The New Split In The Anti-War Left
By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in 2008 — Comments (1) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
The details are found here:
Congress's failure to secure a timetable for withdrawing American troops from Iraq has split anti-war activists on the tactical question of whether to attack Democrats, who now control Capitol Hill.
The split has also underlined accusations among some activists that MoveOn has abandoned its credentials as an issue-based advocacy group and now instead provides cover for Democratic Party leaders.
Anti-war activists throughout the country are united in spending August pressing lawmakers to bring U.S. troops home. But tensions within the movement have been bubbling for months over tactics and whether their fire should be aimed exclusively at Republicans.
The divisions underscore the tough position Democrats are in -- short of the 60 votes needed in the Senate to pass binding restrictions on the war and far shy of the two-thirds majority in both chambers required to override a presidential veto.
Some activist groups say MoveOn is giving a pass to Democratic leaders, whom they say are not taking a hard enough line to stop funding U.S. involvement in the war.
But MoveOn argues that burning bridges with Democrats is not an effective strategy. Much better, the influential organization says, is to work with them to peel away Republican support for the war and thus force President Bush's hand.
Interestingly enough, this is good news for Democratic Presidential candidates in their quest to ensure that the Democratic Party is organized and motivated for the White House sweepstakes in 2008. After all, if the Democratic Congress can't get the country to withdraw, the argument will be that it will take a Democratic President to do so. That will just increase the impetus to elect a Democratic President. If Hillary Clinton becomes the nominee--as it seems that she will--the best favor the Democratic Congress could do for her chances is to continue to fail to pass legislation that would bring about a withdrawal from Iraq. In those circumstances, she would be able to position herself as the only hope to get American troops out.

But what will they say when even Hillary wont pull out, knowing that to do so under her watch would be a certain catastrophe?
Oh, the joys of having no spine.