Respecting the Institution

The Senate, secret holds and Harry Reid

By Bluey Posted in | Comments (3) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

This week's blog-driven debate over the Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act has left me thinking about the conflict between good-intentioned bloggers and long-standing Senate traditions.

Over the past two days I've reached out to friends who work in the Senate, many of whom are supporters of the so-called "hold." I've long shared those sentiments, as I believe all conservatives should. As conservative Sen. Jeff Sessions said last year, taking away this legislative procedure would provide "a new advantage for those who want bigger and more expensive government."

While I've said from the beginning that I support the Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act (here and here), I have taken some exception to the tactics employed by bloggers. This stems from my deep respect for the Senate as an institution with long-standing traditions. Unlike the House of Representatives, where the speaker can ram through legislation, the same isn't true in the Senate -- and for good reason. Without the tactics used by Senator Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R.-Ky.) this year, imagine the atrocious legislation that would have proceeded to President Bush's desk.

Read on ...

Although I've failed to convince many of my friends on the left and right that they have some basic facts incorrect about Senate procedure, a few bloggers (particularly Liz Mair) have courageously stood up for accuracy.

Up until now, I've avoided bringing partisan politics into this debate. But it's important to understand the Democrats' agenda here: they're in this to embarrass Republicans regardless of the bill's outcome. Although the Democrats' own leader is now just as responsible for the bill's fate as the Republican who objected to it, we've seen little pressure put on Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-Nev.). Sunlight's Paul Blumenthal continued to hammer away at the "remaining 12 Republican Senators" today without ever mentioning Reid. (In fairness to Sunlight, Bill Allison did mention it, but only in passing.)

Here's my friendly advice to the Sunlight Foundation: Stop playing phone tag with Republican offices and demand that bloggers exert pressure on Reid to bring the bill to the floor immediately. Such a move might restore Republicans' faith in your organization. But more importantly, it would accomplish what we all want -- passage of the bill.

« Rep. Capuano's Newspeak for CensorshipComments (5) | Transparency Bill Isn't Being 'Blocked'Comments (2) »
Respecting the Institution 3 Comments (0 topical, 3 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

the senate.

Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
Starbucks: Coffee, good. Cups, bad, but
"One man with courage makes a majority."-Andrew Jackson

From you're blog: There’s a clear difference between a “secret hold” and an objection to unanimous consent.

Being no expert on Senate procedure myself, I agree with you. The question I have is are you SURE there isn't ALSO a secret hold and hence the objection? I mean, it's not like some Senator is going to stand up and say "secret hold"! Since Sunlight now has at least THREE Republican staffers for different Senators claiming there is a hold I think that's something that needs to be considered...

...I'll respect the Senate, as soon as the Senate starts respecting me.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service