Two Recent Success in WOT You Didn't Hear About in the Media

By Warner Todd Huston Posted in Comments (16) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

-By Warner Todd Huston

The Taliban suffered a big loss in Pakistan/Afghanistan this month and so did al Qaeda in Iraq, but the MSM has been practically silent on these great successes. It only goes to show that the media is so completely sold on the claim that the war is lost that they aren't interested in doing any real reporting on the war.

Not only has Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki headed up a brilliantly successful attack on rebel leader and Iranian backed Moqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi army in Basra, but it seems that Maliki's hard-line against Sadr has convinced Iraq's main Sunni block to return to their places in the Iraqi government. Sadr has called for a ceasefire between forces loyal to him and the Iraqi government. At this point, al-Maliki seems poised on a breakthrough in Iraqi affairs that could lead to more involvement and less bloodshed. This is all something that few expect possible only a few months ago.

The western press has reported the information above widely, if not enthusiastically, but that isn't the only good news in Iraq. What seems to have been given short shrift is the fact that al Qaeda has been severely hurt in Iraq, even "decapitated."

Read on . . .

April 22, 2008: Between mid-March and mid-April, al Qaeda suffered major losses in Iraq. American and Iraqi troops killed or captured 53 al Qaeda leaders. These include men in charge of entire cities (or portions of large cities like Mosul or Baghdad), as well as men in charge of various aspects of terror operations (making bombs, placing them or minding the bombers). Most important, nine of the ten most senior men involved, were captured, and interrogated. This led to locating more al Qaeda staff, and assets. Hundreds of weapons and explosives caches have been discovered this year, as a result of interrogating captured terrorists. The result has been a sharp fall in suicide bomber attacks, and the ones still carried out are against soft targets (civilians), including the recent funeral of two men earlier killed by terrorists. This was part of an al Qaeda campaign to force Sunni Arabs to switch sides again and support terrorism. But these attacks have the opposite effect, causing more hatred for al Qaeda.

Of course that first bit of Iraq news is certainly good to hear about and the western news media has done some reporting on the matter. But, seeing as how al Qaeda is America's chief concern, one would think that its decapitation in Iraq would be something that at least the news media in the U.S.A. would be highly interested in. But we've heard practically nothing about this good news from our media. And what holds for the unreported good news in Iraq is repeated in Afghanistan and Pakistan in the efforts against the resurgent Taliban there.

At the end of April the Taliban was handed a major set back in the Khyber Agency area of Pakistan, but little of this has been reported in the western media about it.

For the better part of the year thus far, al Qaeda and the Taliban have been reaching out of their strongholds in the tribal Warzistan area of Pakistan and seeking to extend their influence deeper into Pakistan. Up until recently they seemed to be having great success, but they have at last overreached themselves. Recently, they’ve suffered a major defeat.

One of the Taliban's focuses has been in attacking the Western alliance's supply lines that run through Pakistan into Afghanistan. On March 20th, for instance, the Taliban really shook up NATO when they destroyed 40 gas tankers at Torkham -- the border crossing in Khyber Agency into Afghanistan's Nangarhar province. This and a smattering of successful smaller attacks gave the Taliban/al Qaeda a measure of success emboldening them to further efforts and a major push.

That major push came in the form of a campaign to gain influence in the Khyber Agency. Since the Taliban and al Qaeda work through tribal alliances and influence, a major stumbling block for them had been a lack of sympathetic tribes in the Khyber Agency. However, the Taliban had imagined that with a recent agreement with a leader in the Khyber Agency they had, at last, found their way into the area.

The Taliban hit on one of the few Salafis in the area, Haji Namdar, as their point man. Namdar is not a traditional tribal, he's a trader who has worked in Saudi Arabia. His Salafi ideology and the fact that he is a practicing Muslim lent him credibility - and trustworthiness - in the eyes of the Taliban.

Namdar came on board, offering to provide the Taliban with sanctuary for their men, arms and supplies along the main road leading to the border area. He gave these assurances to Taliban leaders in his own home.

With this new alliance in place, the Taliban planned and launched several military attacks on western convoys until last Monday they captured some workers of the World Food Program.

But here is where things began to go awry for the Taliban and their al Qaeda associates. Instead of letting the Taliban retreat to regroup and plan their next moves, the local paramilitary forces kept up the chase. The Taliban stopped to fight and killed five soldiers, but they had no re-supply of ammunition and so ran out. Both the paramilitary forces and the Taliban called in reinforcements and the battle ground to a stalemate. Eventually, though, the Taliban forces captured a local political agent (representing the central government in Karachi) and they used this hostage as a shield to escape the stalemate.

They tried to disperse to safe houses in the area arranged for by their new ally Haji Namdar to rest and refit. But to the Taliban's shock they found that every safe house had government troops inside waiting to gobble up those Taliban members attempting to seek safety there.

It turns out that Haji Namdar sold his Taliban associates out for $150,000 in local currency provided by the CIA and Pakistani intelligence services.

Their worst suspicions were confirmed when Namdar broke his cover and announced on a local radio station that Taliban commanders, including Ustad Yasir, should surrender or face a "massacre", as happened when local tribes turned against Uzbek fighters in South Waziristan in January 2007.

Namdar said that he had the full weight of the security forces behind him, and he did not fear any suicide attack.

This is all good news, off course. It shows that all the people in the Afghanistan/Warzistan/Pakistan triangle aren't sold out to al Qaeda and the Taliban. This was a major setback for the Taliban and has sent them running back to their Warzistan strong holds.

But, it is a story that the western media are not doing much to cover, sadly. And it's all because it is a success in the War On Terror, something that the western media does not want to advertise.

Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius' Forum. It's what's happening NOW!

Socialism doesn't work. It looks nice on paper, but it's been tried and it's failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.

I always hesitate to "blame the media". I was playing that game when the Bush Administration was telling us that the media was the problem -- and they really were not -- at least not the extent I had thought they were.

Would it be nice if they were on board with these successes? Yes. Will they ever be? No. Does it change the mission? No.

I'm not stupid. I understand that better reporting would get our troops more support for their mission. The mission continues regardless, though.

I guess all I'm saying is that this piece would have contributed more to the dialog if you just integrated the reporting and left the whole "(implied) lefty Western Media" angle out of it. As the traditional media continues to falter, pieces like this need to take their place. There was more than enough meat in your piece for it to stand on its own without that admonition.

I found the information presented here very, very useful, but the "angry righty" spin prevents me from simply forwarding it to my friends.

It's worth thinking about.

--
We would also like to know your advice for somebody like my daughter, who's going to graduate in two years, advice that you would give a young person.

SEC. RUMSFELD: Advice for a young person. Study history.

in this environment, among conservative and moderate conservatives, media bias is a known quantity. To those less politically astute persons of the liberal persuasion "media bias" is a figment of a neocon's imagination. It's like dealing with a Missourri mule, first you hit him on the head with a 2x4, now that you have his attention you can do something with him. In a discussion, one example is enlightening, two examples are informative, three arguments show a trend. Once you get past four it's hard to dismiss the idea as an anomaly!

If we keep hittng people with more examples of main stream media bias maybe, just maybe we may be able to save the patient and put him on the road to full recovery!(But I doubt it!)


omnia dicta fortiora si dicta Latina

Known quantity or not, they are our (and America's) enemy, and we take the 2x4 up against their heads at every opportunity, and with zeal and abandon.

Kill the terrorists
Protect the borders
Punch the hippies
-- Frank J



omnia dicta fortiora si dicta Latina

My apologies. Must have hit the 'post' button twice. Mea Culpa, Mea maxima culpa!


omnia dicta fortiora si dicta Latina

The media are not against the military or the war. They hate Bush with a passion. If Obama were president you would see the most glowing reports imaginable coming out of this area. They would be bending over backwards to paint him as a great military/political leader. Applying this filter alone helps to understand the disparity between MSM reporting and blog reporting. People's recognizing of this reality is seen in the turning of once mighty newspapers to little more than local bulletins advertising supermarket sales and the plummeting ratings of the "major" networks news shows. Sic Transit Gloria

"One useless man is called a disgrace, two men are called a law firm, and three or more become a Congress. "
-- John Adams

yes if a Democrat were the one to begin a war then they would support him, for a while. But in their hearts the majority of the MSM are old Vietnam War era lefties. They do not think that the USA can legitimatly use it's power except perhaps as a junior partner in some UN sanctioned effort.

Eventually they would turn against even a Dem president if the war started causing too many casualties, or if there were reports of bad conduct by the troops.

"Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty"
Kyle

Against the war? Without a doubt. Don't believe me, go find twenty or thirty soldiers who have been to Iraq and ask them. They'll tell you they're glad to be back with their families and the majority will tell you that what the're doing in Iraq is important and that the media aren't reporting it well. Most reporters don't even leave the 'Green zone'!

The bias is most aparent in most reporters condescending attitude towards any conservative. God help you if you are ever interviewed Your comments will be sliced and diced to portray you in the most negative fashion. You will be villified and made to look like the most dangerous thing to civilization since Gengis Khan.


omnia dicta fortiora si dicta Latina

Like kyle8 mentioned, the Vietnam war was hardly written in glowing terms during democrat presidents even though we never lost a battle there.

Do the libs have as much of a love affair with islamo facists as they do communists? I don't know, but that might affect their aid and commfort to the enemy.

As far as the media not being against the troops or the war, the coverage of Haditha, Gitmo, Abu Ghraib and others certainly indicates that they at a minimum are willing to throw the military and the war under the bus to get to Bush. At a maximum, they just plain hate the military and think the only purpose of having a military is to do hurricane rescue or some other such social engineering problem*.

*yes, that's right I said social engineering and not disaster recovery. You know which hurricane I'm talking about. Their problem wasn't nature as much as their own damned incompetance at the state, local and individual levels.

"Hey, I call 'em like I see 'em. I'm a whale biologist."

If al Qaeda were decapitated it would be very good news indeed, but al Qaeda, as we all know, is not the only source of violence being brought to our troops in Iraq. I am not stupid--and neither are most Americans--and I don't depend on any one network or blog to deliver information that I need. If I believed everything coming out of the White House, for instance, I would be here telling you all we are at the threshold of a glorious victory in Iraq and that KBR is a small outfil that supplies our troops with fuel and ice cream.

* * *

"...By 1956, Lansdale had hatched a plan, with nods from Washington, to import 1.1 million North Vietnamese Catholics, using CIA proprietary aircraft (Continental Air Transport) and ships, to support the Diem Regime (Catholic) much to the angst of the Buddhist's who were the great majority in newly designated "South" Vietnam. The religious conflict set in motion by Lansdale evolved into the Second Indo China War; The Vietnam War. Those displaced by the North Vietnamese Catholics were forced into the country side and resorted to banditry just to survive. This nucleus became the Viet Cong (Free Vietnam---not Vietnamese Communists as spouted by the US Media.)"

I think this OP covers it pretty thoroughly, everything is looking up for us there. And even if Sadr was left unmentioned, trying to insert a "but" into that news is kind of pathetic. One of our enemies is being destroyed. You don't need to add a "but" to that sentence.

Oh and by the way, I'd love to believe anything coming out of the White House but unfortunately they don't make a case for anything which is why the conservative media has to actually do most of the heavy lifting. Your little swipe at KBR is kind of unwarranted. And by the way, they did fill up my tank and give me ice cream. I don't care what else they did because I got ice cream.

"Hey, I call 'em like I see 'em. I'm a whale biologist."

Lansdale and Viet-Nam. I recognize some of the enclosed factoids but a citation as to the source would be helpfull for those readers who are not as familiar with Vietnamese history.

that does not directly reference that claim, but give a good overview of our involvement in vietnam

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWvietnam.htm

it is obvious to anyone that we screwed up badly in what should have been a slam dunk for the western powers. As in Iran and some other places, our heavy handed methods and lack of true understanding of the area came back to bite us in the ass.

It is these things which tend to make me distrustful of the government and their handling of world issues.

And, no, you do not have to be a lefty to point this out.

"Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty"
Kyle

"Not only has Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki headed up a brilliantly successful attack on rebel leader and Iranian backed Moqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi army in Basra,"

So brilliantly successful that it was a disappointment?
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/04/08/petraeus-says-basra-offensive-w...

and is going to "continue for months"
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=51012&sectionid=351020201

There are various eyes. Even the Sphinx has eyes: and as a result there are various truths, and as a result there is no truth.
~Friedrich Nietzsche

or that's at least how I was taught. Do you have any wishes for us to pull out of Chicago anytime soon? I'm under the impression that the police plan to occupy the city for several months and there will probably be some deaths too.

Your tag line indicates that talking to you is probably going to be about as fruitful as sniffing glue.

"Hey, I call 'em like I see 'em. I'm a whale biologist."

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service