Heads Blown Off For The President's Amusement?

By haystack Posted in Comments (41) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »


Pete Stark is an American Democrat-Politician scumbag

The biggest scumbag to bubble to the surface of the Democrat swill just opened his pie-hole and spewed the foulest thing to come out of a politicians mouth in, perhaps, my lifetime (maybe not-but this is in the top 3):

But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President's amusement.

Democrats have no problem using troops or kids to advance their political goals in Washington. There should be an OUTRAGE...and this piece of human bile should be called out for it by every American who, like me, is ABSOLUTELY not amused.

Updated by Neil Stevens: It appears that House Republicans are moving that Stark's words be taken down from the record, as I watch C-SPAN live here. Good for them!

Update 2 by Neil: After reading only the part of Rep. Stark's remarks where he doesn't imply the President is a war criminal, the House ruled Stark not to be out of order. That just reflects on the Democratic leadership of the body.

Update 3 by Mark I.: The House Republicans unbelievably did not move that these words be taken down. They came in an earlier part of the debate. Rep. Joe Barton moved that Rep. Stark's third mention of the deaths of soldiers in iraq be taken down. The words were: "I would like to point out that under the Republican proposal, we probably would have killed 20,000 soldiers in Iraq by 2017."


« Rep. Capuano's Newspeak for CensorshipComments (5) | Talking with Price & Hensarling: SCHIP and AMTComments (9) »
Heads Blown Off For The President's Amusement? 41 Comments (0 topical, 41 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

More evidence that the BushLied brainwashing daily by the media affects those in high places. I hope our next candidate realizes how dangerous it is to leave that daily crap unchallenged.

Ask not what I can do for my country, ask what my country can do for me. Washington Elected Elite

Stark is not affected by the msm lies - he and his foul creche mates run the spawing pool of anti-American propaganda and hatred. They have become so utterly deranged in thier alternate reality that they are clueless about the reaction of the majority of normal people have to this type of outrageous slander.
Nor do they care.
They will be insulated, protected and quietly encouraged by thier fellow travellers for 'speaking truth to power'. But hey, let's have that NewTone, let's compomise....

Brainwashed by the media? Heh. You're referring to one of Mr. Clean's evil minions.

...I can think of several things I'd like to see done to Pete Stark.

However, I'll leave the vile, wide-eyed hate-spewing to the professionals on the Left.

--
"We want great men who, when fortune frowns, will not be discouraged." - Colonel Henry Knox

I live a few miles up the SF Bay coast from this idiot, but not in his district. Never mind. I just sent his office an email calling him a disgrace to the country and telling him to resign. He won't care, but at least they'll know someone is paying attention.

The people in his district are not idiots. I honestly don't know how they can elect this fool. Half of them work in Silicon Valley.

Stark implies "that kids that grow old enough for you to send to Iraq" (AKA U.S. Troops)will be blowing up innocent people in Iraq. Those Dems really support the troops don't they? Accusing our troops of blowing up innocent people is disgusting. It makes me think of how ridiculous it was when the Senate Dems tried to convince people that conservatives such as Rush are really against the troops and that they support them.

Have you no shame Congressman, have you no shame?

-----------
We are all heroes, you and Boo and I. Hamsters and rangers everywhere, rejoice!

Your right, he should not have said "for the President's amusement." Clearly it is about his ego, not his entertainment.

The House and Senate approved the war. The UN approved action in Iraq.

Shut up and go away-no ONE man in any elected office can initiate and sustain a war without Congress...they continue to fund "Bush's ego" so be gone with you.

haystack's 12th:
Conservatives (and Presidential Candidates especially) shall offer no aid and comfort to the opposition in times of legislative conflict (and ensuing political campaigns).

When it comes to astronomy, he disagrees vehemently with Coppernicus. His model is the egocentric theory of the solar system.

“The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men."

One can only hope there is a special place waiting in hell for Pete Stark - and you.

-------------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.

“pas besoin de gril: l'enfer, c'est les autres – You don't need red-hot pokers: Hell is—other people!”

Putting him and FOrtney in the same log cabin for a month and not allowing them to leave would prove ineffible damnation for them both.

“The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men."

Doo-dah, doo-dah.

Criminy, is it a virus or something that's transmitted over the internet? It appears to leave you capable of typing, while paradoxically incapable of thinking.

Oh, well. Seek treatment elsewhere.

-----------
We are all heroes, you and Boo and I. Hamsters and rangers everywhere, rejoice!

“The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men."

[Retread. Disregard. - Moe Lane]

A good Republican must blindly support Bush. One comment and I get banned?

People here can indulge in personal attacks against one candidate (stark) against the rules, yet I can't state one realistic comment about Bush.

I hate to say it people, but Congress did vote to pull out the troops. They reached a vote that overrode any chance of filibustser and put it on the Presidents desk. He vetoed it.

If you look at Bush's latest numbers only 24% support him. Not a majority, hardly even a relevancy at this point. 24%! Is RedState so blindly eager to cast out the 26% of those people who are Republicans simply because they don't agree with you?

No wonder the GOP is falling apart at the seems. Instead of trying to find a consensus within the party, they simply throw out any opinion that isn't in lockstep and say "Hey, look at us, we all agree". 24%. Looks like that line is going to get really lonely really quickly.

Thank you for placing another straw on the camel's back that's leading me quickly to claim Independence rather than this party bull.

*expecting an even quicker ban on this post from the people afraid of the discussion of opinions and ideas*

-------------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.

I haven't summoned up good trolls in a long time-lemme enjoy a "little" foolish bds drooling...

heh

haystack's 12th:
Conservatives (and Presidential Candidates especially) shall offer no aid and comfort to the opposition in times of legislative conflict (and ensuing political campaigns).

Got one right here for 'ya.

Oops, Thomas was too fast for me. Better luck next time...

-------------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.

At Cnn.com
"The CNN-ORC poll finds Mr. Bush's approval rating remains steady at 36 percent"
This from a story about a poll that found nearly half the respondents think the U.S. economy is in a recession.

Must be us. We are, after all, falling apart at the seems.

That was some quality trolling there, eh?

absentee

conservatives who disagree with the President on Iraq. Some believe we should have never gone in, while others just disagree how the whole thing was handled. That is fine and debatable.

But to say he is sending our troops to get their heads blown off just to feed his own ego goes way beyond disagreement over policy.

... by Gonzo

it's alright fella just go get laid or something.

For what? A frontal lobotomy? The man is to intellectual thought what a migraine headache is to a night of good sex. Pete Stark is an embarassment. His own party was telling him to dial it down and zip the soup-cooler.

“The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men."

If they were returned home they wouldn't be forced to commit murder and mayhem on Bush's behalf.

is not over there commiting murder.

My son will probably be over there early next year after he finishes AIT, so I'm on your side, not that idiot Stark's.

____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

to designate one of those silly symbols to represent our tag. And tell us how to implement it.

Oh, MacIntosh-cult Moonies, anybody out there?

It's war -- so when can we start shooting back at the enemy Democrats?

For what it's worth to the non-bandwidth enabled:

"First of all, I'm just amazed they can't figure out, the Republicans are worried we can't pay for insuring an additional 10 million children. They sure don't care about finding $200 billion to fight the illegal war in Iraq. Where ya gonna get that money? You going to tell us lies like you're telling us today? Is that how you're going to fund the war? You don't have money to fund the war or children. But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President's amusement. This bill would provide healthcare for 10 million children and unlike the President's own kids, these children can't see a doctor or receive necessary care. [...]

But President Bush's statements about children's health shouldn't be taken any more seriously than his lies about the war in Iraq. The truth is that Bush just likes to blow things up. In Iraq, in the United States and in Congress."

--Pete Stark

If nothing else, the man knows how to write his point in pure hellfire. Anyone know of any Republican pols firing back? (In kind, not procedurally.)

This is incoherant... Is this guy on drugs?

Sadly he represents another district in my state...I would so enjoy voting against him after this incredibly idiotic statement on his part.

Stark has always been a scumbag with a tendency toward "Diarrhea of the mouth." I remember during consideration of healthcare legislation that he told former Congresswoman Nancy Johnston that the only thing she knew about healthcare came from pillowtalk as her husband is an MD. Any Republican who said that would have been savaged in the media. HOWEVER THIS STATEMENT GOES BEYOND THE PALE!!!!!

Stark has been added to the list of those who place self above country at http://www.countryaboveself.com .. vote to comdemn him for it.

Referred to Nancy Johnson, formerly (R-CT) as a "whore".

Referred to Scott McInnis, (R-CO) as a "fruitcake".

Referred to JC Watt's children as "born out of wedlock". (Must have been because former Cong. Watts is black).

Referred to former HHS Director Lewis Sullivan (also black) as a "disgrace to his race."

Even the normally unreadable San Francisco Chronicle tired of his "buffoonery" and suggested a primary challenger.

Says as much about the constituency who returns him to office every election cycle as it does about the man himself.

--furious

"I find your lack of faith disturbing." -- Darth Vader

That sure is a lot of wasted extra words!

=========
About the Author

Vegas picture

Lord Vegas is a true American. some would call him a Mutt, but he prefers the taste of Democrats over cats.

Contact Pete Stark and tell him how wonderful a job he's doing. As Beck once sung...

The insects are huge and the poison's all been used
And the drugs won't kill your day job

Somehow that describes Congressman Stark's world more accurately than he would like to admit.

“The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men."

Wow!! What a pathetic display. The reason I love free speech is because it allows idiots like Stark to open their mouths and prove to the rest of the world how pathetic they really are. The fact is what he said is very important because it outlines the absolute ridiculous stance the liberals have taken against America. Your hatred for the president has clouded everything you do and has led a once great party to the bottom of the barrel; history will be embarrassed by you and your actions.

As is well established, the only way liberals can make any political gains from the war on terror is if America loses, because that is the side of the fight you are on. How many times do liberals have to attempt to discredit the military for the American people to realize where they actually stand? If the Democrats of today existed back during World War II, the entire world would be speaking German. What is wrong with your thinking? How has your hatred for the president caused your views of the world become so distorted? Is it really that hard to realize what is at stake and who we are fighting? With all of the sources of information available at your fingertips, how can you still be so tragically wrong? For people who are actually defending what this coward has said, not his right to say it but what he actually said, it makes me wonder how you can look at yourselves in the mirror and still sleep at night.

Congratulations to those Dems who enable the patriot-based community to make lemonades from their lemons!

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service