Arlen Specter, John McCain, and "broken windows"

By Jack Savage Posted in Comments (9) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

In 1982, sociologists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling introduced their “Broken Windows” thesis. Wilson and Kelling observed that if a broken window in a building was not repaired, then soon all the windows would be broken. They extended the metaphor to crime in neighborhoods. For example, if public drunkenness, abandoned cars and graffiti were tolerated, more serious crimes would soon follow. Here’s how it goes:

- Minor crime leads to an atmosphere / perception of disorder
- This perception aids those who would take advantage of the situation
- The disorder leads to demoralization and isolation of law-abiding citizens

In reverse, if minor crimes are met with aggressive intolerance, not only were these crimes curbed but the incidences of more serious crimes dropped substantially. Rudy Giuliani turned New York City around using this theory of law enforcement.

So what does this have to do with the Republican Party, you ask? Let me answer by giving a good example of a political “broken window”:

“Kerry / Specter 2004”.

Remember those signs? Even though they were blamed on a well-known rogue consultant, no one doubted their sincerity or applicability. Since Specter is perceived to be a leader of the Republican Party (most often by the media), his betrayals (abortion is a good example) carry a great deal of weight - particularly among the party faithful. Not only were these minor “crimes” not dealt with aggressively, Specter was rewarded with the chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee. The old Republican saw “it was his turn” no doubt came into play. (Quick gratuitous sports analogy - “it was his turn” is the political equivalent of the “prevent defense”. Sounds good, but most often leads to defeat.) There has been much talk of behind-the-scenes machinations to make Specter toe the Republican line more frequently in exchange for his trophy, but in our example, behind-the-scenes doesn’t count. Anyway, that prize was short-lived, since Republicans quickly lost the majority in both the House and Senate. It seems that the base was pretty demoralized in the election of 2006. Hmmm…..

I won’t go into detail about John McCain. Suffice to say that I believe he has been responsible for a lot of broken windows, with much the same effect on the loyal residents of the Republican neighborhood. And now, it is quite likely that he will become the next President of the United States.

So when does it stop? Answer: It doesn’t. Specter’s and McCain’s triangulation away from the conservative base and their own party by using small, petty, self-aggrandizing moves has been met with nothing. No statements from elected leaders. Not a peep from the party chairmen. Not a word from our President. Just like the neighborhood with broken windows and unchecked petty crime, things will only get worse. If a Republican can get away with trashing Gitmo, trampling free speech, advocating open borders or invoking Scottish law, it makes one wonder what is next.

The point, however, is that the effect of these highly visible “crimes” on the base is the same as the effect on a neighborhood. And no matter how you look at things, this is simply not good for Republicans.

Freedom of Religion not Freedom from Religion

Exactly. Maybe Bill Kristol and his ilk could consider that.

"Leaders" since Newt walked off the edge of the earth and "shut down" the government. Clinton neutered him, he got fed into the Machine shredder and the party has been pretty much rudderless since.

GWB has led on the War. Sort of. He's ignored the enemy at home while remaining solid on the foreign battlefield. He just can't bring himself to control spending, to downsize government, to protect the borders or offend a Democrat.

Congress hasn't seen a person in a leadership role in 10 years. Frist couldn't lead a teenage boy to a beer. Hastert thought protecting William "The Freezer" Jefferson was more important than controlling spending.

Don't expect things to improve in a McCain Administration.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

A simple veto of McCain - Feingold would have gone a long way, but we didn't even have any leadership there.

I pine for the days of Lee Atwater and Haley Barber. And lack of leadership is the exact reason everyone can run wild in the 'hood.

I agree with you on about everything, but your writing style is better-short and to the point. Mine are long-winded diatribes, whereas yours is cutting.

What we need to concentrate on is sending the message to our congresscritters that they need to put a movement conservative and a true leader in charge. If they really want to get back the majority, they need someone with the political skills of Newt, the spine and conservatism of Coburn or DeMint, and the leadership to match that already amazing hybrid.

Unfortunately, I don't see that happening under Johnny Mac.

Vote for the ulti-Mitt conservative. Romney '08!

DISCLAIMER: I am loosly affiliated as a volunteer for the Mitt Romney campaign. All viewpoints expressed are my own, not the campaign's.

...for the Dems. It sent a booming shot across the bow of any wafflers. Lieberman has his chance to drill the Dems when the Senate was split evenly, but chose to caucus with them. Now they are in the majority in both houses, and Lieberman gets his committee assignments from them. Everyone is in line.

They are disciplined. Just think how powerful they would be if they actually had any brains or principles.



Better be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident security. --Edmund Burke

Blog: TMYN

I wish it were not so, though.

---
Finrod's First Law of Bandwidth:
A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it takes the bandwidth of ten thousand.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service