Can We Shut This Down Before It Starts?
By Erick Posted in KS-02 | Targets | Targetted Seats — Comments (8) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Nancy Boyda (D-KS) is a target for us, though she's been very smart at toeing the line lately. While we certainly want to see Nancy beaten in 2008, I think we should not whore out our principles to do so.
The Republican party, if it wants to stay credible and distinguished from the Democrats, must maintain its believe in fiscal conservatism, which means we don't need to be nominating tax hikers. Our friends at the Club for Growth are raising warning flags over Lynn Jenkins, a potential challenger to Boyda.
- Jenkins voted to raise the state sales tax by 8% (HB 2009, 2002)
- Jenkins voted to expand the Death Tax to family members outside the immediate family (SB 39, 2002)
- Jenkins voted to increase fuel taxes by more than 38% over four years (HB 2071, 1999; HB 2507, 2001; HB 3011, 2002)
- Jenkins voted to increase state income taxes by 5% (Topeka Capital-Journal, 04/12/02)
- Jenkins voted against decreasing state property taxes by $1 million (SB 69, 2001)
- Jenkins voted to increase taxes on insurance premiums (HB 2065, 2001)
- Jenkins voted to increase taxes on tobacco by 270% (Topeka Capital-Journal, 04/12/02)
- Jenkins voted for an $18.1 million increase in alcohol taxes (Topeka Capital-
- Journal, 04/12/02)
- Jenkins voted for a total of $335 million in higher taxes in 2002 (Topeka Capital-Journal, 04/12/02) and a total of $31.4 million in higher taxes in 2001 (Topeka-Capital-Journal, 05/05/01)
- Jenkins supported taxing the Internet (Project Vote Smart, 2000)
- Jenkins refused to sign a pledge against new taxes. (Kansas Taxpayers Network)
With Republicans like that, who needs the Democrats?
« Snakes in the Kansas Grass — Comments (7)
Can We Shut This Down Before It Starts? 8 Comments (0 topical, 8 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
I bet that the CoG would throw a bucket of cash at him if he had the right fiscal policies but was pro-choice. In other words, I admire your disapproval of this guy Erick, I just hope it carries over to non-CoG issues as well.
Signature disclaimer: I'm not currently paid by any campaign, but I am available. Current preferences for President: 1) F.Thompson; 2) Romney; 3) McCain; 4) Gingrich; Guiliani removed 04/03/07
CfG's purpose is fiscal conservatism. Just as Right to Life's is abortion. CfG does not need to narrow its pool of candidates for other issues. RS or individual contributors might not sign on, but CfG should focus on its goal. For example, they have said good things about Giuliani and Brownback for President and put a hit out on Huckabee. They stay on their message which is their job.
Erick, otoh, wants the whole enchilada. So my guess is he wouldn't bend on either set of issues.
I also note that this is a girl, not a guy. Lynn Jenkins is from the moderate wing of the KS GOP.
There is a big fight going on between the moderate and conservative wings and it is allowing Ds to make up ground in KS. The current D GOV has wooed over several high level moderate GOPers including a past state chair because of the feud.
Rs should be mindful of the need for both moderates and conservatives in a state like KS to have a "part of the pie." If people like Jenkins are run out of a race, they may be the next to side with the Sebelius Ds.
I'd say stay out of the primary and let the state GOP voters decide, then support whoever wins.
______________________________________
Bobby Jindal Saves Louisiana
I agree with that and its the reason I don't give cash to the National Congressional Committee anymore since they don't know how to do that. I give directly to candidates I like instead.
Oz
Signature disclaimer: I'm not currently paid by any campaign, but I am available. Current preferences for President: 1) F.Thompson; 2) Romney; 3) McCain; 4) Gingrich; Guiliani removed 04/03/07
I do not know anything about this candidate other than what you post. My comments go merely to the list.
1. Is it the total list? Were there other votes on fiscal issues to put this in context?
2. Raising alcohol and tobacco taxes does not offend all conservatives. These products cause many social problems that result in government and other public costs. In my opinion, those costs should be born significantly by the users. Without more information regarding the vote, I would not criticize this.
3. Ditto on the fuel taxes. User fees - of which this is a type - are consistent with traditional Republican views.
4. By the Death Tax, do you mean the state inheritance tax? Was this perhaps a package in which some rates rose and others dropped? In any event, a primary objection to such a tax involves taxes on transfers within the immediate family unit. Taxes outside such a unit are less offensive. We need more information before we attack this.
5. I don't know what Kansas Insurance premium taxes are. However, in many states the sales tax system is a mess. We need to raise rates on some items and lower them on others because exclusions and exemptions and exceptions abound. Again, perhaps she had a very good reason for this.
6. Generally, I don't like a state income tax. I'd prefer a lower property tax and higher sales/use taxes, including on services. Government must be supported, however. I notice these votes were in different years. Perhaps, however, one affected the other or resulted from the success or failure of prior bills. Out of context, I do not know and am reluctant to judge. A sales tax, as a consumption tax, is better for our economy than income or property taxes. This is consitent with a VAT or FAIR Tax supported by many Republicans. Also, perhaps the votes were a compromise or the result of a failed compromise.
By way of example, in Florida, many Republicans are supporting a restructuring of the state tax system. It would raise sales taxes and lower property taxes. I don't know how it will come out and I don't support it all, but it illustrates that supporting a tax increase is not necessarily a bad thing: it can often be part of a greater plan.
I also agree with Adam C: we need to have room for moderates and conservatives.
Steve Willis
Professor of Law
University of Florida College of Law
As far as I know she voted in favor of the union thug bill, the Democratic budget with a massive tax increase, and the surrender and retreat bill. Am I missing anything? So far she is toeing the moveon.org and dailykos line if anything.
“.....women and minorities hardest hit”
At the end of the day, it's far easier to get a Republican to vote the Republican line than it is to get a Democrat to stand up against their party.
There are exceptions, like Zell Miller or Lincoln Chafee, but 99.9% of the time, the Republican candidate will be the better conservative than the Democrat candidate.
Once a primary has been settled, I think conservatives owe the Republican nominee their vote.
"Back in the thirties we were told we must collectivize the nation because the people were so poor. Now we are told we must collectivize the nation because the people are so rich. "
William F. Buckley, Jr.

The tax issue and the Second Amendment might very well be the only Conservative issues that are popular with independents, which the advocates of "Big Government Republicanism" have not completely sacrificed in their quest to destroy the Republican brand.
...a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right...
---Thomas Paine---