Fidel Castro Will Not Survive George W. Bush

By Erick Posted in Comments (32) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

ImageThe media, always willing to prop up a communist dictator, loves to talk about Castro's survival. Next to Saddam Hussein's electoral victories, it is one of the most fawning statements the media gives out to anyone.

Castro survived Eisenhower. Castro survived Kennedy. He survived Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush 41, and Clinton.

He won't survive George W. Bush. For all you media types stopping by, let me repeat that so you can cry a little longer — Fidel Castro will not survive the reign of George W. Bush.

It is a sad day for America haters — the grand daddy champion of the champions of the underprivileged who don't really care about the underprivileged has given up power in anticipation of meeting his maker on the short path to hell.

As Babalublog notes, this is really much ado about nothing. Castro's prisons still hold people who just wanted to speak freely. Castro's brother will take the reins of power. The Communist Party will continue its tight grip. Sean Penn, Alec Baldwin, and Michael Moore will continue their odes to blood thirsty tyrants solely because they hate America.

And the Cuban people will continue to be beaten down.

But Fidel Castro will not survive George W. Bush.


« So Tell Me, Mr. Immelt, Why Are You Killing American Servicemen?Comments (30) | The Pakistani Powder KegComments (3) »
Fidel Castro Will Not Survive George W. Bush 32 Comments (0 topical, 32 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

It's Weekend at Fidel's.

"Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty"
Kyle

You inspired me to add a graphic. ;)

Fight On!


Alternate image, Rangel and Moore holding him up.

absentee

an occurence.
What a dispicable man he is. Cuba's future will be brighter once he is gone.

Kinda makes you wish we could re-elect George for one more term, doesn't it.

Why? He has had nothing to do with this and he has done nothing to our Cuba policy to hasten the decline of Castro or ensure a better government rises in his wake.

Erick wrote:

He won't survive George W. Bush. For all you media types stopping by, let me repeat that so you can cry a little longer — Fidel Castro will not survive the reign of George W. Bush. [emphasis mine]

If you read my comment carefully, I think you'll see I agree with you.

If you see one looking a little down, remind them about Hugo's Chavez's U.N. speech; that should cheer them up.

five minutes of his Hell on Earth. Hurry the day lil' brother and the other communist thugs on the island feel the heat as well.

Fidel won't survive Bush but that is not really a measure of success - our policy towards Cuba has got to be the longest living policy failure in our country's history. We have failed to push Castro out of power, to reform the country in anyway, to set the country open for reform following Castro's death and all at the expense of freedom of movement and association of our own citizens.

Obama would fly into Havana on day 1 of his presidency and promiss all kinds of aid and trade in exchange for some weak promiss of "reform".

Issues like these is where McCain needs to emphasize his experience. I'm sure the Obama campaign(well, at least Michelle), who only recently became proud of America, has been proud of Cuba's resistance to capitalism and corporatism since the days Che stringing up people who sought freedom.


"We don't need proof to execute a man. We only need proof that it's necessary to execute him. A revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate."

Eric you should put the above picture and Che quote on the front page.

one lick that the dictator's health problems forced this resignation (real or otherwise) during a specific term. (And that Erick apparently equates reporting about how long this dictator has lasted with an apologetic attitude toward him is interesting, but that's another story).

What matters now, during the last months of the Bush Administration, is how we respond to the dictator's decline, and what, if anything, we can do to help Cubans throw off this crushing system now that its main backer, apparently, has taken a step back. It would be nice, too, if can figure out an efficient way to eventually get American companies into the country, but that's another issue.

I can understand the glee that welcomes any sign of Castro's demise--he is a textbook totalitarian, after all--but the apparent implication that President Bush had something to do with this is strange, as is the "gotcha" to assorted Hollywood types who really don't matter all that much.

I think that sums up my position admirably.

I take it that the reason Castro chose to resign was that he wanted to be sure to turn over the reins of power to his chosen successor(s) before he died. Meaning that he knows he's near death.

It will be fun to see who will be the mourners attending Castro's funeral. There may be so many from Hollywood there that for a few days, Hollywood may come to a screeching halt.

The guy's just freakin' old. Happens to everybody.

We would have been far better off engaging Castro, in the way we engaged his counterparts in Vietnam. Opening up that society would have had the same beneficial effects we saw in the Eastern Bloc during Reagan's reign.

We could have done so much more, had we stuck to our principles and exercised a little more Reaganesque pragmatism.

How you feel joy at this failure is not fathomable to me.

HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater

Nam isn't exactly free, but if you go to Hanoi today, you can actually stay in the Hanoi Hilton. http://www1.hilton.com/en_US/hi/hotel/HANHITW-Hilton-Hanoi-Opera-hotel/i...

Sean Penn: Last year I went to Iraq. Before Team America showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles

Yes, and we messed up Cuba. It's all our fault.

"Nec Aspera Terrent"
bene ambula et redambula
Contributor to The Minority Report

That's just ridiculous. So Bush outlasted Castro? If Kim Jong-il dies from a drunken fall two days into a Hillary administration does that mean it's triumph for the Clintons? No.

I'm glad Castro's gone, but what kind of power was he yielding anyway the last two years? More importantly, I don't see the celebration if corrupt totalitarian dictator hands power to corrupt totalitarian dictator's brother.

...is that the media loves to state that Castro stayed in power longer than X US Presidents (I don't know the number). They of course say that despite the fact that no US President CAN be in office for 50 years even if he wanted to.

So, the fact that Bush will outlast Castro is a spike at the media, not a statement that Bush had anything to do with his demise.

--------------------------------------
GOP for President, 2008

then it seems a pretty weak and meaningless point, and a rather juvenile attack on the media.

And if that is the point, the point, really, has yet to be made: For all we know, the dictator can live another 20 years, enjoying influence and even blunt power from the sidelines.

After all, you can be sure that no matter how good the healthcare in Cuba may be for the common folk, his is much better.

Considering Castro lasted through six Republican and four Democratic administrations, I think we could use this moment to re-assess our failed bipartisan policies toward Cuba, not to point out the irrelevant fact that GWB outlasted Castro.

I think we should have exploded that scumbag Fidel's head with a bullet or two years ago. We should reconsider not doing the same to Raul Castro, I agree.

HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater

Unless Castro is at his brother's swearing in-inauguration-coronation, I think the man is and has been dead. He hasn't been seen alive and in the flesh in what, 18 months? Only on video.
I figure the Cuban government had only two ways to go in dealing with a Castro death. Cover it up for as long as possible as they transition to Raul. Or, they could have announced the death and made it a National Day of Mourning, etc - praising Castro (this will still probably happen).

Symbolically, it is an historic day. Fidel is no longer dictator. But, the Communist regime still rules. When it crumbles, then the celebrations can begin.
R.J.

"When it crumbles, then the celebrations can begin."

Let's hope so.

Let us hope the next big change of government in Cuba doesn't produce something bad and tragic yet again. The history of the island offers examples of bad regimes on both the right and left, whether colonial or not. I am hopeful the Cuban people have had enough, but I'll remain skeptical until there are signs of lasting change that at least tilts toward the democratic. I am optimistic the USA will help in an efficient manner, whether this means small-scale or large-scale efforts.

However, I will enjoy a nice single-malt once Castro is confirmed dead, as I doubt I will have a chance to spit on his grave. That said, I have no problems with a long but painful retirement for him.

This is worth celebrating no matter when he finally goes. He stopped mattering as much to us when his Soviet backers fell from power, but for the sake of the Cuban people this is a good development. Raul Castro will undoubtedly keep the warm communist gulag going a while longer, but he lacks Fidel Castro's cult of personality.

Now about that idea of Kim Jong Il dying from a fall down the steps in a drunken stupor.... want to take up a collection to send him a case of booze?!

It will be worth celebrating when the people of Cuba have government at least somewhat to the level they deserve. Not Raul, not Batista v2.0.

I'm sure if Kim Jong-Il died in a drunken stupor, the DPRK propaganda would portray it that he somehow died catching an asteroid that was going to wipe out North Korea!

"It will be worth celebrating when the people of Cuba have government at least somewhat to the level they deserve. Not Raul, not Batista v2.0."

True. That will be worth a really, really BIG celebration. I'm not suggesting we break out the champagne just yet. However, this is at least worth breaking out the Coke Classic.

Change comes slowly and small events have a way of foreshadowing bigger changes. It was a small event when Castro turned power over to his brother and retreated from public view. 18 months later we have him stepping down formally. Next we'll see how effective Raul is at maintaining the repression or if he tries to lighten it up. Either way, he's likely to find that he's not able to totally control how things go.

In the meantime, let's savor this development and be happy it came today as opposed to later.

As for Kim Jong-Il, let the DRPK propagandists do their best - it will still be a happy day when that little creep finds his way onto the ash-heap of history. After decades of living lavishly while his stunted countrymen starved, he has a lot to answer for. Whenever that happens I expect his personal trinkets to be exhibited to greater amazement than Imelda Marcos' shoe collection. His heels are probably higher than hers.

...that America is going the way of Cuba and not visa versa.

The MSM reports I read take great lengths to trumpet the Cuban Medical System providing health care for all (with the decided undertone that the USA should follow this great leader).

The MSM and the liberal front love everything that was Castro and Cuba. The overthrow of the establishment, the vast equality of the rules on the citizenry (well except for the ruling class and military), the removal of personal property (you don't buy houses or lands in Cuba, you lease), the subsidies for milk, bread, gasoline, rum, sugar and tobacco (well, you know, the staples in life).

Yes, the more I listen to folks on the street here in the USA, they just pine for the good life down in Fidel's world where socialism rules supreme. There's that ugly little thing about living on $20/week and not having cars and being restricted from beaches and hotels - but hey, life is good down there on the island working for the common good of man.

It would be a notable day if we weren't heading into an election where the choices for President are two extreme Liberals and one kinda-sorta Liberal. If we had any backbone, there would be a call for cooperation and the possibility of economic expansion between the two countries especially if Cuba wanted to try Capitalism and free trade once again. It would be lovely if Cuba could embrace a representative government that would respond to the wishes of the people rather than dictating life to them.

But alas, I fear that by the time Raul and a generation or so of modern dictators wear out their welcome in Cuba, the Cuban people will look up North and go "ewwwww", we certainly don't want to become a socialist cesspool like what the United States has become. The only good news is that the folks down in Miami can return home to the island and potentially start a new country - maybe take a Declaration of Independence and a Constitution as it was written by our founding fathers and create a great new Republic right at our doorstep.

I can dream can't I?

From Club for Growth, here

Forty-four days before Fidel Castro became dictator of Cuba, Robert Byrd was sworn in as a U.S. senator.

That's a lot of tyranny...and a lot of pork.



Fighting for conservatism one day at a time.

Vote for your preferred candidate even if they've dropped out. Don't follow the herd in the stampede!

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service