professors y'all can bring up, but it does not mean that all, or even most, students are taught by those professors.
Now that is just my experience, maybe others have had different ones, but it is surely possible to go to an ivy league school and not be indoctrinated, or even exposed to indoctrination. This despite the fact that the University is heavily Democratic, I am pretty sure (they say that more than half of white students are Jewish, which doesn't bode well for Republicans from a statistical standpoint...)
*A lot of international students hate Pres. Bush and don't like many of our policies, but don't hate America either. The thing I hear the most complaints about is that it is apparently hard to get a visa to stay here in order to work after college.
as I understand it. Further details are elaborated at the Snopes page about the infamous e-mail in circulation.
I have books on this I read 6-7 years ago. I'll look my highlighted notes and update.
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
"But even more importantly, my heart aches for the joy too many liberals are missing. America deserves to be loved and it is part of the greatest joy of my life that I was properly educated to realize it, and to live it."
As a progressive, my heart is bursting with joy at the potential in November, of taking control of this great country away from the misguided, criminally negligent and destructive hands of the conservatives. The USA eight years ago was universally respected around the world, financially solvent, and if not perfect, still the leader of the free world. Today it is morally and economically bankrupt, owned by China, disrespected for it's arrogant bullying of nations who had nothing to do with 9/11, and a weak shadow of it's former self. We torture, ignore the Constitution, ignore all civilized conventions that other nations aspire to.
We will once again value and aspire for the noble ideals, social justice, and opportunity for all that our nation once stood for. Instead of the selfish, me-first, screw you attitude that conservatives live by, and that has brought this country to the brink of ruin.
The only dark cloud on the horizon is the likelihood that one of you more paranoid right-wing nut jobs will assassinate whichever progressive candidate becomes president, because you always do: Lincoln, King, Kennedy. I've already read such comments on right-wing blogs, calling for the assasination of one of the candidates.
Blam. – NS
you're only proud of America when under left-wing leadership. That's not really the pride we're talking about here. It's far more about the people and the system, than about who's in control of Washington. Our nation is not its government.
I won't bother arguing the tirade, since I expect the moderators will be blamming you shortly for the gratuitous insults. But you might reconsider whether political differences are caused by open evil. Are your conservative friends really as black as that? Or don't you know because you've been too selfish to befriend any conservatives? :)
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
The only nut job is those who can support liberalism. Liberalism didn't win Cold War, Liberalism didn't bring world economic system, or bring about the freedom to those living under oppression.
Seems like you care about the US exporting its nat'l security and letting ACLU run our judicial system and worse of all you live in a naive world. 8 years ago the US was letting the USS Cole and first attack on World Towers go answered and slashing our military defense and the groundwork for 9/11 was happening
Ur comments on assassinate are beyond unintelligent you truly are a liberal. Now run along and go support your turban boy
I think probably not.
You probably heard Hillary or same super rich liberal hero of yours refer to themselves as a "progressive", and thought to yourself, hey, that sounds a heck of a lot better than anything else their tossing around right now...
If you are so open minded as you indicate here, try this, there is a great book out right now that might surprise you. I just finished it and it is actually a good read; Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg.
Let us know...
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation." ~ Von Goethe
I have no doubt that you have read about potential assassination attempts of candidates -- but not on "rightwing" websites advocating it. Kos and DD and DU might be full of blogs "fearing" (read HOPING) for such a thing to happen -- but only extremist hate sites would advocate such things.
As for the halcyon days of President Clinton -- his was a false peace --false prosperity built on false projections based on the internet bubble and accounting fraud. America was "respected" because we were giving away our secrets to China and North Korea while allowing terrorists around the world to attack us with impunity. The 9-11 plot was hatched under the nose of that President -- while he frittered his time away with popularity polls and interns.
Sadly, you are the result of an educational system that has completely failed its citizenry, a MSM that has become a cheerleader section for one party, and an entertainment industry that projects their own lies and deceit onto everyone else.
I pity you...
...President King? Whew!
You left out Presidents Garfield and McKinley, both famous progressives.
And your paranoid delusion would not be complete without an explanation of how reactionaries orchestrated the two assassination attempts on Gerald Ford and the one on Ronald Reagan. Or are they "progressives", too?
There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life. - Frank Zappa
scooterguy:
1) Do you give ANY credit to Bush/Cheney for the fact we haven't had another terrorist attack on our soil since 9/11? Or did they just get lucky?
2) Would you have sacrificed the Brooklyn Bridge, in return for the "princples" of not using enhanced interrogation?
3) Name one legislative accomplishment of Obama.
4) Name one qualification of Obama to be president.
The American Left has not so much duped American Blacks as much as American Blacks feed into this inferiority complex. I'm going to be putting this into a diary later today, but allow me to give you the short version first. The idea that Blacks at one time were oppressed in this country has led many to seize upon that as a reliable crutch for failure. The iroiny of this is, most of the people whob use that crutch like Michelle Obama have had nothing but opportunity for themselves and their children. The politics of personal responsibility has long since been anthema to the American Left, and their biggest constituency, American Blacks. The Democrats are the ones who run their party like a plantation...and you know what I mean, girlfirend, to quote the Witch. More for a Horn's favorite rooster later :-)
"Do not yield. Do not flinch. Stand up. Stand up with our President and fight. We're Americans. We're Americans, and we'll never surrender. They will."-John McCain
McCain/Rudy 08-kill the terrorists and punch the hippies.
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Don's quite depressing reaction to a letter to the editor I got in response to the below column that appeared in the Charlotte Observer, in which this veteran of the local civil rights movement simply had not moved on and was wallowing in the inferiority complex. I mean to to put it in the blog but it got too long.
http://gamecock.blogtownhall.com/2007/10/19/the_jena_one.thtml
Mike "Gamecock" DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
http://thehinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
www.race42008.com
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Wow, I thought this was a free country! I got blammed, ridiculed and blocked from logging in again! [And this where I stopped reading. - Moe Lane]
coming back as your own sock-puppet is a bannable offense here, too. From reading your last rant where you patted yourself on the back for coming back--you brave boy, you--I will assume that you are a snot-nosed little fellow who is busy tossing overboard all the principles that you were raised with, if indeed your father was a Republican organizer, and that your education was paid for by the same father you so dishonor. And what church, pray tell, was it that you graduated from with your theological bachelor's degree--the Church of Global Warming? Which would mean that you, what, proselytized about CFL's to folks in the cashout line at your closest Whole Foods store?
You are unworthy of being taken seriously by anyone other than your KosKids buddies. Run back and get some high fives for sticking your tongue out at the grown-ups, m'kay?
A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong enough to take everything you have. Thomas Jefferson