The WaPo Smears Iraqi Reconstructors

By Pat Cleary Posted in Comments (11) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

"Describing Jim Haveman as a social worker who was a community health director is a little like describing Bill Gates as a college dropout who now runs an electronics company."

On the front page of last Sunday's WaPo was an article by their former Baghdad bureau chief, Rajiv Chandrasekaran entitled, "Ties to GOP Trumped Know-How Among Staff Sent to Rebuild Iraq." It's an excerpt from his book that the WaPo is hyping. You can pretty much tell from the title of the piece where it's headed.

In any event, it got us wondering about how close his facts might have landed to the truth. Regular RS readers will likely not be surprised by what we found.

Read on....

Chandrasekaran's thesis comes early in the piece, contending that one of the Bush Administration's "gravest errors" in Iraq was sending "loyal and the willing" political supporters to Iraq for reconstruction, says Chandrasekaran, "instead of the best and the brightest." He goes on to say that, "Many of those selected because of their political fidelity spent their time trying to impose a conservative agenda on the postwar occupation..." OK, so at least now we know where he's coming from: Clearly the Bush Administration doled out these plum (?) Iraqi reconstruction jobs to conservatives. Right.

Among his "case in point" studies is one Jim Haveman, brought in to oversee the rebuilding of Iraq's health care system. Chandrasekaran 's description of Haveman? "A 60 year-old social worker" who had "been the community health director for the former Republican governor of Michigan." Wait -- it gets worse: Not only did he work for a Republican (sneer), but Haveman's international experience was only in his capacity as director of a "faith-based relief organization." So he must be unqualified, right? He worked for a Republican and he ran a faith-based group. Is your skin crawling yet? If not, here's the coup de grace: "Before his stint in government", says Chandrasekaran, "Haveman ran a large Christian adoption agency in Michigan that urged pregnant women not to have abortions." Wow -- how unqualified can you get?!?

And so we had an opportunity to talk to Jim Haveman this week, to see just how unqualified he was to run this operation. What we found is that describing Jim Haveman as a social worker who was a community health director is a little like describing Bill Gates as a college dropout who now runs an electronics company. Jim Haveman ran the $9.5 billion Michigan Department of Community Health, one of the largest in the country. Were this 5,000-employee, Cabinet-level agency a private corporation, its size alone would place it well into the Fortune 500 list. The adoption agency that he ran happened to be the largest in the world, with employees in the US and 12 other countries. You can see his full curriculum vitae here and judge for yourself.

The other half of Chandrasekaran 's working theses is that these unqualified (?) hacks wreaked havoc on the system they were sent to fix, blinded -- of course -- by their conservative ideologies. Once again, some facts on Jim Haveman's tour of duty in Iraq:

-- When the Coalition Provisional Authority health team arrived, there was no functioning Ministry of Health. Saddam's Ministry was riddled with corruption and health care delivery was poor to non-existent.

-- Under Haveman's direction, The CPA health team acquired, distributed and administered 30 million doses of vaccines for a monthly immunization program that reached 3 million children under the age of 5 -- vaccines against such potentially fatal diseases as polio, diphtheria, TB and measles.

-- Saddam's health ministry spent $16 million on Iraq's population of 26 million. Within a year, Haveman had a budget of $1 billion -- bereft of the corruption and graft that had marked Saddam's system.

-- They distributed supplementary food rations providing high-protein supplements to almost a quarter of a million high-risk Iraqi citizens, including pregnant mother and malnourished children;

-- The national blood service was reconstituted and they secured $2 million of World Health Organization funding to modernize the central blood bank, enabling a viable blood bank throughout Iraq;

-- They provided tetanus vaccinations for 700,000 pregnant women;

-- Some 30,000 tons of medicines and supplies were procured and distributed;

-- More than 8,000 health workers were trained in diagnosing and treating malnourished children.

This is just a piece of what Haveman's team accomplished. You can see more in this official summary. In fact, the Ministry of Health was the first to earn full autonomy, far in advance of other Ministries.

Iraq reconstruction is and was hardly a dream assignment. The people who are involved in it put themselves far from their families and loved ones, and in harm's way. Haveman's own security chief was murdered, and Haveman and his team were the victims of some dozen attacks. Let there be no mistake, Iraqi reconstruction is no boondoggle. Yet despite Chandrasekaran's best efforts, Jim Haveman remains committed to the mission he began in Iraq.

Chandrasekaran's attack on Haveman betrays his own partisanship. Of all the time he spent on this book, only a scant 3 hours were spent directly interviewing the man he would savage. It makes one question the accuracy of a book whose premise is tainted by its author's clear point of view. It also makes you wonder if he mis-characterized the qualifications or the work of the other people profiled in the article or his book. Apparently others have accused Chandrasekaran of "generat[ing] a relentlessly negative stream of articles from Iraq." Guess so.

Fact is, Jim Haveman and the brave men and women who have worked hard to rebuild Iraq and restore its freedom deserve better.

[UPDATE]: Here's a link from Powerline on the same subject.

« Today is worthy of celebrationComments (7) | Prayers And ConcernComments (25) »
The WaPo Smears Iraqi Reconstructors 11 Comments (0 topical, 11 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

run by DNC cronies would look like, if such an event were possible.

It's tempting to let these kind of stories sink out of view unrebutted, or only haphazardly rebutted, because, heck, the author's biases would seem clear to any objective reader and, besides, it's just a newspaper story.

But it's also numerous media apperances and a book tour, full of numerous, high-profile appearances from now until election day. (Election day? What a coincidence.)

Anyway, thanks for this, Pat. We need more pushback against an obvious hit job.

9/26/2006 Malika Restaurant
210 E. 43rd St, btw 2nd & 3rd Aves
New York, NY 10003
212-675-5500 6:30 pm

9/27/2006 Council on Foreign Relations
58 East 68th Street
New York, NY 10021
212-434-9602 5:30 pm

9/28/2006 Woodrow Wilson School
Princeton U, Robertson Hall
Princeton, NJ
4:30 pm

9/29/2006 Middle East Institute
1761N Street NW
Washington, DC 20036
202-785-1141 x202 Noon

10/5/2006 CUNY Graduate Center Author Series
365 Fifth Ave, Suite 8111
New York, NY 10016
212 817 2007 6:30 pm

10/14/2006 Politics & Prose Bookstore
5015 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20008
202-364-1919 3 pm

10/16/2006 Harvard Bookstore
1256 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-661-1515 6:30 pm

10/18/2006 Stanford U
Palo Alto, CA
Noon

10/18/2006 Books Inc.
301 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650-428-1234 7:30 pm

10/19/2006 Washington Post Goest To War - UC Berkeley Wheeler Auditorium
2460 Telegraph Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94704
510-845-0837 7 pm

10/23/2006 World Affairs Council of Northern California
312 Sutter Street, Suite 200
San Francisco, CA 94108
415-293-4647 6 pm

11/8/2006 USC
840 Child's Way USC Trojan Bookstore
Los Angeles, CA 90089
213-740-9030 Noon

11/9/2006 Commonwealth Club of California
595 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
415-597-4846 6 pm

The book doesn't seem to be generating a lot of buzz in the Red States.

Brent Money

-- Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too. --

Politics & Prose is usually good for two author readings a week on the latest, "How the Bush Administration Messed Up [fill in the blank]." Interspersed with a few, "The Radical Right -- A Growing Threat to [fill in the blank.]"

And then a sensitive coming of age story by a young Ukrainian gypsy who discovers that cows and butterflies spell freedom in their own special way.

It's tedious. But the world music section is good.

That quote would seem to be complimentary of Jim Haveman. To say that Bill Gates is a college dropout who runs an electronics company would be an understatement in the extreme. Thus, saying that Jim Haveman was a social worker who is a community health director would also be an extreme understatement. I guess I'd need more context.

I'm also confused about the article's premise. I thought that all of these liberals with the bumper stickers on their little hatchbacks were telling me that we needed to draft Young Republicans to send to Iraq. My response has always been, "75% of the military voted for Dubya, so obviously Young Republicans are the ones fighting this war." Seems like they're carrying out reconstruction as well. Again...I thought that liberals were telling us that they didn't support this war and didn't want any part of it. Seems like this is in keeping with their wishes.

If I'm reading the diary correctly, the Wapo described Haveman as a social worker who is a community health director. The OP is using the Bill Gates comparison to show that that is something of an understatement.

I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant's faithful 100 percent.

Yes, that's what I meant. Maybe I was too subtle...

...(from the book author) is, we're sending "Christians" there to proselytize for something BEYOND democracy, freedom, and security in a deprived nation--a nation that just happens to be Muslim. And it implies that we're not sending the best people. The "best people" are individuals that can get hard things done in difficult circumstances. Sometimes those people have a long distinguished resume, but sometimes they don't.

Sometimes what passes for balance (at places like, .. oh, PBS) is being rough on the Left in June of odd-numbered years and rough on the Right in October of even-numbered years--perfect balance.

See, it starts with wild accusations from people like that Ruddy "reporter", then the U.K. Telegraph picks it up, and the far-out charges come back semilegitimized from across the pond into the Washington Times and....no, wait, that's the other vast conspiracy from a decade ago.

In this case, it starts with a Washington Post hit piece, used to flog a book by a Washington Post writer, which then produces a DNC news release, which sparks a bunch of blog posts. All in the service of political character assassination.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service