All the Soldiers Refute All the Claims. All of them.
By Erick Posted in Scott Thomas | The New Republic | War — Comments (26) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Others, like Jeff, will I'm sure say more better than I, but the day should not get too far gone without mentioning this AP report:
The Army said this week it had concluded an investigation of Beauchamp's claims and found them false."During that investigation, all the soldiers from his unit refuted all claims that Pvt. Beauchamp made in his blog," Sgt. 1st Class Robert Timmons, a spokesman in Baghdad for the 4th Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, based at Fort Riley, Kan., said in an e-mail interview.
The New Republic used Scott Thomas Beauchamp used the New Republic to expound on how war turns all soldiers into rogue cretins. All those soldiers, at least the ones Scott Thomas Beauchamp served with, have now refuted all of Scott Thomas Beauchamp's claims.
Are all the soldiers liars or just Scott Thomas Beauchamp? And if all soldiers are liars, isn't Scott Thomas Beauchamp, a soldier himself, a liar? Or are only those soldiers Scott Thomas Beauchamp serves with day in and day out sharing the same experiences liars?
TheNew Republic still has a lot of explaining to do.
« My last word on Scott Thomas Dirtbag — Comments (11) | The New Republic meets Dan Rather (and finds that they have a surprising amount in common) [Updated repeatedly] — Comments (11) »
All the Soldiers Refute All the Claims. All of them. 26 Comments (0 topical, 26 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
...are about heroism and sacrifice. That's what defines our military today. That's what's "typical" today.
You bet. Anytime there are lies told to color the reality of the war in Iraq, the liar should be made to give a full explanation.
Lets see TNR line up there with the liars who framed the Pat Tillman death and explain themselves.
I don't think the American public would have time to listen to all of them.
You probably need standardized forms, and revolving doors to get the job done.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
Nice to see that the Left is now no longer defending their man in Iraq and are now reduced to pointing at others and shrieking "They did it too!!"
George W. Bush: He's A Folder ... Not A Fighter.
He was a blip on the news radar and not worth the trouble. Nobody in the general public paid any attention to him after a couple of days. He was and will be a true nobody with no power to do anything but call attention to himself. (Actually, Redstate is by far the most publicity this guy has gotten other than the original TNR writings. My cynical side tells me that that this is because it gives the pro war crowd a chance to wallow in self righteous indignation, because he really IS just a publicity seeking cretin. If it helps you sleep better at night, go ahead and knock yourselves out with the silly straw man argument that all people who oppose the war are just like him.
On the other hand, the way that our government knowingly used false stories about Pat Tillman to further glorify the Iraq war in the earlier stages is an example of people IN power used falsehoods to change public opinion. It is a worse offense.
Switch the subject and make people argue about something else.
So Tillman's death (a true fact and reported as such from the beginning) under friendly fire (not identified as such up front, but admitted later thru internal investigation) is used to equate the Army (not a news organization, but a war-fighting organization that has to evaluate facts on friendly fire situations that are not clear under most circumstances)
with TNR (a news organization) which created news (and opinion!) by deliberately using a very badly fact-checked story from a very unreliable source.
No sale.
BTW, my sky is blue unless clouds obsure it and the rain makes for a lot of mud on the ground.
1. Stories that are clearly lies, and published in purported high quality journals such as TNR, and are clearly published for sole purpose of defaming the US military as a whole and soldiers in particular, are not a "blip". This comes from the same playbook that Jon Cary used when he accused US soldiers of being war criminals. The purpose of this story is to further undermine the moral and steadfastness of the public. It needs to be refuted and it's purveyors need to be whatever the modern equivalent of tarred and feathered is.
2. Your "self-righteous indignation" comment can be written on a tin bucket, left in the Phoenix sun for a couple of hours and rammed where the sun does not shine. Just where you get off howling about self-righteous indignation when people are pointing out lies supported by shoddy journalism I'll never figure out.
3. Nobody has set up the straw man you toss out. In point of fact, the left - in general - uses the techniques fronted by STB and TNR on a daily basis to discredit the US military. See #1 re: Cary's comments for starters. In the current context, see J.Murtha & D.Durbin comments.
4. Tillman served and was killed in Afghanistan, not Iraq. See my comments below on the difference between TNR and the Army.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
First of all, all of the information related to Tillman has been discovered and released BY THE ARMY. Second, if in fact Tillman was intentionally killed, it will be the Army who gets the details and who will prosecute all involved. Third, with respect to a cover-up, officers and enlisted involved will forfeit - at a minimum - their careers. The Army will clean it's own house, maybe not as fast as you'd like, but they will get the job done nonetheless.
TNR, on the other hand, did an objectively lousy job of fact checking the original stories fronted by STB. Their work would earn the editor of a High School newspaper an "F". After doing a pointedly bad job of fact checking in the first place, they went into full "bury it" mode when they were challenged by people who are familiar with Iraq and the military on issues that just didn't pass the smell test. STB has now, under oath, recanted his stories to the Army investigators and no one has been produced who will support anything he wrote. A representative of the Bradley manufacturer commented that while TNR contacted him, the information they asked for was very general in nature and when questioned about the actual comments by STB, he threw cold water on the stories.
So, on the one hand, we have the Army acting in a responsible (albeit delayed) manner with respect to Tillman's death. On the other hand, we have TNR in full screech that their readily evident pack of lies is true. They are utterly reprehensible. And, let's see if Foer is still employed in a month.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
And as you correctly point out, our military is inherently honest with admirable integrity. In fact,within a few weeks of his death, some in the army had already begun warning the Bush administration that there were questions about the Tillman death. My problem in the case is with the way that the politicians involved in pushing this war went ahead and used information that they knew was doubtful because it helped them sell the war.
As for the TNR-yeah-a bunch of jerks. Who reads them anyway?
I'm all agog to hear.
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
Of course you have links...
Who reads TNR? Well, for starters, the enemy. And I'm referring to the Left in this country. They are every bit the enemy of this nation that aQ is.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
But it is even more of a juggernaut...
"It's a book about a man who doesn't know he's about to die, and then dies...
...But if the man does know he's going to die and dies anyway. Dies, dies willing, knowing he can stop it, then...
Well, isn't that the type of man you want to keep alive?"
Karen Eiffel, Stranger Than Fiction
Anything ever published by this magazine must, to some degree depending on the editor, bear an asterisk.
* This story was made up by an attention-hungry psychopath, but we stand behind it because it fits what we believe.
--
Gone 2500 years, still not PC.
I'm not sure that all soldiers in that situation would be completely forth right. There would be an AWFUL lot of pressure being brought to bear on them.
Having said that, I think the Scottie B is a lying piece of garbage.
And they say 5 soldiers have confirmed Beauchamp's account.
It's TNR's word against the army.
After Tillman and Lynch, I don't know who to believe.
dumb as a box of rocks.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.
The Army investigated and were the ones to uncover what went on (ongoing) as compared to TNR who looked the other way for a LONG time with Stephen Glass (among others) and now STB - his IED lady story was shown to be a lie and he and TNR have admitted that. Hmmmm, seems like the Army has a better track record, I'm sure you'll agree!
___________________________________
The CIA has better politicians than it has spies - Fred Thompson
... (nee clearlyobjective); so bail.
Moe
PS: We got the third one, too.
The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC. I've been usurped!
Brings up a black mark and then just goes for uncertainty instead of a partisan position.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
They say five soldiers have confirmed the story -- the story that TNR already indicated was incorrect.
Doesn't reductio ad absurdum come into play here?

Waiting on that explanation
But in the larger sense this ‘battle’ with The New Republic (standing in as they do for the left in general) mirrors the greater war on terror that we now also fight.
“They” are totally unbound by any rules of conduct.
They hide behind anonymous sources… terrorists hide behind women and children
They make accusations to disrupt our military… terrorist fly planes into buildings to disrupt our economy
They pose as journalists… terrorists pose as civilians.
The list is almost endless.