Mexico vows to sue US
By ocschuylkill Posted in User Blogs — Comments (21) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Prompted by the Presidents plan to station National Gaurd troops at the border,Mexican Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez was quoted on a Mexico City radio station:
["If there is a real wave of rights abuses, if we see the National Guard starting to directly participate in detaining people ... we would immediately start filing lawsuits through our consulates]
Also noted in the same CNN report is a statement from Julieta Nunez Gonzalez, a representative of Mexico's National Immigration Institute indicating she will ask the Mexican government to send a protection force, Grupo Beta, to remote sections of the border.
That idea was quickly quashed by a Vicente Fox spokesman, who stated that reports of Mexican troops being sent to the border were "absolutely false".
Ask yourself "is the Senate listening?" And you answer ... what was that ... did you say NO!
on the Mexican Troops at the border was:
Since they are already complicit in illegals and illegal substances cossing our border, why not just make it official?
Next they'll be having illegals tandem jump from airplanes, to get around the fence.
Mexico to US: "Let our people invade your country illegally or we'll sue."
Yeah, right.
One more reason NEVER to have an International Criminal Court!
Maybe sooner than you think. I saw a report a few days ago that Condi was purportedly saying that the administration's opposition to the ICC as softening and Bush was rethinking our opposition. I don't remember the source but you can probably Google it, it's been a week so google should have swept it up by now.
From the Official Mexican Government Dictionary:
Real wave of rights abuses
(n)
- Detaining of a Mexican for crossing the US border illegally.
- ...
I can imagine how opponents of this atrocity are viewed.
Those who oppose these actions will be viewed the same as anyone who takes a serious stance against illegal immigration, as we found out last night.
Your strong concern for the maintaining of the English language in our culture is a dark motive, and must be "exposed and deplored".
Your anger over the inaction toward illegal immigration is a "boiling rage against the Mexican influx" and is based on negative generalizations about Mexicans.
Your concern about preserving our American culture amounts to unfairly vilifying Catholic North Americans.
When you are offended by remarks about racism, it exposes you as a racist.
If illegal immigration is a paramount issue with you, you are dividing the party and hurting the War on Terror.
The degree of concern you have over this issue is "nonsense".
You are a nativist.
Your nativism is going to destroy America's preeminence in the world.
Oh, and besides the usual pejoratives, you are also guilty of demagoguery, paranoia, unfair generalizations, and being anti-immigrant.
If I've left anything out, I apologize to our detractors. I'd hate to be accused of trying to dodge any of the guilt we so obviously deserve.
don't hold back, tell us how you really feel. :-)
Neatly encapsulated.
probably because I'm up to my nose in their rhetoric of moral superiority.
So far beyond belief it is comical.
I actually hope they do try and sue us for enforcing our own borders. Then perhaps Guatamalans, Nicaraguans, etc can sue Mexico for how the Mexicans rigidly enforce their own militarized southern border.
Please let it be some high profile Dem donor that files the first suit in support of the right of illegal aliens to invade our country.
I love Condi Rice and I think she is a phenomenally competant individual - but in the next administration, I'd like to see her moved to Secretary of Defense and John Bolton named Secretary of State. LOL
I'd love to see Bolton stay where he is.
UN Ambassador is a different position than other diplomatic posts, in that at the UN, we're a paying customer. We have very right to throw our weight around, which is what he was sent in to do.
Secretary of State doesn't get to do that, though. Maybe Bolton should move to Defense? heh
"Yahoo." Otherwise, you have it covered.
and feel guilty about that as well.
I would be creative enought to find a way to tie homophobia into it. Anyhow, have a nice guilt trip.
go join Amnesty International, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, and the ACLU. Will that suffice to redeem my wicked soul?
who think me guilty of that as well. But I'm very fortunate. My simple, ideological outlook tends to compartmentalize my guilt, so I only have to deal with one area of guilt at a time.
Oh the joys of a simple mind...
They understand how America works. Change is not made by legislation. It's made by court decisions by liberal judges. That is the history of the last 40 years. They will go venue and judge shopping and before you know it we will be paying billions in damages to Mexican nationals and there will likely be quotas of mexican nationals required to live in in every U.S. city.
This is not as dumb an idea as it initially appears. And then when they go to the International Court in the Hague....
...for damages.
To recover the cost of law enforcement and border patrol.
To recover the cost of social services rendered to Mexican citizens.
To recover the cost of wages, driven artificially low due to transient Mexicans, willing to work for peanuts.
And... then, the drug related costs... but I don't have enough enthusiasm to keep typing.
?
You have to wonder who handles their PR. Basically, the illegal proponents have told Americans and the United States business community to expect national strikes and lots of litigation. I can imagine how opponents of this atrocity are viewed.