Reassessing al Qaida's good day

"We feel today that we are stronger than yesterday."

By AcademicElephant Posted in Comments (10) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

As you may or may not have heard, the parliament of our ally, the democratic state of Iraq, was brutally attacked by a terrorist on Thursday. A suicide bomber detonated himself in the middle of a communal cafeteria during lunchtime, spewing death and destruction—and his own body parts—around the heart of Iraq’s new legislature. Leon pointed out “This is Bad.” And he’s right. Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, the deputy U.S. commander in Iraq, called it “a very bad day.” Which means for the terrorists who perpetuated this murder and mayhem, it was a good day.

But sometimes good days are just that. Isolated days. Not so much a lasting success.

Read on...

The Iraqi parliament signaled as much yesterday, when they met in an unprecedented “session of defiance." Friday is a holy day, and so normally they would not meet. As a matter of fact, they have not met previously on a Friday. But yesterday was different. It wasn’t just any Friday, it was an opportunity to show the terrorists what they had achieved with their “good day.” Would the Iraqi lawmakers have learned their lesson? Would they cower in their tents and wonder how to appease their tormentors?

Or would they return to their chamber and speak out against the terrorists, and for a free and peaceful Iraq?

The Iraqis appear to have chosen the later course. Unmindful of their religious holiday—or their personal safety, for that matter—they returned to session. Flowers adorned the chair of their martyred fellow and they took turns speaking out against the terrorists who attacked them. According to Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, the goal of this ceremonial session was to send “a clear message to all the terrorists and all those who dare try to stop this (political) process, that we will sacrifice in order for it to continue. We feel today that we are stronger than yesterday. The parliament, government and the people are all the same — they are all in the same ship which, if it sinks, will make everyone sink.”

This session was an extraordinary act of courage by the Iraqi parliament as lawmakers defied the terrorists who attacked them and the naysayers who carp that they cannot do the job of a proper legislature. Like our venerable congress, for example. Well, I would say to those naysayers that Speaker Pelosi might take a page from Speaker al-Mashhadani’s book. She might forgo her self-granted holiday and get herself back to Washington to work out a deal that will fund this mission and support both our troops and those brave people in Baghdad who are willing to risk something more than breaking a nail for the freedom that they—and we—have so dearly bought.

Oh, and by the way, is anyone curious about which terrorists attacked the Iraqi parliament? The investigation is ongoing, but al Qaida has already taken proud responsibility for this “good day." Time described the horrific and barbaric attack as a "message" from al Qaida to Iraqi lawmakers. But I wonder if their message was as clear as Time appears to think? I wonder if Speaker al-Mashhadani’s message might turn out in time to have been the more powerful one, even without the media-grabbing punctuation of an explosion?

It seems to me Speaker Pelosi might do well to reflect on that other “good day” for al Qaida, 9/11/01, when her own chamber was a target. Perhaps now is not the moment to pull the plug on our Iraqi allies, who are demonstrating some pretty impressive grit under fire. Perhaps now is the moment to recognize that we face a common foe—a foe who will not be appeased if we precipitously leave Iraq now. It would be a tragic and unnecessary shame if it took a successful attack on our own legislature to wake our congress up to its peril.

« We need more COIN in the Afghan realmComments (0) | Seen in IraqComments (53) »
Reassessing al Qaida's good day 10 Comments (0 topical, 10 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »

for the Iraqis not appreciating freedom. Brave indeed. Every time AQ kill their brothers they are taking a step back. They are proving to be the enemy of the people. Hopefully these acts will drive the Iraqis together and accomplish the elusive unity that they need. Hope and prayers to them.

It is beyond sad that "loyal" opposition, the Democrats and their mainstream media supporters, fail to celebrate, or even acknowledge, the courage of the Iraqis as they fight to overcome terrorism and build a democratic society.

For a country that lacks the will to win, i.e. the United States, the Iraq Parliament bombing is an ominous sign. All we need now is for Walter Cronkite to step up and utter "We've lost the war" again. For the political party that is salivating like Pavlov's dogs at the prospect of the United States', George Bush's, and the Republican Party's defeat in the Iraq war, it is a godsend for the Democrats.
If San Fran Nan had pulled a similar stunt sixty two years ago, she would have found herself very quickly bound, blindfolded, and standing against a stone wall waiting to hear to the command to "fire".
Take a moment to reflect on the historical significance of the Democratic Party's betrayal of this nation's legacy. Abraham Lincoln's contemporaries called him a chimpanzee, an orangutan, and cretin. Lincoln had to endure riots in New York City and washington DC. How many monuments exist today in honor of the name callers and the rioters. Who remembers them?
It's a basic maternal instinct for a mother to grieve over her lost child, something that has been hard wired into the human specie for at least for the last five million years. I'm sure the mothers of the three hundred Spartans lost at Thermopylae also grieved for their lost sons. For a minute, consider what could have happened if a Greek anti Persian War political party had existed at that time acting as a catalyst, a lightning rod, for these mother's grief and others' pacifist sentiments. The World as we know it today would be unrecognizable to its present inhabitants. Those three hundred Spartans are just as dead today as the unknown, uncounted Norman Soldiers who died at Hastings, the six hundred thousand Americans lost in the Civil War, and the four hundred sixty five thousand Americans lost in WWII. Yet, none of those deaths were in vain. Every word in the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution and its various interpretations depends for their existence on those deaths. Without them this nation and its heritage would not exist in its present form, if at all.

it's our duty to (a) make sure they fail and (b) bash them like the buffoons they are while they try to quit. The conservative blogosphere is a strong weapon, and it goes stronger every day.

If the Dems want to quit, I say let them try. I think we can inflict enough PR damage on them that they'll back down. America is not a nation of quitters. It simply needs to be inspired.

We keep hearing that the war against terror is not in Iraq. Well, after the AQ statement AE just mentioned, it is now!

Please oh please, will the GOP reps on the Sunday talk shows make that point over and over and over again! FORCE the Dem reps to go through all their verbal gymnanstics routines, as they try to cover up the fact that their party is laying the groundwork for dumping the Iraqis at the earliest possible moment.

This fight would be so much easier, if our nation were properly motivated, and properly focused on the tasks we face.

(Turn "STREAM OF CONSCIOUSNESS" switch to "Off" position)

"Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?" (Macaulay)

Freedom is not, and has never been free.

Al Qaeda is an utter failure. Most of their "surge" failed. More importantly, we now see that they can't even try to do anything besides suicide bombings, proves they are a failure. Al Qaeda can't hold territory. They can't run for office. They can't plan their flag anywhere. Instead they cower in caves and sewers, unable to do anything besides use civilians to kill civilians. Al Qaeda can't peacefully persuade anyone to follow them, and in fact the Iraqi Sunnis recently turned against them.

As for the Iraqi Parliament bombing, it mostly failed. The US had intelligence reports before the bombing took place, and increased security. That foiled most of the attack. As an Iraqi minister said at the time, AQ bombed a mostly deserted cafeteria. If they had launched the bomb in the assembly hall a few minutes earlier, they could have taken out most of the parliament. Indeed, it was later reported that unexploded explosives were found and detonated in a controlled blast. In summary, Al Qaeda bombed the wrong room, most of its explosives didn't work, and there were leaks from inside their organization.

It is also important to remember that several ministers of parliament have been arrested and had their houses searched because of being part of terrorist organizations. Large amounts of weapons were found. So it shouldn't be shocking that a terrorist group managed to get something into the parliament.

This shows how the MSM hates America by always twists the truth to try and say America is the loser. Imagine if the US had tried a raid on a terrorist camp, and most of our weapons didn't work, we hit the wrong part of the camp, word of the attack leaked out in advance, and we missed most of the terrorists. The media would quickly say the raid was a failure, which "proves" that the US has lost the war. Yet when our enemy, Al Qaeda, tries an operation that fails in exactly those ways, the media says it was a success, which "proves" that the US has lost the war. This really just shows that the media and the hate-American crowd can't be trusted.

As for the Iraqi Parliament bombing, it mostly failed. The US had intelligence reports before the bombing took place, and increased security. That foiled most of the attack. As an Iraqi minister said at the time, AQ bombed a mostly deserted cafeteria. If they had launched the bomb in the assembly hall a few minutes earlier, they could have taken out most of the parliament. Indeed, it was later reported that unexploded explosives were found and detonated in a controlled blast. In summary, Al Qaeda bombed the wrong room, most of its explosives didn't work, and there were leaks from inside their organization.

I wonder if the MSM is sorta hoping for yet another Tet. A war effort damaged (perhaps fatally) by overhyped and inaccurate characterizations of what really happened.

At the very least, this will allow old MSM "Vietnam hands" to reminisce about the glory days on Larry King and Charlie Rose.

"Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?" (Macaulay)

"Al Qaeda is an utter failure. Most of their "surge" failed. More importantly, we now see that they can't even try to do anything besides suicide bombings, proves they are a failure. Al Qaeda can't hold territory. They can't run for office. They can't plan their flag anywhere. Instead they cower in caves and sewers, unable to do anything besides use civilians to kill civilians. Al Qaeda can't peacefully persuade anyone to follow them, and in fact the Iraqi Sunnis recently turned against them."

I'm hoping the above words by Wu Wei are a joke. It's like saying that the US Olympic basketball team is inept because they can't shoot under 80 at the Masters.

Since when has Al Qaeda every wanted to "plan (sic) their flag anywhere"? Or "try to do anything besides suicide bombings"? Or "run for office"? That's not what they do. They create havoc through 'terrorism.' Or, put more simply, they 'terrorize.' That means that they hide in their caves or wherever and plan terrorism. One of our biggest problems has been to confligrate OUR idea of getting our point across with theirs-- and others. The sooner we understand that they could not care less about planting their flag or engaging in rational discourse, the better off we'll be. Today they want us out of Iraq, 6 years ago they wanted us out of Saudi Arabia. I agree that I would rather have them blowing up the Iraqi parliament than the Macy's down the road here, so I don't have a solution other than to fight them there. But let's get real about what constitutes success for these people. Yesterday was a success for them-- as sad as it was for us. Time to pull up that American flag sweatband that has managed to slip down over our eyes and be realistic about things. Only after we're honest with each other and ourselves can we actually plan properly. We've already had enough plans made based on self-deluded foundations and aspirations.

...are expected to read more.

But I'm sure that the 2,000 word essay on the origins of al-Queda that you've just been assigned will correct that regrettable lack in your education. Please make sure your essay includes an analysis of the works of Sayyid Qutb...

(pause)

Well, look him up, then.

At any rate, write it up, send it in and we'll think about turning your account back on.

Moe

The Fuzzy Puppy of the VRWC.

> Today they want us out of Iraq, 6 years ago they wanted us out of Saudi Arabia.

And then what? They just sit in the sewers planting bombs forever, for no purpose?

No, the reality is that Al Qaeda wants what they had in Afghanistan, which we took away from them. They want to be the government of a Caliphate, an Islamic fundamentalist dictatorship. That's what they keep trying to build in Iraq, and what we keep knocking down.

They planted their flag in Fallujah, but we tore it down. Al Qaeda had control of Anbar, but now with our help the Iraqi people have liberated themselves.

Measured against any other guerrilla & terrorist movement, AQ is a miserable failure. Mao Tse Tung is considered a success because he took over China, not because of his terrorist attacks. If Mao's enemies still controlled China, while Mao's son or grandson was still leading the "revolution" by launching suicide attacks from the caves of China, would we consider Mao a success?

Mao said that the terrorist "swims in the sea of the People", meaning that the revolutionary needs the support of the people. AQ can't get anyone to support them, so they are resorting to insane, desperate tactics like trying to bomb everyone in Iraq into submission. That never works. A terrorist group can scare some of the people some of the time, but they can't scare everyone all the time.

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service