Redstate

1. Evolution vs. Creationism. Devolution vs. ? Destructionism?
2. Evolution vs. Devolution. Intelligent design vs. Planned obsolescence?
3. Excelerates. Only exceptable if you speak with an excent.
4. Assume global warming is a theory. Assume that it may be either completely right or completely wrong. Assume that we may either do something about it or we may ignore it. For 100 points of your final exam, calculate the risk to the human population of the four possible scenarios. For an additional 10 bonus points, calculate the economic cost of each of the four scenarios over the next 100 years.

Possibilities that are far more likely to be Probabilities than the possibilites you mentioned are.

1) Climate Change Theory is Not entirely right Or wrong, but, as is usually the case with human theories, somewhere in the middle.

2) we may Not be able to do something about it.

"I Will Always Place The Mission First.
"I will never accept defeat.
"I will never quit.
"I will never leave a fallen comrade."
Warrior Ethos, US Army

It's also possible that the solution, if needed, could be completely technological and does not need to involve massive social restructuring. It isn't surprising that that is the Only Acceptable Solution^TM of the environmental fanatics. As a movement, it has always been closely tied to the Marxists.

Not bad for dead bones:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_exports_per_capita

Maybe phrenology can make a come back or better yet corrective phrenology.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

that has such hedge funds and outsourcing in it.

Empericism beats guilt by association. You lose.

Apparently, you don't know any Germans.

It was a conspiracy of pre printed forms manufacturers. The evil NEBS headed the plot.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

Umm.... Who do you think was conspiring with the pre-printed forms manufacturers?

that theorem, I'm converted ;). But ISO9000 as sabotage? Mon Dieu! It reminds me of a story of the problem of twelve coins, one counterfeit, solve in three weighings etc. During WW2, it wasted so much time at Bletchley Park etc, that it was believed to be a German plant. The solution - get the RAF to drop it on Germany.

Six sigma ... ?

ISO 9000 is not a form of sabotage. It can be worthless, sure, if the people at the top are more interested in getting a certificate on the wall than in being leaders and implementing change in their own processes and the processes company wide, sure.

It's impossible to do effectively if you don't have the backbone to stand up to people who say "Well this is my job and I've been doing it this way for X years, and I know what's best so leave me alone."

But the whole point of the ISO 9000 process is just to document what you do, improve those documented processes, and make sure you implement them consistently.

There's nothing wrong with that, but like most things, it just depends on proper leadership.

And it's not like ISO 9000 is dead. Boeing is still keen on its vendors using the aerospace-specific AS 9000 series of standards, as far as I know, just as an example.

HTML Help Central for Red Staters

You might have a point there.

General rule of thumb: Drink with Slavs. They're a lot more fun.

Although you'd think that these "totally feminized societies" would have pedophilia at the top of their list of monstrous crimes, a la Reno in Miami. After all, this crime is largely committed by men. I guess the Northern Europe Man-Boy Love Association has some clout. Who knows? Maybe Erick's counterpart had a personal interest in his ranking of the crimes. ;)

Someone left a turd in the middle of the aisle.

___________________________________
The CIA has better politicians than it has spies - Fred Thompson

without access to the raw data and actual computer algorithms have managed to force NASA to recompute the erroneous numbers that lead to the models that predict catastrophe.

Sorry, I still know too much about science to believe in AGW.

How come the doubters weren't able to get NASA to change temperatures for the remaining 99% of Earth's surface?

Haven't been able to make an accurate forecast yet ?

Come on wink press your luck.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

Just make sure not to hit the Facts Dragon!

HTML Help Central for Red Staters

Mike Gamecock DeVine @ The Charlotte Observer
www.race42008.com
www.hinzsightreport.com
www.theminorityreportblog.com
"One man with courage makes a majority" - Andrew Jackson

HTML Help Central for Red Staters