A Day in the Life of Speaker Pelosi.
What was that phrase that they tried to link to the President, again? Oh, yes: "Miserable Failure."
By Moe Lane Posted in Archived — Comments (10) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
You had us, Nancy. You absolutely had us.
Your Party had gotten a bloated S-CHIP bill through the Senate with a veto-proof majority, and within spitting distance of one in the House. You had bipartisan support - reluctant support (they didn't like the bloat), but support nonetheless - and a favorable media presence. You knew that President Bush was going to veto the bill, but it wouldn't matter. All you had to do was get it overridden and hey presto! You'd have scored your first personal win against the President and the GOP. Simple. Straightforward. Arranging this sort of thing is what competent Speakers of the House do.
And you flubbed it. Which means that President George W Bush beat you.
Again.
Read on.
The truly astounding part of all of this was how simply you could have avoided it. As our own Bluey adeptly noted, you were told, point-blank, by Rep. Deborah Price that the Republicans that voted for this bill originally expected that people would sit down and come up with something that addressed both sides of the issue, not the petty political desires of your faction. We were well into the "haggling over the price" phase of the legislation; you tried for $50 billion extra and had already gone down to $35 billion, so let us not pretend that you could not have gone down further. A compromise of $15 to $20 billion would have easily kept the bill's current supporters and sliced off enough opponents to overturn the veto. Plus, you'd have given the President a stinging defeat on a domestic policy. Plus, you'd have looked like the reasonable one in this dispute.
But you didn't do any of that - you raised, we called, and you had garbage in your hand. So now you have to go back to the drawing board, only this time you have to deal with Republican legislators who will treat $35 billion extra as pie-in-the-sky, not the best compromise that they can find. Let me tell you a secret: S-CHIP will be funded for somewhere between $10 and $20 billion dollars extra. Well, not a secret as much as my rule-of-thumb guess. It'll pass, too. The President will make a show of being bothered by the increased spending, but will in the end sign it, because after all someone has to be the reasonable one in this dispute. And you'll have to fight to get whatever crumbs of credit that can be salvaged from this mistake of yours. Just like all the other times, really.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi, do both the country and the Republican Party a favor, will you? Don't ever change.
Moe
PS: You will notice that nowhere do I request that you do something about this... person. To do so would be to imply that you would recognize the offensive nature of his remarks, or indeed care about them if you did. Then again, there is now some question about whether you would be able to do anything at all, no?
« BREAKING: Bank Collapses. Feds cite Sen. Chuck Schumer as "immediate cause" of collapse — Comments (14) | The Sunday Morning Talk Shows - The Review — Comments (6) »
A Day in the Life of Speaker Pelosi. 10 Comments (0 topical, 10 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
it's for the children, oh and the qualifying adults they expanded it to, and the middle class they will pull of private insurance and the 25-50% people on it today that can afford private insurance but would rather have us pay for it.
We are the cruel Simon Legree's here? Please are people really that ignorant to not see who is using children as a political tool?
"Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori"
Contributor to The Minority Report
Kill the bill, let the whining little creatures die out in front of their local emergency ward while holding a coffee can and a sign labeled "Help me afford medical care so I can grow up."
/snark/ sort of.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
an appearance on O'Reilly. Or maybe Olbermann. And I'll bring Franz with me.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
She wanted the figure high enough that it would get a veto.
- If overridden it makes Bush look bad.
- If not it goes into next year's Dem campaign ads.
Craft a bill that will get majority support and 60 votes in the Senate then use the discharge petition process.
Gotta keep those goals unattained, or what will the direct mail say?
"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill
Reporter: "Sir, (snarky question about why the President hates children so much)"
Bush: "Thanks, Buck, for that queshtion. You know, it's my *job* to veto what I think's a -- *bad* bill. It's the *job* of *congress* to work with the White House. --- We haven't --- haven't been *dialed in*. Ya know? Ya know, I vetoed the bill because it's lousy policy. -- Speaking of *jobs* and *lousy* I'd really like to insert here how *lousy* the press has been doing. You've been giving me hard queshtions -- tough queshtions today. Now -- uh, where are the tough queshtions for Pelosi and friends who have been just simply saying that the President *hates* children. I don't *hate* children. I want the other 500,000 *children* who aren't insured included. When are you guys going to start doing your *job* and press the Speaker and other Dems to start giving you some facts -- rather than sitting out there asking *me* some of this s**t. Thanks, Buck. How's the wife?

Let the veto stand, let the program die and use it as a campaign ad in '08.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.