Redstate

The first and second questions have the same answer: the Media needs to do something for the next few weeks, and ginning up controversy like this will have to do until the next gaffe.

As for the third... please. Obama's trying to win an election, and the progressive half of his base react badly to any suggestion at all that Republicans or conservatives deserve respect - or, indeed, oxygen. You were expecting moral courage from the man? Hee.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

Any sane person would realize that, it's so simple. And such people, grounded in reality, also know the only thing to do with world wide, long term terrorism, is to ignore it. Or maybe keep ordering police investigations.

And why does CNN give Ed Schitz a platform? Because he says the kind of things they would like to say but can't, and if you're going to pimp for a politician with nothing to offer but gas you might as well go whole hog.

Actually CNN and Ed are doing us a favor, let's not spoil the fun. The more the vile nuts of the left are pulled out from beneath the rocks by their like minded buddies of the media, the more their ugliness is exposed.

"a man's admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him". Tocqueville

Consider who else was called a "warmonger." a gentleman called Winston Spencer Churchill by those people who were sure that Herr Hitler wanted peace until he invaded the Soviet Union.

Then a pacifist who lives in fairy tale land.

Though I don't see much of a difference between McCain's rhetoric on Iran and Obama's threats to unilaterally attack Pakistan. But the media has already given him a pass on that.

Mt. Rush territory, a hopeless task. CNN & MSNBC are in a race to see who can get further left & more awkwardly stupid as this contest turns into an Obama/McCain fight.

Every few days, some nobody like Schlitz will pop its head up and instead of whack-a-mole, the CNNBC construct will promote the rodent to full-time "journalism."

Good to remind us of Churchill, also. There will always be ostriches like Obama, we need an eagle like McCain.

sounds like.
That line of Schultz's - "Labeling a candidate is not being disrespectful,"
Is one thing I think he and all lefties will regret mightily.
For a group whose party members have gone out of their way to help the enemy and harm our troops and compromise security during war to call John McCain a 'warmonger' is a move that will haunt our democrat friends for years to come.
And now that we know labeling candidates is not only Ok but is not disrespectful, well, I am reaching for my thesaurus even as I type.

any politician who brazenly and recklessly sings "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb iran'' in public, before TV cameras, can't squeal when he gets called a warmonger...those of you on this site who hold Obama accountable for what his pastor said should hold McCain to the same standards and stop blaming the media and everyone else...

He used to be a conservative talk show host here in North Dakota. Used to allow the former Republican Governor to fill in for him and so on. Then the Soros money came his way. An idea was floated to get a "red state" radio guy (North Dakota) to launch a new progressive radio theme. You know try to break into middle America. So Schultz changed. He bacame a liberal and he hasn't looked back. I wonder if all of Schultz's fans know that he used to hunt deer and upland game here in North Dakota. Wouldn't that qualify him as a warmonger in a liberal world?

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson