The Pro-Life Vote: It's Going FDT and Huckabee.

By Erick Posted in Comments (18) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Here's a few more data points for you out there:

Adding to National Right to Life's endorsement of Fred Thompson, Iowa Right to Life has decided to remain neutral and Georgia Right to Life has endorsed Huckabee.

In battleground South Carolina today South Carolina Citizens for Life endorsed Fred Thompson. So, if you are keeping tally, we have the national group and South Carolina going for Fred. Iowa remaining neutral. New Hampshire hasn't endorsed anyone.

That's a good streak for Fred thus far. He's been in South Carolina getting big crowds. The news here though is not Fred Thompson. The news is Mitt Romney. Mitt made a big play for the NRLC's endorsement and a big play for SCCL's endorsement. He's lost them both.

Perhaps tomorrow's speech will actually help him on that front. It seems the evangelicals who are, by and large, the leaders in these organizations have turned cold toward him.

« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims?Comments (2) | The Makings of a Real ConservativeComments (77) »
The Pro-Life Vote: It's Going FDT and Huckabee. 18 Comments (0 topical, 18 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

Well, not so sure how much that helps, endorsements may be over rated. The Polls have Thompson going down, and Romney, Rudy, and Huckabee going up.

I would rather have Thompson get the endorsement than Huckabee.
_______________________
Give me juicy, Red meat

...any of that pro-life vote? And if so, why?

Comparing McCain and FDT, there were two years in Congress that they shared where FDT had a better rating from NRLC than McCain. McCain went wobbly on stemcell issues.

Fight On!

-------------------------------------------------------------
I am a Positivist Pastafarian for the alliteration alone.

This pro-lifer supports Mitt Romney. So do lots of other pro-lifers. You can't holler all you want but there's no Thompson stampede. Huckabee, now . . .

They that are with us are more than they that are against us.

I haven't heard Huckabee call for the Congress to limit the Court's jurisdiction by removing abortion issues from its power to review cases. Such a bill could be passed by a simple majority in Congress and signed by the President. It would immediately return the nation's jurisprudence to the state it existed in prior to Roe v. Wade. Many state statute's prohibiting abortion would immediately spring back into effect, the likely consequence of which would be the saving of tens of thousands of lives. I have a hard time believing that a candidate is serious about curtailing abortion, rather than merely using it as a convenient issue, when they haven't endorsed this practical, easy step in the right direction.

Thats a bridge even I wouldn't cross. Good luck.
_______________________
Give me juicy, Red meat

it will be the equivalent of political suicide.

“.....women and minorities hardest hit”

I don't see that the endorsements have mattered much.

I'm pro-life but the GWOT is more important to me. Huckabee's big gov. and soft-on-terrorists stances eliminate him as a possibility, in this household. Fred's pro-life endorsements are interesting but I'm more interested in his principles as stated on clueless Rose's show and less in his specific positions. Can any other Republican candidate actually clearly and convincingly articulate his conservative principles?

Rush has been refusing to endorse but it's been rather obvious with whom his sympathies lay. I am starting to think Fred will be the last man standing on our side!

You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.

I'm finally getting around to telling you: I love and totally agree with your signature!

"You may not be interested in war,
but war is interested in you."

Love it! Could not agree more! Classic! Just wish more people could understand it! Some people really do want to kill us!

Kathy
=============
Life is not fair, but It's still a Wonderful Life!

Fred may talk convincingly about principles, but he still shows up with a remarkably left leaning policy package. His website speaks in vague generalities, but there are clear implications that he wants national government intervention in health care at some level, he has refused to articulate any drastic cuts in spending or the end of useless national government departments like the dept. of education, and he seems to want to continue the wasteful practice of government subsidization of energy solutions that don't work, like ethanol (undoubtedly to pander to farmers).

Talking the good talk doesn't mean much when you still have the leftist's laundry list of big government programs.

the federal government is already very much involved in health care. Why else do you think our system is so employer-centric?

I have heard Fred talk about this topic quite persuasively.

No one suggested that it wasn't involved. All I suggested is that according to Mr. Thompson's website he wants something less than complete federal withdrawl from this area of the economy. I only favor having the government get out of medicine, not some Republican version of a left wing socialst scheme. If you've heard Thompson speak "persuasively" on this issue then what exactly does his plan entail? All his webiste says is that he'll "streamline [current government programs] and improve [government programs] so that those who truly need help can get the health care they need." I don't want these programs "improved." I want them eliminated as the unconstitutional, wasteful, dangerous programs that they are.

Let's not forget that the Wisconsin Right to Life group also endorsed Thompson. Keep up with the score. Fred Thompson is the overall majority leader among the Right to Life groups. I think we need to look as Christians at every issue. I believe abortion and Gay marriage are at the top. So Thompson and Huckabee are both right on those issues, now lets look at immigration, foriegn policy and taxes. Fred Thompson is the only true conservative as Rush say's and he is the only candiate to come out with strong and positive ideas and policy statements.

Government intervention in medicine and status quo spending is conservative now?

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service