My complaint about Pres. George W Bush
By tadams1138 Posted in Miscellanea — Comments (23) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
The last thing I wanted to do this Tuesday night was spend several hours writing, editing, and typing this letter. However, I needed to do it because it's indeed the best way to give you some background information about Pres. George W Bush. In the rest of this letter, I will use history and science (in the Hegelian sense) to prove that out of all of the conscienceless hellions I've ever known, Pres. Bush is clearly the most impulsive.
The ultimate aim of Pres. Bush's complaints is to restructure society as a pyramid with Pres. Bush at the top, Pres. Bush's advocates directly underneath, chauvinistic loan sharks beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable Pres. Bush to encourage men to leave their wives, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become nugatory loons, which makes me realize that I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of his irresponsible communications and narrow-minded claims. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that it appears that, for Pres. Bush, "open-mindedness" isn't a policy or a belief, but a flag to wave when he feels like it, and one to hide when it doesn't suit his purposes. Pres. Bush may mean well but he enjoys the sense of control that comes from forcing someone else to do things the way he wants them done. I'll stand by that controversial statement and even assume that most readers who bring their own real-life experience will agree with it. At a bare minimum, Pres. Bush has already been able to convert houses of worship into houses of Maoism. What worries me more than that, however, is that if Pres. Bush ever manages to dump effluent into creeks, lakes, streams, and rivers, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning.
Pres. Bush's principles are like an enormous nonrepresentationalism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must change the world for the better because mass anxiety is the equivalent of steroids for Pres. Bush. If we feel helpless, Pres. Bush is energized and ramps up his efforts to convert lush forests into arid deserts. When one examines the ramifications of letting him undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, and family, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why the same pattern of guilt-by-association practiced by his assistants can be found in his reports. My peers think that we must stand united as free, sovereign individuals and rub his nose in his own hypocrisy. While this is decidedly true, I suspect we must add that if it weren't for whiney fribbles, he would have no friends. In closing, Pres. George W Bush doesn't care about accountability in our public systems.
If you too would like to know how to do a rant worthy of DKos, see this site. I'll never have to put any effort into complaining about anyone or anything again!
Did someone else book the iron maiden and thumb screws this evening ?
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
I hate it when the schools are out for vacation.
==== 13 ====
What I have to say will probably provoke a response from Mr. Moe Lane. He may label me "piteous" or even "predaceous". I realize and accept that as a consequence of what I am about to say. However, I do doubtlessly hope that Moe will read everything I have to say before labeling me. Some background is in order: I am merely pointing out what I have observed. Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that if he thinks his antics represent progress, Moe should rethink his definition of progress.
As far as I can tell, one of the great mysteries of modern life is, Do postmodernist idiots like Moe's deputies actually have lives, or do they exist solely to slow scientific progress? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let me take a stab at it: I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of Moe's writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Moe's writings to know that if Moe can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that he knows 100% of everything 100% of the time, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Self-pitying Rhetoric. In the meantime, Moe dreams of a time when he'll be free to play the blame game. That's the way he's planned it and that's the way it'll happen -- not may happen but will happen -- if we don't interfere, if we don't do what comes naturally.
On a more pedestrian level, I wonder what would happen if Moe really did lower our standard of living. There's a spooky thought. He exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority. Although Moe babbles on and on about fanaticism, he has no more conception of it than any other licentious, flagitious braggart. Although this may come as a surprise to some readers, his fulminations are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of lexiphanicism.
Some people think it's a bit extreme of me to place a high value on honor and self-respect -- a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that Moe's claim that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is is factually unsupported and politically motivated. I once overheard Moe say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Moe said that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that the really interesting thing about all this is not that all of his views about life come straight out of "Teach Yourself Gangsterism in 30 Minutes". The interesting thing is that our battle with him is a battle between spiritualism and favoritism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that if we let Moe dress up his profit motive in the cloak of selfless altruism, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization.
One other thing: Moe's invidious, contentious perceptions can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. I correctly predicted that Moe would make a mockery of the term "physicophysiological". Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively -- or so soon.
As sure as a bear does you-know-what in the woods, Moe will call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place in the immediate years ahead. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true. He has been trying to convince us that his gruesome little empire is a respected civil-rights organization. This pathetic attempt to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole deserves no comment other than to say that it is not uncommon for Moe to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole snivelling affair as some great benefit to humanity.
You may be wondering why the most patronizing toughies you'll ever see latch onto Moe's effusions. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why we must work together to raise insolent, grotty boors out of their cultural misery and lead them to the national community as a valuable, united factor. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to analyze Moe's hariolations in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because it's possible that Moe doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of irrationalism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we protect innocent, little children from crude oafs like him.
I have the following to say to the assertion that we can stop incendiarism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for sadistic pseudo-intellectuals: Baloney! To add another dimension to this argument, let me mention that Moe's serfs have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times -- stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize Moe's snotty accusations. It is clearly not a pretty sight. You know, it strikes me that when you tell Moe's slaves that Moe's retorts to criticism are so rehearsed that he may be almost unconscious of what he's saying, as one is when one utters the responses in church, they begin to get fidgety and their eyes begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing that from the very beginning, sex-crazed adolescents have labored to recruit into their ranks the sons and daughters of the powerful, famous, and rich. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to him.
There is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Moe's essays from the first word to the last. If Moe were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Moe and his expositors, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that Moe sees the world as somewhat anarchic, a game of catch-as-catch-can in which the sneakiest lounge lizards nab the biggest prizes.
We mustn't let Moe suborn inhumane pinheads to appropriate sacred symbols for conniving purposes. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. If I have a bias, it is only against sneaky, lubricious barbarians who vandalize our neighborhoods. Moe insists that we should avoid personal responsibility. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. That's a very important point; most people react to his counter-productive quips as they would to having a pile of steaming pig manure dumped on their doorstep. Even when they can cope, they resent having to do so. Speaking of resentment, Moe plans to entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of the worst classes of unconscionable troglodytes there are. He has instructed his sycophants not to discuss this or even admit to his plan's existence. Obviously, Moe knows he has something to hide. As I have tried to show in this letter, in the good old days, when courage, honor, devotion, duty, and loyalty meant something, it was comparatively easy to brush away the cobwebs of fogyism. As long as you remember that, we may yet be able to break the neck of Mr. Moe Lane's policy of totalitarianism once and for all.
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
Just how did you get past the headlines
I consider this just further reason to press the question.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
I didn't expect someone else's rant to upstage mine. Dang. Mine also seemed more reasonable. Dang.
I've been blogging since, when? 2002? Long time, in this business: long enough to acquire at least a limited immunity.
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
You do yourself faint credit If course that is from a man who should change his handle to killing braincells but nonetheless. I was certainly ready to pillory Mr. ? Taddams after the first paragraph.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
You had me for minute. Good thing I'm a habitual link clicker.
This letter is not meant to be witty or insulting and I am afraid I won't even be able to make it eloquent. But I will do the best I can to enable patriots to use their freedoms to save their freedoms. First things first: The Democratic Party has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then footling ignoramuses will be free to create widespread psychological suffering. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how The Democratic Party wants to crush the will of all individuals who have expressed political and intellectual opposition to its witticisms. Why it wants that, I don't know, but that's what it wants.
To those amateurish loan sharks who think that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments, know this: It may seem at first that by supporting disgusting energumens with inferior moral standards, we devalue ourselves, the lives of our children, and the heroes who died for our freedoms. When we descend to details, however, we see that it has a morbid fascination with all that is inferior, debased, deformed, neurotic, and garrulous. An obvious parallel from a different context is that The Democratic Party would have us believe that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. Yeah, right. And I also suppose that The Democratic Party can change its catty ways? The fact of the matter is that I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But it has been, and is, my great undertaking to investigate its snotty principles, ideals, and objectives. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that its mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life.
The Democratic Party must think that being uninformed entitles one to justify, palliate, or excuse the evils of The Democratic Party's heart. No matter how close it's come to making me become clinically depressed, it won't be satisfied until it finds a way to make scabrous profiteers out to be something they're not. It would be wrong to imply that The Democratic Party is involved in some kind of conspiracy to manipulate everything and everybody. It would be wrong because its outbursts are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but it has been trying for some time to convince people that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to its picayunish, grotesque prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. Don't believe its hype! The Democratic Party has just been offering that line as a means to weave its purblind traits, humorless ultimata, and prudish contrivances into a rich tapestry that is sure to project a stream of impulsive images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament.
For all of the foregoing reasons, I can confidently claim that The Democratic Party can't fool me. I've met surly, self-aggrandizing clunks before, so I know that The Democratic Party's favorite activities include cheating, lying, and tricking people into believing that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. In reaching that conclusion I have made the usual assumption that The Democratic Party's grand plan is to smear people of impeccable character and reputation. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, The Democratic Party likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is as innocent as a newborn lamb. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of its pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that it's The Democratic Party's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to dispense outright misinformation and flashlight-under-the-chin ghost stories. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a froward idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of The Democratic Party". In it, I chronicle all of The Democratic Party's hypnopompic insights from the odious to the destructive and conclude that The Democratic Party's viewpoints are more than just rebarbative. They're a revolt against nature.
Truth be told, we must reveal some shocking facts about The Democratic Party's words. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility -- a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that if The Democratic Party doesn't like it here, then perhaps it should go elsewhere.
As I see it, The Democratic Party has warned us that in a matter of days, xenophobic sociopaths will make bargains with the devil. If you think about it, you'll realize that The Democratic Party's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that the ultimate aim of The Democratic Party's whinges is to restructure society as a pyramid with The Democratic Party at the top, The Democratic Party's advocates directly underneath, cynical buggers beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable The Democratic Party to create a The Democratic Party-centric society in which revolting blowhards dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes, which makes me realize that if you ever ask The Democratic Party to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. Some people consider The Democratic Party's exegeses a necessary evil but the truth is that if five years ago I had described an organization like The Democratic Party to you and told you that in five years it'd ridicule, parody, censor, and downgrade opposing ideas, you'd have thought me pretentious. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how its remarks are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, many organizations lie. However, The Democratic Party lies with such ease it's troubling.
Hey, it's not my fault that I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of The Democratic Party's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. All of these things are related: pauperism, The Democratic Party's memoranda, and the general breakdown of our society. I'll even tell you how they're related. It's really very simple. In essence, The Democratic Party insists that it has answers to everything. Has anyone, at any time, ever been more wrong? I've never gotten a clear and honest answer to that question from The Democratic Party. But what is clear is that it has a strategy. Its strategy is to open the floodgates of narcissism. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with The Democratic Party.
Often, the lure of an articulate new pundit, a well-financed attention-getting program, an effective audience generator, hot new "inside" information, or a professionally produced exposé is irresistible to piteous Neanderthals who want to shift blame from those who benefit from oppression to those who suffer from it. Take, as an example, the way that The Democratic Party wants to fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries. Well, it turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten foul turncoats into bombarding me with insults. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me.
Don't misunderstand me; I'm not saying that divine ichor flows through The Democratic Party's veins. In fact, its excuses are like an enormous imperialism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combating The Democratic Party because The Democratic Party has delivered exactly the opposite of what it had previously promised us. Most notably, its vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, The Democratic Party's vows of equality did little more than convince people that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind The Democratic Party that if its plan to replace intellectual integrity with brutish sloganeering is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to shield people from The Democratic Party's pouty and sex-crazed deceptions. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that it presents itself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. The Democratic Party is eloquent in its denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors grotty, empty-headed hell-raisers. And here we have the ultimate irony because if The Democratic Party were as bright as it thinks it is, it'd know that if it thinks that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like it, then it's sadly mistaken.
The Democratic Party's peons claim that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. This is precisely the non-equation that The Democratic Party is trying to patch together. What it's missing, as usual, is that it is not uncommon for it to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole ostentatious affair as some great benefit to humanity. The Democratic Party's credos are grounded in phony acts of kindness. In this case, one cannot help but recall that it wants all of us to believe that its mistakes are always someone else's fault. That's why it sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. The Democratic Party has lost sight of the lessons of history. For proof of this fact I must point out that The Democratic Party's theatrics are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to focus on concrete facts, on hard news, on analyzing and interpreting what's happening in the world. The only way to destroy its Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I wish only that The Democratic Party had the same intellectual honesty. And that's what writing this sort of letter is all about. It's a way to build an inclusive, nondiscriminatory movement for social and political change.
___________________________________
Two thirds of the world is covered by water,
the other third is covered by Champ Bailey.
Allow me the honor of giving you a brief lesson in Darin H's many venom-spouting attributes. The key point of the following exposition is that Darin H attracts self-righteous, ruthless wisenheimers of one sort or another to its coalition by telling them that his pronouncements enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. I suppose the people to whom he tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, Darin H always looks the other way when one of his worshippers gets it in his head to herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses. Apparently, the principle laid down by Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois during the French Reign of Terror still holds true today: Tout est permis à quiconque agit dans le sens de la révolution. To recap the main points made: 1) I find it amusing how all thinking people simultaneously flinched when they heard Darin H insist that I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by dishonest, lubricious voluptuaries for the purpose of population reduction, 2) pride and solidarity prepare individuals to become partners in an alliance against ornery misoneism, and 3) his personal motto is "never forgive and never forget".
I could create a whole leftist site in one night with this handy little tool.
writing this letter because I recently heard some troubling news. Apparently, a large number of people actually believe Mr. T Adams1138, Jr.'s claim that he's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against him and his subtle but repressive attempts to lead us, lemminglike, over the precipice of self-destruction.
There is no doubt that T will discourage us from expressing our belief systems in whatever way we damn well please as soon as our backs are turned. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that T is trying hard to convince a substantial number of paltry, logorrheic fault-finders to overthrow western civilization through the destruction of its four pillars -- family, nation, religion, and democracy. He presumably believes that the "hundredth-monkey phenomenon" will spontaneously incite ridiculous oafs to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that T gained ascendancy through monstrous abuse of his foot soldiers. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that if T continues to change this country's moral infrastructure, I will be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations.
T's tracts may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into self-serving neopaganism. What I have been writing up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this letter. Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that I will stop at nothing to build an inclusive, nondiscriminatory movement for social and political change. My resolve cannot fully be articulated but it is unyielding. As evidence, consider that we must make the world safe for democracy. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own obstreperous slurs. In summary, Mr. T Adams1138, Jr. has always used alcoholism as his moorings. Is anyone listening? Does anyone care?
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
I know surprisingly little about Mr. Thomas H. Crown. I know nothing about his background or lineage. I do not know where Thomas was educated or what he has done besides give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society. Nevertheless, I can tell you all that you need to know about him. Let's get down to business: He asserts that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. That assertion is not only untrue but a conscious lie. If he gets his way, none of us will be able to take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of Thomas and his attendants and put them back in the hands of ordinary people and encourage others to do the same. Therefore, we must not let him project a stream of impulsive images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament.
I was, however, going to forget about the whole thing when it suddenly occurred to me that Thomas likes forcing me to have to fight with one hand tied behind my back. That's the most damnable thing about him. It's also why our conception of fogyism still remains a good deal less clear than we would wish. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.
There is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as pessimism or elitism. Specifically, the poststructuralism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, sexist attack on progressive ideas. Thomas can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could make it nearly impossible to disturb his daft gravy train.
Thomas demands obeisance from his spin doctors. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Thomas forces them to justify, palliate, or excuse the evils of his heart. Identifying and naming benighted, irrational schizophrenics is fundamentally different from using their convictions as an instrument of rebellion. Let me rephrase that: He knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive -- or at least overlook -- all of his iconoclastic excesses. My take on the matter is that one can only speculate how much worse things would be if Thomas were to pigeonhole people into predetermined categories. But I digress. Even if one is opposed to pouty simplism (and I am), then surely, his conclusions promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Thomas's stooges because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Thomas.
There is little question that there is no reason to rob us of our lives, our health, our honor, and our belongings and there is every reason not to. And that's where we are right now. Thomas's pals are too lazy to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that Thomas's ballyhoos are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, animalism doesn't work. So why does Thomas cling to it? That is, what accounts for Thomas's prodigious criminality and dissipation? We must decidedly ask ourselves questions like that before it's too late, before Thomas gets the opportunity to reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. I would like to close by saying that Mr. Thomas H. Crown is against everything and for nothing.
This simply rocks.
-----------
We are all heroes, you and Boo and I. Hamsters and rangers everywhere, rejoice!
I'm busy at work today, so I don't think I have time to play at the moment. Without checking the links, I'd have to guess that you (and your fellow slime-merchants Darin, Joli, and Thomas) have found a tool that writes it for you -- I guess you feed it a subject (GWB), a couple of targets, and let 'er rip. Just the sheer weight of typing something like that would take some time, so I guess it returns to you the whole essay. [marketing note to self -- dang, wish I'd thought of that!]
But it sounds like fun! I sometimes post for my church's newsletter, and I can see this coming in handy....
Stare decisis is fo' suckas -- Feddie
There are three talking points that no reasonable letter about Mr. JDub19 can possibly ignore:
1. JDub is so incredibly grotty that he really ought to change his name to "Grotty McGrotty, the Grotty King of the Grotty".
2. JDub makes so many laughably wily statements, it boggles the mind to think about them.
3. JDub's appeal to elitism is dangerous stuff.
But first, let me pose you a question: Is JDub actually concerned about any of us or does he just want to reinforce the impression that resentful, feral freeloaders -- as opposed to JDub's apple-polishers -- are striving to cause pain and injury to those who don't deserve it? After reading this letter, you'll certainly find it's the latter.
At the risk of shocking you further I shall point out that JDub insists that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates. To be fair, whenever I turn around I see him forcing me to jump in the lake. To deny such a truth would be to deny the evidence of our own senses. Although JDub is trying to portray himself as a great philosopher on par with Wittgenstein or some such personage, he may shout obscenities at passers-by right after he reads this letter. Let him. When you least expect it, I will criticize the obvious incongruities presented by JDub and his grunts. Worse yet, he wants to bring this battle to a fever pitch.
What JDub is incapable of seeing is that before he initiated a Jacobinism flap to help promote his materialistic imprecations, people everywhere were expected to get people to sign a petition to limit JDub's ability to cause trouble. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that if his thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, JDub wouldn't consider it such a good idea to take the focus off the real issues. He not only lies but he brags about his lying to his partisans. At the risk of repeating myself, I must reiterate that whenever JDub announces that national-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever his personal interests are at stake, his collaborators applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that there is no doubt that JDub will break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas he deems to be uncompanionable sooner or later. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that people often get the impression that diabolic pinheads and JDub's goombahs are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that JDub is almost unique among what I call ignominious, catty dummkopfs in that he espouses an ostentatious view of reality and a defense of insincere immoralism. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that JDub exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority. One last thing: Mr. JDub 19's ability to perpetuate the myth that the bogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to JDub's demands is astounding.
Stare decisis is fo' suckas -- Feddie
I admit, the only reason I finished reading it was the same fascination that makes motorists slow down and crane their necks to see a car wreck.