"Pale Face Speak With Forked Tongue"
By Erick Posted in 2008 — Comments (6) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
As I said yesterday, the media would not be willing to accept they were wrong in the story about Obama v. Hillary. They would not be able to admit their polling models were wrong.
They would instead say that New Hampshire Democrats are closet racists who, once in the privacy of the polling booth, would put the black man down in his proper place.
It has begun. In fact, as I was writing this yesterday, Chris Matthews was on MSNBC saying the reason Obama lost was "pale face speak with forked tongue." Listen here.
But don't fret. By November, the media will be back on the GOP as the party of the Klan. They just can't help themselves.
« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims? — Comments (2) | The Romney Camp needs to do something quick [UPDATED] — Comments (31) »
"Pale Face Speak With Forked Tongue" 6 Comments (0 topical, 6 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
I love the liberal mindset. If a liberal black doesn't win an election it MUST be rascism. If a liberal woman doesn't win an election it MUST be sexism. ...Of course, ideas, worldviews, and the volitional nature inherent in all humans has NOTHING to do with it. (And of course that a black man, and a white woman are the front-runners of the Dem race to begin with has no bearing in the matter, or the fact that blacks and women are in the highest levels of government. Nope. That doesn't matter.)
If I may ramble, it reminds me of the argument people make that since there is so much evil in the world, surely that proves God doesn't exist. Well, surely there is great good in the world as well. In fact, one could argue much more good in the world than evil,... so, what does this prove? That God does exist?
Okay, I'm done.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
βIt must not be supposed that folly is as powerful as truth,
just because it can, if it likes, shout louder and longer than truth.β
--Augustine
I heard Alan Colmes ask Fred Luntz this question last night and could not believe it. "Is is possible that white voters told pollsters that they would vote for Obama, but when they got into the voting booth could not vote for the black man?"
Pathetic even for Alan who is constantly baiting with his comments on H&C. I would love to see this smug, pompous ass get a smack down from the network for one of the most offensive things I have heard on air in a while.
Soon after the war ended, it was a Republican-controlled Congress that rammed through the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution that, among other things, abolished slavery, guaranteed equal protection and due process and addressed blacks' right to vote.
In the late 19th century, Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled state legislatures in the South couldn't pass Jim Crow laws fast enough. Those Democrats created a nearly century-long, legal racial caste system that relegated blacks to the lowest educational, political, economic and social strata. I have family members who grew up under Jim Crow. To hear them tell it, it weren't no joke.
And let us not forget that during the same period it was Democrats throughout the United States who organized and ran America's premier terrorist organization β the Ku Klux Klan.
from The Long, Sad, Violent History of Democrats Racial Hatred for Blacks
Great article - well researched and quite different than the Jackson - Sharpton whining, spin and lying.
Having said all of that i think that there are many folks that will tell pollsters what they believe to be PC or the pollsters want which may be different than what they do iun the secrecy of the ballot booth.
the compulsive paralyzing angst of the liberal mind. How did it happen? Maybe it was us. It can't be us, it must have been them. It can't be them, they look like us. -- Damn Republicans!
I happen to catch Brian Williams talking about a blog post he penned re: NH the other night. Found this pretty refreshing:
http://dailynightly.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/09/563444.aspx
"...A further prediction? Give us a few weeks β we will promptly forget the lessons of this debacle in polling, predictions and primary politics. We will all live to screw up another day, though our performance in New Hampshire will be hard to beat."

Voters don't need to be residents in NH to vote, they merely need to state that they plan to live in NH at some time. There were bus loads of out-of-state voters coming in to vote for Hill, so much so that many places ran out of ballots.
The Supreme Court ruling on picture ID's can't come fast enough.