MSNBC cheats John Edwards
Boneheaded News Network functions only at most basic level these days
By Mark Kilmer Posted in 2008 — Comments (12) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Democratic Party Presidential candidate John Edwards paid MSNBC campaign cash to have his whiney, little rant in response aired directly following the President's address to the nation last night. The lefty network lied to the candidate.
The failed infotainment network aired the speech, with implied heckling, Jack Reed's silly response, then a panel discussion before giving Edwards that for which he paid. Also after the panel discussion but before Edwards, MSNBC talked to Joe Biden, Mike Huckabee, a commercial break, Tim Russert, Brian Williams and more commercials. So it went from angry Dems, fresh from Bush's address, getting a glimpse of red meat from candidate Edwards, to the slow-functioning crowd listening to Keith Olbermann's rancid candy then tuning out.
Edwards was ripped off.
« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims? — Comments (2) | Slam. Bam. Knock. Zap. — Comments (54) »
MSNBC cheats John Edwards 12 Comments (0 topical, 12 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Yea, but none of Edwards voters would have been watching Fox!
There are a lot more liberals watching Fox than MSNBC. It Maybe a small percentage of the Total viewers but since there are usually three times as many people watching there are still more liberals watching Fox than MSNBC.
"The nine most dangerous words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'"
Ronald Reagan
As I understood it, John Edwards paid MSNBC for the time immediately following the President's speech, the time which other networks -- besides FOX entertainment -- gave to Jack Reed's trip down non-sequitur lane.
He would speak instead of Reed. If that is true, he redefnes hubris.
"The nine most dangerous words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'"
Ronald Reagan
"Boy, you lay down with dogs you go'n to get up with fleas"
I'll bet he cried when it happened...
I'm guessing that Edwards has a small glimpse as to the feelings of the good doctors he sued.
Why should I care if a lefty hack failed network rips off a failed lefty hack ambulance chaser?
Is this not a good thing?
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
...a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right...
---Thomas Paine---
Was ripped off then you do not know how they, MSNBC, operate. If Edwards did not know then shame on him. This is a clear case of caveat emptor.
Maybe if he hadn't ruined his relationship with Fox News he could have bought time with a network on which his message would have actually been seen
"The nine most dangerous words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'"
Ronald Reagan
www.proprietornation.blogspot.com