Does Hillary Keep Her Secrets In Her Pantyhose?
By Erick Posted in 2008 — Comments (33) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
With news that she's got Sandy Berger advising her, I must wonder if she's taken to hiding her secrets in her pantyhose to make sure they don't wind up in his socks.
Of course, why would Hillary want to be advised by a man who illegally stole and destroyed national security secrets unless, of course, the secrets he stole were designed to hide her husband's mistakes? Quite a reward for loyal service.
Sandy Berger, who stole highly classified terrorism documents from the National Archives, destroyed them and lied to investigators, is now an adviser to presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Berger, who was fired from John Kerry’s presidential campaign when the scandal broke in 2004, has assumed a similar role in Clinton’s campaign, even though his security clearance has been suspended until September 2008. This is raising eyebrows even among Clinton’s admirers. “It shows poor judgment and a lack of regard for Berger’s serious misdeeds,” said law professor Jonathan Adler of Case Western Reserve University, who nonetheless called Clinton “by far the most impressive candidate in the Democratic field.”
« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims? — Comments (2) | Republicans Will be Ready for Matthews — Comments (30) »
Does Hillary Keep Her Secrets In Her Pantyhose? 33 Comments (0 topical, 33 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Sounds like good meat for some negative (but deserved) campaign ads.
Berger suddenly supposed to be someone Americans can trust again? No American should ever trust him again, and should have even less trust in someone who would claim that he is advising
them on national security matters. Why do Americans put up with these people? Do anyone who posts on this site, think any one in
America would give them back a security clearance after they admitted they stole classified documents?
No, no, no! Hillary hides her secrets in her jock strap!
This clown doesn't have a security clearance. Does Hill discuss top secret info (from Armed Services Comm., etc.) with him?
Sandy Berger will be on the short list for State; he'll end up with a very high position in the Administration (reward for the paper in his drawers); he'll be given his security clearance back, as if that matters to the MSM; and he'll receive accolades from the political pundits for his years of experience with under the Clintons. Ahhh, nothing like bring the best and brightest back into government. You want more? I'm sure Reno can't be far behind; after all, the buck stopped with her at Waco.
Actually, the Democrats seem so enthralled with Sandy Berger, I don't understand why they just don't run him for President.
How could any sane person allow Sandy Burgler within 100 miles of a candidate for president? It's not like folks don't remember what he did or how serious stealing America's history and destroying it is.
Why would Hillary do such a thing? The only thing I can think of is that Sandy Burgler has something on President Clinton. Something powerful enough to make Hillary Clinton take a huge public relations blow, in order to keep a lid on it. Apparently Sandy Burgler is not interested in the standard forms of payoffs like money or gifts, he seems to enjoy the power. Which is even more worrisome.
How else to explain the loyalty of people to Bill without much reciprocation and given the historic loss of congress during his presidency.
I suspect Bill has lots of dirt on repubs as well. His use of the IRS and FBI makes Nixon look Amish.
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson
never again have anything to do with one another.
Breaking whatever laws are in the way of a victory or a policy or a coverup.
this reminds me that Hillary seems to attract crooks - the Clinton admin did see more people go to prison, or go on trial, than any other, if I recall.
And do remember - Berger was destroying and editing the historical record to protect the Clintons.
Berger will destroy the files of Clinton II BEFORE they are files.
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson
are content to let the news media flesh it out...
.....When pigs fly !!
Watching Fox News at lunch it looked like Hillary's campaign was already back-peddling (he's just an "unpaid advisor", blah, blah, blah).
I bet he's gone within 48 hours.
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson
Geez, Mike, so many to pick from. In all fairness, there is only a handful of actual on-the-books convictions, and among those, Bill Clinton's crimes for which he was disbarred and fined close to a million bucks -- for, in essence, perjuring himself in a federal case while a sitting POTUS ranks as the worst, IMHO -- because of the damage this caused to (a) the office of POTUS, and (b) the concept of law and order.
A not-too-distant second is the theft by Sandy Burglar of classified documents that might have shown the world how complicit the Clinton Administration was in creating the environment that Al Queda exploited in perpetrating the 9/11 atrocities.
If we open up the whole array of plausibly prosecutable crimes committed (Madison Guarantee, Travelgate, the gropings, flashings, and on and on), I vote that the rape of Juanita Broderick was the worst.
It's war -- so when can we start shooting back at the enemy Democrats?
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson
Dang, forgot about that one (lost in the crowd). Advanced China's ballistic missile delivery by maybe 20 years, and China is now poised to become a super-power rival to the USA. Thanks, Bill. And who knows what other secrets -- nuclear technology, other hi-tech computer knowledge....
It's war -- so when can we start shooting back at the enemy Democrats?
was accepted by Hillary Clinton Front Office, which then instructed the Rodham Team Assassins to leak the stuff to get him out of there.
Does she wear panty hose? I figured she would wear knee highs or trouser socks with all the pantsuits.
I'll agree she's showing poor judgment but she isn't showing "a lack of regard for Berger’s serious misdeeds". She's showing a lack of regard for the American people and believes there will be no backlash due to their moral equivalence stance.
authority/her husband/her
The backlash should occur in the democratic primaries to reject amoral candidates like her, esp given Bill's taking of the dem party down to congressional defeats.
but they won't
The American people will though
Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson
Hillary could put Sandy Berger in her pantyhose and have room left over, she probably has.
I have it on good authority that Hillary's pantyhose are especially made to hide varicose veins, massive ripples of cellulite, and various nerve splotches. Doctors refuse to examine her without first taking sedatives, the last one had a stroke. Her legs are America's secret weapon, the only reason to vote for her.
She is now canvassing the Country's prisons looking for more campaign volunteers, the Orange Jumpsuit Coalition.
Definitely a person the NY Times and America's liberals can support, as honesty and open government are important to them.
"a man's admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him". Tocqueville
This is what you call a successful cover-up.
"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill