Ohio is still worth fighting for
Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good
By Kevin Holtsberry Posted in 2006 — Comments (17) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
The mood is dark for Ohio Republicans these days. On the eve of the election it appears that the party is going down to ignominious defeat on a practically every level. Many on the right are content to blame this on a overly liberal slate of candidates and the whiff of corruption. Conservatives seem intent on viewing Ohio as a solid Red State that liberal squishes are throwing away.
This overly simplistic view helps no one. In reality, Ohio is a diverse and complex state that is more purple than red. It took a GOP GOTV effort of historic proportions for President Bush to win Ohio against a very mediocre opponent. The Ohio Republican Party has always been led by a risk averse and moderate group of politicians and the Culture of Corruption charge is an exaggeration that only seems to apply to Republicans.
We can argue about all of this later. The bottom line is that if you are a conservative, or center-right, Republican living in Ohio you need to get out and vote for the Republican ticket. In my mind there is simply no reason not to vote Republican. There are no moral victories to be had tomorrow. We need to fight to win and settle policy disputes later.
If you want more details read on.
Why should you vote for Republicans? Here are some reasons:
- Politicians and parties don't get sophisticated messages. The only message the media will report and people will hear if the GOP loses is voters chose Democrats. That is not a good message.
- The lesser of two evils may get old and it may be uninspiring but it is nevertheless true. Another cliche is also true: Democrats are for higher taxes, more regulation, and a retreat in the war on terror. We need a majority to get things done AND to stop the left. GOP moderates are better than Democrat liberals. Incumbent Republicans may be squishy and maddeningly spineless at times, but they are better than their opponents without question.
Would you really rather have Sherrod Brown than Mike DeWine? Put aside DeWine's actions on the Gang of Four, etc. The simple choice is DeWine or Brown. For any conservative the choice is easy. The fact of the matter is that elections are choices pure and simple. You get A or you get B. You don't get ideal candidates or perfect scenarios. In many districts you will have to choose between an uninspiring moderate and a typical liberal clothed as a sensible centrist. Don't buy it. The GOP moderate is still better. Do you really want the likes Ted Strickland, Sherrod Brown, and Mary Jo Kilroy to be the face of Ohio politics?
Has the Ohio GOP had its problems? Sure. Taft has bumbled his way into historic unpopularity. But his public humiliation has been a little over the top. The Tom Noe fiasco has allowed the media to portray the entire party as corrupt and many on the right seem happy to play along. Bob Ney should have resigned ages ago. But in reality Taft failed to report some golf outings and Noe deceived a great many people including some of his closest friends. Was there some lax over-sight? Yes, but corruption no. Do you really think Taft knowingly winked so Noe could steal millions for a few thousand dollars a cycle in donations? Meanwhile, investment losses on a larger scale go unreported when they connect to big city Democrats.
Yes, Taft and the General Assembly raised taxes to solve the budget crises; most states take this path. But lost in all the noise about corruption and scandal is the fact that the GOP led GA passed a historic tax overhaul which included a large income tax cut. These cuts have since been accelerated thanks to growing tax receipts. Your paycheck is bigger thanks to the the Ohio Republican Party. When was the last time you read that in the paper?
If you want a clear picture of the future under the Democrats look no further than Ohio's large urban centers. High taxes, bloated budgets, bad neighborhoods, rising crime, this is what you get when you vote for Democrats. They are beholden to the unions and to those that live at the public trough (social welfare agencies, non-profits, etc.). Do you really think the Ds would have over-hauled the tax code and cut income taxes after the budget stabilized? Think about this when you are deciding to vote or stay home.
Conservatives and libertarians love to blast Ohio as a high tax state but ignore the fact that state wide taxes are not that high. It is the ability of local and municipal governments to add on taxes at the local level that makes Ohio's overall tax rate so high. And as I mentioned above, the GA recently reformed the tax code and cut income taxes. The libertarian dream of slashed budgets and minimalist government is not realistic.
I will end this rather rambling post and just reiterate the bottom line: at the end of the day Ohio Republicans are the best choice for Ohio and for the nation. Not the perfect choice, just the best choice of the options we have before us.
If you are an Ohio Republican voter considering staying home or not voting for certain candidates please reconsider. The price of losing is just too high.
« When Negative Ads Backfire — Comments (4) | Theocratic Candidates Bent on Destroying the Constitution — Comments (30) »
Ohio is still worth fighting for 17 Comments (0 topical, 17 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
What exactly did Taft do that is/was corrupt?
----------------
Kevin Holtsberry
www.kevinholtsberry.com
The problems with BWC - Bureau of Workers Compensation unraveled under Taft. Noe was involved with investments and GOP fund raising. He was dipping into BWC funds and there is a trial going on right now. The BWC funds were invested into questionable investments.
The real problems go back to Voinovich when he was Govenor. He raised taxes hurting economic growth. DeWine was his Lt Govennor at the time. Voinovich was also involved with BWC but had left to become senator. We have Congressman Ney's scandal. We had a Republican House Speaker involved in some questionable fund raising using his office. Republicans taxed and spent like democrats.
The democrats are running as "we are not republicans" instead of any issues. Strickland is running a stealth campaign without talking specifics. His campaign is "Turn Ohio Around", no details outside of education. This means we create more jobs in education but no real plans for real jobs.
What Republicans should do (most likely will control House & Senate) is control spending and try to pass tax cuts. Hang that around Strickland's neck each and allow him to veto it. Bring it back every year and let him veto it. In four years you can say we passed tax cuts but the govenor vetoed them.
Ohio really is a purple state. More Republican than Democrat but piss poor management by the Republicans have hurt our chances. Fortunately all the crap about Taft, Noe and BWC hit right after the 2004 election or Kerry would have been President.
I am not very optimistic about a GOP victory tomorrow, but I hope that the backlash does not extend to the Ohio House and Senate. A Governor Strickland with GOP Ohio House/Senate may actually not be a bad thing. As for Dewine, I never liked him, but cannot bring myself to vote for Brown, but I still think Dewine is going to lose by at least 5 points and Blackwell by at least 10. Taft/Noe really killed R's in Ohio this election.
Isn't there a third party candidate in the Ohio senate race you can vote for? You shouldn't vote for DeWine just because he is a Republican - especially if he is going to get crushed. Instead of voting for Brown or abstaining altogether, why not vote for the Libertarian if one is slated?
Was my sin saying that DeWine is going to get crushed? I think we all know that's going to happen. However, if you want DeWine re-elected, by all means work for him and vote for him. However, if, like DoD, you don't like DeWine, isn't it better to vote for a Libertarian than for Brown?
And what does voting for a Libertarian accomplish exactly? Did you read the post?
Ohio will never elect a libertarian and a vote for them is a waste. Any way you cut it a vote for anyone but DeWine is a vote for Brown.
----------------
Kevin Holtsberry
www.kevinholtsberry.com
especially when the elections results are not likely to be close. I understand your concern and I don't think I would advocate a vote for the Libertarian in Montana, for instance, though Burns is kind of a boob. In that election, a vote for the Libertarian could be seen as effectively a vote for Tester. Though, as I said, I don't really subscribe to the wasted vote theory. People should vote their conscience. On this board, 99.9% of the time, the vote will be for the R.
I think most of us expect DeWine to lose, but stranger things have happened.
"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill
because a vote for a Libertarian is 1/2 a vote for brown.
shoofly .. if you're not a troll (and yeah I've read all your postings) ... you might want to consider waiting till after the election before piping in again.
From the sounds of your posting, your goal in coming here is to be a very subtle troll and post doubts in the minds of Red Staters. Trust us, we all have doubts, not the least of which are about Mike DeWine, but I'd tell you that probably 95% or better of us would vote for DeWine 100 times out of 100 against Brown.
It's called control of the Senate.
I don't think so. I am new to this forum so I don't know what kind of vandalism or mischief Liberals have made here. (I just learned what a Moby was yesterday) However, I have noticed that any kind of disagreement is viewed very negatively by the regulars here. I don't think that is necessary. If you disagree with my post, as you have done above, it's easy enough to just counter with some logic of your own.
On the topic, I don't subscribe to the wasted vote theory though I would definitely respect a Libertarian voting for Talent in MO or Allen in PA or Burns (yuck) in Montana if they thought a vote for the 3rd party would turn over control of the Senate to the opposing party.
All I heard was that he failed to disclose some golf outings. I'm not in Ohio but this seems rather petty.
That'll keep the donks home. Don't let it keep you away from the polls. Vote early. Vote often.
I don't want NONE of them Democrat tactics here! I want a good clean vote, with no peaters or zombies. Phone calls, go ahead and make plenty, but NO double, triple, or more voting?!
Okay?
Go to the polls. Vote for her for Attorney General. She has a good chance of winning and of being Ohio's governor in 2010 after Strickland runs the State into the ground.
And if you talk to a Democrat, most of them will be voting for Strickland because they can't stomach voting for Blackwell. You probably can't turn the top of the ticket vote. But remind them that Marc Dann, the Democrat Attorney General candidate, was reprimanded by a UNANIMOUS vote of the Ohio Supreme Court for ethical violations. . . no voter, Republican or Democrat, should vote for a dishonest lawyer for Attorney General.
All is not lost - - keep working until the last vote is cast!

but "whiff of corruption" is putting it a bit mildly.
Now, whether it is right to hold all Republicans guilty for what Taft did or not is very arguable (I would say No).
Here's hoping that DeWine can close it out.