Chuckle
The Zionist Conspiracy Strikes Again!
By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in Featured Stories | Foreign Affairs — Comments (9) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Look who's blogging. Currently, the poll question asks us "Do you think that the US and Israeli intention and goal by attacking Lebanon is pulling the trigger for another word war?"
As things currently stand, 1,462 votes (31% of the total) say "yes." 3,325 votes say "no."
I don't think that 69% is nearly enough to constitute an acceptable "no" vote. Wander over to the site and run up the score. Vote early and vote often, as we say in Chicago. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad hasn't done anything to prevent repeat voting and given the degree of political corruption brought about by the Islamic regime, what goes around should certainly come around.
« Republican Moderates May Walk Away From Veto Threat — Comments (17) | Lieberman Leads In Post-Primary Poll — Comments (20) »
Chuckle 9 Comments (0 topical, 9 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
Just voted on the site, and the percentages yes/no are now 41/59... getting closer. Ugh.
Which means that they were embarrassed by the fact that the anti-anti-Semitic side was winning by such a lopsided margin.
"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." --Friedrich Nietzsche
Call me cynical, but surely we can predict the results of this poll.
Votes have apparently been reset, and the breakdown is now 97/3 no/yes, with just over 200 votes in the yes column. This afternoon when I contributed 30 votes or so it was 70/30 with over 1000 votes for yes.
Heh. "The server at www.ahmadinejad.ir is taking too long to respond."
I wonder if someone found a database issue, as I mentioned above, heh.
--
"In this day and age, you're not going to get a fair shake in the media" -- Lance Armstrong
LGF is saying that the site might try to use a back door into IE.
Here is a link to Mr. Johnson's post - Ahmadinejad's Blog is Dangerous
How stupid, they're crudely logging their hits into a database, judging by this error message I get when I try to read the site:
"Procedure 'sptblHits_Insert' expects parameter '@hitUserAgent', which was not supplied."
Anyone want to see if they're protecting the user agent from injection attacks? heh
--
"In this day and age, you're not going to get a fair shake in the media" -- Lance Armstrong