Why Don't Their Heads Explode?

My cognitive is still dissonating.

By Robert A. Hahn Posted in Comments (21) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

It was my displeasure last evening to watch a delayed telecast of the final debate among the candidates for Governor of Florida. If you're like me you're not from Florida, so there's no reason to care who these gentlemen are. Suffice to say there was a Republican, a Democrat, and a guy from the Reform Party who was running as a Disgruntled Republican. The moderator was the hardballing Chris Matthews, who has apparently discovered a loophole through which he can now appear on C-SPAN so as to get some actual ratings for a change.

More below...

Have you ever watched adult humans talk, while getting the sense that their heads should be exploding? But they aren't? That's what watching this debate was like. There were three separate issues on which Florida voters were asked to accept a Verbal Nostrum™ from one or more of these televised politicians, which nostrum could not possibly exist in this Universe. These were:

  • Improving Education
    Here we were told that to improve education, we must stop all this testing that the teachers hate, while simultaneously holding teachers accountable for their results.

  • Election Integrity
    Here the solution is to have a paper trail which leaves no record of how anyone voted. In fairness, the Republican candidate did not try to sell this crock. But the other two candidates did. Pressed repeatedly by Matthews to explain how one could simultaneously give each voter a Paper Trail™ recording their vote, without leaving little receipts everywhere telling how people voted, both of these allegedly sane candidates invoked the magic word Paper Trail over and over again, while insisting that no record should ever be produced indicating how anyone voted.

  • Fiscal Legerdemain
    Nothing really new here, just the usual promises to cut taxes while leaving no child behind and not raising taxes anywhere else and not cutting any benefits you are getting sleepy.

Seriously: here were the actual candidates for a serious office with substantial responsibility and billions of dollars in budgetary authority, and all of them were promising voters existential paradoxes from an alternate Universe instead of even a partial solution to real-world problems. Yikes.

Great Nixon's Ghost

I'd forgotten about this when Kerry did it, but the Democratic candidate did this so many times last night that Richard Nixon himself appeared in my room to rattle his chains and say, "I am the Ghost of the Secret Plan." Those old enough to remember this know that in 1968, Richard Nixon ran on the platform of having "a plan" to end the war in Vietnam. If pressed to say what the plan was, he'd claim that to reveal it would be to wreck it. Believe it or not, this worked. Nixon won the election.

Last night, no matter what the issue was, the Democratic candidate in this race began his response with, "I have a plan." To his credit, Chris Matthews was having none of this. He tried numerous times to pin this guy down on even one item of specificity concerning any of these plans. But it was not to be. This candidate was a slogan machine, and slogans were all anyone was going to get out of him.

This is not to say that the Republican, or even the Reform Party candidate, was any better. The whole debate was a depressing exercise in watching supposedly intelligent human beings trying to bamboozle what they all assumed to be an ignorant electorate into buying Stuff And Nonsense from one or another blow-dried empty suit. Yes, it has come to this: an entire hour devoted to impossible-to-execute Secret Plans that contradict themselves. When it was over, everyone acted as though this were perfectly normal.

« When Negative Ads BackfireComments (4) | BREAKING: GOP Moves GA-12 Into "Pickup" CategoryComments (11) »
Why Don't Their Heads Explode? 21 Comments (0 topical, 21 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

Listening to nothing repeated over and over is bad for your mental health (and that is not party limited)!

Just as every cop is a criminal, and all the sinners saints - Sympathy for the Democrats

Just as every cop is a criminal, and all the sinners saints - Sympathy for the Democrats

Actually, this one is possible. You go to the voting booth and use the electronic machine to record your votes. Before you press the submit button, press the print button and get a neatly printed list of how you voted. Then you hit the submit button. You get another neatly printed receipt for voting. If you like, both pieces of paper can have barcodes printed on them that aren't connected to your identity. You deposit the actual ballot in the paper ballot collection box, and take your receipt home with you. No link that the election officials can trace to you exists. The paper ballot can serve as a check against a "rigged" electronic voting machine, which is the complaint being registered against the systems.

Q.E.D.

Personally, I prefer the SAT style voting ballots that run through a scanner, but that wouldn't have cost as much to implement. Go figure.

The machine prints the paper, and you either drop the paper in the box or hit 'not what I wanted' and try again. The paper is the official ballot, but both it and the electronic version get sent in.

--
Evil men hide from the truth, but good men stand upon it.

And hand out the "receipts" to the people as they come to the polls to vote, then have them fill in the dots on these "receipts" for the candidates they want to vote for. Think of all the electricity we would save!
---
"I am a great believer in luck. The harder I work, the more I have of it." -- Thomas Jefferson

    The paper ballot can serve as a check against a "rigged" electronic voting machine, which is the complaint being registered against the systems.

That's the complaint now. But just wait until voters can return from the polls with proof of how they voted. Then the complaint will be that various and sundry Evil Influences are paying people to vote in certain ways. You get a buck from the AFL-CIO for voting Democrat, two bucks from the Friends of Big Insurance for voting against Proposition Z, five bucks from Judge Hoomelfopper, and so on.

Or maybe the complaint will be that employers are insisting on seeing these receipts, and that certain things involving pay and advancement happen, or don't happen, depending on what the receipt says.

We could easily trade one evil for something far worse.

Drink Good Coffee. You can sleep when you're dead.

The AFL-CIO gives you at least a pack of ciggies for voting for the Democrat today. If you had a receipt that proved how you voted, they could probably up that to a whole carton of smokes.
---
"I am a great believer in luck. The harder I work, the more I have of it." -- Thomas Jefferson

Welcome back, Bob. All is now right with the Universe again. Hope you're doing well and feeling better. I missed you, man.

showing you what the machine recorded and keep it on a cartridge. When the tally is done use the digital memory for election night, if a recount is ordered load the cartridges to reader that scan them and makes a new fresh count. If barcodes are a no go because of cost (someone does own that copyright) i'm sure another method could be found. When you look at it if you agree cool, if you disagree you blow the whistle and the world rushes in to see what happened. It's not perfect but it means secret ballots still exist and problems are discovered quickly.

Nobody owns "the copyright" to barcoding. At some point I'm sure someone had patents on it but any relevant patents (at least on traditional 1 dimensional barcodes) would be long expired. Feel free to put barcodes on whatever you want without fear of litigation.
---
"I am a great believer in luck. The harder I work, the more I have of it." -- Thomas Jefferson

or you lose privacy. If a voter can prove he voted a certain way, then he can be forced (by a boss or a thug) to prove it.

--
Evil men hide from the truth, but good men stand upon it.

The machine fills in an optical scan card for the voter. The voter can read it and see that it is correct. Its anonymous , untraceable and provides a check against faulty machines.

---
"I am a great believer in luck. The harder I work, the more I have of it." -- Thomas Jefferson

Are meant to aid the handicapped and provide a faster tally. Its part of the Help America Vote Act. I am not certain about the acronym.

More people have problems reading a CRT and using a touch screen than have problems with a pencil and piece of paper. There seems to be far more complaints about touch screen voting than any other kind of voting, due to the screens being miscalibrated. To someone that doesn't understand how these screens work, this looks like some kind of conspiracy to manipulate their votes.

Some of these voting machines apparently do not use touch screens. This one seems to use some ridiculous dial interface.

As far as a faster tally goes, I don't see why we need anything faster than optical scan provides. Tallies aren't going to be all that fast in any case, with how many people are voting absentee now.
---
"I am a great believer in luck. The harder I work, the more I have of it." -- Thomas Jefferson

I just don't like the idea of a purely electronic ballot. Its too easy to rig.

The machine fills in an optical scan card for the voter. The voter can read it and see that it is correct. Its anonymous , untraceable and provides a check against faulty machines.

Uninformed Americans who don't understand the free lunch (or lack thereof) concept being politict to by politicians. (You can read that: Lied to by liars if you like).

Those of us with a brain in our heads can hardly stand to vote.

I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant's faithful 100 percent.

I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant's faithful 100 percent.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service