In which I endorse punitive, confiscatory taxation against Oil Companies
By Erick Posted in Congress — Comments (11) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
I believe we should punitively tax oil companies and take from them as much as their profit as we possibly can, diverting that profit into the general fund of the United States Treasury.
There, I said it.
I want the oil companies to have no profits -- none. Nothing for their shareholders and nothing to reinvest in their companies. Not one penny.
This is a relatively simple thing for the feds to do and I'm sure you'll agree with me once you understand why.
First of all, 27% of oil stocks are held by union pension funds. If we punitively tax big oil, we will be screwing the unions. And heck, they want to be screwed in that way. Likewise, given unionization in the oil industry and the need for layoffs if we start taxing their profits, they'll be laying off union members, likewise hurting unions through a decline in dues.
Second, I believe there are few greater dangers in this country than the movement toward an Earth First mentality where oil is bad, keeping your lights on is bad, and people are bad. Few industries devote more of their profits to green technology and alternative fuel sources than, ironically, the oil companies -- all of whom recognize the need to adapt and become more earth friendly.
As we advance down this road to earth friendliness, we will see our taxes go up, our costs go up, and our standard of living go down -- all for the sake of putting the earth first. By and large, we will have the oil companies to blame. Due to their research on how to ween themselves from Saudi Arabia's teat, we will actually be advancing the radical environmentalists' agenda.
The only way to stop this is to tax the profits of oil companies in a punitive way, thereby providing them less money to invest in earth friendly technology. The sooner we start, the better off we'll be in the long run.
Taking money away from the oil companies sticks it to both unions and environmentalists. I have no problem with that. Let's do it.
UPDATE (Dan McLaughlin): I would add one further point to Erick's analysis. If you take all oil profits out of private hands and reallocate them to the federal government, Congress will become literally addicted to selling oil, thus eliminating the possibility of any future movement to restrict oil consumption in this country. Once Congress - especially big-spending Congressional liberals - has a vested interest in the oil business, it won't want that business to dry up, any more than the states want the tobacco business to go away. Congress surrenders existing revenue streams about as easily as a barnacle abandons a boat (remember the telephone tax instituted to pay for the Spanish-American War?). Someday down the road, a future Congress will need to decide whether it can pay for some big new spending program by drilling in ANWR, or whether it is willing to lose all those tasty extra tax dollars by imposing stricter CAFE standards on SUVs. Guess what it will do?
« Rep. Capuano's Newspeak for Censorship — Comments (5) | Steny Hoyer: Blackmail Still In Play For The Supplemental — Comments (0) »
In which I endorse punitive, confiscatory taxation against Oil Companies 11 Comments (0 topical, 11 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
we should intervene in Darfur, make aboritons mandatory (and state funded) because the world is over-populated, and make everyone adopt foreign babies (and encourage same-sex marriage so they can adopt too). I'm on board!
Courage becomes a living and an attractive virtue when it is regarded not only as a willingness to die manfully, but also as a determination to live decently.
Many years ago, a friend of mine had some trouble with his pre-school daughter. Whenever they would go grocery shopping together, she would run away from him into the next aisle, and he would have to chase her.
One day, when she ran from him, rather than chase her, he hid. After a few moments of not seeing her father chasing as he always did, she returned to see what was wrong. After a few moments of not finding her father where she left him, she panicked.
This was the end of my friend's (and his daughter's) grocery store chase adventures.
when liberals reads this, they feel that the store was too large in the first place. This must be a Walmart we're talking about, right? ;)
"...tax the profits of oil companies in a punitive way, thereby providing them less money to invest in earth friendly technology."
Pssst.... "investment in new technology" is deducted from profits.
----
I can unequivocally say I will not be running for national office in four years.
- Barack Obama, 11/04/04
You can apply arbitrary price controls to their end products - this will eliminate those nasty profits and wasted investment funds. That is the correct marxian approach. Unfortunately it eliminates the tax hook, but still works for the rest of the plan.
---
Finrod's First Law of Bandwidth:
A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it takes the bandwidth of ten thousand.
The literary reference that came to me was "Atlas Shrugged". Of course, that's probably because I've been reading it lately.
Just look no further than our neighbors to the south, Mexico. PEMEX is broke, their infrastructure is crumbling, and for years, petroleum revenue has made up almost 40 percent of Mexico's federal budget. PEMEX is raft with corruption, with some estimates putting the loss at 1.7 billion pesos.
Why not confiscate the assets of ALL American Big Business? For that matter we could confiscate the wealth of ALL successful businesses big and small, and from successful individuals as well. Let's confiscate their propery too!
______________________________
"The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it."
-Ayn Rand

board....enough of the bs from Democrats.....get a bill out there and just do it.
Freedom of Religion not Freedom from Religion