Obamania: Run Obie Run!

By Rick Moran Posted in | Comments (14) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

It's been a long time since we here in Illinois had a favorite son to cheer on in the Presidential race. The much beloved former Illinois Senator Paul Simon, was a candidate in 1988 and ran a throwback race. The gentle man with horn rimmed glasses, bow tie, and professorial manner was an unreconstructed liberal in the classic sense. Perhaps one of the smartest men ever to serve in government, Simon's cerebral campaign never caught on with the voters and he ended up in the back of the pack - a shame in many ways since politicians who are honest, smart, and actually care about the people are something of a rarity. I don't think I would have agreed with Simon if he said the sun set in the west. But I would have given serious consideration to voting for him if he had been the Democratic nominee for President.

Read on . . .

Simon had been in politics for nearly 35 years before making his attempt at the brass ring. He served in the Illinois House, as Lieutenant Governor, the US House, and was elected to the Senate in 1984. Rarely has a man with such breadth of experience in government, keen intellect, and passion for politics offered himself up as a candidate for high office. I suppose time had, in many ways passed him by in that the slick, media driven campaigns he was up against overwhelmed his efforts. Hard to condense his thoughtful and articulate ideas into 30 second sound bites.

Illinois' current favorite son in the Presidential sweepstakes does not have 35 years of experience in politics. He is not possessed of a great intellect. But Barak Obama is many things - smart, charismatic, articulate, an excellent public speaker, and something of an idea man. And as of today, he is a candidate for President of the United States:

U.S. Sen. Barack Obama formally entered the 2008 race for the presidency today, contending he has the experience to know that "Washington must change" and billing himself as the leader who will bring a new generational attitude to address the nation's challenges.

Speaking in a single-digit, morning chill and sunshine to thousands of supporters outside the Old State Capitol, the first-term Democratic senator delivered an address that built upon his biography as a community organizer in Chicago, state legislator and U.S. senator to call for quick action on issues ranging from bringing a close to the Iraq war to the need for universal health care and an end to foreign-oil dependence.

The historic announcement by the state's 45-year-old junior Democratic senator--launching a three-day wave of campaign events in Iowa and New Hampshire with a Chicago fundraiser in between--is heavily tinged in symbolism for the first black candidate with a realistic chance of obtaining the broad-based support necessary for securing a major party presidential nomination.

And befitting a favorite son from Illinois, Obama summoned the ghost of Abraham Lincoln, calling forth the spirit of the Great Emancipator in an effort to unite the nation under the banner of the first black candidate of either party who is seen as having a good chance at winning through to victory:

Using the home of Lincoln's 1858 "House Divided" speech as a backdrop, Obama frequently paid homage to the 16th president for using his will and words to bring a country divided by war together as one through the goal of freedom.

"In the shadow of the Old State Capitol, where Lincoln once called on a divided house to stand together, where common hopes and common dreams still live, I stand before you today to announce my candidacy for President of the United States," Obama said.

"I recognize there is a certain presumptuousness--a certain audacity--to this announcement," he said. "I know I haven't spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington. But I've been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change."

Now that he's in the race, if history is any guide, the national press will do their best to tear him down. After months of building him up and making his candidacy seem more like a coronation, all of the pundits and scribblers who have urged him to run will now shift gears and start digging into his past. Every word he has uttered will be scrutinized. Every vote will be analyzed. They will interview his high school sweetheart, his teachers, his minister, his boyhood friends, neighbors, acquaintances, and most especially, any enemies he's made as he climbed the ladder of success.

The problem that the press and Obama's opponents will have, however, is that there really isn't much there to criticize - yet. Not much of a record. Not many votes. Very few public pronouncements. Obama is still something of a cipher. His public personae - cool, controlled, collected - gives few clues as to what's behind the engaging smile and confident bearing.

One thing is certain. In the crucible of the marathon that is a Presidential campaign, it will be next to impossible to hide any shortcomings. Obama will be tested as he has never been tested before. The campaign will have its way with him and we will discover together whether he truly has what it takes to be president.

Can he win? He and Hillary will battle it out in the early primaries (assuming Obama doesn't collapse in the next year due to a scandal or some major faux pas) along with John Edwards whose longshot effort will fail if the former North Carolina Senator can't win one of the first 4 contests in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, or South Carolina. But Hillary and Obama will probably be well funded enough that they will be able to absorb some early setbacks and stay competitive at least through the first "Super Tuesday" on February 5th when 10 states will hold primaries. Beyond that, it is impossible to say. That's because it is difficult to gauge Obama's appeal to different regions, different constituencies.

Frankly, I think he doesn't have much of a chance. Not because he's black. Not because he doesn't have enough experience. Quite simply, he is too liberal for this new Democratic party that is emerging in the south and west:

When Obama's record and views are separated from the mythmaking and rock star rapture he's wrapped in, the problem of his electability looms large. Obama got a perfect 100 rating from the NAACP, National Organization for Women, National Education Association, the Children's Defense Fund, the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, and the Illinois Environmental Council (during his stint in the Illinois legislature), and a huge plus rating from the ACLU. He got his perfect rating from them for his Senate votes on labor, education, the environment, choice, civil rights and civil liberties. These are America's top liberal advocacy groups, and they are some of his most ardent cheerleaders.

Meanwhile, Obama bombed badly in the ratings he got from the conservative National Taxpayers Union, National Right to Life, the Gun Owners of America, the NRA, the Federation for Immigration Reform, and the American Conservative Union. These are some of the nation's top conservative advocacy groups, and they reflect the interests and views of millions of voters on immigration, spending, guns, abortion, and military prowess. These are the voters that will scrutinize his record and his views with a laser eye.

In short, Obama could very well be blown away in many midwestern and western states where the black vote is less important and where many of these "new Democrats" were elected in 2006. Less liberal, more socially conservative than Democrats in the northeast, Obama will have to sidle toward the center if he wants to be competitive in many of those states.

And under the proportional distribution system for allotting delegates, this would mean that he would have to win big in the larger northeastern states as well as delegate-rich states like Texas and Florida in the south in order to remain viable. It could be that by the March 18 Illinois primary, Hillary will be seen as the inevitable choice, rendering the rest of his campaign an exercise in futility.

Then again, Hillary could stumble early and make Obama seem inevitable although that scenario presupposes that the more than $100 million dollars that she can raise by forgoing public financing between now and the primaries won't be a difference maker.

This is not Obama's time. And he is young enough that he could absorb a defeat and still come back in 8 or even 12 years to try again. But any way you look at it, his candidacy will be historic and, for those of us who love politics, exciting to watch.

Another thoughtful diary.

As most here know I support Mr. Obama. I am wholly unimpressed with Hillary Clinton and if she becomes the Democratic candidate that will make the Republican nominee considerably more desirable to me.

I don't know if those various political groups ratings of Obama mean much. They almost always fall along party lines. I suspect that Clinton and Obama receive very similar ratings from the respective groups you mentioned.

I think that Obama's biggest threat is his lack of experience on the campaign trail. While I don't expect him to have an a Howard Dean moment I do think that he could fall victim to being painted into corners he can't reasonably get out of because he won't see it coming in time.

But it certainly should be an interesting year. I am curious to see how the media responds to his official candidacy. You're right that the honeymoon is over. But Obama has an advantage that others do not. He is a moderate black man and many in the media will be reticent to go after him too harshly out of fear of backlash. This won't make him immune to attack, certainly, but it could muffle it somewhat.

There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why ... I dream of things that never were and ask why not. - Robert Kennedy

the typical left leaning liberal candidate.

Although you may be right that some of his positions are moderate, I haven't seen too much moderation from him.

Granted your definition of moderate and mine may differ given that we are on opposite ends of the spectrum.

And how many Democrats do you NOT consider to be typical left leaning politicians?

On social issues Mr. Obama is about as moderate as a Democratic politician can get without completely alienating the Democratic base. On fiscal matters, he certainly isn't going to win over the Club for Growth but he's not a Socialist either.

There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why ... I dream of things that never were and ask why not. - Robert Kennedy

I would like for you to give specific details that make him a moderate, because he doesn't come across as moderate to me, he actually seems to be about the same as Hillary, Edwards and pretty much everyone running. As a matter of fact, of the dems officially in the race, Hillary seems to be the most moderate.

So, tell me why he is the most moderate-or what is moderate about him.

I am not fussing at you for supporting him-after all you are a liberal leaning poster, it isn't like I expect you to endorse Romney or Newt anytime soon.

All ratings for Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama taken from Project Vote Smart and refer to the 2005 voting record.

Sen. Clinton
NAACP: 95
NOW: 100
Natl Education Association: 100
Children's Defense Fund: 100
American Federation of SCME: 88
ACLU: 83

Natl Taxpayer's Union: 0
Natl Right to Life: 0
Gun Owners of America: 0
NRA: F
Fed for Immigration Reform: 0
American Conservative Union: 12

Sen. Obama

NAACP: 100
NOW: 100
Natl Education Association: 100
Children's Defense Fund: 100
American Federation of SCME: 100
ACLU: 83

Natl Taxpayer's Union: 6
Natl Right to Life: 0
Gun Owners of America: 0
NRA: F
Fed for Immigration Reform: 0
American Conservative Union: 8

"Carthago delenda est" - Marcus Porcius Cato

slate

Every word he has uttered will be scrutinized. Every vote will be analyzed.

With hardly a vote to point to, there is little to point out. With little experience, there is little to quibble with. It is fortunate for him that he is an empty suit...er, slate.

Don C.

Two years out....Who gives a rip?

It is well worth watching the early going. You might recall that when GWB was posturing for his run, it was at this very early stage that he was pulling in all the fundraisers, speechwriters, and backing to sweep the table for the race.

Whichever of Clinton or Obama blinks will have the moderate Dem road (Edwards, with the "loser" tag, will gamely work from the middle to far-left but won't get the backing or money late to make any real noise).

Obama is interesting to watch not because of his early showing on various "ratings" for his votes, but what he brings to the Dems: A well-spoken spokesman for the role of faith in public life. Most Dems run away from their faith (on the other hand, many Republicans hid behind theirs). Obama's religious faith fuels an infectious hope and optimism about the country which many are either not expecting (and who can be won over by it), or want to suppress (coming from the players of the politics of hate from all political stripes).

GWB tried to be the united compassionate conservative and it never really played well despite his obvious personal faith. Obama has a greater eloquence than anyone running. The race is better for him being in it.

Finally, remember that Obama has more elected experience than Clinton, Edwards, Giuliani, Clark, Romney, Gilmore, and (of course), Savage.

Obama is an amazing speaker. I think his future is bright within the democratic party. However, as much as I like Hillary, I think the two have something in common. Hillary would be just another senator if she had not been a first lady, and Obama would be just another senator if he were not the only black man currently serving in that body. They both get attention and benefit from those things.

What will be interesting, is to see if either of them can really capitalize on the attention they are receiving and prove to be a great leader.

I consider John Edwards to be the worst type of opporrtunist. Two years into his first senate term, he decided to run for president, and missed a large portion of his senate votes because he was campaigning (not that he was the only one to do this). He then, after having having his clock cleaned by a lackluster candidate in the primary, announced that his Iraq war vote was a mistake (a clear pander to the left wing of the party in my opinion).

I know Hillary Clinton is not popular with anyone on this site, and I am not about to try to change minds (I realize this is hopeless and unnecessary), but I do respect her thoughtfulness in her Iraq stance. She is right, there are no "do-overs" in politics. She takes responsibility for her vote, even if she does not admit it was a "mistake".

We have a long way to go before either side has a nominee. What any of them SAY now, is less relevant to what they DO while representing their constituents.

The Obama people emailed our office this week to ask if this weekends rally could be in our building at the university. I decided to stop in, since it was literally a stone's throw from my office. They apparently gave out so many tickets that they had to move it to the basketball arena - I went anyway.

I was curious to see if his "rock star" status was real, or manufactured by the media. I would have to say there is some of both going on. He drew a huge crowd (relatively speaking) - maybe 4000 people. There was a live band and lots of rock and roll. The crowd went wild when he showed up.

But what he had to say wasn't so amazing. He would get on a roll, then hesitate and loose the crowd. People obviously loved him but I doubt too many of us undecideds were swayed by what we heard today.

Here's some pics:

http://picasaweb.google.com/thamnophis/Obabma

the mass media to completely abandon Obama at the first sign of real trouble. I think they led him into this and he's been more than a little naive to accept their draft, and he doesn't seem to have factored the MSM as fair-weather friends.

lesterblog.blogspot.com

MSM sort of drug him in, and they will toss him under the bus, when he falters.

Sorry - noticed I misspelled his name. Corrected:

http://picasaweb.google.com/thamnophis/Obama

"BO doesn't pass the smell test"?

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service