No Newt

By Pejman Yousefzadeh Posted in Comments (19) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

I know that Newt Gingrich has his moral flaws. I know that he was a better revolutionary than he was a Speaker. I know as well that he regularly got manipulated and outmaneuvered by Bill Clinton during their political showdowns while at the same time being charmed by Clinton--so much so that Gingrich regularly claimed that he had to go into "detox" in order to recover from Clinton's charm and blandishments.

That having been written, it bears pointing out nonetheless that Newt Gingrich is one of the best ideas people in the Republican Party. He adds intellect and serious argument to any gathering of which he is a part. And his efforts at spreading small government and free market ideas throughout the Republican Party and beyond it ought to be appreciated.

Which is why I can't help but read this, and feel, at the very least, faintly disappointed.


« Burn the WitchComments (18) | Change Begins With UsComments (60) »
No Newt 19 Comments (0 topical, 19 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

I can't argue with any of the accolades. He certainly would've brought a lot to the debates. That said, he's also got an ego bigger than those of the other candidates, Republican and Democrat, combined.

www.republicansenate.org

Although I'm a Rudy supporter...I would have loved to see Newt get into the race. He had some good ideas, as well as good experience in the legislature.

If we manage to hold on to the White House in 2008, he should definitley be considered for VP or a cabinet post.

I like Newt, but he would've been unelectable in a general election. He was our version of Hillary, only the media hates Newt.

Besides, I was always concerned about how Clinton did run rings around him in the 90s.

That hasn't really been something Newt's been doing for some time now.

He's struck me more as a 'national greatness' guy for a while, yes, with the way he adopts Democratic issues and insists that we do what they want, but only in a Republican way.

HTML Help Central for Red Staters
Reality: Thompson/Romney Dream: Santorum/Watts.

Right now, with the challenges we are facing in 2008, we need a candidate that 'can win'. As much as I like Newt, for the reasons stated, the MSM would have dissected him into a million pieces, and found fault with every piece. We don't need that distraction. What I want to see is Newt be a positive ideas contributor to the Republican candidate in helping develop a meaningful platform, and his unqualified support to help win the presidential race. We can't afford to let Hillary walk-in and we need every ounce of experience and leadership within our party, to keep that from happening. Newt can make a difference; we need him to.

We've got 3 great candidates in Romney, Thompson, and Giuliani. Any one of them can beat Hillary.

Newt is certainly a policy wonk and I highly recommend his 2005 book, "Winning the Future". But lately, I've questioned whether Newt wants to use his brain to help America, or to use his soapbox to hear himself speak and impress his new wife.

He says things like "Hillary has an 80% chance of winning." That doesn't help America. Especially when he follows that by saying Hillary is wrong on the issues. He needs to stop being Hillary's cheerleader and start remembering what "maverick status" has done to McCain, Joe Lieberman, and a host of other "mavericks".

Newt needs to stop prognosticating and start getting Republicans registered to vote in states like Arkansas, Pennsylvania, and Ohio.

Romney/Thompson 2008

Newt was giving credit to the clinton political machine. He says most of her positions (does she have any?) are wrong.

It is interesting that many hold Newt to a much higher standard than other candidates. I haven't heard many government transformation ideas from any of the other candidates. Pretty much the same old stuff.

Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what your country can do for you. Washington Elected Elite

A guy like Newt stood no chance in becoming President. People can argue different scenarios, but he simply doesn't have the general support to pull it off.

But a guy like Newt keeps the other candidate honest in a race. He is the guy that will call others out for bonehead ideas, and ultimately raise the level of discussion within the party. So far the race has been boring. He'd be a guy that garners some media attention to the Republican side and makes things a bit more exciting to follow.

And statesmen at her council met
Who knew the seasons when to take
Occasion by the hand, and make
The bounds of freedom wider yet
- Tennyson, _To the Queen_

Truth, Liberty and (a certain presidential candidates Name)
Posted September 29th, 2007 by KyleSanders

Dear Ryan,

The enlightened mind of Thomas Jefferson carefully chose the words of the preamble of the Declaration of Independence:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." (Note: the original hand-written text ended on the phrase "the pursuit of property" rather than "the pursuit of Happiness" but the phrase was changed in subsequent copies.

Thomas Jefferson believed that the "truths are self-evident", meaning, they are mathematically self-explanatory, or proofs and not theories.

Liberty is granted by our humanity alone, not by a governing body. When I learned this, I understood that all government experiments are just that, experiments. The natural state of man is with his family, living by the sweat of his labors under his own power, without any outside force to take anything away unless he consents.

We have been programmed by our society during the past 100 years to believe that we are accountable to the government. That we are indebted to our country, both with money and with liberty. This is wrong. This is the result of a social experiment.

You asked me to show you some convincing material that would help you really appreciate the message of Ron Paul. I am excited by this, however, I cannot show you anything beyond what I have seen or heard on the Internet, which boils down to hours and hours of sound bites, videos, lectures, essays and independent study of law and sociology.

It is my belief that Thomas Jefferson was absolutely correct when he defied King George by rallying the people of the Thirteen Colonies in rebellion against the occupation of British forces. Not just because life was going to be easier without the redcoats and taxes, but because the world needed a place where humans could live in utter freedom without rule. That was the intent of the founding fathers and that is why they took 11 years to finish drafting the Constitution.

I hold both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution dear to my heart. They are not just good ideas, or experiments in government- I see them as mathematical proof of our unalienable rights, printed in words everyone can understand, in order to protect each individual from oppressors and tyrants, large or small.

The world we live in now is far from what the founding fathers had envisioned. The simple explanation for this is because our government has failed to obey the Constitution and they thought they knew best, so they veered way off the path. The undermining started before the Constitution was even finished, however, the major irreversible damage wasn't inflicted until after the civil war when we adopted the Federal Reserve act of 1913. From there, we also adopted the New Deal and other social programs that felt good and looked nice to poor people, but eventually derailed our system, which instead of fixing we decided to expand.

Now we have a state office for everything, a country full of welfare dependents, a military industrial complex, a health care monopoly, a doomed currency, a nose-diving economy, a ridiculous education system designed to make smart kids stupid, a rotting infrastructure that will have to be completely rebuilt in less than fifty years including all electrical lines and substations, we have a highway system completely dependent on cars that burn petroleum controlled by a monopoly, an illegal and unethical tax system designed to destroy the middle class and boost the rich... I could go on for hours.

These are ALL results of disobeying the Constitution. If one carefully and thoughtfully reads the Articles and Amendments, there is no provision for ANY of the social programs that created the mess we are in. We can only blame it on overzealous politicians, uneducated public and corrupt business.

It's that simple. And the only way to undo this mess it to rub the salt in the wound and obey the Constitution, repeal the unconstitutional laws and stay on track from here on out.

Our country is still a great nation. Overall, I still believe it is the greatest nation on Earth, without sounding like a nationalist. We have had our defining moments of prosperity and glory, but now we are falling into a trap of imperialism and despotism.

My life has been drastically altered because of war. I am a different person. I needed answers and I started looking at the problems and figuring out their causes. Now I am working on their solutions. The best solution I have for the problems I see is the Constitution. The only presidential candidate- the only politician for that matter- who subscribes to what I believe to be right and true, is none other than Ron Paul. Not only is he the ONLY candidate who strictly obeys the Constitution, but he has been doing exactly that for 30+ years in office as a Congressman.

He embodies what I believe to be the essence of a true statesman; an intellectual man who cares more about the people than the government. This is truly rare because most politicians do not understand how the government harms the people. In fact, most average people don't understand it either. It seems only the ones who have been affected by it start to grasp this concept. The people of this country who have never gone without or have never had something taken from them live in blissful ignorance, or so it seems.

I envision two possible outcomes for this country, or maybe a shade in between. If we get back on track by obeying our Constitution and undoing the social mess we have become, I see the middle class flourishing in the next 50 years. Education and health care will boom. The tech industry will boom. The transportation and energy industries will boom. The poor will ween themselves from welfare in a matter of one or two generations. The illegal immigrants will enter legally, easily and ready to work and participate. The inflation of our currency will disappear and the volatility of the market will subside to normal, natural growth. The overall quality of life for all Americans will become better, if not wonderful.

On the flip side, if we continue on the path of destruction we have set for ourselves by buying into this idea that we need the government to 'employ' each citizen via corporatism, taxation and welfare programs, our economy will dissolve in less than fifty years. We are already on the brink of bankruptcy now and the only thing keeping us on life support are our generous lenders in China and our Federal Reserve credit deficit, which also is the cause of our rapid inflation. This is a recipe for disaster and many elite bankers and politicians like Rockefeller, Bush Sr and Kissinger know this. In fact, I believe they are purposefully designing the demise of our economy to force us into accepting a global economy much like the European Union.

History has shown us that socialism can only work in tightly controlled environments. If people do not exercise self control, the government will do it for them. And of course, we all know that the opposite of liberty is control.

The sovereignty of our nation is at stake. The freedoms we enjoy granted to us by our Creator and protected by the Constitution are at stake. The people of this country are asleep at the wheel. They are blinded by their bread and games or 'cirque and pan' as Caesar called it. He knew how to pacify the masses in order to build his empire. "Give them bread and games and they will think I am great!" Well, Caesar, just like every empire before yours, they all fall from within, because when you stop people from working, take away their money and give them bread and games and treat them like children, that is what they become. The moral character of society declines to selfishness and greed. People stop caring about families and do not value the sanctity of life. They worship money and material possession. They lose their understanding of the essence of work and replace it with a false belief that they can get something for nothing. And when it is time to work, they do not know how and fall into poverty, hoping the government will provide for them.

This dismal picture is just the pretext to what will happen if we do not take action now. If we do not step up now and use our voices to spread the message of liberty and educate the people, give them hope and cure them of their apathy, we will all fall like Rome. But where Rome fell was safe and soft. The people went back to farming and local government. We will not be so lucky. If and when the US falls, it will be horrific. Revolutionary is not the word I would use. Apocalyptic is more fitting.

It will start with rioting because the price of gas and food has skyrocketed. Thousands will fill the streets as CNN and FOX broadcast the early riots. Police and National Guard will be called to arrest thousands. Curfews will be imposed. Makeshift prisons will be created overnight. Hundreds of thousands of people will be detained indefinitely without due process because Martial Law will be declared. Meanwhile, emergency Congressional meetings will be held to pass desperate bills dissolving the sovereignty of the US, combining our economy with several other countries, if not the EU or the newly created North American Union. Millions of people will lose their jobs and thousands will die of starvation and exposure as the banks foreclose their mortgages and drive them to the streets. The Great Depression will look like the Small Depression compared to what will happen if we do not prevent it.

Well, my friend, I am probably going way too deep into speculation, but I cannot help it. I am an observer of pattern and logic. When I see a pattern, I base my projections on the logical assumption that the pattern will continue. This is what I see happening to our country and I don't like it. I am going to fight by standing up for liberty. Ron Paul has been fighting every day for over 40 years since he joined the Air Force during the 1960s. He is the Champion of the Constitution because he exudes the essence of liberty in action. He is not just belching out the hollow rhetoric the others have memorized and rehearsed. He needs only the Constitution as his guide and no more- he is a moral man by definition.

It is my hope, as you sojourn on your quest for truth, you seek exactly that and nothing else. For truth lies at the heart of all goodness. It breathes life into all plants and animals. It drives us to become better men. It flows through the halls of our homes when we invite it. It protects us from the evil lies and filth that bring down society. Truth bonds us together, deception drives us apart. Truth derives all knowledge and defines all wisdom. It dispels all myth and destroys all falsehood. Truth empowers the weak and brings down the powerful corrupt. Truth cannot be hidden forever for it is eternal. We hold these truths to be self-evident.

And truth is the essence of love and light and nothing more.

Friends in Truth,
Kyle Sanders

www.dailypaul.com

Left up in all its quote-unquote glory, although the poster has been shown the door for endorsing the "government is plotting to start a police state and WON'T GET OFF OF MY LAWN" nonsense.

And if the original author ever drops by, he should know that he's been assigned a preemptive 1,500 word essay on the origins of the American Revolution and ratification of the Constitution. Which, in my mind, trumps the entire get-off-my-lawn thing.

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!

and a lot of truth. I found myself nodding to some of it. Then you had to go and say this:

This is a recipe for disaster and many elite bankers and politicians like Rockefeller, Bush Sr and Kissinger know this. In fact, I believe they are purposefully designing the demise of our economy to force us into accepting a global economy much like the European Union.

Once you wind down that path of Conspiracy Theory you lose all credibility. Jewish Bankers, One World Order, Trilateral Commission....sheesh!

How is it that you guys can go from rational to loonie in seconds? I do like your picture of doom and gloom for our country however. As a writer I am always looking for good plots (not YOUR kind of plots) to write as fiction.

Keep your comments shorter and you'll get your message across better.

Romney/Thompson 2008

Thomas Jefferson believed that the "truths are self-evident", meaning, they are mathematically self-explanatory, or proofs and not theories.

Actually, if it were mathematics, that would make them postulates, not proofs.

And after reading the next two paragraphs, the delusions become even more difficult to correct.

Thankfully, it doesn't seem to matter much since you are now a ghost. Although I would have banned you for mass quoting without adding original thought instead of Moe's reason. But then, he probably waded through more of your drivel than I did.

Minimal, as far as I can see. Under-40s don't remember Newt and the contract with America. He's an old, white-haired guy who used to be something in D.C. No real appeal to independents. Or to Reagan Democrats, who might vote GOP if Hillary's the nominee, and there's a good alternative. Newt could never beat Hillary. At least he realized it.

As everyone says, he is one smart cookie. Smart enough to know what will get him on the talk shows.

He speaks because he likes the sound of his own voice. He gets on talk shows because he is attacking Republicans.

Newt has already given the Clinonites enough sound bites to win the election. Ratbag.

Coudln't agree more

But as a candidate his ideas would have been weighed by polling - and polling not of his ideas but of him As long as he trailed in the polls - which he would have, badly - his ideas would have been dismissed.

It is possible that he will be more influential bartering for his endorsement. Romney and Giuliani in particularly could benefit from the weight he carries with conservatives, especially in the south.

Quentin Langley
Editor of http://www.quentinlangley.net

International Editor of

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service