Democrats try to outflank the GOP on immigration
By jmsierra Posted in User Blogs — Comments (7) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
It seems the Democrats have found an issues that resonates across party lines. Laura Ingraham had this linked on her site, and her comments are worth reading.
Just as we have been telling you all year long, Democrats are now waking up to the power of the illegal immigration issue. (Okay, except for Howard Dean's typically off-the-mark comment a few weeks back, that the GOP will scapegoat "immigrants" in the next campaign.) Now the proof is in the pudding--it's not enough for Hillary to talk about border enforcement in Iowa, then ignore it altogether at La Raza conventions. And we have seen plenty of Republicans talk about the problem of illegal immigration with no action to back it up. The WSJ's John Fund has an interesting take on the maneuvering.
The truth is that the illegal immigration problem is a problem for all conservatives. Illegal immigration affects security, crime, and the economy. Unlike other, though, I am not advocating reducing the quotas or closing our borders. That would go against the very values on which this nation was founded upon.
First, we need to take steps to help and motivate South and Central American countries to curb corruption. This should be up at the level of human rights issues. After all, if a government cannot provide a secure environment where it's citizens can pursue prosperity and happiness, then these citizens are being denied a human right endowed by their creator. Second, we need to put sanctions in place for those countries that refuse to do anything on their side of the border for the illegal immigration problem. Countries that help control illegal immigration should receive certain benefits and support. Finally, we need to get rid of laws and quotas that prevent a wife to be with his legally immigrated husband, laws that divide hundreds of families, and laws that blindly prevent law abiding, hard working individuals from seeking a better future in America.
Here is the article from the WSJ.
The politics of immigration are changing. On Friday Bill Richardson, the nation's only Hispanic governor, declared a "state of emergency" in four New Mexico border counties due to "a chaotic situation involving illegal alien smuggling and illegal drug shipments." His office has pledged $1.5 million for stepped-up law enforcement and also asked Chris Simcox, the president of the volunteer border patrol group Minutemen, for a meeting. Mr. Richardson, a man who wears his ambition for national office on his sleeve, has apparently decided he has to reposition himself on border issues.
He's not the only Democrat to do so. Sen. Hillary Clinton made headlines when she embraced high-tech measures to control the border with Mexico and fines for employers who hire illegal aliens. "Democrats clearly sense frustration on immigration among Bush's base voters and are trying to outflank him rhetorically on the right," says Martha Montelongo, a talk-show hostess in California.
President Bush is vulnerable on immigration. Earlier this summer House Republicans bluntly told him that his proposal to admit guest workers would be dead on arrival unless accompanied by more border enforcement. "All my constituent town meetings want to talk about is immigration and why Washington is still spending so much money," Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas told me. Indeed, 17 of the 37 GOP House and Senate members who responded to a National Journal survey last month identified immigration as the issue "most on the minds" of their constituents. One Republican identified immigration as the issue on which "the mismatch between the federal government's inaction and the realities at home is the greatest."
To the current administration and to the Senators and Legislators, voters want to see more action and results, and less talk and rhetoric.
I am a Latino, and like me, thousands of other Latinos want to live peacefull, productive lives under the law--not outside the law.
I assume that when you say citizen rights and assuming citizenship, you are talking about after a lengthy process.
To me, there is a HUGE difference between legal resident status and citizenship. I don't mind opening our doors to legal, law-abiding, hard working immigrants. But for these to reach citizenship, I do believe the current system that requires a set amount of time living in the country, test of their knowledge of American history, and other such requirements are valuable and necessary.
We need to ensure that those guests that aspire to be a part of our great nation do so with a true intent, and are loyal to our country. We do not want individuals who hold no loyalty or respect for our country to attain citizenship and enjoy the rights and responsibilities of being a citizen of the greatest nation on earth.
There should be no requirement that a person wants to be a citizen, then you defeat the effort and illegal immigration will continue for those just wanting to work in the US for five years and then return home.
That citizenship should be a special designation reserved only for those people whishing to join us in the great experiment of representative democracy called America. Work here legally fine. Leave then when your time expires. But citizenship needs to be protected because of the rights granted to citizens.
I couldn't tell if that is what he was saying or that he thought legal residents here to work should be on a track for citizenship.
No. Legal residents should not be fast tracked for citizenship. Sorry for the confusion.
There should be a healthy waiting period, and a thorough background check. I agree-there are many that want to be our guests, but are looking forward to returning home.
Perhaps we could create privately funded micro-venture programs that would allow hard-working immigrants to return home and set up their own businesses.
Citizenship is not a right, it is a privilege and a huge responsibility that should not be easily attained.
~ Josue Sierra
http://latinoissues.blogspot.com/
Hillary Clinton and Bill Richardson are both pro-illegal alien politicians. The article does not mention that earlier this year Clinton supported legislation that would have given amnesty to hundreds of thousands illegal alien agricultural workers. Richardson once said "we have to put aside party and think of ourselves as Latinos, as Hispanics, more than we have in the past."
Our borders should be secured and enfored. On at least a temporary basis, the United States military should be used to enforce our borders. All illegal aliens should be deported. Legal immigration should be more strictly controlled.

open legal processing centers is my take on it. We don't reallly need less immigration, we just need it done legally so we can offer them citizen rights and they can assume citizen responsibility.