Unleash the Democrats
By Erick Posted in 2008 | Barack Obama | Obamafiles — Comments (11) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
And it is not just Hillary Clinton questioning Barack Obama's judgment and experience. We have this whole host of Democrats who were and probably still are concerned:
Sen. Biden: ABC's George Stephanopoulos: "You were asked is he ready. You said 'I think he can be ready, but right now I don't believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.'" Sen. Biden: "I think that I stand by the statement." (ABC's "This Week," 8/19/07)
Sen. Biden: "Having talking points on foreign policy doesn't get you there." ("Biden Lashes Out At Obama," ABC News' "Political Radar" Blog, blogs.abcnews.com, 8/2/07)
Sen. Dodd: "Over the past several days. ... Senator Obama's assertions about foreign and military affairs have been, frankly, confusing and confused. He has made threats he should not make and made unwise categorical statements about military options." (Anne E. Kornblut, "Obama Again Stirs Up Rivals With Statement On Use Of Nukes," The Washington Post's "The Trail" Blog, blog.washingtonpost.com, 8/2/07)
Read on . . .
Sen. Clinton: "In this election we need a nominee who can pass the commander-in-chief test. Someone ready on day one to defend our country and keep our families safe. And we need a president who passes that test, because the first and most solemn duty of the president of the United States is on protect and defend our nation. And when there is a crisis and when the phone rings whether it's 3:00 p.m. or 3:00 a.m. In the White House, there is no time for speeches and on the job training. Senator McCain will bring a time of experience to the campaign. I will bring a lifetime of experience and Senator Obama will bring a speech he gave in 2002. I think that is a significant difference. I think that since we now know Senator Mc Cain will be the nominee for the party, national security will be front and center in this election. We all know that. And I think it's imperative that each of us be able to demonstrate we can cross the commander in chief threshold. And I believe that I have done that. Certainly Senator McCain has done that. And you will have to ask Senator Obama with respect to his candidacy." (CNN's "Newsroom," 3/8/08)
Sen. Biden: "My colleagues voted against the funding to make a political point ... There's no political point worth my son's life. There's no political point worth anyone's life." (Abby Simons, "Biden Blasts Rivals For Votes Against Iraq Money," The Des Moines Register, 8/15/07)
Sen. Biden: "It's a well-intended notion he has, but it's a very naive way of thinking how you're going to conduct foreign policy. ... [T]he way to deal with it is not to announce it, but to do it. The last thing you want to do is telegraph to the folks in Pakistan that we are about to violate - quote - 'their sovereignty.'" ("Biden Lashes Out At Obama," ABC News' "Political Radar" Blog, blogs.abcnews.com, 8/2/07)
Sen. Dodd: "If you're making a mistake today, you ought to stand up and say so. It was a mistake in my view to suggest somehow that going in unilaterally here, into Pakistan, was somehow in our interest. That, I think, is dangerous. And I don't retreat from that at all." (Sen. Chris Dodd, MSNBC AFL-CIO Presidential Candidates Forum, Chicago, IL, 8/7/07)
Former Gov. Tom Vilsack: "I must say that after reading and reviewing Senator Obama's comments, I have found them to be condescending and disappointing and they reflect in my view a very flawed reading and understanding of people who live in small towns in Pennsylvania and across the United States. Folks who work everyday, play by the rules, and want to do right by their families and their communities. I found his remarks undercutting his message of hope. ... I think the most glaring misreading and misunderstanding of people in small towns were Senator Obama's comments about God and guns. He suggests that in some way the faith of those who live in small towns is superficial. It's used as a crutch in a time of need. That's not what I know." (Hillary Clinton For President, "Gov. Tom Vilsack, PA Mayors Respond To Senator Obama's Recent Characterizations Of Pennsylvanians," Press Release, 4/12/08)
Former Sen. John Edwards: "I mean, the members of the Congressional Black Caucus who are sitting in front of me right now know they have to go to the floor of the House every day and vote on hard issues, and they have to vote up or down or not show up to vote -- one of those three choices. What I didn't hear was an explanation for why over 100 times you voted 'present' instead of yes or no when you had a choice to vote up or down." Sen. Obama: "I'll be happy to answer -- because in Illinois, in Illinois oftentimes you vote 'present' in order -- in order to indicate that you had problems with a bill that otherwise you might be willing to vote for, and oftentimes you'd have a strategy that would help move the thing forward. Keep in mind, John, I voted for 4,00 0 bills, and if you want to know whether or not I worked on tough stuff, I passed the first..." Sen. Edwards: "No, I don't question whether you worked on..." Sen. Obama: "No, no, no, hold on a second..." Sen. Edwards: "I don't question whether you worked on tough stuff. This, the question is..." Sen. Obama: "No, no, but you..." Sen. Edwards: "Why would you over a hundred times vote 'present.'" Sen. Obama: "John..." Sen. Edwards: "I mean, every one of us, every one - you've criticized Hillary, you've criticized me for our votes. We've cast hundreds and hundreds of votes. What you're criticizing her for, by the way, you've done to us, which is you pick this vote and that vote out of the hundreds that we have - (applause) - and all I'm saying is, what's fair is fair. You have every right to defend any vote, you do, and I respect your right to do that on any - on any substantive issue. It does not make sense to me and what if I had just not shown up..." Sen. Obama: "John, John.. ." Sen. Edwards: "Wait, wait, wait, let me finish." Sen. Obama: "Now, hold on a second." Sen. Edwards: "What if I had just not shown up to vote on things that really matter to this country? It would have been safe for me politically. It would have been the careful and cautious thing to do. But I have a responsibility to take a position even when it has political consequences." (Former Sen. John Edwards and Sen. Barack Obama, CNN Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Myrtle Beach, SC, 1/21/08)
Sen. Clinton: "I do not want to fix the problems of Social Security on the backs of middle-class families and seniors. If you lift the cap completely, that is a $1 trillion tax increase. I don't think we need to do that." (Sen. Hillary Clinton, CNN Democratic Presidential Debate, Las Vegas, NV, 11/15/07)
Sen. Clinton: "I'm certainly against one of Senator Obama's ideas, which is to lift the cap on the payroll tax, because that would impose additional taxes on people who are, you know, educators here in the Philadelphia area or in the suburbs, police officers, firefighters and the like." (Sen. Hillary Clinton, ABC Democrat Presidential Debate, Philadelphia, PA, 4/16/08)
Sen. Clinton: "Sen. Obama's plan does not and cannot cover all Americans. He's called his plan universal, then he called it virtually universal, but it is not either. And when it comes to truth in labeling, it simply flunks the test." (Sen. Hillary Clinton, Remarks On Health Care, Des Moines, IA, 11/28/07)
« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims? — Comments (2) | Breaking Down Obama's Sermon on the Mount of Victory — Comments (53) »
Unleash the Democrats 11 Comments (0 topical, 11 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
today. Now as we speak he has changed his total perspective on Iran and on the preconditions. Catering to the Jews in their house is winning points. The crowd is also full of supporters I suggest are not jewish. Hillary is to follow.
Can you imagine if the Democrats pull out what Romney said about McCain. What Tancredo said about his immigration stance? Or what if they pull up what RedState says about the guy?
I would prefer to keep the discussion far away from how each of the candidate's were/are perceived by the base.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I am a Positivist Pastafarian for the alliteration alone.
The Dems wouldn't dare use what we said about JMac. They're already gonna have trouble keeping the Reagan Dems on their side. If they find out that Mac is too liberal for the Republican base, they may come over in droves.
For the love of God, please, please, please, let them try that one.
.
and as a person not swooning with McCain love, I still love it!
Unfair. Unbalanced. Unmedicated. -- IMAO
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
But the Dems will likely pull the same childish tricks to produce "gotcha" ads against McCain. It's one of the many reasons I hate modern American politics. Heaven forbid we focus on the issues, let's instead take snippets of comments from a candidate or their primary opponents and spin them into claims of profound importance.
"Gone to the White House! Ha, ha, ha!"
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
Didn't the Dems and his GOP opponents start a whisper campaign against President Harding claiming that he was part black? I believe Thomas Jefferson had to deal with innuendo in his first presidential campaign.
The first political ad I can remember seeing on TV was a pro-Nixon ad with a picture of McGovern spinning on a spindle, with voice over talking about how he had changed his position on so many issues, such as busing, etc.
Accusations of this and that using actual quotes and accusations of "flip-flop" are nothing new even in the TV era.
"Government of the people, by the people, for the people."
A. Lincoln
the Obama machine is maturing . Or his speak writers are reading up on foreign affairs. McCain has it on security if he has the good luck of the war continuing to well. If it slips at all Obama will be all over it,like a duck on a june bug.

I could not find your coverage of McCain's speech.
The Essene