Jules Crittenden Catches The New York Times In A Moment Of Unguarded Honesty
By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in Featured Stories | War — Comments (6) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Go over and look. But be warned: The New York Times's brand of honesty is not for those with weak stomachs.
It never occurred to me that a national American newspaper could make it clear that it barely blinks an eyelash at the possibility of murder on a mass scale in Iraq in the aftermath of a precipitous American departure. I guess I overestimated the Times in that regard.
Relatedly, you can catch Natan Sharansky in a moment of unguarded honesty here. Of course, one need not belabor the point that Sharansky's honest opinions are far more grounded in ethics, logic and basic humanity than are those of the New York Times.
« Republican Moderates May Walk Away From Veto Threat — Comments (17) | What Might Have Been — Comments (54) »
Jules Crittenden Catches The New York Times In A Moment Of Unguarded Honesty 6 Comments (0 topical, 6 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
How can you equate the killing of terrorists with the genocide and mass murder of a dictator? Only a liberal can take BDS to the point of defending Saddam Hussein and his rule.
I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant's faithful 100 percent.
On anything. Mores the shame.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
"murder on a mass scale in Iraq"
Four years and surging.