You know, Michelle Obama, I could have been a bit more concise about this.

Alas, Gaelic obscenities are just as banned as English ones.

By Moe Lane Posted in Comments (71) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

You might have noticed the recent TNR article about Michelle Obama, which included this bit:

In a 2004 interview with the Chicago Tribune, Michelle observed: "What I notice about men, all men, is that their order is me, my family, God is in there somewhere, but me is first. ... And, for women, me is fourth, and that's not healthy." This is not a radical observation: Get a half-dozen gals together with a few bottles of Beaujolais, and a similar theme will eventually emerge. (Trust me on this.)

[Bolding mine.]

And you no doubt, like several other people, raised an eyebrow at it. Now, being a charitable sort, I actually went to the Chicago Tribune and shelled out the $3.95 to read the article in question (more on this later), just in case that it got taken out of context.

Not really, no. Below is the lead-up:

Staying sane

As the countdown to Election Day enters a critical phase, and the prospect of making postelection plans becomes inevitable, Obama makes psychic and emotional space a priority for herself.

She has made a deal with herself: Remain sane.

"I cannot be crazy, because then I'm a crazy mother and I'm an angry wife.

"What I notice about men, all men, is that their order is me, my family, God is in there somewhere, but me is first. And for women, me is fourth, and that's not healthy."

...followed by some bits on how she stays healthy. So, yes, she really said that.

Read on.

Let me get back to that $3.95. The reason why this is being written so late is because I needed some assurance that I'd get reimbursed for shelling out four bucks for the article; and the reason why I needed that reassurance is because, these days, four bucks is a significant part of my weekly income. As in, one-fifth. And do you know why that is? It's because, when our son was born, we had a choice: I could work full time and pay for full-time child care, or I could stay at home, or my wife could stay at home. My wife has a PhD in aerospace engineering and is a civilian worker for the Navy; I was a real estate researcher. And I wasn't ready to let my son be raised by strangers. So we picked what was best for the family, which is why I'm at home full time, for as long as I can manage it.

Now, I am not going to pretend that my life is miserable; it's not. But it is by no means selfish, which is what Michelle Obama called me. Everything I do these days is put through the filter of baby first, family second, me third. Because that's what real men do, including the ones with a more traditional family arrangement. They work hard jobs - or even merely mind-killing ones - to make sure that their loved ones are provided for; they go without their little bachelor luxuries to make sure that there is enough in the bank for the family to benefit; they define themselves, proudly, as fathers and husbands.

Are there many men who fail this test of character? Of course. Far too many of them, in fact. But we are not here to suffer the misplaced scorn of people like Michelle Obama, and I would greatly appreciate it if she avoided commenting about my relationships in the future.

Because if she doesn't, I may decide to start talking about hers. Fair's fair, and she's certainly providing us with enough ammunition.

« Dueling June Obama fundraising claims?Comments (2) | More on the 50 state head-to-head SUSA pollComments (24) »
You know, Michelle Obama, I could have been a bit more concise about this. 71 Comments (0 topical, 71 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

Some advisor for the Obama campaign is going to figure out how to convince Michelle Obama to shut up - or at least quit blasting America and/or the male portion of the population at every opportunity. That will be a very sad day for me.

------------
The Red Sox Republican: Burkeanism, Baseball, and Sundries.

this. Just one point though.
Should, God forbid, BHO become president, I think Michelle Obama will become only the second first lady I can honestly say I detest.
I'll let you guess who the first one was.

...as the Queen of cheap shots.

It's hard to believe that someone who is supposedly as intelligent as the Obamassiah's wife consistently spews so much flatulent ignorance. Perhaps her husband, father, and other male friends and family members are as selfish as she claims all men to be. Too bad for her.

However, I know why I wake up every morning and endure a job that causes me so much stress that I can sometimes barely breathe. I know why I drive a 1998 car while my wife drives the kids to school in a 2008 model.

Every day I make sacrifices that will help my family have a better life. I'm not talking about liberal pseudo-sacrifices such as hiring the government to demand that others make sacrifices for my benefit. I'm talking about sacrificing my own time, money, and comfort because my family deserves everything that I can offer them. Because that's what men do.

--
"We want great men who, when fortune frowns, will not be discouraged." - Colonel Henry Knox

Perhaps Mrs. Obama is really communicating something deeper about men. Could it be that she realizes that for at least some of us (and I tend to believe all of us) true joy and health comes from putting our family first? In other words, I am actually incredibly selfish when I put my wife's needs ahead of mine. I just am totally self absorbed when I stay up all night rocking and walking my sick child, so that she can get some sleep. Nah... she is just the self absorbed leftist she seems to be, trying to blame men for her woes.

My Ph.D. is in geochemistry. My research has included studies of greenhouse gas levels and temperatures in Earth's earliest atmosphere in an effort to greatly extend the timeline over which we can explore the relationship between these gases and climate. Yes, I try to provide data that can be used to test the hypotheses that the thousands of modelers around the world like to treat as 'data' when they discuss climate change and the 'fact' that we are heading for the end of the world. I have also helped lead a massive effort to narrow down the search parameters for looking for life on planets around other stars using massively powerful telescopes that NASA was supposed to launch next decade (think Hubble on some serious steroids). Why all this build up of me and my career?

Well, my wife and I have three very young children. She is an information technologist with 15 years experience and therefore makes way more money than I do per hour worked. So, despite knowing that I had been on the fast track to the highest levels of academic success, I spent much of the past 5 years as a semi-stay-at-home dad, making sure that my wife could do her 20 hour/week job AND we never had to put our children in day care (I am employed but I work on soft money (NASA grants) that I raise. Therefore, I can set my own hours and work location, which has meant working bizarre hours at home mostly when the kids were asleep or my wife had them). One of our children has Down Syndrome. I drove her around to 7 therapies every week for well over a year. (Aside: Our 47-chromosome-child is the happiest person I know. I have been incredibly blessed to get to spend so much time with her... so I guess I really am selfish)

Do I feel cheated that my career has been stalled by the choices I have made to care for my family? Not one bit. I am thrilled that my children are raised by their parents, not by strangers.

We are finally dropping my wife's job. We just cannot sustain both jobs and homeschool our children and sleep. One thing had to go, and it could not be sleep and it could not be homeschooling. We talked about my staying home, but she has grown to hate her job. So, that means I have to find a new career, one that feeds my family and our mortgage. I don't really know what I will do. I had a long-term vision for my career path, that might still be viable, but who knows. What I do know is that I will do whatever job I get to take care of my family. Yes, I hope to find a job that stimulates my mind and uses all the skills I have been given, but those considerations must come after the basics: take care of my wife and children. There is no better way for me to find happiness. So, I suppose in the end, I have to admit, I am selfish after all. After all, we all know that up is down, if you just look at it through the eyes of a socialist.

The purpose of Compulsory Education is to deprive the common people of their commonsense. -G.K. Chesterton

Well said, and most impressive.

You sound just like another self-absorbed man. Must be because Ms. Obama stated that ALL men are that way.

--------------------
Vista really sucks!

Thank you sir, may I have another.

The purpose of Compulsory Education is to deprive the common people of their commonsense. -G.K. Chesterton

that perhaps Michelle Obama's assessment of men is proceeding from an unusually small sample size.

"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill

Her husband, father and father in-law?

More importantly what does this say about Mr changemister?

Excellent point!!!
I have known many men, who as Thoreau put it, live "lives of quiet desperation", trying their best to take care of their families.

Dan hits one out of the park!

Evil prevails only when good men do nothing.

Just click here to make the McCain 2008 minicity grow!

Dan hits one out of the park!

Evil prevails only when good men do nothing.

Just click here to make the McCain 2008 minicity grow!

Since Michelle insists on being concise, doesn’t her husband fit into the set of ‘all men’? If he truly suffers from the intolerable selfish priorities of male narcissism, then perhaps Michelle will be voting for Hillary in November.

and then inquire of the Great One why he hasn't told us the truth about why he is running for president? Where IS God in your family's situation? Are you taking anything for all for your insane/angry moments? How much wine does it usually take to take the edge off of your self-importance?

I have way to many questions for these folks just off the little bit presented. Why isn't anyone pursuing any of these questions with the Messiah and his wife?

I admire you guys that have been able to keep the kids out of daycare, but I think it's inaccurate at best and a cheap shot at worst to say that somebody else is "raising my kid" because she's in daycare.

She's there about 7 hours a day, which is, of course, significant, but she doesn't exactly live there. Her being there is a choice her mom and I made. We wanted to expose her to other kids and to be sure she was learning from professionals AS WELL AS from her parents.

She still learns the most important things at home. We teach her about God, about family, about love, about manners, how to brush her teeth, how to use the potty, and on and on and on. Trust me: we're raising her, but there are some great professionals helping us out.

Now that I've said all of that, my wife has turned in her notice so she can stay home fulltime with our little girl. We're both glad she's been able to do that, but we wouldn't take back the positive effects daycare has had on our daughter for anything.

And finally, Michelle Obama is a gift from God directed right at the RNC.

...choices - or anyone else's - and my apologies if you took that amiss.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

No offense taken-- I just hear people characterize daycare as letting their kids be raised by somebody else pretty often and it starts to grate after awhile!

Every one of us has to make choices regarding our work and our family. Like most, if not all the readers here (Mrs. Obama's comments regarding 50% of us notwithstanding) I feel passionately that I need to make the best choices I can for my family. That sometimes leads me to characterize the things I choose against in very negative terms, if for no other reason than that they are things against which I have chosen. Thus, for me, I feel like I would be giving over the raising of my children to someone else if I had to send them to day care for the whole work day each weekday.

Yet, I know that there are many situations in which the parents have no realistic alternative to daycare. There are other situations in which parents choose daycare because they believe they can provide for their children in a meaningfully better way by working jobs that require such a choice for their children. Certainly, the parents remain the people making the choices in the best interests of the children and therefore are clearly the ones raising the children.

My wife and I have been fortunate that we have always (up to today) been able to find a solution that did not involve daycare. The choices we have made have not always been easy and many of our closest friends have felt we were foolish to have left ourselves so severely sleep-deprived, etc. We have always replied that we are doing the best we can for our family. I am not always so certain we are right, and maybe that is part of why I feel the need to identify the alternative as "letting someone else raise my children", so that I am not tempted to go down that road. Who knows? All I know, is that I simply meant here to say that my comments were not meant as an attack on those who make choices different from my own. They were more a reflection of my internal attitudes toward my own choices.

Unlike the presidential candidate whose wife KNOWS what motivates the half of the human race of which she is not a part, I believe that everyone in America should be free to make their own choices, especially with regards to parenting. I seek to demonstrate respect for those around me and to and support their right to make their own choices, even when I would not make the same choices myself. To do otherwise, barring cases in which the child is clearly endangered, would be hypocritical of me at the very best and leftist of me at the very worst.

The purpose of Compulsory Education is to deprive the common people of their commonsense. -G.K. Chesterton

We shouldn't criticize her unless we can appreciate the stress of trying to raise a family of four on a mere $500,000 a year.

Personally, I can't empathize with a family who admits to spending more on private instruction every year for their progeny than my family growing up made in five years' time, but they're entitled to do it, and God bless them for it.

But to whine about how hard life is? I wonder if her husband needs to remind her about what his life was like growing up.

Those living on the edge (which, in a sagging economy, could be more people than you'd think) have very little capacity to feel sympathy for sufferers of affluenza.

"No matter how much lipstick you put on the taxation pig, it's still a pig... and it's currently snout-down in your wallet." - Michael Fisk

Ahh Moe, you wouldn't be the first to get hitched late in life due to the proverbial first lay and subsequent fear of dying alone.

You're just the latest, creepiest version of a gaming geek that somehow thinks he's been granted extra powers by not being a virgin anymore.

Nice mustache by the way.

Being a spoiled, ungrateful witch doesn't make a person a "strong woman."

Not that I'd expect your average liberal troll to understand that.

Just out of curiosity - in your world, are women who stay at home with their kids reliant on their strong husbands?

If you have an answer drop it into the contact form. Blam.

------------
The Red Sox Republican: Burkeanism, Baseball, and Sundries.

And then I read posts like these, and I realize that yes: yes, I can. And I do. :)

Moe Lane

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

You can advocate for the party of "rugged individualism" by staying at home, hitting F5 every five minutes and being an authoritarian prick.

While your wife brings home the bacon.

You've just demonstrated that you really are that much of a moron.

How quaint of Moe and his wife to think that children should be cared for and that maybe if she has the better income producing job, she should be the one who goes to work. I think of it as sound economic decision making on their part.

"I believe we must adjourn this meeting to some other place." - The last recorded words of Adam Smith.

...don't be mad at us just because you can't quit us.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater

Doubtless a result of your expanded free time.

What happened to Redstate 3.0 anyway? Inquiring donors want to know.



Fighting for conservatism one day at a time.

that you think so little of someone who would choose to stay at home and raise their child. I'm sure you think that Moe is at home with the kid in the crib while he "plays" on RedState. You clearly have never had to take care of an infant for an extended period of time.



Fighting for conservatism one day at a time.

HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater

Life exists on what I call the Fifteen-Minute Rule. You can do anything that you like, as long as it can be done in fifteen minutes, or broken-up blocks of fifteen minutes. Otherwise, not so much.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

Life beigns to exist on the Five Minute rule, if that. Especially if you have a daddy's boy like me who needs to be with his daddy at every waking moment of his life, not to be missing out on anything that his daddy might be doing that looks remotely fun, like playing around with those dishes in the water with that sponge thing :-). Consequently, he's become an avid reader of RedState and watcher of Fox News. Consequently, I've also become and avidreader of GoodNight Moon and avid watcher of Sesame Street. Ah, what a good life.

"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.Let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."-Barry Goldwater
McCain/Rudy 08-kill the terrorists and punch the hippies.

Gee, I guess we're broken as a society once parenthood is reduced to the limitations of an Andy Warhol quote.

...free time," who's the one who's registered 6+ accounts here?

Look, I know we're like crack, and that your mancrush on Moe is chafing you something awful, but hey -- you should know that real men never end up going for the limp-wristed stalker. The sooner you turn your fixation elsewhere, the better for your heart and for your loins.

Which, ironically, I'm not currently sporting.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

There, you feel better now? Not so left out? I have a pretty good idea on who owns your "heart and loins" buddy. So back off.

Then I saw it wasn't.

And I was disappointed.

Man is free at the moment he wishes to be. --Voltaire

Who's a former Air Force Special Ops guy and who's done multiple tours of duty in Iraq? That chickenhawk?

Honestly. We haven't had anyone this enamored with RedState since Demophilus.

------------
The Red Sox Republican: Burkeanism, Baseball, and Sundries.

who apparently hated his own freedom so much that he shot the pope.

lesterblog.blogspot.com

I have long ago given up trying to rationalize the stream-of-consciousness opines of such wayward self proclaimed pseudo intellectuals. However, it is quite easy to determine the rhizomes are firmly planted in a Marxist-Socialist state of mind that constantly gravitates to the collective and places groups of people in a classes.

True Michelle, men are a class unto themselves as part of the species homo sapien. Nonetheless, the collective classification ends there. I thought it would be helpful to use biological terms since it appear a basic, learned distinction of human traits and individuality seems to have somehow eluded your grasp (or selectively and consciously discounted as vestiges of a useless political philosophy). You may have also missed the fact that classifying entire groups of people to fit one’s personal proclivities and by extension superior intellect is, well, revealing. By that I mean it exposes a deeper mistrust and prejudice formed by personal experience.

Now I am not prescient or privy to any personal information but the bet is you have made similar statements before to the Mr. Can’t say I blame you as he seems rather enthralled with all the personal attention. Problem is, he reeks of the same mental, philosophical and moral flaws hidden by oratory and doublespeak, but which unveil themselves in poor judgment, recusant mainstream moral choices and specious religious doctrine.

I think that about covers it.

"Nec Aspera Terrent"
bene ambula et redambula
Contributor to The Minority Report

beyond belief. Typical therefore for a marvelously intelligent Democratic woman. Republican women on the other hand, mere slugs and slaves enabling their husbands sexism.

Just like the last Most Intelligent Woman on Earth [until she proved she couldn't even run a competent campaign ] at some point the managers for Obama will have to skyhook her offstage and muzzle her. In 1992 Hillary was making a fool of herself and had to be silenced. I daresay the Obama people are taking fittings for that muzzle about now.
.

"a man's admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him". Tocqueville

I'm usually with you Moe, but I'm not sure she meant that men are narcissist because they prioritize themselves differently. I know you specifically didn't say she called men narcissist, but I think she was making a statement on how women prioritize themselves (which is the debatable point).

It's funny that from a female perspective I thought she was paying men a compliment...and I also found it ironic that by reading her comment, many men felt the need to defend themselves and talk about themselves, even though I don't think she meant to attack men or even address them directly.

Ironic that you would place yourselves and your perspectives as the central issue, and not address what she was saying about women. It's possible you may be proving her point.

Also: not to be pedantic, but it's a little hard to respond to her personal attack without being, you know, personal. Don't get me wrong: I can see your point about what she may have been intending to say about women. But Ms. Obama's implicit assumptions about men is what raised my hackles something fierce.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

that it would raise hairs, the implicit assumptions in her comments are and continue to be slippery, which is what makes her so controversal and in some cases appealing. I worry that attention like this from RSers just fuels her fire and adds to her mystique.

As we both know, people now respond to anyone even mentioning anything that could be "presumed" to be negative about women, and I just don't want to see good men falling for the same bait.

Which just goes to show how warped modern feminism is: hey--look at all those men being utterly selfish, that's wonderful, let's join them.

"People will not look forward to posterity who never look backward to their ancestors." -Edmund Burke

She is saying chicks rule because they place their needs lower on the personal pecking order than all those evil men who are "unhealthy". I think 40 million abortions is a good enough counter to that argument.

That isn't what she is saying at all. She is calling women unhealthy because she believes they underprioritize themselves. The implicit assumption is that men are therefor MORE healthy because they are able to prioritize their own needs higher than women are able to, and thus remain "sane" (as the article was titled).

I don't agree with her, but I think your interpretation of what she said misses her point so that you can prove yours. Which is (I believe I'm connecting your dots correctly) that all abortions are received by selfish women. The abortion rate doesn't prove that women are more selfish. Aborted pregnancies reflect BOTH GENDER'S and sexual participants inability (or in some cases unwillingness) to follow through with a full term pregnancy.

Sure, there are cases where abortions were received by women who didn't want to have to re-prioritize their lives around children, but many abortions occur because women struggle (in many cases alone) to prioritize the children they already have. This isn't a justification or advocation of abortion but I think you are having too much fun with your fun facts. The key to ending abortions is understanding the 40 million reasons why they occur in the first place.

In the end, there are too few Moe's around, for sure.

The abortion rate doesn't prove that women are more selfish. Aborted pregnancies reflect BOTH GENDER'S and sexual participants inability (or in some cases unwillingness) to follow through with a full term pregnancy

Last time I checked, the husband/boyfriend/sperm donor had absolutely no legal say in the decision to abort. On the other hand, the husband/father/sperm donor has (almost) absolutely no legal say in setting child support if the pregnancy is carried through.

How does that translate into both genders equally sharing the blame for the decision to abort?
_______________________________________________
"You can't save the Earth unless you're willing to make other people sacrifice" - Scott Adams (speaking through Dogbert)

According to many "experts", men don't even have a right to an opion on abortion laws.
_______________________________________--
"You can't save the Earth unless you're willing to make other people sacrifice" - Scott Adams (speaking through Dogbert)

Women do not get to play the victim card at all for having abortions, and yes I do believe that the vast majority of abortions are obtained by very selfish women (remember men have NO/NONE/ZERO say in this matter) so selfish that they would rather kill their child than change their life.

As to Mrs. changemeister how you parse her statements she equates selfish behavior with healthily behavior, which totally fits, in with her self-centered victimized view of the world. How I parsed them she said men are evil because they are too selfish I actually think my version is kinder to her because she just comes off as a stupid man hater.

I addressed the abortion portion down thread.

She was no more praising men than I would be self-effacing if I said in a job interview that my faults were my inability to accept sloppy work from myself or my unwillingness to get to work late.

She was slamming men and promoting herself as Mrs. Wonderful/I Always Put Everyone Else First/Supermom/Superwife/Superperson.

I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant's faithful 100 percent.

I think what you are doing for your wife and your kids is impressive and awesome. You are right, there are too few of you out there. Your wife is a lucky person/woman/mom/professional to have you. (She can readjust that order as she sees fit :) ).

I got into a huge amount of trouble for this, might as well share it.

At a dinner party at the home of one of my wife's closest friends, the hostess' sister was holing forth on what a rotten SOB her latest boyfriend had been towards her daughter. This woman had amassed an amazing track record of bad life decisions, coupled with an almost magical ability to find and latch on to Mr. Wrong, and she'd long ago burned through any slack I might have cut her (which, admittedly, wasn't much).

When she intoned the ritual invocation "All men are pigs", responded with "No, only the ones that will date you". All I could say into the stunned silence around the table was "Did I say that out loud?".
___________________________________________
"You can't save the Earth unless you're willing to make other people sacrifice" - Scott Adams (speaking through Dogbert)

Well put. Although I sympathize with you as I have experienced the same silence as well....

Or has modern feminism actually adopted the mythical chauvinism of the 1950's as their own belief system, merely switching the genders.

Work outside the home is more important than housekeeping.

Women are intrinsically superior to men.

I mean, if the 1950's were so bad, then you'd think that feminists wouldn't be working so hard to recreate it.

which led me to be a single father for several years, and to take lower-paying jobs which allowed me to have a regular schedule, or to work from home. We didn't have much, but they had me.

It was total megalomania which led me to pray every day, on my knees or on my face, that my children would have character and not be like me.

It is a singular vanity which has caused me to endure the commute between my current job and school in the city and the quiet little town where my youngest is in school, to give my wife the attention she craves, and to spend my nights, weekends, and vacation time repairing and remodeling the house to make her happy.

Thank you, Michelle, for opening my eyes.

--
Gone 2500 years, still not PC.

...to agree with Michele Obama, but the complete focus on telling everyone all the amazing sacrifices YOU've made seems to play right into her hands, does it not?

Just to make sure that I'm not misunderstood: no, I don't think all men are selfish. Your sacrifices are to be respected on the highest level; however, pointing out how sacrificial you are tends make your sacrifice less about those you are sacrificing for, and more about you.

And for the record - she did seem from the context to be pointing out how women unhealthily ignore their own needs for other priorities. Although I don't really agree with this either... I've known far more selfish women than men.

What the dear Mrs. Obama has shown us is the fun with controversy you get when you overgeneralize.

...to a personal attack of this nature without being personal in turn. And if she didn't want people like me to take her attack personally, she shouldn't have included people like me in it. :)

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

What Moe is doing is admirable, but it isn't amazing. As he points out, it's what a *real* man does. The reason it seems amazing to some is that we live in a culture that endlessly tells us that what "real" men want is an endless frat party, and what "civilized" men want is to be a woman with a penis.

His recitation of the things he's done to make a safe, secure home for his family isn't meant to demonstrate his "sacrifice" so much as present his credentials; these days a conservative man has to take care to prove his provenance before taking on a liberal feminist.

It's a pretty important distinction that Moe was listing things he's voluntarily done to make a better life for his family, rather than reciting a list of things that society has done to him.
____________________________________________
"You can't save the Earth unless you're willing to make other people sacrifice" - Scott Adams (speaking through Dogbert)

although Chardonnay is the trendy favorite these days.

lesterblog.blogspot.com

because I got so much personal satisfaction from working 90 hours a week for 25 years to put my three kids through private school, Notre Dame, Fairfield University and Wake Forest University. Maybe the next time Mrs. Barack Hussein Obama is spending $1000.00 on a manicure and having her hair done, she can think about the selfishness of wanting that for ones children.

I know just what she means. That lousy guy I'm married to gets up every morning long before the sun comes up and goes off to work his rear end off delivering tires all day, regardless of whether or not it is 110 degrees or -10 degrees. Then on the weekends, he either works on the house and farm or works for someone else to make a little extra money.

Meanwhile, poor, poor little old me, I stay home, in our heated, air-conditioned house with always hot running water, not picking cotton or grinding my own wheat, with our kids, taking care of the house and the homeschooling.

But he's soooooo demanding. When he gets home, he always wants something to eat and some tea. Lousy selfish bum.

Then again, I've never done this,

Get a half-dozen gals together with a few bottles of Beaujolais

and for that matter, don't even know what a Beaujolais is, so maybe I'm just out of the loop.

I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant's faithful 100 percent.

think Boonesfarm, replace the twist-off with a cork, and leave it in the cellar for about ten years.

OR, just drink the Boonesfarm

Take some white-out and a marker to the price tag and move the decimal point one digit (possibly 2) to the right.
___________________________________
"You can't save the Earth unless you're willing to make other people sacrifice" - Scott Adams (speaking through Dogbert)

I'm beginning to see a pattern. Start with this:

"What I notice about men, all men, is that their order is me, my family, God is in there somewhere, but me is first..."

And then consider this:
"For the first time in my adult life, I'm proud of America".

Things suddenly start to make sense. Maybe if Ms. O hung out with a better class of men, she'd think a little more highly of the good old U S of A.

Hay Moe - you have time to do a little mentoring?
___________________________________________
"You can't save the Earth unless you're willing to make other people sacrifice" - Scott Adams (speaking through Dogbert)

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service