"Obamanomics"

By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in | | | | Comments (9) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Guest-blogging over at Andrew Sullivan's place, Peter Suderman uncritically quotes a comment stating that Barack Obama is "Robert Rubin on trade (pretty much keep it open but help workers)." Interesting. Of course, Robert Rubin didn't bash NAFTA and blame it for everything bad that has ever happened since human beings learned to walk upright. No, that is Barack Obama's province, and while I suspect that the good Senator doesn't know or doesn't care about the facts, Robert Rubin (credit where it is due) always did show that he possessed a strong and comprehensive understanding of the ways in which we are enriched by participating in a free trade system.

Look, I know that Austan Goolsbee is advising Barack Obama. And I know that Austan Goolsbee is a good guy. But when it comes to trade, Chicago Boys like Austan Goolsbee are not being listened to by Barack Obama.

Someone needs to point that out. The health of our trade policies--and our economy as a whole--may depend on it.


« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims?Comments (2) | The Obama BubbleComments (15) »
"Obamanomics" 9 Comments (0 topical, 9 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

Obama is no free trader by any means:

http://www.freetrade.org/congress?senator=84

So his record indicates his anti-free trade tendencies, which is the best way to analyze his positions. This idea that he is somehow more moderate on trade is a bogus argument. Clinton was a moderate on free trade i.e. NAFTA. Obama is not.

... Obama backtracks on story of soldiers scavenging weapons and ammunition:

US Troops Scavenging Weapons?

During tonight's debate, Barack Obama related this stunning anecdote:

You know, I've heard from an Army captain who was the head of a rifle platoon--supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up being sent to Afghanistan with 24 because 15 of those soldiers had been sent to Iraq.

And as a consequence, they didn't have enough ammunition, they didn't have enough Humvees. They were actually capturing Taliban weapons, because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief.

As soon as the Senator made the claim he looked as though he knew he'd gone too far. The Corner reports the campaign is already backtracking. After the debate Obama advisor David Axlerod told Stephen Spruiell,

That was a discussion that a captain in the military had with our staff, and he asked that that be passed along to Senator Obama.

So Obama never actually spoke with the captain, which means he can reasonably claim the tale was garbled in transmission. It is possible that an American unit was ill-equipped for combat, these things happen in the fog of war (as do bullshit stories), and they have happened with troubling frequency in this war as in every other. Which is not to diminish any failure on the part of the administration or the military leadership in providing U.S. forces with the equipment they need. But is this particular story true?

Our troops never rotate into theater before running through a series of inspections which ensure that they're properly equipped, and we've never heard a report of soldiers having to scrounge for ammo. If we did, we'd join the Senator in raising hell. In Obama's telling the blame lies with President Bush, but the story is perfectly vague and based on nothing but hearsay. We expect there will be a lot of folks that want to get to the bottom of this, whether the facts supports Obama's version or not.

More from Hot Air and Ace.
Posted by Michael Goldfarb at 01:39 AM

(see link to post here: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Weblogs/TWSFP/TWSFPView.asp#4676 )

I didnt watch the debate and dont know anything about the specific comment but weren't US troops 'up armoring' their humvees with all sorts of found scrap metal and things?

However, there is a big difference between forces enhancing vehicles, and the assertion that forces are not issued firearms and ammunition, and must rely on AK ammo (which is of a different caliber than ours).

Also, while brigades may be broken at the battalion level, has anyone heard of a platoon having been broken up, with the parts distributed to different theaters?

And since when do Captains command platoons? Isn't this the sort of thing a "butter bar" (2nd Lt) does? Or a Sergeant in a pinch/ Aren't Captains supposed to command companies, or serve staff positions?

if a few American soldiers are using AK47s because they prefer them as weapons? If that is the case, they most likely would have to scrounge ammunition either from captured Taliban stockpiles or possibly from any NATO forces that still issue 7.62 rounds.

I don't recall any soldiers I served with in Vietnam using captured AKs or the SKS as primary weapons, but our mortar platoon did use a captured NVA 60mm mortar in the field along with a standard issue 81mm. As the 60mm was not SOP for Army units, we had to scrounge 60mm rounds from a Marine CAP unit that was stationed in our AO. This was contrary to Army regulations so we kept the weapon hidden when necessary.

I have no idea as to what comprises the standard infantry platoon in the Iraq or Afghanistan theatres, but can say that our COMPANY in Vietnam often had a field strength of between 50 and 60 men, including an Artillery FO and his radioman.

We may have had shortages of some things, during my day, but ammunition was never one of them. I suspect the same is true today.

that there was not a shortage of weaponry either, except spare M60 barrels were precious.

Also was the firing-sound factor; when firing against v.c. or n.v.a. using ak's there was the uncertainty by the enemy of who they were firing at. Even then the ak-47 was the more reliable select fire automatic weapon especially as compared with the m-16. extensive under-fire anecdotes attest to the ak-47 firing under conditions where few other weapons will continue to function. it is also easy to maintain and now ammo is universally available and cheap (that's some of the reasons why it's so popular with 3rd world countries and rebels/outlaws).


__________________________________________________________
"The Constitution is not a suicide pact". Justice Robert H. Jackson

I urge all republicans on coming primaries/caucuses whenever you can (if allowed to vote in democratic side) to vote for Clinton. Let them have a long war within themselves.

Here in Virginia where we simply declare at the election judges' desk in which party's primary we want to vote, I considered crossing to inject my tiny piece of havoc into the Democrat process, but I got a Republican ballot, instead. What stopped me was the thought that, should the candidate (Senator Obama was "behind" at the time but expected to win all three Potomac primaries that day) for whom I voted go on to win the presidency, some part of the consequences would be on my head.

I am convinced that Senator Clinton will battle to the bitter end even if Obama takes all of the primary votes left to be had. She, her husband, and the DLC are fighting for their very livelihoods since an Obama win in November would be the last nail in the New Democrat coffin, and they cannot continue to profit from graft without any influence to peddle.

I go so far as to say that, should Obama win the nomination, Clinton, Inc., will act in their selfish interests by torpedoing Obama in the general election to keep 2012 open and the Dean/Kennedy/Obama "democrat wing of the Democratic Party" in abeyance--especially if they think they can false-flag it as an attack from the VRWC.

All this said, I still cannot root for Senator Obama for any reason. His exploitation of demagoguery appears masterful at this point, and there is danger that he, the Democrats, the MSM, and the rest of the collectivist machine can perpetuate the enchantment. The course people like Obama want to chart for this country ends with guys like me in WPA-like labor camps, doing busy-work building infrastructure nobody needs so that the intelligentsia will not have my neanderthal, thought-criminal mug uglifying the vistas from their dachas.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service