The Sunday Morning Talk Shows - Review
By Mark Kilmer Posted in Elections — Comments (24) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Sunday, February 12, 2005
This was an odd week. Joe Biden declared on MTP that the Iraqi insurgency has "nothing to do with terrorists." Host Tim Russert conceded, in a question to Biden, that Saddam did in fact possess WMD. He asked Biden if he would have voted for the war if he knew at the time that "there were not significant levels of weapons of mass destruction."
Biden also quipped that as the Administration talks of drawing down troops in Iraq, the only difference between their plan and Jack Murtha's is "the timing."
On TW, Russ Feingold said he was going to introduce a measure tomorrow to censure the President for "thumbing his nose about the American people" in regards to the NSA terrorist surveillance program. Bill Frist came on next and accused Russ of attacking the President instead of al Qaeda.
On FNS, Dunc Hunter and Mike Pence were all over the DP World Ports Deal, but they defended the President as the victim off being poorly served by his advisors. Dunc bragged that he had investigated the ports deal for the President. Also on FNS, Chris Dodd promised that the Dem agenda was coming out in fits and starts.
On FTN, Barack Obama said basically that the Democrats had to do a better job of dumbing-down their message so that the American people would understand it. Later, host Bob Schieffer asked Mike Huckabee if General Pete Pace had been lying last week when he told Russert that things were going "very, very well" in Iraq. (AcademicElephant treated this line last week.)
On LE, Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad had just emerged from a meeting with Iraq's leaders about getting serious, resolving their issues, and forming a government. This could be the best news we've heard yet this year. Later, Jack Kemp demanded a "date certain" for withdrawal from Iraq.
Read on…
ALLEN AND BIDEN ON MTP. Tim Russert had Joe Biden and George Allen on NBC's Meet the PressAllen sees "some progress" in Iraq, but he called the bombing of the mosque a "burning of the Reichstag tactic." He sees progress being set back by the difficult process in forming a government. He wants them to "get together and form a unity government." He believes "action needs to be taken."
Russert used the "very, very well" part of how General Peter Pace described the situation in Iraq and asked Joe Biden if he had been wrong to support the war. Joe said that his mistake was not knowing that this Administration would "be this incompetent" in their handling of the situation in Iraq. He says that we need to get a government going, "but that's just the first step." If they don't get a government in the next six weeks, we'll "have to have a Plan B": how to contain the Iraqis rather than how to help the Iraqis build a government. Russert asked if we should "get out," and Biden said no. He said that the Administration wanted to "get out," as they were withdrawing troops . He expected under 100,000 troops by the end of this year and 30,0000 next. He said that the only difference between the "Murtha Plan" and the White House plan is timing.
Joe Biden said that the President should be "on a plane" begging world leaders for a consensus. He said that Reagan, Kennedy, and F.D.R. would be "on a plane." Khalilzad cannot do it alone, Joe Biden threw in for good measure.
Russert asked Biden: "Knowing what you know now, that there were not significant levels of weapons of mass destruction," if the vote on the Iraq war were held today, would you vote to go into Iraq. Biden said that he would vote now if he knew how incompetent this Administration would be.
Believe it or not, Senator Allen was still in the studio, seated next to Biden. Russert cited poll numbers indicated that X percentage of Americans surveyed believe that we are all going to die. He asked if we can continue to fight in Iraq even if the American people do not support it. Allen said that the support of the American people is "vitally important," and he explained that the American people are ill-served by the media, getting only the bad news. He agreed with Joe Biden that it is difficult but important for the Iraqis to form the government. Russert asked what we do if they can't, and Allen said that they had to. He suggested that the Administration is trying to get other regional countries to pressure the Iraqis to get it together.
Biden offered: "We can't want peace more than the Irais want it." He suggested that we could "trade a dictator for chaos." Russert asked when is decision day. Biden said that they have to have a government in place by this summer. Russert was kind enough to ask Allen if he agreed, and Allen said that the sooner the better, as the uncertainty was unhealthy, but he was not going to create a timetable.
Allen called for countries inside and outside of the region to pressure the Iraqis to work this out.
Tim Russert opened the seal of doom. Russert suggested that "if they don't get a government together, and we do get out, and we leave chaos behind," it would be a "foreign policy disaster." Biden agreed. Biden argued that we'll need a different policy, which faction to support over the other, a disaster. He said he lectured the President that if every member of al Qaeda were "blown away," it wouldn't matter: "We'd still have a war, Mr. President."
Biden argued that "there is an insurgency, Tim." He said that the insurgency has "nothing to do with terrorists. He said that we've put our military leaders "behind the 8-ball because we didn't go in with the 5,000 police trainers that I talked about on this show."
Russert switched to Iran and played a clip of Vice President Cheney saying that the international community had to let Iran know that there would be "meaningful consequences" if it kept up its nukes program. Russert repated the term "meaningful consequences" and asked Allen if the President should ask Congress before invading Iran. Allen answered that the President should and would, and I think Allen loses points for even answering that question. Then he stepped back to admonish Russert and Biden for trying to "get everyone depressed" about Iraq. He thinks the Iraqi people will prevail.
He said that the Russians were "the most important" to the Iran problem, as they are making money off this. He said that Iran cannot get nukes, as they are a theocracy which seriously wants to eliminate Israel. He stressed sanctions, a possible inside revolt ("a long shot") because of the effects of the sanctions, and he said that though the use of the military is an option, it is to be avoided.
Biden said that the President "has to" go to Congress before he invades Iran. He complimented the Administration for "finally getting it right" on Iran. He criticized the Administration for not know that the Iranians could not survive an oil embargo.
The policy, Biden said, is that the Iranians will not get a nuclear weapon. Russert suggested that they would get a nuke, and Biden said we would stop them. Allen chimed in that he agreed with Biden, that it is "absolutely essential" that we get the rest of the world with us on this, "including Middle Eastern countries." He suggested that Iran could give its nuke capacity to Hezbollah, and he called for biofuel and nanotechnology.
Russert talked of the SRLC straw poll last night, acknowledging the SRLC as only "a gathering of Republicans in Tennessee." Allen came in third in that poll, trailing Frist and Mitt. Allen suggested with a smile that "Bill Frist is popular in Tennessee." Russert playfully taunted him about Mitt's placing, and Romney started to humorously dance. Joe Biden, who faces impossible polling this early in his Dem race, tapped Allen on the shoulder, and admonished him: "Don't worry about that." He called the SLRC "a good chance for us all to get rejuvenated."
Frist showed the President's low approval numbers in a poll and asked Frist if he were comfortable running as a "Bush Republican,' having sided with the President 96% of the time. Allen called himself a "common sense Jeffersonian conservative." Russert wanted the Bush Republican label, and he is working to create it.
Biden is running for President, of course. He said he'll see where he is after Iowa and New Hampshire in 2008 and he'll determine if he's not where he wants to be if he'll seek to be reelected to his Senate seat.
FEINGOLD ON TW. Former Clinton aide George Stephanopoulos, host of ABC's This Week, interviewed Russ Feingold (for President), who thinks he's found his issue in the NSA terrorist surveillance matter. Feingold declared that the President "deliberately broke the law." Yes, he insisted, the President has "violated his oath of office." As evidence, he cited what he called a "shifting legal justification" for the wiretaps.
Russ has declared jihad. (But what else is new for the Senator, who seeks national standing.)
The President should be censured, he declared. Steph wanted to contrast Feingold's call with the case against Clinton (Bill), and Russ declared this one "an open and shut case." Feingold reminded that he was the only Dem not to vote to have the charges against Clinton (Bill) thrown out, which he and Steph agreed gives his accusations against President Bush standing and validity.
He attacked the President for "thumbing his nose at the American people and Congress," and he will introduce his censure resolution on Monday.
FRIST ON TW.. Steph next spoke to Bill Frist, the hometown winner of last evening's Southern Republican Leadership Conference (SRLC) straw poll. The Majority Leader, who said that this was the first he had heard of Feingold's plans to scream censure, said that it was a "crazy political move." He declared: "Russ is just wrong. He's flat wrong' he's dead wrong."
He accused Feingold of attacking the President rather than al Qaeda, and Steph asked him of he thought Feingold's censure move "weakens America abroad." Frist affirmed this.
Frist declared that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ("CFIUS"), who approved the deal with DP World, was a "broken process."
He praised the SRLC, and noted that every time President Bush's name was mentioned, there was sustained applause. He said that in twelve days, the Senate will discuss "comprehensive immigration reform." He wants to concentrate on "interior enforcement," involving those illegals already here, and border security. He does not support "amnesty," but he does support some sort of guest worker program.
HUNTER AND PENCE ON FNS. Both Duncan Hunter and Mike Pence opposed DP World, but on FNS, they also claimed support of the President. Host Chris Wallace talked to them first.
On the DP World deal, Pence said that the President was "ill-served by an antiquated process." That would be CFIUS, which was the target of Republican blame this morning. The DP World deal, he offered, failed a "common sense test" with the American people. (It's only common sense that we not trust the A-rabs after they attacked us on 9-11 is the jist.) Pence, however, made clear that he wanted to express his "gratitude" to the "royal family of Dubai" for their support in the war on terror.
Hunter's plan is to have the Secretary of Defense (with the DHS secretary) identify what is "critical infrustructure" which cannot be associated with none of them foreigners. Thusly designated infrastructure must be owned and operated by Americans, and Hunter scoffed at the notion that no American could do it. He suggested that they sign-up, say, a retired colonel to do it. (I assume he means that the federal government will take over the ports and form an authority to operate them.)
Pence argued that there was no Republican rebellion against the President; rather, he said, Congress was beginning to assert its independence as a co-equal branch of government. (This is fine, unless it is being done merely for its own sake.) Hunter suggested strong support for the President as Commander in Chief and called President Bush "a good leader." He argued that the President had been "let down" by the CFIUS process.
Pence disagreed with the contention, suggested by Wallace, that the President has been "high-handed" with Congress. He said again that Congress and the President were "co-equal branches of government."
The Congressmen were confident that everyone agreed that DP World was the enemy and that they were right to block the deal. Representative Hunter's goal now seemed to be to absolve the President. "The President is busy," he explained. He had no time to examine every detail of the deal, and Congress had provided the President with a "valuable service" by examining it for him. (Congress did not examine the WP World Deal. They offered innuendo.) The President is out of touch with his surroundings, according to this theory.
CHRIS DODD ON FNS Wallace next spoke with Chris Dodd. He declared that the UAE had a "spotty record" in regards to terrorism. He wants the National Intelligence Director (now John Negroponte) to sit in on the CFIUS process. Dodd, absolving the President of wrongdoing in the DP World scandal, said that the President's people should have told him that CFIUS was trying to give our ports to the A-rabs. The President had been let down. (Dodd did not, suprisingly, demand a special prosecutor. Yet.)
Wallace reminded Dodd that polls show that the Democrats should kick kiester in this fall's midterms but that the Democrats seemed not ready to be ready to do so. Dodd argued that the Democrats were unified, mentioning health care, better future, etc. There is unity, he said, on lobbying reform and ethics reform.
Asked about the lack of a Democrat plan for anything, Dodd assured Wallace that they were working on it, and it was coming out piecemeal, "issue-by-issue." It is difficult to do one comprehensive plan, he said, because they're not in power and are "battling upstream."
Wallace obeserved that the Democrats have been "all over the place" on Iraq, and Dodd muttered.
(No, the Dems are not ready for the midterms.)
OBAMA AND BOB. Barack Obama and was Bob Schieffer's first guest on CBS's Face the Nation. Schieffer declared Obama to be "the absolute star of last night's Gridiron show" last night, especially when he made fun of the Vice President's drunkeness.
Obama is concerned about Shi'as and Sunnis fighting each other, "coming close to a civil war." He said that it was up to the civilian leadership in Iraq to step forward and work this out. He said that we should think about getting out if they cannot put a government together in the next several months.
Schieffer asked what will happen when the civil war does come. Obama said that then we would be acting as a "replacement for Saddam's Republican Guard," and he would then ask the Joint Chiefs of Staff to consider a withdrawal. He opposes the U.S. staying if there is a civil war, and Schieffer differentiated this position from the Murtha position.
Schieffer declared that the White House has had "a very tough time lately," and he accused the Democrats of not having their act together. He doesn't know what the Democrats' message is. Obama protested that they cannot have a message when there is no "central figure" to deliver it, but the Dems' are for what the American people support. Health care, education, security -- ports, chemical plants, rails, the 9-11 Commission's complaints.
Obama said that the Dems have trouble keeping their "talking points simple" enough for the American people to understand.
Obama said that there is a "moral component" to the abortion issue, and we have to have a serious consideration on how to reduce the number of times women "have to make that decision." He said that it is a mistake for Dems not to campaign in churches. He is "interested in the Sermon on the Mount."
Schieffer asked him about Hillary. Obama jokes that "half his colleagues" are running, and he was "not going to take that bait." His "focus is on '06," because "we need some balance in our government" to investigate the White House because their power is "unfettered."
On ethics reform, he asserted that the House was the more corrupt body and he was disappointed that their leadership was "backsliding" on reform.
SCHIEFFER AND MIKE HUCKABEE. Schieffer's next guest was the governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee, chairmen of the National Governors Association. He was at the SRLC.
Huckabee said that he wanted to "hold off" announcing a run for President, and no one gathered in Memphis was "thinking at all about a race." Schieffer asked him how much weight he had lost, then he lost the ability to hear the governor. Huckabee answered about 108 pounds. Schieffer announced that he couldn't hear Huckabee and that Huckabee had lost 120 pounds.
Sound back. Schieffer asked Huckabee about Iraq. The governor said that "establishing a beachhead of Democracy" is a messy task. Schieffer again asserted that General Pace had said on MTP last week that things were going "very, very well" in Iraq. He suggested that Pace was lying, and he asked Huckabee if he thought so. Huckabee said that he talked to a soldier in Iraq who wanted to stay and get the job done.
Schieffer said that even Huckabee had to admit that the President was in bad shape and at an "all time low." Schieffer asked Huckabee if Bush were a "liability" to the Republican Party. Huckabee expalainted that it is difficult to be the sole executive, making difficult decisions which may be unpopular in the short term but were for the longterm good.
He wants the President to communicate in clear language how important the mission in Iraq is and how much failure would cost.
WOLF AND KHALILZAD. On CNN's Late Edition, host Wolf Blitzer's first guest was U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad. The ambassador had just come out of "emergency meetings" of Iraqi leaders. Parliament will open on the 16th of March, the leaders will meet non-stop until they have a government -- who will be Prime Minister? -- and "there is no red line" as far as participation.
Prime Minister al Jaafari did not participate in the meetings, Khalilzad explained, because he's not a faction leader. He seemed to indicate that al Jaafari will not be the next Prime Minister even though he was the candidate chosen by the Shi'ite faction.
Wolf quoted Adnan Pachachi insisting that the prime minister be someone who is widely accepted, and Khalilzad agreed. The issue, he said, will come up in the coming days. He expressed that there was "a lot of flexibility" at the meeting.
Wolf asked him how long it was going to take to form a government, and Khalilzad explained that a "National Unity Government" is a big thing, and it will take time. "I do not want to give you a date, or how many days it will take."
Wolf quoted from the New York Times, which had accused Khalilzad of acting for political reasons rather than on democratic ideals. Khalilzad explained that he wants all communities to succeed in a democracy, working together "to achieve a government of national unity."
Khalilzad said that he has not yet met with Iranian leaders. They're still discussing modalities.
Blitzer asked him who killed Tom Fox. Khalilzad: "The terrorists did. ... Tom was a good man."
KEMP AND EDWARDS & WOLF. Jack Kemp and John Edwards were Blitzer's next guests, and Wolf asked Jack if there would be a civil war or a democracy. Kemp argued for a date certain for withdrawal.
John Edward declared that our troops were foiling things up over there and we should have a "serious and substantial reduction" before we cause a "full blown civil war."
Kemp called the DP World rejection, "the betrayal of a friend... a sad day for the United States."
Edwards said he respects Jack Kemp "because we've done all this work on Russia," but that the "threshold question" is "who is going to provide the security and operations of our ports." He wants Americans do it, dammitall.
Then they talked about Russia. They have done work on Russia for the Council on Foreign Relations. Edwards doesn't think Vlad Putin is a small-d democrat and Kemp wants to get Russia into the W.T.O.
-----
Have at it.
« Question and answer time: the Wes Clark thing. — Comments (50) | Who's on the Sunday Morning Talk Shows — Comments (1) »
The Sunday Morning Talk Shows - Review 24 Comments (0 topical, 24 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
Obama said his "focus is on '06," because "we need some balance in our government" to investigate the White House because their power is "unfettered."
What would make him happy?? A fifty fifty split in the Senate and House? Or when he says 'balance', does he really mean more Dems than Republicans? And if we are looking for 'balance' why not have each State adhere to Obama's ideal? They get one Republican and one Democrat Senator. An equal split in the House. ON the State level, fifty fifty again. And if, God forbid, the Dems were to have the advantage on a State, Local or National level, we know that good old Obama would demand that some of them give up their seats in the name of balance.
I nominate Khalilzad for line of the day with "The terrorists did." Those three words could serve as an education for Wolf about what's going on in Iraq.
Smart man, that Khalizad.
Does anyone believe that if we withdraw that suicide bombings, the car bombings, the mosques bombings, the hospital bombings and the funeral bombings are going to stop? It is the American troops that are holding off a civil war. Why is it that these irresponsbile politicians (Feingold and Edwards) get away with saying such irresponsible and dumb things.
I think Feingold knows full well that the President's constitutional war powers include listening to the enemy, and the enemy's agents in the United States. No FISA Statute can trump Article Two of the US Constitution. Feingold is just a liar, playing the odds. He's betting all of his chips that voters in Democrat primaries are every bit as reckless and unprincipled as he is. I think he's wrong. I hope he's wrong.
...Was never elected to higher office! Oy vey...
The only major difference on Iraq is the timing for withdrawal. Since this is, in fact, a relatively nuanced difference, why are those in his party so quick to undermine their nation over it? Why all of the overblown rhetoric and outlandish accusations? If instead Murtha is somehow closer to the truth, why 403-3™?
It's a puzzlement.
win and the other wants to make sure that America is at least SEEN BY THE WORLD, AND VOTERS as quiting in defeat. Murtha said himself, that he FEARED WE WOULD BE SEEN as having won the war when we withdraw. Thats the BIG DIFFERENCE between the parties.
Bring back LoneWacko. The Politically Correct powers to be behind this blog have banned him. Bush Republicans. The President who is trying his hardest to destroy limited government conservatism.
Was Lonewacko on the Sunday morning talk shows?
From my count there were at least two of them: Biden and Feingold
he had a show on the Sci-Fi channel where he claimed to communicate with the dead.
/sarcasm (somewhat - the dead have proven to vote overwhelmingly Democrat, afterall)
I'm not familiar with LW, but:
Does the reader think it's ethical to ban me and then keep my copyrighted content? What I'd like is for them to delete the content and set up a redirect from my URL there to this site. Unfortunately, if they won't respond to emails I might have to send a letter.
How do you copyright content posted on RS? I mean, I voluntarily type my thoughts into my computer to your website, then claim that I have copyright rights?
And as to sending a letter, can you still do such a thing? How do you get the computer into an envelope?
as usual, on Inside Washington.
Mark "Getting Dumber with Age" Shields, Nina "Can't Get Any Dumber" Totenberg, et al. complained that, on the Iran issue, Bush was, yet again, going it alone, acting unilaterally, being a cowboy, etc. Apparently, they haven't been reading the papers for the last two years, as Charles Krauthammer calmly and ably pointed out (not sure how he stays calm with those folks, frankly). He reminded them that Bush has been submitting to the wishes of our European allies, although everyone knew their diplomatic strategy was a farce, to show American cooperation with Europe. Now that the game is up, the next step is sanctions. The question is whether the Europeans will follow through and vote for sanctions in the U.N., or quaver in the face of likely Chinese and Russian opposition. And after that, who knows what steps we will have to take.
By the way, Mark Shields responded to this with some immediate quavering of his own, asking how we could even consider doing something contrary to the wishes of Iran when they are the 4th largest oil producer in the world and can seriously damage our economy. Krauthammer retorted that if Iran gets the bomb, it won't be our economy we'll be worrying about, but our lives.
some defeatist in 1943 had said, "Well, the only difference between bringing our soldiers home now and bringing them home when Roosevelt wants to is timing"?
Just timing. Yep. True. Also just victory and defeat. That's all.
But I'm an old Prodigy Classic member and I'm just giving Mark Kilmer(another Classic member) some friendly razzzzin.
Come on now. Krauthammer was a speech writer for Walter Mondale. Thinks Mel Gibson's movie "The Passion of Christ" is the most anti-semitic movie since Leni Riefenstahl and Nazi Germany
I'd take pretty much everything he writes with a grain of salt. Too many oonservatives think he's one of us. He's not.
"fairness", but they're simply doing what they can to force constraints on the victors, until they can manage to become the victors themselves.
It's like the French making a fuss about multilateralism... (which they don't do, of course, when they believe their own interests are at stake).
CBS "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer lashed out at the U.S. military on Sunday, saying top generals need to "stop blaming the media" for negative coverage of the Iraq war...
"The Iraqis hear that and take it to mean we believe their excuses and they'll continue to dawdle," he lamented.
Whaaaaaaahh. Bob, I do remember a quote that would fit this situation. Something about heat and a kitchen.
The MSM hasn't got an anti-victory agenda on Iraq is living on another planet.
It was fun to watch Chris Dod fry like a lonely piece of bacon at the hands of Chris Wallace. Wallace wasn't especially hard on him, he just asked some embarrassing questions like "where's the plan?" and "Do you agree with the characterization of Pelosi, Dean and Ried as the Three Stooges?"
It appears the democrats still have no agenda they can get behind. They are still hoping that Bushophobia will carry them to victory in 06 and 08.

"John Edward declared that our troops were foiling things up over there and we should have a "serious and substantial reduction" before we cause a "full blown civil war."
He reminds me of one of the idiots currently serving at our base.
Tell me again why anyone should ever take him seriously again?