The Hawkeye Debate

By Erick Posted in Comments (239) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

It's on right now, live from Iowa, despite the weather.

I'll leave this up top for a while and if you're watching, put your thoughts in the comments.

{UPDATE:] Well, the Des Moines Register got what it deserved by inviting Alan Keyes. Please God, please don't subject us to another debate with Alan Keyes. Ron Paul, I can take. For all his nuttiness, he's got some great points. Keyes is a rhetorical tootsie roll pop with a turd in the middle.

[CONCLUDING THOUGHTS:] The moderator had no personality. I never thought I'd long for Chris Matthews. Had the Fred on stage today been around these last few months, he'd be winning. I really do think he won this debate. Now he needs to take my advice.

Romney did quite well and handled his response to Keyes quite well. McCain looked tired, but continued to be adult. How refreshing it was to hear him willing to talk down ethanol subsidies, etc. Maybe he is the guy we're going to need to unite behind if Fred can't pull it out. Keyes should not be given the credibility he got. I liked Ron Paul's line about protecting against "enemies domestic." Tancredo and Hunter need to drop out. Huckabee is Alan Keyes without being a whacked out egomaniacal nutter. He did well, as usual.


« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims?Comments (2) | The Soft on Crime MemeComments (20) »
The Hawkeye Debate 239 Comments (0 topical, 239 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

The only one with any animation is Ron Paul and I'm not sure that's a good thing.

I'll give it 15 more minutes to pick up, or to have Romney and Huckabee trade jabs, then I'm listening to Prokofiev.

Mitt and Fred doing a good job talking about budget cuts, eliminating redundancies and entitlements. Good answers on the fiscal conservative questions.

Fred listed quite a few programs that he thought were worthy of deficit spending. He should have stopped after mentioning the military. I found his answer to be off message.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

please somebody take it on.

I didn't even know about it/

Just tuned it on. OK so far.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Cute little jab from Fred about how rich Mitt is.

All I hear from Huckabee is "I can't deal with taxes, switch to a Fair Tax so I don't have to!"

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

"I'd like to get myself in Mitt's situation so that I don't have to worry about taxes anymore."

Mitt counters that he would like to be in Fred's situation too.

Fred retorts, "you are getting to be a pretty good actor."

Fred wins the exchange. All in good nature and within bounds.

Eh, I'm not sure either one won. But it was a pleasant exchange nonetheless. I see a relationship budding...

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

True by GOP84

I want a Romney-Thompson alliance to defeat the Giuliani-Huckabee alliance.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

I wish they had shown Tancredo's expression when the moderator announced that immigration would not be a focus of the debate.

I am not sure that it was smart for Rudy to push for lowering the corporate tax rate in his first response. However valid, it was an odd answer in an Iowa debate, especially since the question dealt with whether on not our economic situation was a national security issue.

Romney sounds great (I'm not a Romney supporter), Huckabee's doing his thing and, well, Fred seems to be awake for this one.

I really enjoyed watching the response ticker/graph when RP speaks - major nosedive, especially from the conservatives.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

I'm surprised he doesn't start his answers with a short poem and end with a prayer...
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

Is have his three-item answers all start with the same letter, or spell out a word.

"When I was growing up in Hope, I learned early on to always listen to Mom. That's why my three-step budget-solving program is designed with her in mind
More
Of your
Money."

After the election maybe we can do lawyer jokes :>)
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

everyone is taught in English101 at College.

"I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harm's way."
John Paul Jones (letter to M. Le Ray de Chaumont,16 Nov.1778)

I love his free market response on eliminating farm subisidies, right in the heart of corn country.

That's why he's not a major player there....

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

...but he gets big time points on that one. Bravo Senator McCain.

“.....women and minorities hardest hit”

Kudos to McCain on his robust pro-free market stance.

The global warming segment where McCain, Giuliani, and Romney all endorsed Global Warming was depressing.

have never been his problem. The problem is that he uses his "stones" to stand against his own party too often.

I wonder something.

Lots of us here - myself included - go on about being Conservatives first and Republicans second. In other words, that our principles should come before party loyalty. Yet, many seem to lambaste JMac for doing the same thing - standing by his own principles rather than the party line when he thinks that's what's called for.

Now I know that often his principles do not match up with some on this board. But we should be clear that the disagreement is over principle and not over some perceived apostasy from the Republican platform. And to the extent that people criticize him simply because he is not a "good Party man" I think it is a case of the pot calling the kettle black, as many of us aren't "good Party men" either.

I can go along with that assessment. I shouldn't have mentioned party in my comment. It was the fact that when he's strayed, he's strayed to the liberal side of issues that meant a lot to me. I guess I'm just a little bit jaded.

Or is this just another general pointless comment?

Who else would have the guts to slam corn/ethanol subsidies in Iowa? Gotta love that guy. I am increasingly thinking that he will be my guy.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

"I can't part the Red Sea, but I can part the red tape."

I never knew Huckabee was a Christian well-versed in Biblical references, did you y'all?

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

"No hand shows."

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

He just refused to participate in a hand show - "No Hand Shows!" and refused to answer the moderator's question because he wouldn't give her enough time. Yeeeehaw!

Maybe he wants the job after all.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

will you give me a minute to answer it?

moderator: NO

Fred: well then I'm not going to answer it.

I have to say for the first time I am really liking Fred in a debate.

I was proud of him - especially since McCain, Romney, and Giuliani all were so depressing on Global Warming.

Fred Thompson's best moment in the entire campaign. This is the fire we hoped he would show from the first time it was rumored he might throw his hat in the ring.

I have hoped for someone, anyone to stand up to the arrogant moderators in these debates. He picked a perfect time and a perfect question.

"By show of hands who believes in global warming and is man responsible?" As if that were a "show of hands" question not warranting an extended discussion. When they refused to allow the candidates the time necessary to properly address it, Fred refused to play along.

Great job!

here

Fred08

==== 13 ====

comments about the NEA a lot better. It's not often that you hear someone willing to take on a group with the clout the NEA has with a challenge made of easy to understand single syllable words.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

taking on the NEA like that since, well, forever.

among the truest words ever spoken.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

"Are you going to give me a minute to explain?"
"No."
"Then I'm not answering!"

HA

Romney's points are that we need to find ways to address climate change in ways that also improve the economy. The question as posed assumed that dealing with "global warming" required a hit to the economy. Romney refutes the assertion.

He also adds that he is not going to allow the US to shoulder unnecessary burden of what is a global issue. Read: "I'm not doing Kyoto."

I think Romney is weak on Global Warming, unfortunately.

format.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

I love the fire. But he and RP should run as a pair.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

I think the "debates" should include fewer questions with more time to answer.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

I don't understand why we have come to the conclusion that the questions are more important than the answers. Bizarre. This idiocy was best highlighted in the CNN debate, when Cooper was shutting the candidates down to watch more of the ridiculuous video questions. I saw a discussion where Jeri Thompson advocated for a return to Lincoln/Douglas style debates. We need to get a few of those jokes off the stage, which would help with the time issue.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

I think they made the right call saying that the positions of the candidates on immigration and Iraq are for the most part well known (other than Huckabee).

They actually asked Iowa voters what they wanted to hear about.

Compare that to the CNN YouTube debate, where a bunch of CNN employees decided what they thought was important to GOP voters.

but he really is quite abrasive, nearly offensive, in his approach. don't know how he expects folk to warm up to him. too angry.

...meaningless but "nice sounding" abracadabra from Huckabee during his 30 second statement.

Thanks, Mike, we were beginning to forget that little red house where you were born.

Little rags-to-riches Mikey is gonna save the country.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

Isn't that what he has tried to keep reminding us of for the past 5 years?

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

I was listening while typing and thought it was Tanc not Keyes about to launch into another tirade.

Sorry Tanc. Boy this live open thread stuff is tripping me up

I have a disgust for Keyes - why is he there? He is nasty and abrasive andI think a little nuts.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

Where was this passion months ago?

By my take: Thompson and Romney neck and neck.

Thompson - pulling out all stops. Taking no prisoners.

Romney - About as sharp as I've seen him on the issues. Giving good, crisp, substantive issues.

I think Romney is walking away with this one, though Thompson is right up there. What happened to McCain - has he said anything since the subsidies answer?

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

The conservative and moderate lines usually stay really high on the right side of the screen on the Fox News broadcast when Romney is speaking. I wonder who is controlling the dials? If it is representative of Iowa, Romney's in much better shape than the polls show.

Say all you want about Paul and his ideas, he maintains a sense of respect for the Moderator and the other candidates.

Keyes is making *everyone* else look good by comparison.

---
"The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble, I like my coffee black, just like my Metal." - MSI

the NEA is the biggest impediment to improving education in the US.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Didn't Huckabee pick that one up in New Hampshire. Way to go, Mike!

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

that is what I love about Fred...he says what he thinks and doesn't try to pander. He is not afraid of dealing with the issues, even if they are tough are dangerous politically.

Thompson makes a good point about the NEA. They're just a puppet for the government. The AEA in Alabama is the same way. They're ruining education by trying to eliminate and discourage choice.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

He popped me out of my chair for a little dance on that one.

Standing ovation for Fred on standing up to the NEA.

Perhaps Fred would be a great Dick Cheney-esque Vice President?

He's running for President, and he's also a lot older than Cheney was 7 years ago.

Maybe Mitt would join Fred. 16 years of the two of them would make me 80 years old.

Lets go for it!

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

....he and Romney both have a vested interest in taking out Huckabee. Rush said today that Fred is hitting Huck with direct mail attack ads.

“.....women and minorities hardest hit”

YES! by GOP84

Exactly!!! It's the only way!

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

I am by GOP84

Loving it! I hope they team up against the Giuliani-Huckabee alliance.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

If there is going to be any lovefest it is going to keep coming from Romney...Fred knows he has to hit romney, not make nice with him...they are competing for the same voters.

Fred needs to hit Huck first and foremost.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

He has to hit both...I think Huck is in for a slide once people get to know how he stands on issues a little better. At that point, it will be a Fred/Mitt fight for the conservative vote...fred can't wait until then to start fighting.

I'm really impressed with Fred's performance today.

And Alan Keyes is as annoying as ever.

Fight On!

Luntz's diagram down for Huckabee, up for Fred. Go Fred!

www.fred08.com

I am willing to bet that Huck doesn't even know. I like that Mitt called him on it.

"How did Ark kids rate?"

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

These last couple of weeks must have been an influence on him - he's not doing well today. I thought he would be working hard to defend his #1 status.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

I don't think he is prepared for the status. I wonder if anybody at his campaign ever thought they would be in this position. I think they were hoping to make this move a little later so they wouldn't have to "defend" as soon. I think he made his surge a few weeks earlier than would have been ideal in terms of keeping people in the dark and not having to answer the tough questions that come with the spotlight.

Fluffy feel good gobbledeegook from the Huckster.

are responsible for 'polarization' of thought in the US. Guess he's never noticed the Liberals' contribution.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

He suffers from a very bad case of white guilt.

While such a guilt-ridden mindset is to be expected from a Democrat/liberal, it is truly frightening when coming from a Republican and alleged conservative.

Let's all get on the same wave length.

Huckabee is an idiot.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

I was going to use that for a title, but I thought it might be rejected.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Or starting to prepare for a General Election Campaign. Also hinting to the other Republicans, that really We all need to work together as a team.

it's tripe, but it's good sounding tripe.

---
"The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble, I like my coffee black, just like my Metal." - MSI

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Yep by GOP84

After all, he was an Ambassador...

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

Something about him being an ambassador to a UN committee. Can we PLEASE not invite him to the next debate. Oh, now she called him Mr. - hmmmm

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Huck's would be amazingly expensive. How else does he make everyone happy & come together in love?

How would Huckabee do it? Simple; he'd just stab conservatives in the back and embrace leftist positions on some high-profile issues. That would be enough to garner him accolades about bringing the nation together because the discontent of all those right of center does not matter to the mainstream media.

that not EVERYTHING ties into 9/11.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Had he not lost it earlier in the debate (and had he been included in prior debates), He'd potentially give Huckabee fits.

---
"The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble, I like my coffee black, just like my Metal." - MSI

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

Keyes came out strongly pro-life (no surprise) and also strongly for the Fair Tax in an concise and powerful statement.

I can't stand Keyes, but a strong answer is a strong answer.

---
"The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble, I like my coffee black, just like my Metal." - MSI

in the White House is a good thing?

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Is it just me or has Alan Keyes gotten more airtime than John McCain? Who let this guy in the room?

"The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions."

on his character. then goes after Giuiliani.

One of those canes to come out of nowhere and hook Keyes around the neck and drag him off stage.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

I am laughing because I was imagining the same exact thing.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

like amateur night on Showtime at the Apollo

Does he have one? Good answer Mitt... not a Mitt supporter, but don't think this campaign needs Keyes bashing Mitty.

www.fred08.com

PS- Yes, Fred supporter defending Mitt, for a moment.

Tough crack on Mormonism.

There are too many candidates on the stage. There are ideas being bantered about, but they switch off so often it's virtually impossible for me -- this is my first debate watched this season -- to attach an idea to a candidate before their paltry 30 seconds is up. It's blurry. And even then I'm assuming that many of the candidates agree with what others are saying but just don't have the time to say it. It's like some weird brainstorming session for the GOP where they're all contributing one Republican policy idea. So this might be good for generic GOP vs. Democratic Party numbers, but I can't imagine any individual candidate coming out of this with an advantage or disadvantage.

And the moderator isn't enforcing any limit at all. That isn't helping.

"You don't have a health care system...."

So how does Huck plan on fixing this?

... between faith (the belief in unprovable things) and ethics, which can be informed by faith but not dependent on it.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

I'd give the moderator the ability to turn the microphones off of other candidates, particularly if they run over time.

Do that a couple of times after calling time, and I bet maybe then there'd be more respect for the Moderator.

Mind you, the candidates would *never* allow that. as it would show them up. *sigh*

----
"The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble, I like my coffee black, just like my Metal." - MSI

for the talking head TV shows, I think it would be counterproductive, even though running over is irritating.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

would affect public policy--He just proved it's impossible to answer that question and make sense. What he did do in his video was to slam Mitt's statements about how he would be an American President, not a Mormon one.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

ns by 38585

Hunter was pretty nice to Romney, wait maybe not bring up Bain conspiracy...

In the same paragraph, asking the moderator to repeat the question because he was so caught up in Romney's response, which is a very good one.

THen proceeding to levy a hit job on Mitt with oppo research on Bain Capital. Weird.

he did it in a credible way.

Not all members of the NEA agree with it on many things. I think the 'Pubs have figured that out.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Not very conservative with those answers. Equal health care, equal education? How do we get there Mike?

As in YOUR money.

Next question?
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

I like his answer nonetheless. He has really been ignored for the most part in this debate.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

What a waste of a question.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Maybe because Fred did very well throughout.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

The commentary on Fox News is horrible...I think huck did horrible and they say he wins by default??? And no mention of Fred yet...they seriously dislike him

I'm taping Fox, watching CNN right now. CNN has started out by trivializing FT.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

I have no confimation of that, but I'd have to say that helping Huck would help Rudy at this point in the game... They do seem to be anti-Fred though...

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

New Years Resolution: Don't accept debate offers from the Des Moines Register.

"The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions."

IMO by Mahler

Thompson and Romney were easily the best. Huckabee gave a bunch of non-answers (and implied we need socialized healthcare), but this never hurt him in the past so I don't expect it will now. Giuliani was average, and McCain was good when they were on him but they didn't ask him much.

Winners - Thompson and Romney

Losers - Huckabee and Keyes

Middle of the Pack: McCain, Giuliani, Hunter, Tancredo, Paul, in roughly that order.

..but I don't think he won. I thought the best answer was Romney speaking about the three tenets of conservatism. The focus group seems to agree that he won the debate. Interesting.

It is monarchical and aristocratical government only that requires ignorance for its support.
- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792

then he lost. Expectations are different when you're the frontrunner as opposed to the guy with broom behind the mounted unit in the parade.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Just based on the fact that he scammed his way onto the stage and got to flack his website.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

A little racist there aren't you Erik? Keyes is probably the only man running who would do a good job. We especially do not need a three name female and her sex fiend husband in the white house, now do we?

____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

I think Fred took note of Rush saying that any self respecting candidate would have walked of the stage at the youtube debate by refusing to raised hands questions.

have both had their day in the sun. No analytical skills at all, probably because of having no introspective inclinations at all.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Overall no one was badly winged.
I think Huckabee took a few shots, nothing crippling.
Thompson probably had the best moments and might have just kept his campaign alive.
McCain seemed quiet and a non-entity.
Keys was abrasive and rude, but gave a few good responses.
Guiliani had an ok overall, a few dings
Romney was there and seemed ... boring.
Paul was not good at the start, did better at the end.
Duncan Hunter did ok, but really there's more than the fence
Tancrado looked weak about anything not relating to illegal Immigration.

Ranking it
Grade A
Thompson

Grade B (in no particular order)
Guiliani
Romney

Grade C (in no particular order)
Paul
Hunter
Huckabee

Grade D
McCain
Keyes

Grade F
Tancrado

---
"The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble, I like my coffee black, just like my Metal." - MSI

____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

Not just winners, but hopefully our ticket...

Yell it from the rafters!

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

if this group of "undecided Republican voters" are really that. The first one interviewed couldn't think of the name of someone she seemed to like. LOL. Maybe she was just nervous.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

she was now leaning towards John Edwards. (^:^)

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

he did win this debate. If he had been at all the debates and performed like that, he wouldn't be at 1% in NH. McCain clearly was benefitted by not having audience participation. That seemingly allowed him to get out his national message (against ethanol).

...they say Huck won by default.

No great moves in polls, which have Huck in the lead both nationally (today's Rasmussen daily tracker have him higher than ever) and in Iowa, SC, even in MI...

Not a single mention of AIDS, Mormons, parole/clemency...

...a big win for Huck today.

....he claims the voters thought Mitt won.

“.....women and minorities hardest hit”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFKUopQf2jw&feature=related

see it for yourself.

Yeah, Thompson hit it out of the park in FL debate, propelled him in the polls it did...

...no real political analyst takes these Luntz focus groups seriously.

aren't needed when you're a Huckbot.

Don't waste your breath.

Huckabee could run over someone backing out of his driveway and it'd be good news for Huckabee.

Luntz by Rae

Luntz is a propagandist and he has admitted as much on camera. He is about as "fair and balanced" as FOX News.

Thompson won this debate, hands down. ;)

I remember several debates where Mike Huckabee was off the charts in Frank Luntz focus groups, but the only thing the press said was that he did well. I don't think it was ever clear that he or anyone won a debate with a home run. It was not until the You Tube debate where everyone agreed he won, and this was because Rudy and Mitt looked so bad arguing each other, and of course because of Mike’s performance. I think Huckabee did well in this debate, but the most important part for Mike Huckabee is that he escaped unscathed, and Mitt did not hit it out of the park. Mitt and Fred probably won, but I don’t think they won to the point of Mike or Rudy looking bad.

...and Huckabee sounded like a Democrat. That's my take.

“.....women and minorities hardest hit”

That's a wrap.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Romney and Guiliani.

I know Rudy isn't real popular here but he is a very articulate and sharp candidate.

Fred was doing much better right now. He really has the be positions of any canidate.

It says more about the electorate than the candidate.

He talks issues and proposals... he's not going about speaking platitudes and 30 second sound bytes.

In my view, Thompson is the anti-Huckabee... but the problem is that there are plenty of other candidates who are anti-Huckabee on policy, but very Huckabee-ish on presentation.

If this was the 19th Century or early 20th, Fred Thompson would be our nominee without a doubt.

Fred a lot if Hunter and Tancredo would go away. He'd get more air time, and basically agrees with them on their favorite topics. I think he'd get most of their voters' support.

Who the heck is giving RonPaul all that money?

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

We need a lot few candidates.
If only the top five were allowed to debate, we could have more indepth answers and better back and forth.

(which would solve the Huckabee issue as he has no depth)... Hell, he suggested the U.S. should work to ZERO energy consumption as a national priority and goal.

And to answer your question, about 10 Republicans who are more libertarian than Republican... and about a jillion liberals who realize their party is probably going to nominate a "warmonger" in their eyes. They are looking for someone who doesn't believe the military should EVER be used; and that's Ron Paul.

Where by Rae

Where do you get such crazy ideas.

Whats that all about?

Hunter mentions Romney's compnay doing business with people who did business with Saddam Hussein and has connection to the Taliban.

Anyone heard this? Hunter isnt the type to throw mud like that without accuracy on his side.

And to those who say Romney/Thompson08....No way! Romney wont settle for VP and he is too liberal to sit at the top of any ticket except for in the Democrat Party.

Hunter has been known for throwing out wild nonsense like this.

By the way, we're not saying that Romney will settle for VP. We want him as President. He is not liberal. If you think otherwise, you're just fooling yourself.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

Or maybe Romney fooled him a couple years ago?

I was confused too. I'm not saying it's not true - Hunter isn't one to take pot shots. I would have wanted to hear more. I'm not a Romney guy by any stretch of the imagination, but was SHOCKED that the moderator didn't let him engage that statement. Isn't that a lot more important than Alan Keyes's New Year's Resolution?

playbook? Blame some obscure but nefarious act committed by a company a candidate used to run on the candidate?

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

(Cafferty, Barnes, Bill Bennett) all thought it was BOOOOOORING. I think they are way off base. They seem a bit jealous, to me. Didn't like the questions, didn't like the moderator.

Maybe because the questions touched on issues important to tax-paying Republicans, rather than to 'journalists'?

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

I've been leaning Huck, but I think Romney won this debate. He sounded very Presidential.

All this lady did was find out the issues voters care about and asked about them. She wasn't trying to create drama for its own sake.

I thought it was a perfectly adequate debate.

wasn't at all memorable, but that's the way it should be. After all I can still remember Chris Matthews' inane questions. Who can forget the question about Bill being back in the White House?

The two things I will remember from this debate are 1) Fred Thompson (with the other candidates following) essentially saying if you don't want to give me time to give a substantive answer (to global warming) then I won't answer your question, and 2) Fred Thompson saying the biggest impediment to our education system is the NEA.

Post debate corverage Huck say that the Drudge thing was most likely an attack by another (R)... He then went on to say that in one poll he is leading all other candidates vs the Dems. I watch polls and have not seen this, or is this a possible Huck fabrication?

I am a Fred guy so I went in hoping that Fred would do well.

I think he did and not just because I wanted him to, but because KJL over at NRO mentioned that he did pretty well.

KJL's been on the Romney express since 2006 so for her to throw Fred a bone means he did well.

Let's HOPE that some of the people of Iowa were stuck inside, but still had enough power to watch the debate and saw Fred and Mitt do better than Huck, Rudy, and John.

Iowa polls on Real Clear Politics will likely be one of the top net "hits" for political junkies in the next week.

Hopefully, today was enough for Fred to make a move to at least a very close 3rd in Iowa if not a 2nd.

I liked when he said he would not raise his hand. It’s just a trap. They did it in the first debate when they asked the evolution question. I also liked when he said something about Alan’s Global Warming Answer. Thank You, Fred, for exercising his inner quipster.

Iowans, but come on. Iowa has elected Senator Tom Harkin (a fool), Chuck Grassley (RINO), and seems to be swooning over the Huckster. Why in the world should the rest of us care what Iowans think about politics, at least to the extent that these caucuses seem to be so important.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

This is why I believe all primaries/caucuses should be held on the SAME DAY. There's no reason why 2 states with such miniscule populations should get so much power in national elections.

www.scottbomb.com
Click here to donate to the Fred Thompson campaign.

You must be a Romney supporter. I'd be saying the same thing if I'd spent 7 million dollars and it only bought 21% of the vote versus the so-called "Hillbilly-Huck".

I'm not certain about everything with Huck...but if spending $400,000 and getting 35% is any sign of what he can do fiscally, I'm supporting him.

Question, if Huckabee wins the nomination, who of Redstate will support him?

Thanks

...this plays right into the Huck theme of class warfare and populism.

“.....women and minorities hardest hit”

And people wonder why the Huey Long schtick plays so well with some.

-------------
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.

I support Fred, but I do like Mitt.

"Question, if Huckabee wins the nomination, who of Redstate will support him?"

I will support him. I'll vote for him, but I'm not sure he'd be that much better than Hillary. And I strongly disagree with his take on both taxes and illegal immigration. I think that may also be the reason that Huck isn't very popular here.

I think he's really our worst legitimate candidate.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Day in and day out, folks at Redstate rail on Huckabee and are down right hateful without lots of substance. GOP84 and others...for weeks folks like you who don't like the Social Conservatives pick (Huckabee) have been spelling out the gloom and doom that he brings and embodies, while Huckabee has shot sky high in the polls. At this point, you've turned to whining and mean spirited cry baby tactics. Your emotional "he can't win" because he's not like Rudy and Hillary or Romney because Romney used to claim to be like Rudy and Hillary (e.g. liberals), are tired and boring. Don't bore the rest of us. If I want crying, I'll watch Tim Russert on Meet the Press Sunday mornings or I'll listen to Dingy Harry Reid whine about how our soldiers are loosing as we Win in Iraq. Either complain about some issues or point out something other than your inability to talk about anything other than your own personal hateful disdain for a candidate who's kicking butt right now.

If Rudy and Romney were so great, how come after 12 months and 10's of Millions of dollars, they can't must any more support nationally? Perhaps Huckabee, after spending less than 10 percent and garnering more than double the support in Iowa than Romney is on to something. He can beat Hillary because he's clearly different. I can't say that about Rudy or Romney.
You can't appease the left voters and get them to vote Republican by sending a Democrat in Republican clothing. The voters will see the weakness and either support the real leftest (Hillary) or Hillary will win by default as the conservatives in the party won't show up to vote for Rudy or Romney.
Thanks

A Conservative based community...

You can't appease left voters. Which is why trying to convince you to leave Huck for a true Republican is not worth the

First of all, it is comical for a Huck supporter to call anyone else out for lack of substance, because Huck himself is nothing but style. Second of all, he has let out insane numbers of criminals (including around a dozen convicted murderers), he wants to fix CEO salaries, he calls for "fair trade" instead of free trade, he begged for higher taxes as a governor and nearly trippled his state's tax burden, and he thinks Lawrence was correctly decided. These issues and many more have pretty much all been fleshed out in blog entries, along with many more.

"Either complain about some issues or point out something other than your inability to talk about anything other than your own personal hateful disdain for a candidate who's kicking butt right now."

If the issues I just listed don't count for "substance," then I don't know what does. These aren't our "own personal hateful disdain"; they ARE the issues you are telling us to complain about.

Thanks, that's substance. I desire you to do that. What I was reading in the debate blog was just whining crap.

I guess I should tell you folks why I support Huckabee, even though that seems to be the worst thing ever.

A candidate who can think on his feet is refreshing for one, and you all know what I'm talking about. I believe in compassionate conservatism. I'm faced with 3 other candidates who are not much better or any more electable.

I don't buy into Romney because, as you all know, he's taken three different sides to most issues. He also started State sponsored health care in his home state. I don't see many folks railing on that here...as they should.

Rudy is a liberal. He even told voters at the values summit he's not changing his beliefs to get elected (unlike Mitt). He's pro-choice, pro-gay marriage. His shining moment for me and the rest of America was 9/11. The problem I have with him truly is of character. The man was cheating on his wife during 9/11 with his new wife. I know all the dems stated that "personal life is out of bounds" so I suspect some here will defend him that way. We cannot pretend that character in personal life does not matter. That's why the nation has a nasty taste in its mouth for Clinton (no pun intended my friends).

That leave Fred. I absolutely love everything about Fred Thompson. I wished, hoped, prayed and begged for Governor George W. Bush to pick him as his running mate in 2000. Fred, at the time was the best spokesman for the conservative cause. He could stump for W. and the compassionate conservative cause better than anybody else. If Fred showed me that exuberance (spelling?) today, I'd be on his band wagon. He, to me, looks like he's going to sleep. He looks like pictures of an old Ben Franklin.

That leaves Huckabee. He's full of energy. He has some strong conservative pillars. He is sketchy on taxes and some other things. I don't believe that Rudy or Mitt, considering one is a liberal and one pretends not to be a liberal are going to be any different when the pressures of congress come to be big spenders. I don't see rudy or glove...er sorry, Mitt, making the charge for lower taxes.

What it boils down to, I don't expect any of them to do that. At least Huckabee will hold the status quo on abortion and gay rights, which to me, translates to Supreme Court Justices. Would anyone disagree that Huckabee, knowing what you know, would pick Justices that would follow the Bush selections nicely?

1. Bubba Jr. grew the budget in Arkansas at three times the inflation rate when he was governor.
2. BJ left office with net tax increases on the people of AR.
3. BJ expanded the reach of the state government in AR.
4. His position on immigration and illegal aliens when he was governor, which has suddenly morphed into Tancredo light.
5. His commentary on health care availability that he made today.
6. His support for the FairTax despite the fact that hell will freeze over before it's passed in a form that is being proposed now.
7. His support for the HLA (which one, BTW) despite the fact that he couldn't get 50 votes in the Senate for it.
8. His obvious ignorance with respect to judicial issues (Lawrence decision).
9. His love of the nanny state.
10. His comments on foreign policy which are simply beyond stupid.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

Romney did not knock out the Huckster in the debate, so he still has to figure out a way to come back and win Iowa. If Romney loses after having spent so much money, that 12-13 point lead in New Hampshire is going to melt away. Then we have a three way race in NH between Mitt, McCain, and Giuliani. Mitt is still on the ropes despite a creditable showing in the debate.

Thompson also did well, but without the breakthrough he needs. Reports that Thompson is going to try an Iowa-South Carolina pivot are a sign that Fred is in deep trouble-Biden and Dodd country you might call it. If Fred can't get close in Iowa, he is finished. The idea that he can take off for 26 days (a pause that refreshes?) and win the Palmetto State indicates a rich capacity for imagination, but not much one can bank on.

imagination is thinking that the eventual caucus results will in any way resemble a poll taken today.

Howard Dean was winning Iowa this time for the 2004 election.
Reagan was winning Iowa this time for the 1980 election.

You were probably one of those people who thought Hillary had the democratic nomination locked up a month or two ago.

People are STARTING to pay attention.

If I could put money on the Iowa caucus, it would be against the proposition that Huck and Mitt will both be in the top two.

Others look at what has been, and ask "Why?" Fred looks at what can be and asks, "If we can afford it, why not?"

What? Was that sound bite already taken?

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

Does he have no response of his own??

The Chad

"Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Not that I really think the Romney supporters on Red State care that Romney is my #2, but here is my break down. As it was said up thread, if you are #1 in the polls and don't win the debate, or even have a respectable showing then you lost. So Huckabee will probably begin to see a major cooling down in his poll numbers. Let's face it, much of the polling is based on current emotion and I certainly think that will fade after this debate.

I also have to say this, and I hope Romney fans will take this seriously. I am a major Fred Thompson supporter, however, I have felt myself coming to the defense of Mitt a lot lately. I've been disgusted by the faith/religion attacks on Romney, and to my knowledge, Huckabee is leading the way. As a very devout Catholic, I'm happy to see religion becoming more mainstream; however Huckabee is focusing on it entirely too much, pandering if you will to one group of voters. His outright recent attacks on Romney's faith is terrible, and I am officially declaring Romney my #2, because I think he has attacked Huckabee and others on positions, whether I agree or not, that's politics. Attacking Romney on religion, that is just slime city. Considering Huckabee a serious candidate past today should discredit Iowa from its important roll in presidential elections in the future.

I will work my tail off to support Fred, until he wins, or until I have to support someone else... but I think Romney has withstood the attacks on his faith well, and I greatly admire him for that.

www.fred08.com

Fred
Mitt
Rudy
please don't make me choose between John and Mike

In these debates, Mitt handles himself well without being hyperaggressive (which is what Rudy is if he lets himself loose).

Where and when did Gov. Huckabee attack Gov. Romney over his religion? The supposed Jesus and Satan brothers fiasco was taken out of context as Gov. Huckabee addressed in his Wolf Blitzer interview. The "Christian Leader" ad was made to be something that it was not.

Everytime Gov. Huckabee has been asked about Gov. Romney's religion, he has said no comment or that should have no barring on this race.

When people say "no comment" I often mishear that as a comment about Satan and Jesus being brothers.
---
Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman

about that. Even after that, i couldn't figure out what he meant. Did he say it? I don't think so. Did his interviewer (who Huck claimed knew more about comparative religions than he, a Baptist minister did) say it? Why would he?

Only Wolf Blitzer in the aftermath set the record straight that the statement didn't represent Mormon belief. Huck would have a lot more credibility in his denials if HE had made that statement at the time.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

His explanation was garbage. His apology was the only worthwhile part of it.

They that are with us are more than they that are against us.

Is it me or are these guys shifting their stance to pander for votes already? Where Mr. Reagan when you need him?

Huckabee said this today in the debate, I believe in his video.

IF A PERSON SAYS I'M A PERSON OF FAITH BUT I DON'T LET IT INFLUENCE ME OR TALK ABOUT IT, THEY'VE JUST TOLD ME THEIR FAITH IS SO IMMATERIAL, INSIGNIFICANT, AND INCONSEQUENTIAL IT ISN'T A FAITH AT ALL. IF IT'S A FAITH IT WILL DRIVE THEIR JUDGMENT AND VALUE SYSTEM, AND, THEREFORE, IT'LL HELP FIND THEM.

www.fred08.com

Notice the trouble Huck had trying to tell us just "how his faith would be applied to two issues." He couldn't do it.

The "Third Worst Person in the World" and aiming higher.

______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

The first half of tonight's Hannity and Combes consisted of a discusson with Pollster Frank Luntz and an interview with Romney himself. Romney and team couldn't have wished for better. Fred Thompson also favored very well from the news segment. My two favorite candidates. Go Mitt and Fred.

Hannity is totally batting for Romney. I think he has him on his radio show like once or twice a week, where other candidates appear maybe once a month. Then he has the balls to say he has the most comprehensive election coverage.

I myself am supporting Huckabee right now, though I was a Fred guy during the debate before the CNN Youtube debate. It was then Huckabee caught my attention and over the days that followed I became one of his supporters. But today I think Fred won some more points with me.

Mitt had a good night too, but that's to be expected when you have highly paid consultants framing your every word and telling you what you must say to get those focus group "dials" going up, up, up.

I would be happy to support either Fred or Mike, and I am not too upset if Giuliani wins either. Romney and McCain I could vote for in the general while holding my nose but I will make sure to turn out and tell my friends to vote for them too.

I think people here and in the Republican party at large are taking this stuff to whole new levels. Remember folks, no matter whose horse wins we all have to unite or else Democrats will win. So try not to stab each other in the backs now, twist the knife, and pour salt in the wound, because in November we all better be cooperating so that on Wednesday morning we can be high fiving each other on another Republican win.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service