Islam vs. Islamists: We Report - You Can't Decide

By haystack Posted in Comments (11) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Hundreds of thousands of YOUR money spent to censor yourself...

In this first installment of a two part series, I bring you a tale of how YOUR money gets spent and wasted, and all in the name of furthering an agenda none of us would tolerate if we actually knew it was going on or were willing to admit it.

Worse, the agenda in question runs wholly counter to what America needs most: an understanding and appreciation for what SOME in the Muslim world are trying to do to take back their religion of peace.

The controversy centers around a film that was made FOR PBS/CPB and funded...ostensibly... by you and me at the tidy little sum of $700,00.00. The larger project has a $20 million dollar (yes, MILLION) budget; a series called "America at a Crossroads" which is/was intended to be:

[A] major public television event premiering on PBS in April 2007 that explores the challenges confronting the post-9/11 world — including the war on terrorism; the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan; the experience of American troops serving abroad; the struggle for balance within the Muslim world; and global perspectives on America’s role overseas.

Aimed at creating a national dialogue surrounding the crucial issues explored in the series, an extensive media and outreach campaign in more than 25 communities accompanies the series. The campaign features screening events with the filmmakers and their subjects in discussions with United States military personnel, leading policy experts, leaders of the Islamic community, scholars from across the country as well as members of the public. Integrated Web and educational initiatives further extend the campaign.

Why then would PBS EXCLUDE the film Islam vs. Islamists: Voices from the Muslim Center" that WE just spent 700 grand to make?

Why, because one of the Producers, Frank Gaffney Jr. (who is a founder of The Center For Security Policy) was involved, and heaven forbid we allow card-carryin' Conservative-minded folk to get anywhere NEAR the pristine waters of a never-liberal-biased operation such as PBS and CPB.

More below the fold...

I don't know Gaffney or Burke, nor any of the players here. I DO know, in the for-profit movie biz this sort of thing goes on all the time. The studio invests, later decides there is no profit (or their pristine image may take a bad PR hit) and they shelve films...daily I'd bet. Were this the same case, there'd be nothing more to say.

In THIS case however, I paid for the investment and up front costs, and I deserve a screening to make up my OWN mind. Everyone of YOU have done likewise, and deserve the same-a view.

So what's the story here?

Well, I personally heard Gaffney on Rush the other day talking about this story. He's quite upset over the issue, and NOT because his movie isn't getting air time. His critics will argue otherwise, but the facts behind the PBS decision speak for themselves.

One of Gaffney's partners, Martyn Burke, and the main writer for the piece, suggests THIS:

Martyn Burke says that the Public Broadcasting Service and project managers at station WETA in Washington, D.C., excluded his documentary, Islam vs. Islamists, from the series America at a Crossroads after he refused to fire two co-producers affiliated with a conservative think tank.

"I was ordered to fire my two partners (who brought me into this project) on political grounds," Burke said in a complaint letter to PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supplied funds for the films.

Burke wrote that his documentary depicts the plight of moderate Muslims who are silenced by Islamic extremists, adding, "Now it appears to be PBS and CPB who are silencing them."

Now, consider the PBS response(s):

Mary Stewart, vice president of external affairs at WETA, said Burke's documentary was not completed on time to be among 11 documentaries that will be aired beginning Sunday. Stewart said the picture may be broadcast by PBS at a later date.

"The film is a strong film," Stewart said. "I'm still hoping to see this in the Crossroads initiative."

Jeff Bieber, WETA's executive producer for Crossroads, gave a substantially different explanation. He said Burke's film had "serious structural problems (and) . . . was irresponsible because the writing was alarmist, and it wasn't fair."

"They're crying foul, and there was no foul ball," Bieber added. "The problem is in their film."

So, let me see...VP of External affairs says it is only because the film wasn't done on time...but that it was "strong", while the Executive Producer for the series suggests the movie was just bad and the writing "unfair."

For me, given my 40 plus years of experience in viewing PBS-sponsored programs, I'm not so sure anyone in that organization has possession of an unfiltered definition of the word "fair" but that could just be me.

I ventured off to find my own answers about the film itself. It seems to me that pulling the plug on this film runs counter to everything we should be trying to do in this country to educate ourselves about Islam, its various sub-membership coalitions and groups, and how they see the world...from their own mouths.

We get plenty of news clips about burning effigies of our President, and protests against cartoons and the resulting carnage whenever you upset them. These things only serve to further isolate us from them-we are given every reason to form stereotypes, develop deep-rooted bigotry against them, and stand in fear of what they might do to US. Is this fair? No. Is it realistic? Absolutely.

So, if there are Muslims in the world that DON'T believe in the image the radicals among them are perpetrating around the globe, why wouldn't we want...NEED to hear their story?

Because Conservative minds are wrapped around the writing of the movie? Give me a break.

Consider THIS article from Contributing Editor M. Zuhdi Jasser at Family Security Matters, who suggests a different issue is at work here (be careful, they have been accused of being Conservative thinking as well):

I have previously discussed the harm of our government’s enabling of Islamists (like CAIR, MPAC, MAS, MSA, or ISNA) in the United States and how the governmental endorsement of Islamists publicly empowers them and allows them to dodge their responsibility of countering Islamism as an ideology. This order of magnitude is greater in impact when it concerns the media’s inability to wage the debate of the “struggle for the soul of Islam”. Stories about Islam and Muslims have been more and more ubiquitous since 9-11 and now are actually commonplace. Yet, the actual debate within the Muslim community has barely begun. Where’s the disconnect? Look no further than the Islamist enablers in the media.

When so many ask across the nation, “where are the moderate voices of Islam?”, one cannot help lately but exclaim that they are being suffocated by misguided political correctness and by Islamist influence within mainstream media and government. The PBS censorship of the documentary, Islam vs. Islamists, highlights one of the best examples to date of the symbiosis of both government complicity and media complicity with the Islamist ideology.

Pretty strong words.

Word has gotten out about PBS shelving the film, and is spreading. Jennifer Harper has this to say Washington Times:

A documentary billed as "the film PBS doesn't want you to see" found an audience yesterday. Producers who say their movie was shelved by the nation's Public Broadcasting Service for political reasons screened the production privately at a theater a few blocks from the White House.

About 60 people watched "Islam vs. Islamists," a provocative and often disturbing account of threats faced by moderate American Muslims at the hands of their more radical brethren and the growing "parallel Islamic society" within the borders of Western nations, including the United States, Canada, France and Denmark.

A dozen members of Congress will view the 52-minute film on Capitol Hill today.

Interesting that Congress can see the film, but we (who sent them to Washington) are not sufficiently able to discern for ourselves the simple from the more complex meanings held within it.

Whether the movie is good or bad, strong or weak, on time or delayed...we should be given access to it because it is OURS to begin with. What we may glean from it, like with any other film from Fahrenheit 911 to the Passion of the Christ is ours to decipher for ourselves. And what if, per chance, some good might have come from it had we been given the opportunity?

In an interesting piece at the NovaTownhall Blog, the possibility is in the title itself: "What if they found the secret to world peace but no one got the memo?" Food for thought. The piece suggests PBS pulled the plug:

Because the topic of the film is the question that so many of us have been asking since September 11, 2001: "Where are the moderate Muslims?" - and some don't like the answer one little bit.

Powerful interest groups, it turns out - some of whom govern a massive, oil-laden Arabian kingdom, some of whom simply do the kingdom's bidding, and some of whom blindly follow wherever the nose-ring of multiculturalism leads them - don't like the fact that the documentary reveals the extensive Saudi/Wahabbi money trail in the development of Islamic institutions in the U.S., and exposes the widespread conspiracy against Islamic reformers. Thus there has been pressure on PBS and the CPB to spike the film.

Interestingly, CNS goes a far step further HERE and HERE when it suggests that "Moderate Muslims Speak Out, But Not on PBS" and that "PBS Accused of Same Tactics Radical Muslims Use Against Moderates."

I have been granted access to a DVD of the film. I will be back in a couple days for part 2...and will give you my personal opinion (instead of having to take PBS and CPB's word for it) about what I think, and whether it is strong or unfair...

I don't plan to be surprised by what I find.

How can we in the United States criticize Euros for cowardice when such a thing can happen? Cartoon riots aren't necessary here. Extremists here just have to pick up the telephone; there is no need to any physical exertion. We see this cowardice on display from the State Department to Hollywood, and those on the frontline--Muslim reformers--are tossed to the wolves first. Multicultural ignorance has confused legitimate criticism with prejudice. PBS hardly is alone here.

God almighty.

by the time they were done, WE were apologizing for being suspicious uncomfortable and unhappy with their behavior.

If there is to be understanding, there must an opportunity to hear FROM them and explain TO them, and a mutual willingness to find a middle ground...shelving movies that represent the moderate Muslim does NOT further this need for either side of the debate.

haystack's 12th:
Conservatives (and Presidential Candidates especially) shall offer no aid and comfort to the opposition in times of legislative conflict (and ensuing political campaigns).

were not testing the system to see how far they, or someone who looked like them, could go before being separated and contained. Either that, or that was the first in a series of incidents to "desensitize" us to unusual behavior, to make the next attack easier.

The question that was never asked was, "If this behavior is simply typical for Imams flying together, why has it never been observed before?"

Harry Reid on Iraq: “I say we’ve lost. Let’s bring our boys home in, oh, say 18 months. In the meantime, no more funding for them.”

For those interested in following what presents as activist modern Western-aware Islam follow this blog. www.eteraz.org

Some posts and discussions you might find interesting are
http://www.altmuslim.com/perm.php?id=1871_0_25_0_M
http://www.eteraz.org/story/2007/4/25/83511/5218
http://eteraz.org/story/2007/3/18/9426/53820

Warning, to read, you will have to abide an irritating unchecked disdain for conservatives.

John E.

For me, given my 40 plus years of experience in viewing PBS-sponsored programs, I'm not so sure anyone in that organization has possession of an unfiltered definition of the word "fair" but that could just be me.

It's not just you haystack, it's anyone who's had dealings with that organization which leans from left [Lehrer News Hour] to Lefter [Frontline] to Leftist [Now].

Moyers et al. is a symptom of the disease that is consuming public television.

As I understand it- this series of 11 is actually part of 20 films that were made. This statement was made on some PBS show, Charlie Rose or Jim Lehrer- so if that's the case, why not ask to see all of them- not just this one.

I don't agree that this film was not shown strictly for political reasons, but maybe that is the case. Richard Perle did one of the episodes, so maybe PBS had some kind of quota on the number of "conservative viewpoints" and that quota was one. I haven't seen all of the episodes only 2 or 3, but the ones I saw I thought were very well done, especially the one that followed the lives of several soliders throughout Iraq. That one made me very proud of our fighting men and women. I also wondered where else on T.V. might we see such shows with a diversity of topics and viewpoints.

All this to say that yes I would like to see the "lost episode" and all of the other episodes because I found them to be very informative.

This is an outrage and I think we should continue the drumbeat on this issue far and wide.

If ever there was a time for members of Congress to let PBS know they are playing with fire...ie, members support of their programs...this is it.

PBS is doing a great dis-service to the people of America as so many still struggle to understand the politics and mindset behind Islamist jihadists.

Great post...I hope members of Congress let PBS know what they think.

Keep up the pressure.

Saulius "Saul" Anuzis
Chairman
Michigan Republican Party

Untrustworthy, as in "Can't be trusted to deliver the whole story on any subject they present."

Maybe I should say NPR, or PBS, but the CPB is supposed to be in charge of the whole shebang.

Everything on both networks is slanted left--the only question is how far.

Harry Reid on Iraq: “I say we’ve lost. Let’s bring our boys home in, oh, say 18 months. In the meantime, no more funding for them.”

I understand that my money has already been spent producing it. Nonetheless, my interest in piqued sufficiently that would be willing to pay a reasonable price to have the DVD sent to me.

If anyone hears of it becomeing available, please post that fact here on Redstate.

It's not likely to see the light of day. The CPB "owns" it.

Harry Reid on Iraq: “I say we’ve lost. Let’s bring our boys home in, oh, say 18 months. In the meantime, no more funding for them.”

The Film PBS Does Not Want You to See
Islam vs. Islamists
A Documentary by ABG Films on the Struggle for the Future of Islam and the Free World
Followed by Discussion with the Filmmakers
Martyn Baker, Alex Alexiev, and Frank Gaffney

Location: Regal Union Square Stadium 14
850 Broadway at 13th Street
New York City

Date: Tuesday, May 1, 2007
Time: 6:00 pm Doors Open
6:30 pm Private Screening Begins
RSVP CapitolHQ at nterzulli@capitalhq.com / 212. 588.9148

As you may already know, PBS has just been airing its series on America, its values, and its politics, entitled: "America at a Crossroad." What you may not know is part of the series, "America at a Crossroad" was CENSORED by PBS and was not broadcast in their series. The movie, Islam vs. Islamists, was produced Martyn Burke, Alex Alexiev and Frank Gaffney and it documents the real crossroads between moderate Muslims and the struggle within their own community and conflict with the fundamentalists to be heard.

Our friends at CapitalHQ, have quickly organized a private screening of this film.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service