Whither Loyalty?
The President Must Pardon Scooter Libby Now
By Mark I Posted in Featured Stories | Law — Comments (21) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Time has run out on Scooter Libby. Today, a Federal appeals court in Washington unanimously rejected Libby’s request to delay the application of his sentence in the Plamegate™ Leak Trial. This means that Libby will have to report to jail while the rest of the appeals process runs its course. The New York Times reports that the US Bureau of Prisons has not yet assigned him to a facility or given him a surrender date, but it has assigned him a federal inmate number: 28301-016.
Members of Libby’s defense fund are now publicly calling for the president to pardon Libby.
"I hope it puts pressure on the president. He's a man of pronounced loyalties and he should have loyalty to Scooter Libby," said former Ambassador Richard Carlson, a member of Libby's defense fund. "It would be a travesty for him to go off to prison. The president will take some heat for it. So what? He takes heat for everything."
Mr. Cohen is correct. The time has come for the President to pardon Libby. President Bush has stated that he would not consider a pardon until the legal system has run its course. I don’t believe that in making that statement, the president expected Libby to spend one day in jail. The most likely scenario was for Libby to be convicted and remain free on appeals which would consume the time between the conviction and the end of the president’s term, when he could be pardoned. But that has not come to fruition. Instead of facing two years of legal wrangling and legal bills in the millions, for which he could raise money to help defray the costs, Libby now faces 2 ½ years in a Federal Penitentiary for loyally doing his job for the President. Mr. Bush must return that loyalty now.
Read on…
The Bush 43 Administration has been marked by one overriding trait, loyalty. President Bush has famously stuck by his subordinates, some for too long. He has rightly stood by embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales through the pseudo-scandal over the firing of eight United States Attorneys. He wrongly stuck by White House Counsel cum Supreme Court Nominee Harriet Miers for a crucial month in the face of unrelenting criticism from his conservative base. He rightly rebuffed ad nauseam demands for the head of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, until wrongly giving in after the Democratic takeover of Congress last November. He wrongly expressed confidence in the clearly in-over-his-head FEMA Director Mike Brown after Hurricane Katrina for close to two weeks until rightly replacing him. Libby has yet to receive the loyalty from the president that the least of these men and women have received, yet he faces a far more serious fate.
Libby was convicted of lying to FBI agents and the grand jury investigating the leak of Valerie Plame’s name to the press. This was a process crime outside the bounds of the original charge given to Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald by a politically spooked Justice Department. It has since been learned that Fitzgerald knew the identity of the leaker almost immediately upon commencing his investigation. It was Richard Armitage. Armitage has admitted to being Novak’s source. Yet, he was never charged with any crime. Instead, Fitzgerald continued to investigate a question for which the answer was known in hopes of unearthing a conspiracy at the highest levels of government. This would-be Woodward and Bernstein of a prosecutor abused the authority given to him by continuing his investigation and all he has to show for it is a conviction of a man with a faulty memory. There was never a conspiracy, and Fitzgerald knew it, better than most, all along.
Libby was engaged in talking to reporters about Joe Wilson’s wife as part of his job responsibilities in the Vice-President’s office. He was engaging in political pushback against Administration critics, including Wilson, in an attempt to counter the developing Bush Lied™ mantra. Wilson’s New York Times op-ed was the cannon blast that started the avalanche. It has since become part of the narrative of the Iraq war that the Bush Administration gave deliberately false reasons for going to war in Iraq when nothing could be further from the truth.
The Bush administration acted on faulty intelligence and made some poor judgments in executing the war and especially in handling the aftermath, but it did not lie. If it did, then every time the Clinton Administration lobbed missiles at Iraq and used Saddam Hussein’s WMD programs as a justification, it was lying too. President Clinton had people to do political pushback; one of them was Sandy Berger. As National Security Advisor, Berger had access to much of the same intelligence on Iraq that President Bush would later have. Indeed, he had lots of access to classified documents even after his tenure in the White House. But, he’s not facing any jail time either.
The fact is that had President Bush or someone in his administration had the courage to call Joe Wilson on the carpet immediately after his op-ed appeared, instead of trying to do it in a whisper campaign through subordinates, Libby would not be facing jail time today. It wouldn’t have been too hard to show that Wilson was a political hack and a liar himself. Even the Senate Intelligence Committee was able to determine as much in its investigation into the pre-war use of intelligence, with the concurrence of committee Democrats. Be that as it may, the president decided to handle the matter in a behind the scenes way and chose Libby to help in the effort. This is standard operating procedure for political staff in the White House and should not result in jail time.
As for President Bush, Mr. Cohen is again right. The president’s political position couldn’t be any weaker. His poll numbers, though higher than Congress’s, are in the mid 30s, the campaign to succeed him is getting loads of attention, he has just lost face badly with the base over immigration, and Congressional Democrats are hell bent on investigating every single decision he has made as president since day one. There will never be a good time to pardon Libby because of the hue and cry it will raise from the left and from Democrats. But it must be done. Scooter Libby should never see the inside of a Federal prison. Libby has taken a lot of heat for the president these last two years. It is now time for the president to show his famous regard for loyalty. He must return the favor and take the heat that comes with pardoning Libby, and he must do it now.
There is no guarantee that the base will rally to the president if he does so, but this sorry affair has moved far beyond political calculations. It has become about right and wrong. It is wrong for Libby to serve time for loyally doing his job on behalf of the President of the United States. It would be equally wrong for the president, the only man in the country who can stop it, to allow it to happen.
« Republican Moderates May Walk Away From Veto Threat — Comments (17) | Do You Believe In Miracles? — Comments (13) »
Whither Loyalty? 21 Comments (0 topical, 21 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
That's why they never went after Joe Wilson like they should have or even close to the way that Wilson claims they did.
________________________________________________________
Halls of Justice Painted Green, Money Talking.
Power Wolves Beset Your Door, Hear Them Stalking.
however, it will be the darkest stain on his tenure if he doesn't pardon Libby, NOW. There is no rational excuse to allow this man to ever walk through a prison door.
Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
I flushed the "Bush is loyal" meme after Secretary Rumsfeld and General Pace were canned while Sandy Berger skipped through the streets of D.C. a free man (and until last week, a licensed attorney). I am afraid Iraq may face the same indifference.
Whatever remnant of relevance and dignity this Administration retains will be lost if Scooter Libby serves one minute behind bars.
Now there is an image I won't soon forget.
"Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori"
Contributor to The Minority Report
Granted, not one of my brightest admirers but certainly one of the most influential. I must drop him a personal note.
Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
second Libby is behind bars if that indeed happens.
Also, where's Fred T today? He should be out front on this. It should be on his campaign commercials.
“Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15.”
-Ronald Reagan
.
“Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15.”
-Ronald Reagan
Looking at this through a purely political lens, pardoning Libby is a no-brainer. What do you think will reflect more poorly on Bush, a high-level member of his administration in an orange jumpsuit behind bars, or a Presidential pardon that will drive a few Democrats crazy for a few news cycles?
Is anyone going to change their mind about Bush if he lets Libby go to prison? Is he suddenly going to have a newfound respect among the MSM? Can his poll numbers go down any lower if he does pardon Libby?
I could understand the political case for not pardoning Libby if Bush had a high approval rating, but with 30% approval numbers, he really has a blank check to use whatever Presidential powers he has at his disposal.
"Back in the thirties we were told we must collectivize the nation because the people were so poor. Now we are told we must collectivize the nation because the people are so rich. "
William F. Buckley, Jr.
My comments are not meant to be of liberal thinking. I know I sometimes provoke the ire of some because I personally believe the man should serve his time, just as the average Joe Citizen does when he/she breaks the law. I can agree that Libby was railroaded into his predicament but at the end of the day, he was convicted of failing to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth--- something that he swore under oath to do. Now, personally, I don't think he should of been there to begin with, but, he was. I don't have a real issue with the Bill Clinton cigar shenanigans but I do have a problem that he lied under oath and I think he should have served time for it even though he was the President of the United States. Likewise, I fail to see where Libby should be exonerated for perjury. If one argues that he really and honestly couldn't recall, I could might see that side. Otherwise, if one can get away with false testimony with no fear of paying a penalty, our investigations and court systems are truly in trouble. I'm not so thick headed that I can't look at arguments objectively, I just haven't heard any that justifies his pardon.
" in the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years."
Abe Lincoln
Some have more confidence in Bush on this matter than I do. When the campaign finance (McCain-Feingold) was being written in the Senate, Bush said he would veto it because it was "unconstitutional." When it passed and he signed it, his reasoning was... it was "unconstitutional" and (passing the buck) that the Supreme Court would strike it down. Well the Supreme Court didn't and now we have a bad law (though recently partially remedied), one that has infringed on free speech.
In the Libby case, the presiding Judge Walton refused to hear arguments for Libby remaining free while the appeal process goes forward. Which meant he would likely go to jail in 30 to 60 days. Bush punted hoping that the appeals court would keep Libby out of jail while the appeals process carried on. With the stay-out-of-jail appeal denied Bush doesn't have any "grey area" options left. A pardon following the completion of the appeals process, after spending 18 months in jail (come post election November 2008) is scant relief To Mr. Libby. If he deserves a pardon, then Bush should do it now. Indeed, Bush should have pardoned him right after the trial. Heck, it was the Bush Administration's passing of the buck to a special prosecutor that was the first lapse of judgment and responsibility in this political storm that has been parading as a criminal investigation. Bush claims compassion for Scooter and his family, but that isn't the issue and merely a diversion from his role as Absent-In-Chief in this affair.
In my mind a pardon would serve both justice (which IS the issue) and politics (help shore up his base which has been deserting him over immigration and ineptitude at the Justice Dept.)... that is, if he does it now. By postponing a pardon until Libby spends some time in jail or until he is leaving office, President Bush shows lack of strength, lack of courage, lack of loyalty, lack of justice... and, oh yeah, zero compassion for Libby.
Sorry for the long post...
Jack
The World's Ruined
You suggest that Bush should pardon Libby out of loyalty to a subordinate who acted out of loyalty to him.
Does no one care any more about loyalty to the law? Libby's loyalty should have been, first and foremost, not to George W. Bush, but to the law of the land. This should also have been Bush/Cheney's first loyalty.
To pardon Libby after he has been convicted by our legal system would just lend weight to the claims that Bush/Cheney wish to establish an autocracy.
We are a nation of laws, not autocrats. Libby should go to jail.
That's why President Clinton resigned after being cited for contempt of court for lying during the Paula Jones trial, right?
Sauce for the goose, and all that.
-----------------------
Develop alternatives to existing policies and keep them alive and available until the politically impossible becomes the politically inevitable. Milton Friedman
Go read up on the actual ISSUES with the prosecution, then come back and comment. As it is, you're just making a fool of yourself. And it wasn't hard either.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
So two wrongs make a right? Is that what you teach your children? Is that what you would like the children of this nation to learn? That's the implication of your argument.
If we follow this logic through, everyone should be free to commit any crime he likes just as long as he can cite an example of someone who committed a similar crime and got away with it.
Is that a legal principle you would like to see enshrined in our system?

Any person spending five minutes examining the facts could come to no other conclusion. We have now established that Fitzgerald knew before questioning Libby that Armitage was the source. So the trap was then set by asking a series of questions meant to test Libby's memory and find fault, all to be used as pressure towards an exchange. That "exchange" was information of alleged involvement by the WH in return for dropping the phony charge.
Problem is, there was no criminal WH involvement and Libby had nothing to give up. So Fitzgerald needed to save face and put Libby in jail; a detestable abuse of power in which he trampled not only on the rights of Libby, but also undertook an almost unprecedented skewering of the applicable reporters First Amendment rights. Yet the silence is deafening.
What of the original "crime" or whether there was even grounds for such a charge? We will never know, since it was never established. There are many good reasons for pardoning Libby; Mr. President how about you find just one?
"Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori"
Contributor to The Minority Report