Newt on Winning in 2006....
By saul anuzis Comments (11) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
http://www.newt.org/backpage.asp?art=3547
The American Eleven - A Values Led Plan for Victory in November
Human Events Online September 5 2006
Newt Gingrich
Welcome to a special 2006 election edition of "Winning the Future."
The fall 2006 elections are now just two months away. Although the conventional wisdom is that Republicans will have a tough time this fall, I believe that we can still win -- but not without substantial changes.
In this edition of "Winning the Future," I outline 11 values-led policies that are both morally right and that enjoy (not coincidentally) the overwhelming support of the American people. These are the values and the policies that Republicans should embrace this fall.
Here's the key:
Republican victory in 2006 depends on a return to the American values that twice elected Ronald Reagan and returned the House to a Republican majority with the Contract with America.
Republicans in 2006 must return to the pattern that allowed the center-right majority to win decisive elections for President Reagan in 1980 and 1984 and win with the Contract with America in 1994.
President Ronald Reagan was successful because as governor, as a candidate and as President he spoke for and advocated the values of the overwhelming majority of Americans.
The Contract with America succeeded because its core solutions (standing on President Reagan's shoulders) reflected deeply held American values. It is vital that Republican leaders understand these were American values not Republican values.
92% of the American people favored welfare reform.
88% of the people on welfare favored welfare reform.
83% of the American people favored a balanced budget.
On issue after issue the Contract with America represented the values of the American people. The left was defeated in 1994 because it had lost touch with the American people.
The Reagan-Contract Rule: Change Starts With the People
For the last few years, Republicans in Washington have forgotten the Reagan-Contract rule that successful change starts with the American people. There is a real danger that Republicans will lose the House and the Senate this fall because they have strayed from this core principle of starting first with the concerns and values of the American people and then developing effective policies.
Consultants are working overtime to convince the American people to favor Republican policies. This is exactly backwards.
What really works is what happens when Republicans identify themselves with the American people and against the values of the left-wing establishment that dominates the media, the bureaucracies and the lobbying community.
11 Ways to Say: "We're Not Nancy Pelosi"
Republicans should spend the next two months focused on 11 straightforward, morally grounded issues about which the American people have clearly defined beliefs.
Some of these issues will make Republican elitists uncomfortable, but these were the same elitists who were uncomfortable with President Reagan and who scoffed at the Contract with America and rejected its bold proposals.
A Republican majority in the House that spent the next two months on these eleven issues would go a long way toward clarifying the choice between the San Francisco values of Nancy Pelosi and those of a GOP majority. This refreshing approach would reject the "incumbentitis" of relying on pork-barrel spending for reelection and return to the basic populist conservative values which gave us a majority in the first place.
These 11 issues are all clear and all doable.
1. Make English the Official Language of Government. The House should pass a bill making English the official language of government, abolishing multilingual ballots and reaffirming that new citizens should be required to pass a test on American history in English. The Rasmussen poll reported that support for English as the official language was 85%. The Zogby poll had it at 84%. Why do Republican leaders find it so hard to side with more than four out of every five Americans? How many liberal Democrats who currently assume they are unbeatable would suddenly have a hard time explaining a series of votes against English to their constituents? Remember, at 85%, there are no anti-English congressional districts no matter what the elite media says.
2. Control the Borders. The House should pass a narrowly focused bill to ensure that the United States can control the border. The current Senate bill is a disaster. It is impossible to pass a "comprehensive" immigration bill in the next two months. The American people overwhelmingly want the borders controlled and every act of terrorism reminds us that having the borders uncontrolled makes us more vulnerable to attack. The House should immediately pass a border-control bill and conservative Republican senators should move every day to bring it up in the Senate. Let Democrats and elitist Republicans block controlling the border and make that a referendum test for Election Day.
3. Keep God in the Pledge. Congress should take two steps to preserve the right to say "one nation under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, a right which is supported by 91% of all Americans. The American people feel deeply that our Declaration of Independence is correct in saying that each of us is endowed by our Creator with inalienable rights. Beginning with the Supreme Court's 1963 decision outlawing school prayer, the courts have waged a 43-year assault on the core values of American liberty. It is time to return to a balanced Constitutional system. There is no Constitutional case for five lawyers on the court being a floating majority for a permanent Constitutional Convention.
The American people would rally to the elected branches' taking steps to rebalance the Constitution. First, the Congress should pass a bill suspending the recent federal district court decision in California outlawing the words "one nation under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. Second, the House should pass a law blocking the Supreme Court from reviewing the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance (a power of the House expressly granted in the Constitution).
4. Require a Voter ID Card. The American people overwhelmingly support (85% in one case, 70%-plus even after all the arguments against it are made) having a voter id card so we can be sure only legal citizens are voting. Passing a bill to require this in all federal elections would be a big step toward more honest elections.
5. Repeal the Death Tax, for Good. The American people have consistently supported the total repeal of the death tax and the House should simply pass it once a week and attach it to various Senate bills to force the Senate to deal with it again and again. Let liberals explain why they oppose something that more than 70% of the country favors.
6. Restore Property Rights. The American people are deeply opposed to local politicians' being able to seize a citizen's home or business. The Supreme Court's Kelo decision on eminent domain is one of the most unpopular in recent years and is also one of the most dangerous. Anyone who knows the history of local government corruption in America knows it will not be long before some corrupt developers engage some corrupt politicians and this power is exploited at the cost of most Americans. Members of the Black Caucus have been among the most vocal in pointing out that it is poor people who will be the most victimized so rich developers and greedy politicians can make the money off their homes and businesses. The House should pass a powerful bill returning the constitutional law to the pre-Kelo rules and blocking the Supreme Court from reviewing it.
7. Achieve Sustainable Energy Independence. The country is eager for a straightforward new energy strategy for national security, environmental and economic reasons. The combination of $3 gasoline, watching Iran, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and Russia get more of our money, and concerns about the environment come together to require real change. The House should meet that need. Starting with Rep. Jim Nussle's (R-Iowa) bill on renewable fuels, adding to it clean nuclear power using new technologies that are safe and produce little waste, developing more clean coal solutions, investing in a conversion to a hydrogen economy, incentivizing conservation, providing tax credits so the auto industry can invest in the new technology and new manufacturing equipment needed to produce revolutionary new vehicles, creating the tax incentives to build the distribution system for biofuels, hybrids, and hydrogen, providing deeper tax incentives for radically better cars (imagine a substantial tax credit for cars exceeding 200 miles to the gallon of petroleum through a combination of E-85 or biodiesel, hybrid use of electricity and hydrogen), and a bill to create state flexibility in exploring off shore with a 50% split in revenue so state legislatures and governors would have an incentive to develop environmentally sound methods of exploration and production.
8. Control Spending and Balance the Budget. The House should pass new budget legislation to control spending, leading to a balanced budget in seven years (the length of time we gave ourselves in the Contract with America and which led to the first four balanced budgets since the 1920s), with special focus on programs liberals will fight to increase spending. Let the country see who is really committed to smaller government with lower taxes and who is committed to bigger government with higher taxes.
9. Tie Education Funding to Teacher Accountability. A major result of the No Child Left Behind legislation has been the clear revelation that a number of schools systems are crippling and destroying children. When the Detroit school system only graduates 21% of entering freshman on time, it is clear the children are being cheated. The American people strongly support reforms designed to save the children. The first step would be to insist that federal funds only go to school systems which require teacher competency and accountability. A clear choice between those who want to save the children and those who want to save the bureaucrats would mobilize the country in favor of dramatic education reform.
10. Defend America From the Irreconcilable Wing of Islam. Terrorism is a real threat. Congress should hold hearings on the recent terror activities in Canada, the United Kingdom and Morocco. The House should move bills that strengthen our security from terrorists with increased powers for surveillance, an overruling of the disastrous Hamdan decision and a series of other steps.
11. Focus on Iran and North Korea. The American people are very prepared to believe we face extraordinary threats from a nuclear North Korea and an Iranian regime actively seeking to develop nuclear weapons. Any actions in Iraq need to be recast in terms of their impact on Iran. A weak America in Iraq will be unable to stop Iran. Stopping Iran is potentially literally a matter of life and death. Congress should hold hearings on the scale of the Iranian and North Korean threat, the statements of their key leaders and the requirements for action to replace these dictatorships before they succeed in killing millions of Americans. The Santorum Iranian democracy bill should be forced out of the Senate in the context of these threats. Everything about Iraq should be debated within this larger and much more dangerous context.
These eleven steps focus on the House because Republicans have practical control of the House and can move legislation in the House in a timely manner.
The Senate is so hard to manage and the confusion in the Senate is so great that it is impossible to imagine a clear message coming from the Senate.
The House of Representatives, however, has the opportunity to set the agenda for the fall and to define the issues in terms which will have overwhelming support from the American people.
House Republicans have two months to change history. They can go one of two ways.
They can continue to ignore the lessons of history, and forget the fact that real change must begin with the American people, not the media or Washington elite.
Or House Republicans can learn from history. They can listen to the American people and return to the center-right populist majority which President Reagan and the Contract with America gave them. The choice is theirs -- and ours.
Develop alternatives to existing policies and keep them alive and available until the politically impossible becomes the politically inevitable. Milton Friedman
and everything he lists would sway voters. I hope the elitist ascendancy hasn't castrated the GOP to the point it cannot compete on basic conservative principles.
I don't think this as good as the 1994 Contract, and perhaps even harder programs to pass (senate Democrats will filibuster a voter id card proposal) as well as tough illegal immigration laws, I think Newt's setting up a good start.
Thats the idea. Let the Dems block popular and sensible ideas. It shows those who may have forgotten what their true colors are.
IF these ideas were put forward in the form of a Contract with America, several things would happen.
1. The Dem's and the media would go ballistic.
2. The people would overwhelmingly approve.
IF the congressional republicans (sc on purpose) could manage a spine transplant and turn this list into legislation...
1. The Dem's would call out the warhorses to oppose the legislation.
2. The House D's would make statements the likes of which can only be made by people like Pelosi, Barbara Lee and moonbat wing of the party.
3. The media will give the moonbats all the time they want.
4. The D's in the Senate will filibuster.
5. The people will marginalize the Democrats on domestic policy.
IF the republican congressional leadership will stand and fight, with or without Bush's support, '08 would be in the bag and the R's would have probably 60 seats in the Senate and 250 in the House.
All this requires leadership from the Republicans on the Hill. I'm not confident.
-----
If "pro" is the opposite of "con", what is the opposite of "progress"?
Newt is definitely right on the issues.
Smarts and great delivery. Glad he's viewed as a leader in the GOP again as he can help rally the base (boy are we going to need all the base this election).
Jeff Fuller
http://iowansforromney.blogspot.com/
Click on my user profile to see the "full disclaimer."
Okay, I like many of these ideas. There are a handful here that Congress needs to focus on between now and November. However, some of them aren't really strong. If we narrowed this down to just, say, the 5 strongest ones instead of all 11, it would work better IMO.
I like number 1 (English), 4 (Voter ID card), 5 (death tax), and 8 (balanced budget) a lot. Let's push those as hard as we can.
I also think 2 (borders) is a strong issue for the GOP, but I find Newt's suggestions way too vague. How exactly should we go about it? Put a fence up? A wall? Put more troops/agents there? Pass more laws? Stiffer penalties for those who are caught? Stiffer penalties for employers? What? I have my thoughts: put up a fence, increase the border presence with mroe INS agents and give them the authority to arrest and deport, as well as fire their weapons if necessary, and implement infinitely stricter laws against employers who hire illegals.
Number 7 (energy independence) would be a good issue, of course, but I think Newt actually complicates the issue by making too many suggestions of what "could" be in this one. Two words for you: nuclear power. Okay, two more: off-shore drilling. There. That's an energy policy the American people can understand.
Number 3 (Pledge of Allegiance) is a monumental waste of time. The public would respond by saying something to the effect of, "With everything else going on in the world and all the problems Congress should be fixing, why are they focused on the Pledge of Allegiance???" I would agree wholeheartedly.
Number 6 (property rights) would be a good issue to fight against, but I was under the impression that Congress did not have the power to alter "Constitutional Law" that the SCOTUS had ruled on. Otherwise, what would be the point of having SCOTUS decisions or Constitutional amendments? Can Congress really just pass a law that negates a SCOTUS ruling? That doesn't seem right to me. And if they can, why haven't we done that with Roe or Casey or any other of the dozens of rulings either party has disagreed with in the past?
Education reform (#9) sounds fine and dandy but I think this administration has lost credibility on that issue, at least with everyone that I talk to. NCLB was one of those things that sounded nice in theory (and I support it in theory), but turned out to be a collosal flop in real life (and I do not support it in real life). Any more reforms built on the back of NCLB will just increase the problems. I'm all for accountability and standards - that's the part of the legislation I agree with in theory. However, how it plays out is not good for the children, for the teachers, or for the parents. For real education reform, we've got to let the teachers know we are also on their side and that we support them. We should have input from them so we more fully understand what it is they do, why some schools are failing, and what their ideas are to fix the problem. Look, I am friends with many teachers, and even those who are strong conservatives and voted for Bush twice absolutely hate the NCLB act. It's a ridiculous overreach of federal power with way too many unreachable and unsustainable goals. I disagree with Newt's perception that we must increase federal oversight even farther to improve education. For reform to our education system, we need to decrease federal oversight and let the states handle their own education with incentives of extra federal moneys for states or districts that perform past expectations.
And finally, nobody's going to argue with 10 and 11 - defending America and focusing on Iran and NK are already what we're doing. I don't know how you do that more from a seat in the House of Representatives, though. Hold hearings? Oooh.... that'll scare the terrorists and change the Democrats' minds. Pass a law for wiretapping when that right already exists, only to have the law struck down by some cherry-picked Dem-appointee lower court judge? I'd rather let the wiretapping thing work itself out at the SCOTUS first.
If we focused on 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8, it would be a winning combination and enough without having to add some of the other less favorable ideas here.
--------
There is no theory of evolution, just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
In his 21st Century Contract for America. I would strongly reccommend your read it.
Or you could just go to his website, Newt.org and find out exactly what he means by controlling the borders, energy independence, and education reform. You would also find his health care reform ideas as well.
As for number 6, yes, congress can pass a constitutional ammendment or a bill that would erase or at least blunt the effects of kelo.
and run with it?
If all the bloggers who have pushed to uncover the Senate hold on earmark transparency would push the GOP to adapt a plan like this, then our chances in November would increase significantly.

I thought in the late '80's and '90's that he had one of the best minds for politics that God ever wired up. This confirms my opinion.
-----
If "pro" is the opposite of "con", what is the opposite of "progress"?