New SCHIP Attack Ads Target 4 Republicans
Will conservatives come to their defense?
By Bluey Posted in Congress — Comments (10) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
When Democrats decided to pick a fight over SCHIP, their liberal allies clearly got the message. According to a report in National Journal's CongressDaily ($), the liberal Americans United for Change has launched attack ads against four Republicans in hopes of swaying them to vote to override President Bush's veto of the $35-billion SCHIP expansion.
A coalition of groups urging Republicans to reverse their positions on State Children's Health Insurance Program legislation estimate they will spend $1.25 million to $1.5 million on television ads in the two weeks leading up to the House's attempt to override President Bush's veto, Americans United for Change President Brad Woodhouse said this afternoon. Americans United unveiled a series of television ads that urged Reps. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., Dean Heller, R-Nev., and Ginny Brown-Waite and Ric Keller, both R-Fla., to "think again" about their opposition to SCHIP legislation and to encourage them to vote to override the president's veto next week.
"Bush vetoed health insurance for millions of America's children. And Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann voted with him," the ad states. "Bush and Bachmann would rather send half a trillion [dollars] to Iraq than spend a fraction of that here at home to keep our kids healthy." The ads, which are set to run today and Thursday, are part of a larger campaign that includes national television spots and ads targeting at least 21 GOP members. Other groups running ads include the Service Employees International Union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and U.S. Action.
Americans United for Change is spinning the ads in a way that makes the four congressmen look callous and cruel. But what the liberal group fails to mention is that Republicans want to continue funding SCHIP, only they insist that it help poor children, not adults, illegal aliens or families earning up to $83,000.
« Rep. Capuano's Newspeak for Censorship — Comments (5) | The 'C' in SCHIP Is for Children — Comments (14) »
New SCHIP Attack Ads Target 4 Republicans 10 Comments (0 topical, 10 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
I would donate money to such a cause.
Where is the defense? We can complain about attack ads being untrue, and we can call the targets to express our support for their original position. But it would be so much better to have someone on the air with ads that tell our side of things.
The Dems have PACs that are ALWAYS running TV ads. Where is our team?!
I'd buy some ads myself but I'm just a working stiff of modest means.
www.scottbomb.com
Click here to donate to the Fred Thompson campaign.
Buying airtime is apparently rather affordable.
http://www.redstate.com/blogs/eabo_clipper/2007/sep/27/ma_05_14_824_rais...
...a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right...
---Thomas Paine---
I to am tired of liberals having free reign to distort issues without any public, effective refutation. I would donate money. Perhaps we at Redstate should start our own PAC.
The naive forgive and forget.
The foolish forget but do not forgive.
The wise forgive but do not forget.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I speak to you tonight from the Oval Office on something of interest to most American families. This week, because it was the right thing to do, because my job as President is to make sure the nation does not over-extend itself or its commitments, I vetoed the State Childrens' Health Insurance Program.
Let's be serious for a minute. Why would a President veto something meant to benefit children and their healthcare?
The answer is that the expansion of the program wasnt about children. And it would have changed the way healthcare is delivered in America.
...I vetoed this program because it would have expanded coverage to families with up to $80,000 of income, and to "children" up to 25 years of age.
That is not what the Congress had in mind in 1997 when it authorized this program.
I call on the current Congress to stop playing politics with the healthcare of America's less well to do children.
That is apparently not what some of our present Congressmen have in mind for this program. Speaking about this legislation on a radio program this month, one of our Senators said, "Shame on us for not having a single payer healthcare plan."
The SCHIPS program is not meant to radically change how Americans deal with their family doctors, with their local hospitals, with their pharmacies. It is meant to assure children, real children, that no matter what their parents circumstances that this nation will make sure no one misses a doctor's care because of a job loss or a parents' illness.
I call on both houses to pass, so that I may sign, the expansion of the SCHIPS program which I have sent to Congress.
And I call on you, my fellow Americans, to make sure that your legislators hear loud and clear that what you, my beloved citizens, want is a program to protect low income children, not a program which seizes control of health care deliveries for all.
Thank you and good night.
our president is not so articulate as you.
"Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty"
Kyle

Michelle Bachmann won't buckle for sure. Dean Heller probably won't. He's been voting much better than anyone could have predicted. I think that he's afraid of another Club for Growth primary challenge that saw him squeak by with a little more than 100 vote margin of victory I believe, so he might hold too.
As for the Floridians...who knows. Hopefully they'll stay strong.