Another Reason To Be Glad That Robert Reich Is Not In A Position Of Power Anymore . . .
By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in Economy — Comments (3) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Found here. Relatedly, once in a blue moon, I will disagree with Tyler Cowen about something and I disagree with his referenced remark that a flat tax system "would harm the decentralised production of ideas and art." Not so. If you broaden the tax base--via either a flat or a consumption-based tax system--and are thus able to lower taxes while at the same time collecting more revenue from a broadened base, you leave people with plenty of money with which they can endow universities, concert halls, opera companies and museums.
« Rethinking the Goals of a National Mortgage Bailout — Comments (45) | The upside of a down dollar, illustrated — Comments (34) »
Another Reason To Be Glad That Robert Reich Is Not In A Position Of Power Anymore . . . 3 Comments (0 topical, 3 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
I think the point was supposed to be that people would stop patronizing the arts and sciences if there weren't a tax incentive for doing so.
Because the Medicis never funded the arts, you know. :-)
HTML Help Central for Red Staters
Reality: Thompson/Romney Dream: Santorum/Watts.
There is no reasonable equity of distribution under the current INCOME tax system. What's more, the Tax Code has become a "tinkerer's paradise" for 53% of the lobbyists who game it in Washington DC. It's a lucrative business, and the U.S. TAXPAYER pays for ALL of it in higher prices (i.e., a hidden tax which is incomprehensible to the average working person).
Prices after FairTax passage would look similar to prices before FairTax - not "30% higher" as opponents contend - competition would see to it. So, the FairTax rate (figured as an income-tax-rate-non-comparative, sales tax) on new items would be 29.85% (on the new, reduced cost of items because business isn't taxed under FairTax - thus lowering retail prices by 20% to 30%), or 23% of the "tax inclusive" price tag - this is the way INCOME TAX is figured (parts of the total dollar).
The effective tax rate percentages, that different income groups would pay under the FairTax, are calculated by crediting the monthly "prebate" (advance rebate of projected tax on necessities) against total monthly spending of citizen families (1 member and greater, Dept. of HHS poverty-level data). A single person would receive a prebate of ~$200/mo. A family of four, ~$500/mo. - in addition to working members no longer having tax withholding confiscated from the fruits of their labor every two weeks.) Prof.'s Kotlikoff and Rapson (10/06) concluded,
"...the FairTax imposes much lower average taxes on working-age households than does the current system. The FairTax broadens the tax base from what is now primarily a system of labor income taxation to a system that taxes, albeit indirectly, both labor income and existing wealth. By including existing wealth in the effective tax base, much of which is owned by rich and middle-class elderly households, the FairTax is able to tax labor income at a lower effective rate and, thereby, lower the average lifetime tax rates facing working-age Americans.
"Consider, as an example, a single household age 30 earning $50,000. The household’s average tax rate under the current system is 21.1 percent. It’s 13.5 percent under the FairTax. Since the FairTax would preserve the purchasing power of Social Security benefits and also provide a tax rebate, older low-income workers who will live primarily or exclusively on Social Security would be better off. As an example, the average remaining lifetime tax rate for an age 60 married couple with $20,000 of earnings falls from its current value of 7.2 percent to -11.0 percent under the FairTax. As another example, compare the current 24.0 percent remaining lifetime average tax rate of a married age 45 couple with $100,000 in earnings to the 14.7 percent rate that arises under the FairTax."
Further, per Jokischa and Kotlikoff (circa 2006?) ...
"...once one moves to generations postdating the baby boomers there are positive welfare gains for all income groups in each cohort. Under a 23 percent FairTax policy, the poorest members of the generation born in 1990 enjoy a 13.5 percent welfare gain. Their middle-class and rich contemporaries experience 5 and 2 percent welfare gains, respectively. The welfare gains are largest for future generations. Take the cohort born in 2030. The poorest members of this cohort enjoy a huge 26 percent improvement in their well-being. For middle class members of this birth group, there's a 12 percent welfare gain. And for the richest members of the group, the gain is 5 percent."

how are taxes in any way tied to either Ideas or Art? I sort of thought that those things could be produced by all classes of people at all times and in all systems of government.
Now if there is a link between government and art it would be the production of pretend, or crap art through government subsidies.
"Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty"
Kyle