John Edwards' Flip-Flop On Israel and Iran

Iranian Memory Lane, Volume I

By Dan McLaughlin Posted in Comments (19) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Steven Foley's diary notes this quote from former Senator John Edwards in Variety:

John Edwards was cruising along, detailing his litany of liberal causes last week until, during question time, he invoked the "I" word -- Israel. Perhaps the greatest short-term threat to world peace, Edwards remarked, was the possibility that Israel would bomb Iran's nuclear facilities.

UPDATE: Edwards now denies he said this.

Well, now that would be quite a surprise to a certain then-U.S. Senator running for Vice President in 2004. Then, you will recall, Democrats wanted Iran to be dangerous so they could argue that the Iraq War was a distraction from the real security threat; in the service of that election-year talking point, Senator Edwards told the nation as follows in a nationally televised debate with Vice President Cheney:

Read On... [UPDATED]

The vice president just said that we should focus on state sponsors of terrorism. Iran has moved forward with its nuclear weapons program. They're more dangerous today than they were four years ago.

+++

The reality about Iran is that Iran has moved forward with their nuclear weapons program on their watch.

And in response to a question about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:

First, the Israeli people not only have the right to defend themselves, they should defend themselves. They have an obligation to defend themselves.

I mean, if I can, just for a moment, tell you a personal story. I was in Jerusalem a couple of years ago, actually three years ago, in August of 2001, staying at the King David Hotel.

We left in the morning, headed to the airport to leave, and later in the day I found out that that same day, not far from where we were staying, the Sbarro Pizzeria was hit by a suicide bomber in Jerusalem. Fifteen people were killed. Six children were killed.

What are the Israeli people supposed to do? How can they continue to watch Israeli children killed by suicide bombers, killed by terrorists?

They have not only the right to the obligation to defend themselves.

Now, we know that the prime minister has made a decision, a historic decision, to unilaterally withdraw from Gaza. It's important for America to participate in helping with that process.

Now, if Gaza's being used as a platform for attacking the Israeli people, that has to be stopped. And Israel has a right to defend itself. They don't have a partner for peace right now. They certainly don't have a partner in Arafat, and they need a legitimate partner for peace.

And I might add, it is very important for America to crack down on the Saudis who have not had a public prosecution for financing terrorism since 9/11.

And it's important for America to confront the situation in Iran, because Iran is an enormous threat to Israel and to the Israeli people.

Of course, then, Senator Edwards was a member of, and at least theoretically entitled to attend sessions of, the Senate Intelligence Committee, whereas now, he presumably has access to a really big television. So maybe he's better informed now. Alternative talking points may be available upon request from the former Senator.

UPDATE: The hits keep coming. Turns out that Edwards also spoke at the AIPAC Policy Conference in May 2006:

During this difficult time, all Israelis should know that America stands with them, remaining committed to their security and their efforts to build a better and more peaceful future, and as we all wish the Prime Minister [Ariel Sharon] our love and affection for he and for his family, our thoughts and prayers are with him every day. More than anyone else, Prime Minister Sharon understood that a strong Israel is a safe Israel, and we need to remember, all of us need to remember the example that he set, especially as we consider the extraordinary security threats that Israel faces today.

Let’s start with Iran’s nuclear ambitions, which I believe is the single greatest security threat, not only to Israel, but to the United States. In fact today is a pivotal day with the IAEA meeting to send the matter to the U.N. Security Council to take action. It’s about time, is what I have to say about that. For years I have argued that the United States has not been doing enough to deal with the growing threat in Iran. While we’ve talked about the dangers of nuclear terrorism, we’ve largely stood on the sidelines and the problems got worse.

I believe that for far too long we’ve abdicated our responsibility to deal with the Iranian threat to the Europeans. That is not the way to deal with an unacceptable threat to America, and an unacceptable threat to Israel. Iran’s recent actions beginning with the reprocessing of uranium, refusing to cooperate with international inspections, makes clear that it intends to build nuclear weapons.

And the Iranian President’s statements such as the despicable description of the Holocaust as a myth or his ugly pledge to wipe Israel off the map, you know, when he says these kind of things, I take him at his word. And we need to treat it as a very serious statement.

You can read more ducking and weaving by Edwards in this interview with Ezra Klein following the AIPAC speech.

« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims?Comments (2) | Multiple Choice Mitt And AbortionComments (59) »
John Edwards' Flip-Flop On Israel and Iran 19 Comments (0 topical, 19 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

He's just not.

Even in The Moonbat Party, this guy doesn't have a chance when he spouts nonsense like this.

This guy is looking to be the Dean of 2008. Except even more short-lived. I doubt he'll make it thru December, 2007...

would be...? Edwards is as serious as is Hillary and perhaps more so than Obama.

I'm afraid they're stick with Fritz again.

in recent memory, and he's not running again, unfortunately

nice hair, pretty face, elbowing people out of the way to stand next to the probable winner.
____
Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled, or hanged.
J. Michael Waller

And he really *did* let Sen. Clinton try them out. I thought that I was joking.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC.

______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

...that control arrow free on California, then.

Moe

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC.

It would explain a lot.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

I think.

Moe

PS: For those of you wondering what we're talking about, look here. Steve Jackson should market it as a primer for understanding the American political system; it has the virtue of not being really less absurd than the truth.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC.

I always thought the rules about cheating were spot on
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

-------------
So libs, how's that Congressional Resolution to end The War™ coming along?

what do his bloggers say about this? Not that we could quote them on a family friendly site.
____
Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled, or hanged.
J. Michael Waller

when you've got important issues on your mind like hiring new bloggers, hair styling appointments, and running a 200 acre estate.

====
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." -- James Madison

...when he was making the right social-con sounds. I didn't know he flip-flopped. Hell I did too, but it just looks like naked ambition now. I'm tired of guys who just want to run because they Can. It's just opportunity and personal fulfillment with these people. And I don't give a rip if they're personally fulfilled.

Where's our Churchill? Is there anyone out there who is ready to take command and knows what he's going to do when he gets there? Or where's our Thatcher for that matter?

I hate to say it but it's that old Vision Thing we're missing.

It's clear that the dems kahunas have been itching to sell Israel out. Sometimes it slips out, sometimes they play camouflage but it is just the matter of time before an official dems Israel hunting season opens (replicating European and Canadian left and unions).

It probably will happen, but convincing people in advance just won't happen.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

It's clear that the dems kahunas have been itching to sell Israel out. Sometimes it slips out, sometimes they play camouflage but it is just the matter of time before an official democrats Israel hunting season opens (replicating European and Canadian left and unions).

not a denial.

And, again, just how stupid is the insurance defense bar in North Carolina if this man made millions from tort lawsuits?

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service