Barack Obama and the Lost Opportunity.
Not precisely a Harry Potter title, but evocative.
By Moe Lane Posted in 2008 — Comments (8) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Roger Simon says something that resonates with a thought that's been in my head for a while (H/T: Instapundit):
I caught most of the Democratic debate tonight and I was astonished by how unprepared Obama seemed to be on the most obvious question of the evening - how he stood on illegal aliens having driver's licenses. This is the very subject he had used to nail Hillary Clinton at the previous debate, yet his answer to this same question this time was, if anything, more evasive than Hillary's at the other debate. [Video here.]
Surely his handlers must have prepared him for this question. Otherwise they are rank incompetents. So there can only be one conclusion: Barack Obama does not really want to be President.
Watching the video: it's a bad sign when the audience laughs at your answer and you didn't want them to, right?
Read on.
Roger seems to be taking the position that Senator Obama is too inexperienced to be President, that he himself knows it, and is thus not making the effort he'd need to overcome Hillary. It's an interesting idea, although in the end I can't quite agree with it. There is really no way to be experienced enough to be the President, after all. Sure, every candidate in the race will be happy to tell you how their CV proves that they're fully prepared to do the job, but they're all spinning (I say that with no disapproval: these people are trying to win an election, after all). The job entails being the final authority for the welfare of 300,000,000 million people (directly), and the rest of the planet (indirectly) - which also includes the responsibility of making sure that the human race survives to see tomorrow's sunrise. The President of the United States of America can wipe out human civilization above the township level in an afternoon. Reduction of nuclear stocks, or no. There is no adequate preparation for that kind of responsibility. So, whether Senator Obama is experienced enough to be President is in some ways a moot point.
Whether he is experienced enough to campaign for President is not.
I say this with no malice in my heart: he's not. In a lot of ways this is his first real campaign on the Federal level. His Senatorial campaign in 2004 was more of a triumphal progression than anything else; Jack Ryan's utter, unfortunately deserved collapse* made his election inevitable. Now, there's nothing wrong with taking what's offered to you, if doing so won't touch upon your honor: he was lucky enough to be able to take advantage of the situation, and smart enough to do it. He would have been better off if he had had to make a fight of it, though. Because he's not playing in a crowd that will obligingly self-destruct for his benefit, and there's a limit to how far a friendly media will take you**.
Now, what he should have done was sit this one out. Depending on how you look at it, he should have either run in 2006 or 2010 for Illinois' Governorship: Governor Blagojevich was exceptionally vulnerable to a strong primary challenge, and if Obama had lost, so what? He could have tried again in 2010 (Blagojevich has rather bad numbers, to put it mildly). A win either time would have put him in a very, very good position for either '12 or '16, as he'd be: the Governor of a large, important State; right age; possessor of a powerful political machine with which to tap into; and, most importantly, the experience to use all of this effectively. Much better than a one-term Senator.
So why couldn't he do this anyway, after the nomination process is done? Because he's on most people's short list for a VP slot, and if the ticket he's on loses he'll never, ever be considered for a Presidential slot again. I do not say that the Democratic Party eats babies, but it does have a definite taste for consuming the flesh of its failed champions. And if he does refuse the VP slot, it's going to sour a lot of activists on him, particularly if the GOP keeps the White House.
So, all in all, bit of a wrong turn there, what-what?
Moe Lane
*I am a good Party man, but I have to say: taking Jeri Ryan to a sex club when she doesn't want to go is not the sign of a fool. It's the sign of a damfool.
**Oh, he'll last past the first round; he's this year's Fresh-Faced Outsider That Speaks To The Ordinary Man And Woman. Howard Dean can tell you how many delegates that translates to in the real world, although I do believe that you should wait until he's in a good mood before you ask.
« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims? — Comments (2) | Romney and Fred have the same position. Fred's just had it longer. — Comments (70) »
Barack Obama and the Lost Opportunity. 8 Comments (0 topical, 8 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Wonder why he didn't go for it. I vaguely remember last year's conventional wisdom about 2008 being his only chance to run for President, because after 10+ years in the Senate, he'd have an indefensible voting record. But being Governor of Illinois would have been a stellar credential (assuming success, of course).
On the whole, Obama strikes me as having missed his calling. He should have been a tenured university professor isolated from any kind of risk-taking.
I simply can't imagine Hillary will pick him for VP. She will already have to deal with one preening male prima donna emphasizing her lack of charm. Why would she choose to have two?
... is that he is nowhere close to being ready for anything remotely resembling Prime Time.
I mean, think of your average - of even "above average" - State Senator. Now, picture that same solon a mere 4-years removed from the Presidency of the United States of America.
If that isn't enough to tell you all you need to know about why Obama isn't "getting the job done", then I really cannot help you.
-------------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.
"Give us your poor, your tired, your huddled masses..."
and Barack's Supreme Court will make everything all right.
His description of the role of courts was the most infuriating thing I heard all night!
Electing Obama would be like trying to use a screwdriver to comb your hair; a tool totally unsuited for the task at hand.
_________________________________
Standard-bearer for grouchy curmudgeonry since, oh, 1975 or so.
This lets the media narrative return to Clinton is inevitable. She returned to her usual vague self in the debate, and that is all it takes for the media to say she won.
If we get the MSM to push the Clinton is inevitable theme hard until February, then we're good to go, and she'll get destroyed in the general. It's time to start gearing up to take her down, not that it will be that hard.
Amazing how by Mike Ditka passing up the chance to run for Senator instead gave us this idiot. When Ditka was before a Senate panel he sound intelligent, dignified and passionate. Meanwhile Obama sounds like a Columbia trust fund baby reading off this weeks headlines from Kos.
I don't know which will be more entertaining, someone Vs. Hillary and her 10,000 scandals or a Repub Vs. Obama and the fact he's naive, he's robotic, and when he tried to make a point it seems like he isn't even intelligent enough to tie his shoes.
as, Hillary redeemed herself and the rest of the candidates lamed out.
This is in relative terms, of course, but it also seems to indicate that the person to stop Hillary will be the GOP nominee because her Democrat rivals simply can't.

I don't understand why Obama is not hitting Hillary on the scandals of the 90s, as well as the recent fundraising scandal.