Justice Thomas's speech to the Federalist Society

By Alexham Posted in | Comments (16) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

I sit in the presence of greatness. I've heard Justice Clarence Thomas speak before, but it is an honor and a privilege to do so again. Needless to say, the grand ballroom here at the Mayflower is jam packed, and the feddies are thrilled to have an opportunity to listen to (perhaps) the greatest originalist justice in the history of the Supreme Court. The excitement in the room is palpable.

We are Justice Thomas's people. He is beloved because is one of America's greatest success stories. Indeed, it is hard to think of anyone who is a better example of "American Exceptionalism" than Justice Thomas.

(read on)

As Justice Thomas approaches the podium, he is greeted with a standing ovation, to which he responds by suggesting that perhaps he should "quit while he is ahead."

He is here to discuss his marvelous book, "My Grandfather's son," which you should purchase right now if you don't already own a copy. At the outset, he notes that his 16 years on the bench have flown by, and that sometimes he wonders what happened to his life, and then quips "perhaps I need to get a life."

Justice Thomas said that he has been greatly touched by how so many American have identified with his life story. He also highlighted a story where a black man expressed to him how he sat in his car and wept after reading Justice Thomas's book because he regretted "going along to get along," and not thinking for himself on matters.

Now it is time for the Q&A.

Question: Is the job of being a supreme-court justice is wonderful/fun as you thought it would be?

Answer: Justice Thomas said that he never thought about it because he never envisioned himself as a supreme-court justice. And while he does not view the job as "fun," he does view it as an honor and a mission. It is "protectng and promoting an ideal."

Question: In what environment do you do your best thinking?

Answer: Justice Thomas says he works at home a great deal, and that is where he wrote most of his book. He loves his law clerks (present and former), and talking with them, and says that they help him to see matters more clearly.

Question: Why do your fellow justices ask so many questions during oral argument.

Answer: "I did not plant that question. It is a fine question, and if anyone finds out the answer please let me know. I've done a pretty good job for 16 years without asking questions at oral argument."

Question: What is the best thing one takes away from law school?

Answer: Belief in your own abilities, the ability to think critically, and the humility that comes from understanding that there are often various views on a given issue.

Question; What role does natural law play in your jurisprudence?

Answer: It plays no direct role, but does help one to understand the origin of the Constitution.

Question: If you could have anticpated the battle of your nomination, would you have still gone through it?

Answer: Yes. What is the alternative? You have a duty to do so. He stated that whatever "wounds" he received in the confirmation process pale in comparison to the real dangers our brave men and women in the military have to face.

« Chief Justice John Roberts remarks to the Federalist SocietyComments (7) | Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention Coverage: Day OneComments (1) »
Justice Thomas's speech to the Federalist Society 16 Comments (0 topical, 16 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

Great man.

Live Free or Die.

We are honored to have such a fine man spend his life working in service for our country and its citizens.

Thanks, CT!! (I assume you read RS) :-)

I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant's faithful 100 percent.

It would be an honor to hear Thomas speak. His book sounds great as well. I'll have to read it soon.

If it helps I could bring Franz who is a big fan of the Justice also.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

Justice Thomas is my favorite justice, by far. I happened to have the wonderful opportunity to study under him at Hillsdale College, and now, in law school, as head of my law school's Federalist Society, it is, as always, wonderful to hear him speak once more. I wonder if folks here realize that he is a strict constructionist? I mean, Redstaters don't often support a strict construction of the U.S. Constitution, so it amazes me that Justice Thomas is receiving any sort of positive welcome here. He's consistent, he's extremely free-market, he's an Austrian in terms of his economic perspective... odd. I'm sure he's too diplomatic to answer who his favorite candidate is today, or the candidate closest in ideological makeup would be, but having asked him his opinion of four of the top six or so candidates on the Republican side of the isle, I'll just say, if he wrote an op-ed piece on the positions he supports and the candidate most closely reflecting them, and proceeded posted it here, he would be banned from Redstate for supporting a certain "nameless" candidate.

"Vote for principle, even when you vote alone" ~John Q. Adams

Moderators would not want "others" to get the impression that red staters supported that viewpoint.

Or at least restrict it to complaints via the Contact link.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

Just pointing out that Justice Thomas and Scalia's views on that particular issue would not be welcomed at RedState. I was being a bit cynical in terms of whether or not those views truly reflect those of "red staters" (clearly they do), but that such viewpoints are not held by the moderators at redstate.com.

-----------
We are all heroes, you and Boo and I. Hamsters and rangers everywhere, rejoice!

Publicly expressing an opinion with which at least half the Directors agree would have him tossed out the door.

We are helpless before your cutting insight. Spare us. Please.

-----------
We are all heroes, you and Boo and I. Hamsters and rangers everywhere, rejoice!

____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

If about half of the directors would agree with Justice Thomas and Scalia on that issue, I wrongly overstated my previous comment. Justice Thomas would have better than a 50/50 chance not to be deleted on redstate.com if his judicial opinon was in the form of a post on the website.

That's the first time I've literally felt it slip away.

Neat. Thanks for the experience.

Grow up and cut your whining, cretin. I'll yank your account, and I think Thomas's reasoning was too soft. You wanna whine about Moe Lane? Hit the contact form or start your own blog. Next comment like this is your last here.

-----------
We are all heroes, you and Boo and I. Hamsters and rangers everywhere, rejoice!

-----------
We are all heroes, you and Boo and I. Hamsters and rangers everywhere, rejoice!

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service