Our Nation At Risk - Iran

By GordonTaylor Comments (8) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Our Nation At Risk - Iran
HinzSight Team - Gordon Taylor

With the '06 elections behind us, our focus has been set on the '08 and developing a strategy to regain control of the government for the Republican Party.

However, we must not forget that his election has been seen as a victory for the enemies of our freedom and we MUST continue to monitor their actions and respond accordingly.

Since the election, Iran has begun taking steps to become a world diplomat in the name of peace. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other Iranian government leaders such as Iranian Parliament Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, have begun entertaining officials from several nations that have traveled to Tehran to meet with Ahmadinejad and his delegation.

As you will see below, Iran was very busy on Saturday extending their hand of friendship to several nations struggling with terrorism. They are visiting nations that are having internal struggles and are currently receiving direct and indirect help and support from the United States. Iran wants to be there as an alternative to the "Outlaw Empire".

Saturday, November 11, 2006 was a very busy diplomatic day in Tehran, as evidenced below.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad meets with Filipino Parliament Speaker Jose de Venecia in Tehran on Saturday, November 11, 2006.

At the same time, Iranian Parliament Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel and his Indonesian counterpart Agung Laksono here.

Also on Saturday, there was a meeting between Iranian Parliament Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel and his Afghan counterpart Mohammad Yunis Qanuni.

And once again, the very busy Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel meets with his Iraqi counterpart Mahmoud al-Mashhadani.

Ahmadinejad was very busy as well, meeting with a number of Asain Parliament speakers and inserting Iran's influence upon them. Read more here...

Today, he continues his retoric with a direct blast at the United Nations Security Council. Read more on that here... from CBS news.

Iran is absolutely determined to strengthen ties with the Philippines, according to Expediency Council Chairman Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and you can read more about that story here...

Mulsim influence is gaining a strong foothold in the Phillipines and what better place for Iran to begin extending their influence. Already struggling with terrorism, Ahmadinejad offers Iran's help with the struggle. The out come of which I am sure will be the end of Democracy and the installation for a Muslim controlled government.

Cross Posted at HinzSight

And as America retreats under the "new direction" Democrats, our enemies expand their influence around the world!

See The World In HinzSight!
Political HinzSight

And the Democrats will call it "diversity."

I'm wondering if Tradesports has set up a futures auction on how much longer Israel will last. My feeling is that with the enormous emboldening that this election has given to the Iranians, we're going to be seeing a lot of Jewish refugees within the next five years. I give the State of Israel 3 years.

I wouldn't bet against us.

But I haven't fully internalized 11/07 yet

Israel is tough and they have the big one already. However, your point is well taken, they are in a terrible geographic location with multiple fronts to defend.

But, then the Democrats will surly come to their rescue, surly they will.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - "We did not have
a revolution in order to have democracy."

Conservative News and
Views

AIM hinzsightteam2

...as a result of our election is the demise of our commitment to foster democracy and freedom around the world. Freedom is only associated with power when it is found in strong nations. State power, on the other hand, is far easier to achieve and far more commonplace in the world (and in history) because it only depends on the will to power of the regime, not of the people that they dominate. (Obviously, democracy confers only legitimacy, not freedom.)

Our election created a near-instantaneous power vacuum in the region which the Iranians naturally are moving to exploit. The name of the game for them is regional dominance, and their wild card is their oil wealth and their imminent nuclear capability. Intriguingly, their primary opponents will be the Arabs. It's entirely possible that a future Democratic Administration, not bound by ideological qualms about cooperating with terror sponsors, will make common cause with the Arab states to oppose Iran.

I agree with the many people who have predicted here that our foreign policy goals will degenerate into a quest for "stability." While we were locked in the Cold War, that was most of what we could hope for, and the moment has now passed for unopposed unilateral action in the world, courtesy of America's voters. Now we will face a world unlike the Cold War, with only one major adversary, but rather one like the run-up to WW1, in which there were many powers competing for regional dominance. But the primary goal, "stability," will be the same. (And the anticipated outcome, world war, is also the same.)

One external power which we should expect will make a move to ally tightly with the new Iranian superpower is China. Iran's oil industry is set up in an unusual way, so as to make it difficult for other countries to directly invest in Iranian oil assets. But the most important strategic goal for China in the decades ahead will be to secure "equity" oil supplies, so they don't have to buy them on the open market. Expect China to make long-term supply arrangements with Iran in return for arms and for political cover in the UN for Iran's terror-exporting activities.

America is unique among all the world's powers in that freedom for other peoples produces natural advantages for us in the global competition. We have now decided that we don't have what it takes to pursue this broad goal, so we'll need to adapt to the world as we find it. And people will be writing books for decades about whether or not we might have succeeded.

You're right, we shouldn't forget that Iran is probably the biggest challenge we're going to be facing in the imminent future. And now with a Democrat-ruled Congress, what do you think the odds are we'll be able to do anything?

As Israeli PM Olmert said today: "I don't believe that Iran will accept a compromise unless they have a very good reason to fear the consequences of not reaching it. In other words, Iran must start to fear."

Olmert arrived in the US today, mainly to discuss the Iranian issue with President Bush and Secretary Rice.

www.thearmchairpolitician.com

"What do you think the odds are we'll be able to do anything?"

They are banking on the fact that we won't do anything. The only option is to envoke the war powers act if we have too. You can't get much done in 90 days, which is only how long it will last without the backing of the Congress.

Tell me, how many seats did Iran win again? I'm old and I have forgotten.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - "We did not have
a revolution in order to have democracy."

Conservative News and
Views

AIM hinzsightteam2

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service