"Defining Democracy Down"

Killing Venezuela Softly . . . With His Song

By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in | Comments (5) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

"Mary Anastasia O'Grady destroys any notion that Venezuela comes even remotely close to achieving the ideals of democracy (read on):

The assault on Venezuelan democracy, which began before Mr. Chávez came to power, has been possible largely because of state corruption. But the Chávez government has taken the concept to a whole new level. In this space last week I cited a report by Gustavo Coronel, a former director of the state oil company. His paper, "Corruption, Mismanagement and Abuse of Power in Hugo Chávez's Venezuela," published by the Cato Institute, deserves a fuller airing.

Mr. Coronel, who was the Venezuelan representative for Transparency International from 1996-2000, has painstakingly traced the "hypercorruption" that is now flourishing as a result of record oil income, poor management, and the "ideological predilections" of a president trying to "play a messianic role in world affairs." In 23 pages he neatly shows that Mr. Chávez, who claims to represent the progressive left, is nothing but an old-fashioned authoritarian otherwise known in Latin America as a caudillo.

The report properly notes that government corruption is "the violation of public interest for personal or partisan gain," a definition that goes beyond graft to "the use and abuse of political power." Chávez corruption includes the 1999 constituent assembly, which was packed with his supporters and given supraconstitutional powers to dissolve the country's democratic institutions and create new ones made up of pro-Chávez actors. "This ended with all Venezuelan political institutions under the control of the government and eliminated effective checks and balances," Mr. Coronel writes. "From that moment on . . . Venezuela ceased to be a democracy."

Since then the government has used its unchecked power to "spend" the country's oil wealth arbitrarily and without any accountability. Using the data from the Center for Economic Research in Caracas, Mr. Coronel identifies $17 billion in Venezuelan "donations to politically friendly countries," various infrastructure projects around the region and weapons purchases. Bolivian President Evo Morales, who famously used street violence to bring down two elected governments, got $30 million on a visit to Caracas in January. "According to the Venezuelan Central Bank," Mr. Coronel writes, "about $22.5 billion has been transferred to accounts abroad by the Chávez government since 2004." Some $12 billion of it, he says, remains unaccounted for.

Mr. Coronel notes that "according to Transparency International 95% of all known public contracts are awarded without bidding." In a country where the state owns the oil and the oil is the economy this means massive politicized fraud. False invoicing and the signing of contracts with "nonexistent suppliers" are among the tricks of the trade and explain why the country is witnessing the "emergence of a new rich 'revolutionary' class."

The politicized Supreme Court, National Electoral Council (CNE) and state-owned oil company PdVSA no longer have any transparency obligations. The CNE, for example, has not allowed an independent audit of the voter registry, which contains almost 17 million names, "a statistical improbabilty" in a country of 26 million, "60% of whom are too young to register." With Chávez carte blanche comes power to destroy political enemies too. After a PdVSA strike to oppose the politicization of the oil company 20,000 skilled employees were fired in violation of Venezuelan labor laws.

Read the whole thing for the depressing details. Of course, anyone who is familiar with those details understands that Venezuela is an autocracy and a corrupt one at that. And in the event that we have forgotten, the cult of personality is alive and well in Venezuela:

The red-clad Chávez dramatically recited from the Lord's Prayer and then borrowed from it for his own prophesy. "Thy kingdom come," he bellowed, and thereafter, "the kingdom of socialism." The ailing Fidel Castro reportedly sent a short message from Havana congratulating Mr. Chávez and noting that "the victory was resounding, crushing and without parallel in the history of our America."

Appropriating the Lord's Prayer for political purposes, eh? Since when did the Almighty speak through Hugo Chávez? Or is this part of that "Christianist" phenomenon I keep hearing about? Oh, and by the way, the Cato study referred to in the O'Grady article can be found here.

« "CIBD"Comments (7) | Into That Good Night He GoesComments (11) »
"Defining Democracy Down" 5 Comments (0 topical, 5 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

I'm not really all that convinced by this article.

The author states that Mr. Chavez has awarded no-bid contracts. Didn't the DoD do the same with Halliburton?

"Chávez corruption includes the 1999 constituent assembly, which was packed with his supporters and given supraconstitutional powers to dissolve the country's democratic institutions and create new ones made up of pro-Chávez actors."

That sounds like the clincher. However, the people who temporarily overthrew Chavez in 2003 did the exact same thing, installing new government heads. As for supraconstitutional powers, didn't Bush claim something similar in his signing statements, or in response to the wiretapping?

"Since then the government has used its unchecked power to "spend" the country's oil wealth arbitrarily and without any accountability."

Troubling, yes, but hasn't Bush done the same? Billions flowed into Iraq and aren't accounted for, cash-wise.

harpoons.
_______________________________
If "pro" is the opposite of "con", what is the opposite of "progress"?

-----------
Even those who learn from history are surrounded by those doomed to repeat it.

Bush is Chavez, is Hitler, etc., etc.

The temptation to resort to the same ad hominem and unsubstantiated attacks you use on The President of the United States of America is almost irresistible. However, in the interest of crushing your zombified, “progressive” opinions let me attempt to demonstrate the difference...

On the one hand you have a country that has been serial raped by a madman for thirty years, then smashed by the US military who removed said rapist. There are two engineering and contracting companies in the entire world, one of which happens to be European who even have half the experience and expertice necessary to rebuild the country.

On the other hand you have a dictator, elected by plebiscite (sound familiar), who seizes all revenue generating private property in his country, that is at peace, and awards phony contracts to his friends and cronies when there are literally thousands of companies worldwide that would be more than happy to bid for said country’s oil contracts. Are you starting to see some reality, or are the alphabet networks still broadcasting their mind control lasers at your head?

Actually, George Washington, the President does not control the expenditure of funds in our DEMOCRACY, the SENATE does.

I suggest that before you comment further you read a copy of our Constitution, and familiarize yourself with the fundamentals of our democracy before comparing it to Chavez’s communist junta.

Frankly, as one who has sworn an oath to defend said document with my life, on several ocasions I find your comments far more offensive than you can possibly imagine, all your fantasies aside!

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem." - President Ronald Reagan

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service