Redstate

Like zombies on the scent of flesh they pull the lever for a Clinton.

To be fair to the dems, It may also be because they know it ticks off conservatives.

President Clinton got 49% of the popular vote in 1996. And I'd assume that's the high water mark of the hypnotic effects of his name, heh.
--
Run like Reagan!

that she also managed to parlay a bad marriage and some moderate level of celebrity into a Senate Seat For Life®.

No small accomplishment, that.

-------------
"I don't know." -- Helen Thomas, in response to the question, "Are we at war, Helen?" - posed by then-White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

but I think you're referring to Rep. William "The Fridge" Jefferson (D, of course - NOLA, of course), not Rep. Ford.

...in his freezer!

-------------
"I don't know." -- Helen Thomas, in response to the question, "Are we at war, Helen?" - posed by then-White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

... for correcting my misattribution. Too much eggnog, too early, I fear.

I predict that this list (and Hilary's status therein) will be picked up by precisely 0 of the MSM outlets

Oh, yeah, some conservative organization thinks that Hillary is corrupt. Stop the presses.

...the Left's working model on dealing with corruption issues. Its brevity is only matched by its effrontery.

Bravo, and remind me never to let you have control of the lifeboat supplies.

Moe

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC.

It's not news. "Questions" about "connections" to what someone "allegedly" did aren't worth the paper they're printed on, virtual or otherwise. Especially when the FEC, Congressional investigations in both the Hosue and Senate, and a criminal investigation by the Ashcroft Justice Department all cleared her of wrongdoing.

I was just impressed at the way that Judicial Watch instantly segues from bipartisan watchdog to conservative group when it's one of your people on the griddle.

Moe

PS: If your reply doesn't include a link to when you lectured a Lefty site about their referencing JW's activities against a Righty, don't bother writing it.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC.

It's odd that referring to JW as a "conservative" group is somehow unacceptable. They describe themselves that way.

If your reply doesn't include a link to when you lectured a Lefty site about their referencing JW's activities against a Righty

Alas, I'm afraid I'm unable to include any links to me posting on a lefty site at all. So please accept my apologies on that score.

And at any rate, I can't really find any cases of lefties pretending that JW is a "bipartisan watchdog" group when attacking figures on the right anyway:

--Kos consistently refers to them as "conservative" or skewing "right" (here here and here for examples).
--The few other times JW is mentioned in dKos stories, they're merely references to documents obtained by JW or mentions them in passing, and therefore not really about JW (see here or here).

So, long story short, even if I did spend time posting on lefty sites, I'm not sure the opportunity for me to give that particular lecture has really ever come up.

I guess I could go through the archives of other lefty sites, but frankly, I doubt the results would be much different. So again, my apologies.

Can you honestly say that Hillary Clinton is the 2nd most corrupt politician in Washington?

It smacks of political agenda.

And calling Obama corrupt because he publicly bought a home from some sleazy guy is a major reach. But at least they didn't list him as being more corrupt than Cunninham, Ney, and Jefferson.

"There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream of things that never were and ask why not." George Bernard Shaw

-----------
Even those who learn from history are surrounded by those doomed to repeat it.

Erick and the JW's has caused me to completely alter my regimine of meds. Not sure I'll ever sleep well again.
_______________________________
If "pro" is the opposite of "con", what is the opposite of "progress"?

Okay, I’ll bite. In what way is the pro-gun control and anti-line item veto Rudy Giuliani considered a “libertarian”?

Or is this just another case where if you’re a Republican candidate who is touted as being “socially liberal” (with no evidence of being “fiscally conservative”) then you’re presumed “libertarian”?

Rudy is my current pick out of a fairly sad field, but he's not a libertarian kind of guy. He's authoritarian to the core.

I'm no fan of Hillar Clinton but it astounds me how viscious people such as you can be regarding her.

A whore? Well I guess that's appropriate, since she's a woman and all.

"There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream of things that never were and ask why not." George Bernard Shaw

Your point is fair. Besides that, who here actually knows when the last time was that she actually slept with him? I certainly don't, and I wouldn't go betting either way on whether their marriage includes a current physical aspect.

What do you call her? Why does she stay with Bill? For the sake of the child? The worst is the feminists giving both of them a pass.

Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.

Why should I call her a whore? What evidence is there that she is? It isn't like there is actual evidence of infidelity on her part, as there is with a certain potential Republican candidate for President.

You have no idea why she stayed with Bill but you feel it acceptable to call her a whore because, well, you don't like her.

This is pure misogyny.

"There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream of things that never were and ask why not." George Bernard Shaw

--
Run like Reagan!