"Tankers on Two Legs"

One ‘Surge’ Brigade Gets Creative in Fight Against Al Qaeda

By Jeff Emanuel Posted in | | Comments (10) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

SALMAN PAK, IRAQ – Georgia’s 3rd Infantry Division (known as the “Marne” Division) has a long, storied history as a mechanized unit. For years, they have brought the big guns of tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles, as well as M-113 Armored Personnel Carriers and dismounted infantry patrols, to the fight wherever they may be needed.

The third of the five ‘surge’ Brigades, the area of operations (AO) covered by the Marne Division’s 3rd Brigade – a region just southeast of Baghdad – is made up of a population that is majority Shi’a, with Sunni to the east along the Tigris River, and includes the site of the Iraqi nuclear reactor which was destroyed by the Israelis in 1982, as well as Highway 8, which runs directly to Iran, and the former terrorist training center (and resort town) of Salmon Pak.

The part of that area which 3rd Brigade’s 1st Battalion (also known as the 1st Battalion of the 15th Infantry Regiment, or ‘1-15’) is responsible for includes a geographic feature called the “deep bowl” – so named because of its round-bottomed appearance on a map. Bordered on the east, west, and south sides by a large bend in the Tigris, the “deep bowl” is an extremely defensible area in the southernmost part of 1-15’s area of operations, and is home to the majority of AQI in the region. Terrorists cross the river from the south, and base their weapons factories and operations out of farms and various other unmapped places.

Read on . . .

One problem with 1-15’s AO is the fact that, over much of its terrain, there are very few actual roads; most passageways are canals and other paths which are less navigable by large vehicles, and which are more susceptible to ambush. As the northern limit of the “deep bowl” is one of these areas, the only realistic vehicle-based approaches into the bowl are from the east and the west – and the cost of actually making such an entrance would be extraordinarily high. “We tried to drive in, but the roads were absolutely laden with IEDs [improvised explosive devices] at the eastern and western access points,” said Lieutenant Colonel Jack Marr, the 1-15’s Battalion Commander. “Approaching from the east, we found so many IEDs that our EOD [explosive ordnance disposal] team ran out of demolitions before they could destroy them all.”

Rather than accept that there was a region within their AO that his forces simply could not enter – let alone one containing large numbers of al Qaeda fighters – Marr made the decision to radically alter his battalion’s way of doing business. “Since we couldn’t drive in without an inordinate amount of risk,” Marr told me, “we decided to go in the way that we knew we could – by air.”

In essence, Marr, a former light infantry officer with the 82nd Airborne and the 25th Infantry Division, took his infantry battalion – long used to heavy vehicle-based operations – and made them into a unit capable of the mission known as ‘Air Assault.’ Air Assault units are able to fly to an objective via helicopter, perform a quick dismount upon landing, do an infantryman’s job on the ground, and then re-board the helicopters and ‘exfil’ back to their base.

The transition from mechanized infantry to an Air Assault-capable unit didn’t come quickly or easily – and it is still ongoing. However, the men of the 1-15 “have made great strides,” according to their commander, “and will get better at it the more that we do it. Right now, we are limited to just a few hours on the objective – land, get off [the helicopter], do a quick mission, and then get back on. Eventually, I want to be able to have my soldiers stay on the objective for up to 24 hours – to have the helicopters drop us off and leave, and then come back and get us the following night. We’re not there yet, but we hope to be soon.”

Given the Army’s past penchant for separating light infantry from their mechanized brethren – and for keeping each in their own lane mission-wise – the transition was expected to be far less smooth than it has been.

“The mechanized world has been far behind the light infantry world for a while now,” Marr explained. “Until the beginning of OIF, the guy who got out of a Bradley Fighting Vehicle and patrolled on foot had a different MOS (“military occupational specialty,” or job title) than the guy who was manning the gun or driving it. What I’m doing now is to have all of my infantrymen be infantrymen, who can dismount or move to the objective by a different means and do the same job as anybody else.”

Marr began the cross-pollinating process by placing officers who specialized in light infantry tactics in charge of his tank and Bradley platoons. “What you have to realize,” said Captain Rich Thompson, commander of 1-15’s B (“Baker”) Company, “is that, just like C-130s for the 82nd Airborne or helicopters for the 101st, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle isn’t an end in itself; it’s just how guys get to work. It’s how they get to the objective – and what they do when they get there is an infantryman’s job.”

An enlisted Ranger for almost twelve years, Thompson’s experience with light and unconventional infantry tactics and techniques provided an invaluable resource in the unit’s quest to adapt, training the men and leading one of the two air assaults that the 1-15 has performed to date, a raid on a chicken farm that was suspected of being a VB (vehicle-borne) IED factory (the other was a successful hit on a large al Qaeda weapons cache).

“For the most part, it went exactly how we had hoped that it would,” Thompson recounted. “We basically had a Company-sized element trying to work a Battalion-sized objective, but I thought we did a very good job.

There are a few things we need to work on – most importantly, how we integrate the attack helicopters into what we’re doing – but overall, I was very pleased.” The Baker Company soldiers were able to flush the al Qaeda fighters into the clearings where they wanted them to go, said Thompson, but “they’re smart. They know that we won’t shoot at an unarmed person,” so they dropped their weapons, or “wouldn’t fire at the helicopters, making it difficult for the pilots to get a PID (positive ID) on the terrorists as opposed to the civilians.”

While no VBIED factory was found (“Sure enough, it was a chicken farm,” Said Staff Sergeant Cory West, platoon sergeant for Baker Company’s 2nd Platoon), the mission was considered a success for multiple reasons.

“First, obviously, we got some experience going in on helicopters,” Thompson told me. “It was two flights of two CH-47s,” so just the infiltration portion of the mission took coordination and provided real-world practice for the soldiers adapting to the world of the light infantryman after spending most of their careers in tanks and APCs.

“Second, and most importantly, we showed al Qaeda that we can land anywhere that we want, and can deny them the safe haven they thought they had [in the bowl]. They thought they were protected there, with the deep-bury IEDs all along the access roads, so us showing them that we can bring the fight to them, on what they thought was their turf, any time we choose to has got to be a blow to their confidence.”

Not to mention to their safety.

Jeff Emanuel is currently embedded with the US Military on the front lines in Iraq. In order to perform this mission, he is entirely dependent on the generosity of his readers. If you are so inclined, please consider following this link and donating to help support his effort.

« President Bush speaks at Ft. Bragg, presents awards to Army heroesComments (15)
"Tankers on Two Legs" 10 Comments (0 topical, 10 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Jeff by Oz

It's a great update. Please pass on to the soldiers that we are proud of them and support their mission regardless of the way they are treated by the media.

Oz

www.first-cut-politics.blospot.com

Thanks.
--------------------
Vista really sucks!

that the Army is getting more flexibile like this, I can only imagine the look on a tank drivers face, who's spent the last 10 years on his back driving from a coffin looking out a 6 inch slit, thinking "dude, wtf, is this legit?"

I'm glad that we have soldiers good enough that they can change jobs on the fly like this, I can't imagine many other countries in the world capable of retasking soldiers so quickly in the field.

Although I have to take exception (it's my job!) when anyone refers to any tracked vehicle as a tank, this is a great illustration of the flexible nature of the infantry. Infantry officers rotate between light and mechanized units giving them the ability to accomplish this.
Indeed a lot of military occupation-changing is going on already. Given that air defense artillery is a pointless combat capability in this war they take on different missions than what they trained for. I understand the field artillery maybe doing the same as well (155mm shells aren't great in the arena of collateral damage avoidance). I'd be really interested to hear about the experiences of those two branches, as well as combat engineers, who aren't the bridge-building, house building type, but the obstacle and hole-making type. I believe 1-15 IN's (Audie Murphy's regiment) sister tank battalion is still 1-64 AR. I suspect they do a fair amount of dismounted operations as well.

Rock of the Marne!!

Consensus doesn't prove anything, in science or anywhere else, except in democracy, maybe. - Reid Bryson, speaking on Global Warming

Do you really think that I'm getting my vehicles mixed up? ;-)

1-15 is a modular infantry Battalion and, under the new force structure, it has BFVs, 113s, Humvees, and M1A1s.

In the old days (10 years ago) 1-15 IN would be organized as a task force so they have tank companies from their sister tank battalion. (They should have other non-infantry units working directly for the infantry battalion commander too.) Not like you could miss or mistake an M1A1. Of course I believe that and then someone in the media does it.

Of course the distinction between task force and battalion could have been swept away with all the transition from a Cold War division-oriented force to a modular force, as you made reference to. Do the bumper numbers on the tanks say 1-15 or something else (1-64)? In the end American units don't deploy in combat as one-trick ponies which is a good thing.

You couldn't have picked a finer unit to work with in my biased opinion. Do ask a lieutenant if he knows the words to "Dog Faced Soldier" for me please, and definitely thank them for their service and selflessness.

And keep hydrated!

Consensus doesn't prove anything, in science or anywhere else, except in democracy, maybe. - Reid Bryson, speaking on Global Warming

Each company now has organic light, mech, and armor. Blows the mind, doesn't it? :-)

So Cool to hear about positive news from my son's unit. Thank you Jeff for being there - Thanks for taking a hug from home to the soldiers too. We are all so proud of the 3rd ID.

Soldier's Mom - Golfer's Wife - Home alone a lot

....which unit of the 3ID is your son in, and who is he? Feel free to email the info to me at my first name at RedState.

I sent you the info requested.

Earlier I sent the redstate link to Aaron (the soldier) and he sent a reply that he read your report and was really delighted. What a great morale booster.

Soldier's Mom - Golfer's Wife - Home alone a lot

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service