Redstate

Posted at 4:50pm on Nov. 21, 2007 The Culture of Life, Vindicated

Give Thanks for this at least

By Ben Domenech

It may have met with silence from the left and joy from the right, but the announcement of a major advancement in the field of stem cell research is something worth being thankful for this year.

There was a debate, prior to the nominations of Roberts and Alito, concerning the pro-life accomplishments of President Bush or lack thereof. Many pro-lifers, including myself, feel that we've missed opportunities over the past few years to accomplish great leaps forward. We sense the tide turning in the populace as poll after poll details a shift in the American view of abortion - now reaching a point where 6 out of every 10 Americans hold the view that abortion should only be allowed in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. We understand he has had other priorities - but we wish President Bush would have fulfilled his promise in 2000, and invested more effort in using the bully pulpit to apply this shift against our extreme abortion laws.

But as it stands, we have to acknowledge one truth about President Bush: taken as a whole, his presidency has marked more achievements for the culture of life than any that came before it.

Read on.

Posted in Abortion | Life Issues | Stem Cell Research — Comments (10)/ Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 2:27am on Nov. 7, 2007 NJ Voters Reject Corzine's Half-Billion Dollar Stem Cell Boondoggle

Maybe Taxpayers Have Second Thoughts When They Know It's Their Own Money

By Dan McLaughlin

Democrats nationwide have been operating on the assumption that taxpayer funding for stem cell research is endlessly popular with the voters (for all the talk of "banning" research on embryonic stem cells, remember that nobody has advanced a serious proposal to make such research illegal; the issue is whether to spend taxpayer money on it despite the substantial moral/ethical objections of a significant number of taxpayers).

Today in New Jersey, that theory was put to the test, and appears to have gone down in defeat before what is usually accounted as a liberal Northeastern electorate:

New Jersey voters on Tuesday rejected borrowing $450 million to pay for stem cell research grants in the state for 10 years.

With 95 percent of the vote counted, 53 percent of voters opposed the spending.

The rejection was a defeat for Democratic Gov. Jon S. Corzine, who campaigned heavily for the measure. He argued the money would help find cures for conditions such as spinal cord injuries, Parkinson's disease, sickle cell anemia and multiple sclerosis while also luring leading scientists and research firms to the state.

But the measure was opposed by anti-abortion activists, conservatives and the Roman Catholic Church because it would pay for research that destroys human embryos and would increase state debt.

"It's a reinforcement of our values and a rebuke to the governor," said Steve Lonegan, a conservative Republican who led opposition to the question. "The taxpayers are saying enough is enough."

New Jersey voters had not defeated a statewide ballot question since 1990.

Senate President Richard J. Codey, a leading stem cell supporter, pinned the defeat on chronic state fiscal problems and mounting state debt.

"The taxpayers of New Jersey are not against stem cell research," said Codey, D-Essex. "It's clear. The message we're getting is put your fiscal house in order and then do these things."

Presumably, supporters of federal stem cell research believe that the federal government's fiscal house is already in enviable condition. But voters, if asked to judge, might say otherwise.

Posted in 2007 Elections | Jon Corzine | Referendums | State Politics | Stem Cell Research — Comments (6)/ Email this page » / Read More »