The Great Michigan Primary / Shoot 'em Up Movie Simulblog of 2008.

Time to make history here, folks.

By Moe Lane Posted in Comments (38) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Because we here at RedState are all about pushing the edges of the medium, we're going to try something different tonight. The polls should be closing, even as we speak: and I have a rental disc of the movie Shoot 'em Up to watch. No reason why I can't do both, right?

Don't answer that.

We'll start with the traditional "Is there a blipping site giving results that doesn't crash every fifteen seconds?" It'll give me a chance to get the DVD function on the computer to work.

[Update, 8:16 PM EST] Good thing that I started early, because apparently I need to try getting the movie to load on my wife's computer.

[Update, 8:29 PM EST] Marvel at the triumph of the human species over adversity! Movie's up, ready to go; I have Fritos, I have Coca-Cola, I have... no websites to get results from. Hold on.

Everything else under the fold.

[Update, 8:35 PM] Well, that's one way to sever the umbilical cord. 3:50 in, and the death toll already has reached double digits, one involving a carrot. I approve.

Hey, they're all bad.

Anyway, at .59% in, Drudge reports ROMNEY 42%
MCCAIN 30% HUCKABEE 12%. Which means not much of anything, but it's early. Get those sites in!

[8:41 PM] Baby aged six months in one minute - and aww, but don't you just hate it when you aren't actually too evil to abandon one after all?

8:49 PM: Finally, the CNN site. At 5% Dem, it's Clinton 62%, Uncommitted 33%. If that holds out, it's going to look bad for the other two real candidates that dropped. GOP 4%, Romney 36%, McCain 31%, Huckabee 17%.

Meanwhile, the baby is now wearing the hero's sock. There is some faint hope that a bus is about to be shot up.

8:54 Smooth move, ronin. Just got some Good Samaritan killed. 7% and 6% respectively, no real change.

8:58 PM: Ah, the secondary character, after some gratuitous nudity. Jeebus knows this campaign could use some... I kid, I kid... Ewww. No, not the 9%, no change. The scene.

9:04 PM: Yeah, I hate people who park wrongly in handicapped spots, but possibly not as badly as the hero... nope, not enough of a SOB to get slapped around. And I'm starting to dislike the villain's wife's timing, too. 11%/10%, nothing happening, hey we're about to have a car battle! No, just pushing some twit off the road. Again, Jeebus knows..

9:11 PM: 12%, CNN calls it for Clinton/Romney, the baby's in a bulletproof vest, and they got 50 guys, which will just have to do. Guess that this didn't last long.

9:30 PM: Oddly enough, As Above, So Below: at 24% and 44:16, tedious blah blah blah has set in. More gunplay! More! More! I'm still not satisfied.

9:34 PM Good gun advice to the baby... and, yeah, Ben's right: this election needs more Monica Bellucci.

9:46 PM: This movie is apparently ostensibly about gun control. Given that the death count is roughly triple digits by now, I suspect that the "ostensibly" is even more tongue-in-cheek than usual. Meanwhile, 39/37, Romney's breathing easier, and there's going to be no real reason for Obama and Edwards to push to have Michigan's delegates seated at the convention. (pause) Suckers.

9:54 PM: Well, at least it's a Democratic Senator breeding babies for bone marrow... and selling out to the evvvvillll gun lobby at the first hint of problems. This is turning out to be a surprisingly apropos choice.

Except for maybe the sky-diving gun battle.

10:06 PM: Hey! He shot a guy with his hand and got a dog! Score.

10:11 PM: Well, that's the movie - which lasted about three times as long as any suspense in this primary - and what have we learned?

Well, aside from the fact that there's a lot of ways to get killed by a firearm - this movie is so totally worth a rental; I only regret not drinking beer - I suppose that it shows that you just can't walk away from a screaming baby, even if it means removing every Pro From Dover within a twenty mile radius.

The parallels between this and our current political situation are so obvious as to not need elucidating, of course.

Good night, and remember what Paul Giamatti (and Constant Reader Raven) says: Guns don't kill people, but they sure help.

« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims?Comments (2) | MI Evening Open ThreadComments (253) »
The Great Michigan Primary / Shoot 'em Up Movie Simulblog of 2008. 38 Comments (0 topical, 38 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

When your [insert drink of choice] is coming out your nose because of the movie you're watching...

BTW, perfect thread for my Sig.

"Guns don't kill people...
"...But they sure help!"
-Paul Giamatti, Shoot 'Em Up

the station started by Ted Turner based out of Atlanta, GA has pretty good election night coverage and update every 3 or so minutes.

They argue less.

(She still won't see I Am Robot - but Sky Captain got her thumb's up for getting robot motion right.)

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

Thumbs up or thumbs down to Asimov's books?

I finally got the entire Foundation series and I was left with:
"And... So what?"
And they were boring, to boot.

Prelude to Foundation Trilogy was good, though.

"Guns don't kill people...
"...But they sure help!"
-Paul Giamatti, Shoot 'Em Up

He definitely wrote those in a different style.

What did you think of Foundation's Edge and Foundation and Earth? He wrote those closer in time to Prelude than to the original stories.

HTML Help for Red Staters

Was a different man than the one that wrote the original trilogy. If you want a a real guidepost to the extent of his change read Marooned off Vesta.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

not sure if its faster than anything else out there.

Is losing to Uncommitted by a 4-to-1 margin right now. It's time for the joke...er...campaign to end, Congressman.

------------
The Red Sox Republican: Burkeanism, Baseball, and Sundries.

______________________________________
Proud member of the Barry Goldwater wing of the party !

Um, the Romney signs at Romney HQ - those "Change Begins With Us" posters - look exactly like red versions of those Obama signs.

get him votes. As McCain said, Mitt is the "change" candidate.

I know that it's the Communist News Network, but CNN has always had pretty good live election returns.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#MI

"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill

but Uncommitted still leads among the minority vote.

***

“Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so.” – Ronald Reagan

Steve Willis
Professor of Law
University of Florida College of Law

Not sure when they made the call, but it didn't take long.

Yaaaaay! Oops, I mean....Noooooooooooooo! ;)

For a minute I thought you had crossed over to "uncommitted."

www.fred08.com
Redneck Hippie

But notice the spread is consistently near the combined vote of Thompson and Guiliani. I suspect a large portion of Rudy votes would list McCain second. A bit less true of Thompson voters, but still that would be the trend.

Steve Willis
Professor of Law
University of Florida College of Law

for the most part from what I've seen over the past six months here on Redstate. Probably 75% to Romney and 25% to McCain.

Steve Willis
Professor of Law
University of Florida College of Law

He hasn't said anything I find objectionable and appears admirably presidential and reserved. While he may not have Romney's hair I have never seen him make a bad appearance.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

but I am a Rudy supporter who voted for Romney today. I did so because a Romney victory helps the Rudy strategy of multiple winners and no clear frontrunner going into Florida.

Even if Rudy wasn't running I wouldn't be voting for McCain, I would probably be supporting Thompson until he dropped out and then Mitt if he was still in it.

But, I see Thompson as close to McCain. Maybe I'm just projecting myself. I have trouble with Romney, ranking him 4th.

I like Thompson best, but would go for McCain or Rudy next.

Steve Willis
Professor of Law
University of Florida College of Law

I see Romney as closer to Fred.

Perhaps its the immigration issue weighing so heavily for me (my #2 issue after judges).

My rank is:

Fred
Mitt
Rudy
John
Huck

meh

"Guns don't kill people...
"...But they sure help!"
-Paul Giamatti, Shoot 'Em Up

Is Monica Bellucci.

That is all.

w/a grand mexican dinner feast and I return to Mitt Romney winning the MI primary? What's the world coming to?

And when is Fred going to drop? He has yet to win anything.

"I'm just beginning...The pen's in my hand...Ending unplanned"

If Fred doesn't win SC or at least come in second, then we can perhaps talk about whether he should drop out or not. Sooner than that is premature.

---
Finrod's First Law of Bandwidth:
A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it takes the bandwidth of ten thousand.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service